Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Wins Windows XP WGA Lawsuit

Rish writes "A lawsuit that accused Microsoft of misleading consumers to download and install an update for Windows Genuine Advantage (WGA) under the guise that it was critical security update has been tossed out. Last month, a federal judge refused to certify the lawsuit as a class action, which would have meant anyone who owned a Windows XP PC in mid-2006 could join the case without having to hire an attorney, and on Friday the same judge dismissed the case completely."

7 of 307 comments (clear)

  1. Re:No good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    OP here, it's invalid product keys that won't validate. Believe it or not, those VLKs do exist and are used by hobbyist pc people to build their moms, uncles, and other relatives computers. The moms, uncles and relatives blame us, despite the fact that it was their hobbyist relative that really committed the crime.

    And, yes, calling microsoft does give you an option there. Buy a genuine copy for a reduced price.

    Anybody in the repair industry worth their salt knows there's more than one way to be invalidated by WGA.

  2. Re:No good by ksemlerK · · Score: 5, Informative

    Or crack it.

    Import this key at every system restart. (saved as c:\windows\system32\reg.key, it would be regedit /a reg.key located in HKLM\Software\Microsoft\WindowsNT\CurrentVersion\Run)

    Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00

    [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\WPAEvents]
    "OOBETimer"=hex:ff,d5,71,d6,8b,6a,8d,6f,d5,33,93,fd
    "LastWPAEventLogged"=hex:d5,07,05,00,06,00,07,00,0f,00,38,00,24,00,fd,02

    [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion]
    "CurrentBuild"="1.511.1 () (Obsolete data - do not use)"
    "InstallDate"=dword:427cdd95 "ProductId"="69831-640-1780577-45389" "DigitalProductId"=hex:a4,00,00,00,03,00,00,00,36,39,38,33,31,2d,36,34,30,2d,\

    31,37,38,30,35,37,37,2d,34,35,33,38,39,00,5a,00,00,00,41,32,32,2d,30,30,30,\

    30,31,00,00,00,00,00,00,00,00,0d,04,89,b2,15,1b,c4,ee,62,4f,e6,64,6f,01,00,\

    00,00,00,00,27,ed,85,43,a2,20,01,00,00,00,00,00,00,00,00,00,00,00,00,00,00,\

    00,00,00,00,00,00,00,00,00,00,00,31,34,35,30,34,00,00,00,00,00,00,00,ce,0e,\

    00,00,12,42,15,a0,00,08,00,00,87,01,00,00,00,00,00,00,00,00,00,00,00,00,00,\

    00,00,00,00,00,00,00,00,00,00,00,00,00,00,00,00,00,94,a2,b3,ac
    "LicenseInfo"=hex:9e,bf,09,d0,3a,76,a5,27,bb,f2,da,88,58,ce,58,e9,05,6b,0b,82,\

    c3,74,ab,42,0d,fb,ee,c3,ea,57,d0,9d,67,a5,3d,6e,42,0d,60,c0,1a,70,24,46,16,\ 0a,0a,ce,0d,b8,27,4a,46,53,f3,17


    + Anti WPA 3.46

    = Away you go

  3. Sloppy reporting by Ars by xymog · · Score: 5, Informative

    Ars Technica left out a whole bunch of information. The plaintiffs didn't agree to dismissal because the suit was bogus. Plaintiff's' attorneys had a poorly-drafted complaint to start with, spent four years adding and dropping plaintiffs trying to find ones that had actually been "injured", and four years amending the complaint with ever-more-vague claims against Microsoft. This is all part of the public record and anyone can take a look at it. Moral: If you're going to be all mad about something, do your homework first before charging off and filing a lawsuit.

  4. Re:They may have won in the courts.... by trudyscousin · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you were talking about iPhone OS, you might have a rational argument, and would have earned your moderation.

    But I thought we were talking about an operating system for a general-purpose computer. Contrasting Mac OS X with any post- W2K Microsoft OS:

    - I've never had to enter an 'activation' key to install it.
    - I've never had to worry if it's going to turn on me and accuse me of using a 'counterfeit' version of it.
    - I've never had to call Apple and ask, "Pretty please, is it okay to have my computer back?"

    I think you're a little bit confused as to "Super-Lockdown-Incorporated" really is.

    --
    Those who can, do. Those who can't, write technology blogs.
  5. Re:They may have won in the courts.... by MisterSquid · · Score: 5, Informative

    You're missing the forest for the trees. Mac OS never asks for validation at any stage of installation. Just put your disc in, install, reboot. That's it. Change your hardware, no need to validate. Ever. Starting with Mac OS v.10.5, upgrade discs no longer checked to see if you had an older version already installed.

    Lockdown!=Lockout

    --
    blog
  6. Re:They may have won in the courts.... by bdenton42 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Apple primarily makes money on the hardware sales, any money coming in from software is mostly gravy. Microsoft primarily makes money on software sales, so piracy means they get nothing.

    If Apple did not have a monopoly on computers which can run OS-X then it's very likely you would be seeing license keys, activation and anti-counterfeiting measures in place.

  7. Re:Good. There *should* be consequences for using by natehoy · · Score: 4, Informative

    The first contract was a voluntary agreement. One which I did not have the opportunity to review before I broke the shrinkwrap and rendered the product unreturnable, but still one that I feel I entered into reasonably freely.

    The remainder were conditional to receiving a benefit I had already bought and paid for, and the consequences of not agreeing to the new contracts were that my product would not receive updates and therefore become increasingly insecure.

    I can understand the "fine, then don't update it", and I can understand the argument that updates are "added value". But I see them as part of what I purchased in the first place. Maybe I'm wrong in that point of view, but I slowly grew more and more uncomfortable with the additional conditions foisted upon me in return for those updates. With WGA, it reached the point where I had had enough.

    And, by the way, I have complied with every one of Microsoft's agreements I have "agreed" to. It's just reached the point where I'm tired of "agreeing" to changes to the EULA.

    I'm not going to pirate their product, and I'm not espousing that others do so. I don't even want a refund of my purchase price for XP. I feel I've gotten fair value out of it.

    I just don't want to spend any more money on software sold by a company that has changed the conditions under which I can use previous purchases with them. If I go out and buy Windows 7, what's the guarantee that Microsoft won't change the EULA again to their favor?

    Maybe you don't care, and that's certainly your right.

    --
    "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."