AU Gov't Still Wants ISPs To Solve Illegal Downloads

bennyboy64 writes "Australia's Minister for Communications wants internet providers and the film industry to sit down and work out a solution to stop illegal movie downloads, despite a judge ruling in favor of an internet provider not being responsible for policing illegal downloads. The film studios first dragged internet provider iiNet into the Federal Court back in November 2008, arguing that the ISP infringed copyright by failing to take reasonable steps — including enforcing its own terms and conditions — to prevent customers from copying films and TV shows over its network."

Comments

Here's an idea..

[Anonymous Coward]

Flood torrent trackers with episodes of Neighbors.

- NS

And I hereby request

[Anonymous Coward]

that the Australian Government and all the potential murderers and all the potential murder victims sit down and work out a solution to stop murder from ever taking place in Australia.

Re:And I hereby request

[davester666]

Isn't it more like, people are complaining about telephone-related fraud, so would the telephone company please listen to EVERY SINGLE phone conversation, and then report to the police all the calls that are fraud-related.

Re:And I hereby request

[psychodelicacy]

No, the ISPs are the people who build and maintain the roads on which murderers travel to their victims' houses. Or maybe they're the people who sell cooking knives. Or maybe they're the people who provide alcohol to unstable people who then get mad and murder someone.

Equally, you could say that the ISPs are like the owners of Xerox machines, which allow people to make unauthorised copies of copyrighted materials. Or maybe they're like libraries, which allow people to read copyrighted material for free.

The point, I think, is that there is no good analogy for the roles of the parties in this kind of "crime" because it's the result of a pretty much unprecedented set of circumstances related to advances in technology.

About Want...

[flyneye]

Let's make grocers responsible for planet-wide obesity.
Lets make foundrys responsible for gun related crime.
Sounds like Australia has a silly tit in office.
Like the old saying goes, and I believe it applies here in spite of its coarseness, "sh*t in one hand, and want in the other, then see which hand fills up first."

Not My Problem?

[smd75]

What part of a court ordered "Not My Problem" does the AU politicians not understand about policing illegal downloads?

I dunno, I think the ISPs could use this as leverage against the studios to really pay up. Almost to extortion, but legal.

Want us to police your content, we dont, but if you offer good enough incentive, we might make an effort to work with you, but we dont really have to.

Re:Not My Problem?

[nurb432]

He who has the money makes the rules. And apparently that isn't the ISPs down there.

Re:Not My Problem?

[grimJester]

Politicians make the laws. They can't just shrug and say "The courts already decided the issue".

That said, the ISPs have no incentive to spend money policing their customers. I don't think the studios are prepared to pay for any filtering either. Despite what they claim, they don't see piracy as a big enough money drain that spending loads of cash on ISP level policing would be worth it. Piracy is just an excuse to get tighter copyright laws.

Re:Maybe it's time for real reform?

[Anonymous Coward]

You seriously want to put people in jail for copyright infringement? So, someone downloads a 0.99$USD song illegally and you make a government waste thousands of dollars for this person?

It would be less trouble and cost exponentially less for the copyright holder to ask the local government for the retail price of each illegally downloaded copyrighted material than to jail them.

In other words, get real. Copyright infringement doesn't deserve jail nor does it deserve thousands and millions of dollars in damages.

There's also the fact that some things aren't even sold in some markets. So yes there is copyright infringement but no actual loss of sales. So how can there be any monetary damages in these cases?

Gah - somebody stop this ridiculous man

[GrubLord]

It's not representational government when you blindly push your personal agenda against the objections of just about every stakeholder and expert in the system.

I wish Steven Conroy would hurry up and get caught looking at naughty pics of Miranda Kerr on the (uncensored) Internet during a newscast and fired, so the free world can stop giggling at all these Australian human rights violations and we can all get back to being the relaxed outback heroes people used to think of us as.

Re:Gah - somebody stop this ridiculous man

[SQL Error]

There will be an election before too long. DON'T VOTE LABOR.

Vote Liberal/National, Democrat, Independent, hell, even Green (though they're still crazy as a bedbug). Just don't vote Labor.

Why have talks when you won in court?

[TechForensics]

Why should the ISPs enter into talks when they've already won in court?

Not even attempting to police its internet traffic

[D4C5CE]

...seems to be what saved this ISP in court.
For reasons other than network integrity, any surveillance or manipulation of users' data, such as port-blocking, DNS (or simply ToS) censorship, [cough]Phorm[/cough] or Deep Packet Inspection in general lead down a road to perdition, as courts will show little mercy with defendants who through their own actions have themselves conceded (even though inaccurately, as there are still e.g. VPNs) the feasibility of the plaintiffs' outlandish demands.

Re:Maybe it's time for real reform?

[BakaHoushi]

There's also the fact that some things aren't even sold in some markets. So yes there is copyright infringement but no actual loss of sales. So how can there be any monetary damages in these cases?

I thought we were here to politely discuss copyrights, and then you go and bring logic and facts and fairness into this. Clearly you've never negotiated with **AA's before.

Don't you see?!

[Dirtside]

Hollywood just had its highest box office year EVER! Clearly piracy is taking a huge toll, and... ...uh... wait...

this is simple

[Bobtree]

Technical approaches do not solve social problems.

There is a trivial way to resolve illegal downloading.

Legalize it.