Slashdot Mirror


Google To Pay $500 For Bugs Found In Chromium

Trailrunner7 writes to mention that a new program from Google could pay security researchers $500 for every security bug found in Chromium. Of course if you find a particularly clever bug you could be eligible for a $1337 reward. "Today, we are introducing an experimental new incentive for external researchers to participate. We will be rewarding select interesting and original vulnerabilities reported to us by the security research community. For existing contributors to Chromium security — who would likely continue to contribute regardless — this may be seen as a token of our appreciation. In addition, we are hoping that the introduction of this program will encourage new individuals to participate in Chromium security. The more people involved in scrutinizing Chromium's code and behavior, the more secure our millions of users will be. Such a concept is not new; we'd like to give serious kudos to the folks at Mozilla for their long-running and successful vulnerability reward program."

10 of 175 comments (clear)

  1. No adblock plus by sakdoctor · · Score: 3, Funny

    $500 please

  2. Dilbert by fatherjoecode · · Score: 4, Funny

    Time for Ratbert to do his dance on the keyboard.

    1. Re:dilbert by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 5, Funny
  3. Re:$25,750,000,000!!! by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I wrote Billion twice? Clearly the amount amount is staggering staggering.

  4. Re:Here's an idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    exp(1000) =
    19700711140170469938888793522433231253169379853238457899528029913850\

    63850782441193474978076563026889930963817987520226935982981730544612\

    89923262783660152825232320535169584566756192271567602788071422466826\

    31400685516850865349794166031604536781793809290529972858013286994585\

    64702865343759004565643555891562204223202605188261122886383583722487\

    24725214506150418881937494100871264232248436315760560377439930623959\

    705844189509050047074217568

    Given all of those division signs, isn't this a really small number?! :P

  5. Re:Nice idea, but limited scope by sys.stdout.write · · Score: 5, Funny

    5) goto 1
    6) profit!

    You're probably going to want to keep the profit within the scope of the loop...

  6. Re:Nice idea, but limited scope by jopsen · · Score: 2, Funny

    5) goto 1 6) profit!

    You're probably going to want to keep the profit within the scope of the loop...

    Nope... The loop is correct crime never pays off... :)

  7. Re:$1337 - killer reward. by element-o.p. · · Score: 2, Funny

    Tell you what...if 1337 is too "five years ago" for you, feel free to donate the reward to me if you win it ;)

    --
    MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
  8. Re:Nice idea, but limited scope by thsths · · Score: 2, Funny

    4b) fraudster comes round and beats you up

  9. Re:Here's an idea! by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't see a division sign. Division signs look like this: /

    I don't see a sense of humor. A sense of humor looks like this:-D

    --
    Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.