Code Review of Doom For the iPhone

Developer Fabien Sanglard has written a code review for id Software's iPhone port of Doom. It's an interesting look into how the original 1993 game (which he also reviewed to understand its rendering process) was adapted to a modern platform. "Just like Wolfenstein 3D, Doom was rendering a screenframe pixel per pixel. The only way to do this on iPhone with an acceptable framerate would be to use CoreSurface/CoreSurface.h framework. But it is unfortunately restricted and using it would prevent distribution on the AppStore. The only solution is to use OpenGL, but this comes with a few challenges: Doom was faking 3D with a 2D map. OpenGL needs real 3D vertices. More than 3D vertices, OpenGL needs data to be sent as triangles (among other things because they are easy to rasterize). But Doom sectors were made of arbitrary forms. Doom 1993's perspective was also faked, it was actually closer to an orthogonal projection than a perspective projection. Doom was using VGA palette indexing to perform special effect (red for damage, silver for invulnerable...)."

Comments

Re:Already done

[VShael]

did you even read the article?

You must be new here...

Classics never die

[adosch]

I remember playing Doom in the mid-90's on my friend's Gateway 2000 Pentium 100Mhz. I still play it to this day from time to time (openGL port on Linux). It's mindless, self-indulging, gory, non-challenging (now, not then!), and it's becoming one of timeless those FPS games that won't die because it's story line is simple and not drug out, you're thrown right into the mix and you can keep your objective as simple as you want: Make it to the end of the map.

Re:Classics never die

[Antiocheian]

The groundbreaking REAL 3d game was Ultima Underworld. Amazing story, great music and paced to the action (due to midi synthesis) and total 3d immersion.

Pay your respects to Looking Glass.

He's wrong though

[Anonymous Coward]

Doom 1993's perspective was also faked, it was actually closer to an orthogonal projection than a perspective projection

Not remotely true; DOOM's perspective is/was perfectly correct (apart from the monsters being billboards, of course - but they were perspective-correct billboards).

The method for achieving perspective is rather unconventional, but the maths works out the same.

Matching up floor and ceiling in an animated view with fake perspective is basically impossible.

[I did a port of DOOM before it was open-source, so I know a thing or two about this.]

Re:He's wrong though

[Anonymous Coward]

You are correct. What TFA probably means is that walls, floors and ceilings are drawn in strips, and that for every strip all the texels are looked up according to a straight line. But that doesn't mean at all that hence Doom just uses an orthogonal projection, since it actually let's things diminish in the distance properly. A lot of real three dimensional games actually linearised texel lookup, but that says nothing at all about the overall projection a game uses. If you want to know what an orthogonal projection looks like, go play Age of Empires. As an added comparison, take a look at Mode 7 tricks on the SNES. You can actually perspectively correctly display a flat surface on it. How is this done? By setting a different orthogonal projection for each (in this case horizontal) line. That does not mean however that games using this therefore use an orthogonal projection, because the parameters are different for each scanline and the overall projection is perspective.