Slashdot Mirror


2010 — the Year AACS and HDMI Kill Off HD Component Video

For home theater buffs who want (or already have) a high-def system using component-video connections, time may be growing short. Audiofan writes with this story, which begins: "Digital HD (high definition), like that enabled through HDMI and Blu-ray, is awesome. It offers amazing picture and audio quality. It allows you to conveniently connect one single cable to provide both picture and sound. It is royally going to screw up a lot of homes next year. Wait, what was that last part? After December 31, 2010, manufacturers will not be 'allowed' [to] introduce new hardware with component video outputs supplying more than an SD resolution (480i or 576i). Should this go through as planned, it's going to disable or throw a wrench in a lot of existing custom installations as soon as the end of this year." The AACS in the headline stands for Advanced Access Content System, the industry scheme to block "the analog hole" by controlling content from storage media to eyeballs.

20 of 424 comments (clear)

  1. Just buy the unofficial ones by cstdenis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There will still be plenty of HDMI to composite converters coming out of China, etc.

    --
    1984 was not supposed to be an instruction manual.
    1. Re:Just buy the unofficial ones by ArsonSmith · · Score: 5, Funny

      I was really interested in and browsed this for almost 4 hours before I realized that my spell check changed it from HDCP to HARD.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    2. Re:Just buy the unofficial ones by natehoy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sorry, I'm not going to Google any phrase containing the word "stripper". Not gonna do it. Wouldn't be prudent.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    3. Re:Just buy the unofficial ones by rugatero · · Score: 5, Funny
      --
      This comment is for entertainment purposes only. Any similarity to real insight or information is purely coincidental.
    4. Re:Just buy the unofficial ones by sexconker · · Score: 5, Informative

      Wrong. HDFury is legal and sanctioned.

      It's downgrading the digital connection to an analog connection. It has legit HDCP keys.

      It does NOT give you a digital output, and does not crack HDCP.

      If the new rules get adopted, then the manufacturer of HDFury will be unable to manufacture any more of them.

    5. Re:Just buy the unofficial ones by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I hope this does not offend you, but there are people who do not want to be required to break the law to watch their legally bought movies on their legally bought home-theater equipment...

      Well, that's the point of TFA: You're fucked.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
  2. Money Money Money by CorporateSuit · · Score: 5, Insightful
    • $25 for component
    • $60 for HDMI
    • Unchecked licensing authority

    What we have is a perfect recipe for greed!

    --
    I am the richest astronaut ever to win the superbowl.
    1. Re:Money Money Money by Frequency+Domain · · Score: 5, Funny

      You left off the $200 gold-plated HDMI connectors. Since converting to gold plated, I've noticed that the digital signal has 0's which are softer and rounder, while the 1's are slimmer and pointier at the top.

    2. Re:Money Money Money by natehoy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Then you need gold-pressed-latinum plated HDMI cables, and our specially-crafted power strip made of ebony hand-rubbed to a sheen by naked virgins. It softens the zeros and rounds the ones ever so slightly. There's even a knob hand-carved from a Unicorn horn that stretches a bit of snipegut and can adjust the pointiness to a great level of precision. The dial even goes to 11, and there's a 12 setting available for a small extra fee of $50,000.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    3. Re:Money Money Money by natehoy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We're not. It's a very nice-looking cable.

      We're mocking you.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    4. Re:Money Money Money by natehoy · · Score: 5, Funny

      The $50K is the upgrade to 12. The unit itself is $250,000 for the base model, and extra $10,000 if you want to specify the hair color of the virgins who rub the ebony (redheads tend to have brighter, harsher treble, for example).

      Of course, you'll want one for each channel to avoid any crosstalk, and one of our technicians will happily walk you through the process of having a second power feed run to your house so you don't run both channels off the same power lines, because that would be just silly.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
  3. Re:Summary contradicts itself... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    From the article:

    Lest you think that this won't affect existing players, note that after January 1, 2011, the manufacturers of Blu-ray discs will be able (at their option) to insert an Image Constraint Token into any Blu-ray disc. This is a sort of "digital flag" that will turn off the high-definition component video output in the player (effectively turning it into a low-resoluton 480i/576i output). The goal is to make sure that all high-definition video will only be made possible through "secure" digital connections like HDMI.

  4. Shrug. Only affects legitimate consumers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Up to about 2001-2002 I was a legitimate consumer, but when the trend of shafting legitimate consumers became the industry standards, I went 100% piracy.
    My entire entertainment system is a lean, mean, swashbuckling, pirating machine. There is no hole in which to insert a physical media; why would I need a DVD or Blu-ray source, since I have no intention of buying any discs? DVD player went to the dump with my VHS.

    Now my country does levy a blank CD tax...Oh yeah, I never buy any blank discs because EVERYTHING is on Hard drives or flash cards.
    I'm laughing man, because I am so not legit.

    Ok, queue up the haters, I don't give a shit what any of you think.

    1. Re:Shrug. Only affects legitimate consumers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Up to about 2001-2002 I was a legitimate consumer...

      You've failed to grasp that as far as these "content cartels" are concerned, there is NO such thing as a legitimate consumer. To them the world is consists of them, and pirates. There is nothing in between, and all are guilty.

  5. Yes, Just like the last few times. by bferlin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I seem to remember the same argument with Region Codes and DIVX. People voted with the wallet last time, why would this time be any different?

    Even if they do get their way, all they will do is create a cottage industry of security-defeating technologies. And like always, the real pirates who make tons of money selling counterfeits will find ways around it.

    It's the actual consumer that can't watch that latest DVD because of DRM that doesn't quite work right that get screwed.

    --
    - Brett
  6. Oblig... by AmigaHeretic · · Score: 5, Funny

    Though not exactly on topic, I feel like I should post this like I always do...

    "24K gold-plated connectors help protect the cable's optical lens to ensure consistent signal transfer"

    http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Rocketfish%26%23153%3B+-+8'+Digital+Optical+Cable/8315147.p?id=1174694191675&skuId=8315147&st=optical

    1. Re:Oblig... by clarkkent09 · · Score: 5, Funny
      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
  7. Re:Are the manufacturers getting more greedy by natehoy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is just the first time they've removed the old standard by legal caveat, rather than simple obsolescence.

    Component can easily handle very high definition, but it won't be allowed because (snicker) of course it's only possible to (chortle) copy video if you (guffaw) have access to an analog data stream of it. (HA HA HA !!!!! snort)

    I mean, it's just not going to be possible (tee hee) to make an unlocked copy (ha ha) of the video at its full resolution.

    BWAAHAHAH!!!!! Sorry, sometimes I kill myself.

    Don't you worry none, as soon as BluRay turns on this flag there'll be an MKV extractor and you won't have to fret about this silly flag nonsense.

    --
    "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
  8. Re:no analogue holes by UnknowingFool · · Score: 5, Funny

    Monster cables are higher quality than your basic cables. When most the signals were analog, this made a difference especially on a good AV system. Now that the signals are digital, the quality does not suffer as much due to the signal degradation.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  9. Pirates laughing all the way to the home theatre. by azmodean+1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So once again we have more hoops for paying customers to jump through and perhaps have their legally purchased content automatically downgrade itself in order to "protect" the MPAA and member companies. Meanwhile everyone who has given up on the ridiculously outdated and self-defeating content distribution system suffers no inconvenience whatsoever.

    The further along this train wreck progresses the more my outrage turns into bemused detachment. I haven't bought any non-indie media in quite a long time now (occasionally I catch a movie or concert). I do feel somewhat sorry for the people who haven't figured out how totally messed up the system is and are going to be badly affected by this, but I just can't bring myself to the point of actual outrage over it any more.

    How many people are going to just give up trying to be "good consumers" and switch over to piracy based on this? I would expect it will be far more people than will be dissuaded from participating in casual "copyright infringement" by trying to make backup copies of their media or god forbid just trying to watch a movie they bought on the wrong type of TV.