Slashdot Mirror


Spam Hits Google Buzz Already

ChiefMonkeyGrinder writes "Despite only being launched this week, spammers are already targeting Google Buzz, the search engine's social network." If my buzz box is any indicator, the spammers are pretty much the only people actually using Buzz, and until Facebook can integrate, I wonder if that will change. The Times also has a followup on Google's Apologies following various privacy bumbles throughout the launch of Buzz.

31 of 135 comments (clear)

  1. Facebook Will Not Acknowledge the New Guy by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ... until Facebook can integrate ...

    The only way Facebook would integrate is if it didn't view Buzz as a competitor in anyway. But Buzz is a competitor already in some respects. The damned thing keeps asking me to integrate with my Picassa account. And it is already integrated with GMail and GChat. So you've got ad revenue, messaging and pictures ... now Buzz needs finer tuned privacy control and a developer platform to be a direct competitor with Facebook. That last one is a big sticky mess though and Facebook seems to have done as best as possible with it.

    Hilarious that Google got bit on privacy concerns. Facebook learned the lengthy hard way on that one but it does give me hope that people are not entirely offering up their privacy to Google without batting an eye. Maybe the general public is not as doomed as we thought?

    Anyway, there is no way in hell Facebook would validate Buzz's existence by integrating with them. It would just give their users who already use GMail a chance to seamlessly transfer over to Buzz while keeping up with their archaic Facebook contacts. It would be potential suicide for Facebook to do such a thing if/when Google keeps up expanding Buzz.

    Personally I think Buzz targets another market but losing any number of users to Buzz does not make sense in anyway ... devoting time and resources to that endeavor makes even less sense. Facebook will sacrifice interaction between it's large user base and the few Buzz-only people in the name of maintaining its superiority. Really it's sad because the user loses out of being able to transfer and interact with users on Buzz ... but when you're as big as Facebook, you just don't care about those kinds of integration competitor benefits and 'features.'

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Facebook Will Not Acknowledge the New Guy by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Funny

      Integration would be great though as I'd never have to go to FB.com again.

      I can understand you hatin' on Facebook but what have you got against The American Farm Bureau Federation?

      --
      My work here is dung.
    2. Re:Facebook Will Not Acknowledge the New Guy by hedwards · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You already don't have to go there ever again. I've never been there and I'm still alive.

    3. Re:Facebook Will Not Acknowledge the New Guy by D+Ninja · · Score: 2, Informative

      I know what you are hinting at with your answer (AKA "Don't use Facebook") but, the reality of the matter is that Facebook is used all the time with various groups, friends, etc that people are part of. Yeah, there is a high amount of noise, but it is *the* place for people to plan events, talk about life events, etc. While I wouldn't "die" without Facebook, my social life would most definitely suffer (and, yes, I mean a social life outside of Facebook - Facebook is a tool to help plan that). So, leaving Facebook is not necessarily an option.

      To answer the GP post, I too would like to see Buzz integrate with Facebook - even if it is to see status and provide status updates.

    4. Re:Facebook Will Not Acknowledge the New Guy by geegel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Dude, no offense, get a life.

      --
      right...
    5. Re:Facebook Will Not Acknowledge the New Guy by afabbro · · Score: 3, Funny

      This is my giant social networking machine.

      "...but I still haven't kissed a girl.

      --
      Advice: on VPS providers
    6. Re:Facebook Will Not Acknowledge the New Guy by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It didn't used to be.

      They seemed to have hit their peak of 'privacy' a while ago.

      Back in the day, you only had blocking and limited profiles. But you could restrict all your data.

      Then they added groups. Which was great. "Family", "Real Friends","Bar Associates", "Work" which was great. I could complain about work and exclude work. Add photo albums and not let X group see them.

      The problem came with their latest update and the "Who can add you as a friend". Previously you could lock it down. Now it's either "Friends of Friends" or "Everybody".

      At one point in my profile's history I wouldn't even show up to a friend of a friend. Now they can add me.

    7. Re:Facebook Will Not Acknowledge the New Guy by dswensen · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Someone please try again to explain to me"? Seriously?

      People like to talk about themselves. On the Internet and in everyday life. This doesn't really require explanation, nor do I think you actually want one.

      You want validation that you're a brave crusader holding your ground against the shallow, attention-whoring masses. Which is ironic, given that you apparently want someone to convince you in the hope that they'll earn your valuable approval (which you won't give -- your mind is clearly made up.)

      As the poster above said, if you don't want to use it, don't. There's a lot of utility to social networking that has nothing to do with what you ate for breakfast, but like anything else, Sturgeon's Law applies. The good stuff is rarer than the dross but can be found with only a little effort.

    8. Re:Facebook Will Not Acknowledge the New Guy by rah1420 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I got my FB account just after Christmas. Deactivated it last week. No thanks.

      I have a strange feeling about this 'social networking' thing. Not really comfortable with it, I'm not. I can "get" LinkedIn, but I think that's as much as I want to share.

      I also seem to have three Buzz followers already. Keep following me, peeps - I ain't gonna be there, either.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens.
  2. Totally Riding That Buzz by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think Buzz targets people who desire a very simple interface. It seems to perform a lot better on my slow machine than Facebook but is negligible on my main box. Honestly I haven't experienced any Spam on Buzz at all. Don't you have to follow the Spam bot or hacked account to get the Spam?

    It's missing a lot of options, I guess time will tell if that is the intent or merely TBD yet. I do like how it's integrated with Google Reader. I share a lot of my news offerings with my followers. I don't like that it wants me to integrate with Picassa. I simply have too many Google contacts (some Slashdot readers I've never met!) to have them looking at my pictures!

    So the one thing that Buzz has over Facebook is Aardvark. I signed up for that three or four days ago and have asked a question (with very positive results) and answered a few questions. I didn't get quite what I wanted out of answering questions although I think the people that answered my question did a pretty good job. How this is different from Yahoo Answers or Wiki Answers seems to be that it's tightly integrated with Buzz and GChat. Also it actively finds things for you to answer. I'm guessing what Google has with mining your e-mail and chats and searches it will use to locate experts for your questions and also pair you with better questions you're more capable of answering. A lot remains to be seen as to whether or not this is an actual beneficial addition or some more of the bloat a Facebook application would have to offer one.

    Yes, I have already made two book purchases off of those suggestions from my question. Note that a problem with GChat caused two of my questions (which I tried to designate as separate) get slotted into one question. I could just hear the software thinking: the second question is about authors, he must be continuing his thought.

    Personally I'm not leaving Facebook for Buzz. But I'm not decommissioning Buzz. I'm keeping it as a sort of News social network much like The Auteurs and Afternoon Records Community are for my movies and music respectively. Granted none of these niche networks get as much time as the all encompassing Facebook, they still exist harmoniously in the bag of sites I visit. I recognize I'm probably an outlier though.

    --
    My work here is dung.
  3. What's next? by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If there's anything I've learned over the years watching technology, it's that if everyone is suddenly climbing aboard a certain technology, it's time to find the next big thing.

    Social computing may be really hot right now, but I'm wondering what the next big thing is going to be. First we had personal websites, then we moved to blogs, then to social computing and tweeting. What's next? What are you working on or with that is the next step in technological evolution?

    1. Re:What's next? by vlm · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm working on a new technology (script based) where people log into a news site and post completely offtopic and unrelated comments drawn from a bag of on-the-surface-interesting-but-truly-vapid comments.

      You're in the talk radio business?

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    2. Re:What's next? by harmonise · · Score: 4, Funny

      What are you working on or with that is the next step in technological evolution?

      Teledildonics

      --
      Cory Doctorow talking about cloud computing makes as much sense as George W Bush talking about electrical engineering.
  4. Google Buzz's Skyrocketing Usage by MediaStreams · · Score: 5, Informative

    "If my buzz box is any indicator, the spammers are pretty much the only people actually using Buzz, and until Facebook can integrate, i wonder if that will change. "

    Wow, way to make to make yourself look silly submitter:

    http://mashable.com/2010/02/14/google-buzz-column/

    "Google Buzz's Skyrocketing Usage
    While it's still very early into Buzz's life cycle, initial indications show that Google has a hit on its hands. Linking Buzz to Gmail's millions of users has clearly brought people into the company's new social domain.

    Google has only released two numbers so far: there have been over 9 million posts and comments in about 56 hours, amounting to around 160,000 posts and comments per hour. That's even more impressive if you consider the fact that most users didn't get Buzz until Wednesday the 10th.

    The other number: over 200 mobile check-ins per minute, nearly 300,000 mobile check-ins per day.

    Those numbers are simply stellar."

    Every major blogger is using Buzz now and some of them are saying they already have a larger Buzz following in just a few days than they had with other social media sites that they spent years building up.

    1. Re:Google Buzz's Skyrocketing Usage by BrokenHalo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Every major blogger is using Buzz now...

      You might as well say "Every major loser is using Buzz now". Most bloggers write drivel (hence this), and I fail to see the value in Google providing yet another means for cretins to prattle inanities into the void.

    2. Re:Google Buzz's Skyrocketing Usage by WinterSolstice · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I have to agree with this. I found buzz to be just about ideal - it's unobtrusive, simple. and more of a 'feed aggregator' than a twitter app.

      One of my friends just uses it to share his twitter feed with those of us not using twitter. Another just uses it for occasional comments on his flickr photo stream. I use it just for the occasional IM type comment that I would want to send to 3 or 4 people (not things like "I'm watching the game", but things like "everyone who bet on x owes me money", or "did you see this news story").

      Sure, it's kinda pointless. But it does a really good job of combining several disparate feeds of pointless into one simple console that I already have open anyway.

      It's a win for me.

      --
      An operating system should be like a light switch... simple, effective, easy to use, and designed for everyone.
    3. Re:Google Buzz's Skyrocketing Usage by Korbeau · · Score: 2, Informative

      Google Buzz's Skyrocketing Usage

      When the usage passed from 0 to 1, one might argue it got infinitely more popular!

    4. Re:Google Buzz's Skyrocketing Usage by afabbro · · Score: 5, Insightful

      While it's still very early into Buzz's life cycle, initial indications show that Google has a hit on its hands.

      My astroturfing meter is pegged.

      --
      Advice: on VPS providers
  5. What exactly were you expecting? by FlyingBishop · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What makes Facebook so good is that it's all tied to people - even the fake accounts need to seem to be people.

    When you enable social networking for everyone who thought they were signing up for a mailbox, you're naturally going to cause a mess. Social networking is about the walled garden, and the security it gives you in terms of who you're talking to.

    The underlying problem is one of anonymity and the Internet, and finding a way to verify identity without a walled garden. If Google is looking at innovating, they need to find a compelling way to bridge the anonymity gap.

    1. Re:What exactly were you expecting? by FlyingBishop · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I meant security about authentication. Email is probably more secure than Facebook in terms of knowing that your communication is private (even on Gmail, though only marginally so.) What Facebook means is that when you get a message from someone, you can be fairly sure it came from that person. At least as sure as you can possibly be without that person personally comparing the message you're looking at to the one they sent. Even if you're using public key authentication, there's still the potential for an attacker to get your private key, etc.

      Facebook - you know who you're talking to.

      Gmail - you do if you've talked to the person through some other medium. Trying to shoehorn it into the Facebook paradigm was a stupid idea.

    2. Re:What exactly were you expecting? by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What makes Facebook so good is that it's all tied to people - even the fake accounts need to seem to be people.

      Current prices for a facebook account on the spam markets are around $5 per 1000 friends. Creating fake accounts that seem to be people isn't that hard - just scrape pics of hot girls off MySpace, couple with a fake name generator and off you go (assuming you can get past Facebooks defences of course, but then GMail has defences too).

    3. Re:What exactly were you expecting? by FlyingBishop · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, that's why I don't friend people I don't actually know. I don't think I'm unusual in this, at least among those who picked up Facebook back when it was restricted to higher ed.

      The thing that makes Facebook superior to Gmail is that if you get a message from Joe Smith on Facebook, and his picture and friends correspond to a Joe Smith you know, Facebook is very good about making sure that it is in fact Joe Smith talking to you. Obviously a random person you've never met is not guaranteed to be a real person - but that's impossible to guarantee.

    4. Re:What exactly were you expecting? by lennier · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Social networking is about the walled garden, and the security it gives you in terms of who you're talking to.

      The underlying problem is one of anonymity and the Internet, and finding a way to verify identity without a walled garden. If Google is looking at innovating, they need to find a compelling way to bridge the anonymity gap.

      I agree that social networking is about verifiable identity, but disagree that it is or should be about the walled garden. Current social networks ARE walled gardens, and that's a huge net negative for me.

      What frustrates me hugely is that we've had email identity-verification proposals like SPF for years now and always people say 'meh that's useless it doesn't stop spam'. But it's not about spam (bulk of mail received from strangers). It's about identity (knowing that someone who sends to you is who they say they are). The second is FAR more important than the first. And we've had OpenID, and who uses that beyond LiveJournal and Blogger?

      Facebook and Twitter give us an identity, an aggregator, and a content generator, and a simple web-based interface to all three. But we should be able to do this without requiring a centralised proprietary routing hub. For crying out loud, isn't this EXACTLY what RSS was invented for? Why didn't it work?

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
  6. Re:no spam here by badpazzword · · Score: 4, Funny

    Somehow I think making a list of people who aren't spammed (yet) isn't a very good idea...

    --
    When ideas fail, words become very handy.
  7. I knew there was a reason not to use Gmail by Fnkmaster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For years now, it's been "Gmail is so great", "why don't you use Gmail?" I've been that curmudgeon who has these strange ideas about privacy and not entrusting too much data to one company.

    I felt vindicated the other day when my wife freaked out upon seeing people she had emailed with on gmail sudden on her new friends list in the Google Buzz system that she never signed up for, along with the suggestion that she share photos with them and other private data about every action she takes on any system owned by Google.

    On Facebook, at least you went into it *knowing* that everything you post there gets shared with every person you once spoke to in a grad school class who friended you randomly three years later. Google has insidiously roped you into using a bunch of disconnected services that were great and generally free and all the while, you've known that sure, they collect data they can use for advertising to you, but it's all so goddamned warm and fuzzy, what's there to worry about?

    Suddenly, you find that Google Reader, Picasa, Gmail, etc. are all part of a social networking service you didn't intend to sign up for and Google is trying to push you into sharing everything you do with everybody you email with.

    I consider this utterly, well, evil. Deceitful. Sketchy. This stuff needs to be totally opt-in.

    I helped my wife turn off all the "sharing" features of Buzz. But could not find any way to completely opt-out of Buzz. There didn't seem to be a way, other than to cease using Gmail entirely. I consider that vile.

    1. Re:I knew there was a reason not to use Gmail by Nidi62 · · Score: 4, Informative

      But could not find any way to completely opt-out of Buzz. There didn't seem to be a way, other than to cease using Gmail entirely. I consider that vile.

      Go into full gmail, and scroll all the way to the bottom. Right above the line that has all the legal stuff is another line with things like "Gmail view" "turn off/on chat" "Turn off/on Buzz". Click on turn off buzz. It will then be removed from the list of links on the top left-hand side with Inbox, Drafts, and all that.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    2. Re:I knew there was a reason not to use Gmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, but you still have your followers if you turn off the Buzz tab.

    3. Re:I knew there was a reason not to use Gmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      When you click on "Turn off Buzz" it just removes the Buzz link from your gmail UI. That's it; it doesn't disable Buzz!

      More details here.

    4. Re:I knew there was a reason not to use Gmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Click on turn off buzz. It will then be removed from the list of links on the top left-hand side with Inbox, Drafts, and all that.

      Unfortunately, it seems that removing the link from the sidebar is in fact all it'll do. Here's how to really disable buzz for good, courtesy of CNet.

    5. Re:I knew there was a reason not to use Gmail by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 2

      You have to enable it and you can disable it. I fail to see how giving people more options is a bad thing

  8. Re:Indicator by nschubach · · Score: 4, Informative

    No spam here... Compared to Facebook and those incessant applications everyone keeps using. I have quite literally turned off everything but allowing friends to post on my wall and I still get invites to make someone's farm bigger or stupid greeting card invites. I see no option to deny all applications forever, only individual ones as they are sent to me.

    --
    Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.