Slashdot Mirror


Directed Energy Weapon Downs Mosquitos

wisebabo writes "Nathan Myhrvol demonstrated at TED a laser, built from parts scrounged from eBay, capable of shooting down not one but 50 to 100 mosquitos a second. The system is 'so precise that it can specify the species, and even the gender, of the mosquito being targeted.' Currently, for the sake of efficiency, it leaves the males alone because only females are bloodsuckers. Best of all the system could cost as little as $50. Maybe that's too expensive for use in preventing malaria in Africa but I'd buy one in a second!" We ran a story about this last year. It looks like the company has added a bit more polish, and burning mosquito footage to their marketing.

34 of 428 comments (clear)

  1. Nice by girlintraining · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, to hell with the green movement... get me another 250 amp breaker box to my house! It's go time, you little bastards. I'm going to put some energy executive's nephew through college!

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:Nice by girlintraining · · Score: 5, Funny

      P.S. this is the only sexist technology that I fully endorse. Just want that clear.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    2. Re:Nice by _LMark · · Score: 5, Informative

      First: What's more impressive than the lasers that fry* the mosquitoes is the targeting and detection system that drives this crazy thing. Many people are looking at this and wondering how you pick out your targets. The system first scans the surrounding space and *listens*. What it is listening for is quite interesting. See, Malaria is an interesting disease because only specific mosquitoes carry it, and only the females. Since there could be many side effects to zapping any insects within range, or even any mosquitoes (regardless of species or gender), the laser targeting system listens for the precise wingbeat frequency of the female Anopheles Stephensi mosquito and then zaps only those.

      *Technically speaking, the mosquitoes will not be fried in the final product. In addition to potential danger to other occupants of this system's effective bubble, it is planned for deployment to very poor areas of the world where electricity will likely be at a premium. As a result, they are also experimenting with the minimum amount of energy a laser strike must possess to render the mosquito infertile, because that interrupts the cycle necessary for Malaria transmission between humans.


      Cheers,
      Makr

      --
      'the Internet is right.'
    3. Re:Nice by Sechr+Nibw · · Score: 4, Funny

      They're not that big. Not literally. Now DC...DC has mosquitoes the size of people, dressed up as people!

  2. Uh oh by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 5, Funny

    Woe be to the man who walks past wearing his fishing vest.

    --
    Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
  3. Add a techno soundtrack... by gimmebeer · · Score: 5, Funny

    ..and a Roomba to clean up the mess, and you've got a party.

    1. Re:Add a techno soundtrack... by mhajicek · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Heck, mount it on the roomba to patrol.

    2. Re:Add a techno soundtrack... by anss123 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Heck, mount it on the roomba to patrol.

      That would be pure awesome.

      Somebody do this and post on youtube, now!

    3. Re:Add a techno soundtrack... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Careful. You're one voice synthesizer away from a Dalek.

  4. Evolution by lappy512 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When will it be until mosquitoes evolve energy shields?

    1. Re:Evolution by Translation+Error · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ah, the 'mirrorwing' mosquito. I can see it now. Maybe not so much once I get a reflected laser to the eye.

      --
      When someone says, "Any fool can see ..." they're usually exactly right.
    2. Re:Evolution by TubeSteak · · Score: 5, Informative

      Female mosquitoes that can sense the lasers at range and randomly avoid them come to dominate the species.

      Who modded this up as interesting?
      Nothing can sense a laser before it has hit.
      Hence the warning "do not look into laser with remaining eye"

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    3. Re:Evolution by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The sarcasm between the lines here is of course that some species by being cute are somehow magically important and we should intercede at great cost and labor to do whatever we can to prevent their extinction, regardless of the accepted fact that 99% of all once extant species are now extinct. Humanity is so conceited about how it subjectively assigns meaning to niche species that it thinks that a healthy biosphere is one frozen in time where nothing changes, nothing adapts. Never mind that without mass extinctions in prehistory, there would be no animal life as we know it whatsoever.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    4. Re:Evolution by hansamurai · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Maybe he means some females will hear the scream of their brethren after their wings are fried and they're tumbling to the ground and thus avoid that area.

    5. Re:Evolution by jeffmeden · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nevermind the fact that the ecosystems which we *rely on to survive* involve many species, in symbiotic relationships... You can call them cuddly or ugly or whatever, but you can NOT call them meaningless. Your existential rant was beautiful up until the part where you were a completely arrogant ass.

      The "great cost and labor" actually goes INTO their extinction as we destroy natural habitats in search of food, oil, gold, etc.

      Ready for the "big finish"? Hint: this isn't sarcasm...

      If there is another mass extinction, it will INCLUDE US.

  5. Re:Pardon my skepticism by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 5, Informative

    The laser describes a perfectly straight line; no windage is needed. You therefore do not need to track the mosquito in three dimensions, but only two--no fine determination of range is required.

  6. PETA ... by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... is going to throw a fit. A pissy hissy little fit. Good.

    1. Re:PETA ... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't worry, an anti-PETA laser is already in works, to be brought to you by US DoD!

    2. Re:PETA ... by IICV · · Score: 4, Funny

      It works by targetting the buzzing noise they make when they chant their slogans; it also selectively targets females, which will make males think "wtf, why are there no chicks here? I'm leaving".

  7. Future Charity Commerical by hardburn · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Your donation of only $2 a day could help this African village purchase a mosquito defense laser . . . "

    --
    Not a typewriter
    1. Re:Future Charity Commerical by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Funny

      I already sent several checks to a Nigerian prince. What the hell else do they want now?

  8. I want ONE! by gurps_npc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Note, I am one of those people who attract mosquitoes. You put me at a pond and I get bit and no one else does. I would pay $500 for a personal mosquito zapper, that works, let alone $50.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    1. Re:I want ONE! by jamesh · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hire yourself out for parties. For $5/hour you could sit 10m away from the crowd and draw the mosquito's to you. You'd have your $50 in no time! You'd also have malaria, which is a bit of a downside.

  9. Re:I'm from Minnesota by natehoy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm from Maine and I live in the woods near some marshland. If this thing works 1/4 as well as advertised I'd happily pay $200 for one if they wanted to use something similar to the "OLPC" model.

    At a manufacturing cost of $50, that's one for me to enjoy my backyard, two for third-world countries fighting malaria, and $50 profit for the manufacturer.

    --
    "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
  10. A product of Intellectual Ventures by Grond · · Score: 4, Informative

    This came out of Intellectual Ventures, which Slashdot often derides as a patent troll that brainstorms ideas, patents them, then lives off of the licensing revenue without actually contributing real products to the world or even prototyping their vaguely defined ideas.

    This shows that IV is quite capable of producing actual, useful products. Its business model is not limited to patent licensing revenue, which makes it more like, say, IBM, than a typical patent holding company.

    Maybe, just maybe, IV is not the evil parasite that many on Slashdot made it out to be. In fact, it seems to be in the business of shooting evil parasites with lasers, which is pretty cool.

  11. Re:Old 1980's Technology, with One Problem by natehoy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    True, but skeeters are usually active at dusk and after. Two possibilities.

    1. If it can recognize shapes, have it shut down whenever a larger animal is within 10-15 degrees of the beam. I mean, this thing is already accurately identifying specific species of mosquito, right? How hard would it be to put a "don't fire if something bigger than a housefly is emitting heat in the range of fire" system in?

    2. Put it on a timer or switch, and only turn it on when everyone is inside, and put it away from windows (this would only work, of course, if you live like me - in the woods with no neighbors).

    --
    "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
  12. Re:Old 1980's Technology, with One Problem by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 4, Informative

    There is no z in laser.

    --
    Not a sentence!
  13. Re:Can I Give One to my Programmers? by natehoy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sorry, even at best it can only do 50 to 100 bugs per second. You'd need a lot of them.

    --
    "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
  14. An improvement suggestion by mi · · Score: 4, Informative

    An improvement in both safety and efficiency would be to use two lasers, each about 60% as strong as the currently used single one.

    The targeting computer would aim both lasers at the target frying it even faster than now. But, should one of the "canons" miss, or should an unintended target come into one of the beams, the "collateral damage" will be much smaller, because the other laser will not be aimed at the same spot.

    I think, the military lasers should use the similar technique — use multiple weak lasers frying the same target from dispersed locations. An unintended object (such as a civilian airplane) flying into any one of the beams will be safe, and taking out the entire installation will be much harder for the enemy. The set can have a cumulative power twice (or more) than is required to destroy one target, while each individual beam is still (relatively) harmless.

    When "healthy", such a setup will be able to destroy multiple targets at a time, and the enemy will only be able to reduce its capacity gradually, rather than all at once.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  15. Re:So much for the food chain by natehoy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    First, mosquitoes are only one thing at their level of the food chain. Flies, noseeums, and plenty of other non-biting insects live at the same level.

    Second, this is actually better than most current solutions. Mosquito magnets and skeeter deleters and other things attract all manner of insects, not just mosquitoes. Don't get me started on spray permethrin and other insecticides.

    Third, mosquito populations are WAY up in my area because bats are being wiped out by that nose fungus infection. I haven't seen a bat in my area in a couple of years, unfortunately, and they used to be common.

    Fourth, these units would only work in the immediate vicinity of houses. In my area, that means there's still a few hundred acres behind my house that remain prime mosquito real estate. I only want my yard, they can have the marsh.

    And, finally, I don't care. I am, in fact, that self-centered.

    --
    "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
  16. Re:So much for the food chain by ae1294 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Seriously, how self-centered are we?

    God damnit this is /. how dare you come in here and try and spread your silly idea's about mosquitoes being important blah blah blah. What the hell man? THIS IS A GOD DAMN LASER WEAPON FOR KILLING BUGS! You don't get this? pewpewpew? no? FUCK! {throws chair}

  17. Re:Pardon my skepticism by gbjbaanb · · Score: 5, Funny

    Man, if you're the kind of person who says "wow, a laser that shoots down mosquitoes, how cool. Lets dangle my balls in front of it", then you don't deserve to reproduce :)

  18. Re:Darwin says... by Red+Flayer · · Score: 5, Funny

    Darwin says, in a generation or two, the frequency changes...

    So then we update the targeting software with the new effective frequencies.

    Booyah! Take that, Science!

    Intelligent design triumphs over evolution once again!

    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  19. pshaw! You think _you_ have big mosquitoes? by Dhrakar · · Score: 4, Funny

    Here in the interior of Alaska we have to plant trees close together in our campgrounds. That keeps the mosquitos with the larger wingspans from getting through. Heck, some of them have their own landing strip at the airport. Our mosquitoes are big -- scary big.