Slashdot Mirror


Google Phasing Out Gears For HTML5

Kelson writes "Have you noticed that there haven't been many updates to Gears in a while? That's because Google has decided to focus instead on similar capabilities in the emerging HTML5 standard: local storage, database, workers and location cover similar functionality, but natively in the web browser. Of course, since Gears and HTML APIs aren't exactly the same, it's not a simple drop-in replacement, so they'll continue supporting the current version of Gears in Firefox and Internet Explorer. I guess this means the long-anticipated Gears support for 64-bit Firefox on Linux and Opera are moot."

12 of 35 comments (clear)

  1. Support not ending for IE by eihab · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This just goes to show how much IE is holding us back. According to the Blog post, Google won't be dropping Gears' maintenance support for IE for the foreseen future:

    We will not be investing resources in active development of new features. Likewise, there are some platforms that would require a significant engineering effort to support due to large architectural changes. Specifically, we cannot support Gears in Safari on OS X Snow Leopard and later. Support for Gears in Firefox (including 3.6, which will be supported shortly) and Internet Explorer will continue.

    I'm guessing they'll want that around as a fall back for IE when they start depending more and more on HTML5's new features.

    Had IE been keeping up with HTML5's development, we wouldn't be in a situation where we need external plug-ins to make sure our Apps are cross-platform.

    --
    If you can't mod them join them.
    1. Re:Support not ending for IE by stimpleton · · Score: 3, Funny

      "This just goes to show how much IE is holding us back

      I work for a small DNA services company and that is a burgeoning industry. We are pretty young but we match the advancing industry with our own very aggressive, but smart style.

      One of our young team in a meeting the other day, said in regard to a particular DNA trait technology: "Let come down off the top rope with an elbow to the throat of {our competitor}. They are like the Internet Explorer of DNA. Lets fuck 'em up.".

      I do like our meetings. But yeah, if we were google, we wouldnt be able to hold back our your pit bulls. And I bet Google have a few that are chewing their chains to hit MS and Flash with HTML 5. Off the top rope so to speak.

      --

      In post Patriot Act America, the library books scan you.
    2. Re:Support not ending for IE by the_womble · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My money making site, which most people read from work, is getting 18% IE 6 - almost as much as Firefox and not far behind IE 7 or IE 8, and a lot more than Chrome, Safari or Opera.

      My blog traffic is 48% Firefox, with IE6 down to less than 2%.

      It depends on your audience.

    3. Re:Support not ending for IE by Daengbo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There's a difference between implementing proposed components of yet-to-be-gold standards or specifications and implementing whatever the hell you feel like and expecting everyone else to conform. You can see that, can't you?

  2. Glad I didn't skill up on gears by symbolset · · Score: 3, Informative

    W3.org, though, they've got some serious heft in web standards. It probably would not do to ignore their new standard version unless you're Microsoft, in which case interop is a negative and ignoring the new standard is an implied part of "ignore standards".

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  3. ADHD? by pitchpipe · · Score: 4, Funny

    I know that it's good to for a corporation to explore new avenues, but sometimes I get the feeling that Google has ADHD.

    --
    Look where all this talking got us, baby.
    1. Re:ADHD? by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Agility is not a defecit of attention. They're quicker than other big tech to catch on, ballsy enough to take risks, savvy enough to remain a powerhouse, and honest/polite enough to alert users of a change of direction.

      Or Google could be utter crap. But crappier and less trustworthy competition makes Google look like Robin Hoods and all-stars in comparison.

  4. Looking forward to it... by afabbro · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...so I take it that gears will be phased out when HTML5 arrives in 2022?

    --
    Advice: on VPS providers
  5. Re:Standards are great.... by eihab · · Score: 4, Informative

    But honestly I hope they are actively evaluating the standards. Just because it's a "standard" doesn't mean it's good and worth using.

    Evaluating? They're effectively making it.

    Ian Hickson, the author and maintainer of HTML5, is a Google employee.

    Not that this is a bad thing, I mean, I'm very excited about some of the stuff (like background workers) that are basically Google's finger print on the draft. But make no mistake about it, they are evaluating it very well as they're writing it :)

    --
    If you can't mod them join them.
  6. Dupe? by grouchomarxist · · Score: 4, Informative
  7. Here we go, yet again... by FlyingGuy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Once again, we have the guy writing the spec or at least the maintainer working for a company with a HUGE vested interest in its outcome.

    Sorry, but this is no different from MS, IBM or Oracle trying to define how things are going to work and doing it in their best interest.

    Gears was invented to address the hideous short comings of the DOM, and now they think that HTML 5 is the magic pill?!

    Read the HTML 5 spec. It is a rewrite of all the other equally hideous HTML specifications.

    No one, not Google, not the WC3 is doing ANYTHING to fix all the stupidity that is the DOM, HTML and CSS.

    We need to just call it a day on the current state of all of them and start over.

    We need to stop having wars about tables -v- divs and things like What is a construction element and what is a cosmetic element and will CSS effect that part of DOM or not.

    Microsoft was right in a lot of their decisions about how IE would work and present information to the browser user, but as usual they did in the most asshat manner possible and therefor they were wrong, but a lot of their concepts were spot on.

    People keep trying to turn a text rendering program into what is essentially database UI where you can define fields and bind them to data sources. The combination of the two is absolutely insane and should be stopped right now.

    The Browser makers should take a lesson from from from Delphi and VB and just implement a forms painter with objects that handle all the use input and stop trying to build all this crap out of a really really awful mashup of HTML, Javascript and CSS because while it might kinda sorta work, it works like crap.

    A grid control should be implemented that is data aware ( local storage whatevah ) that can properly handle the concept of records instead of having to do all the stupidity you have to do now.

    You want an application UI then build it like one and stop all this insanity of mixing them together.

    I have said it before and I will say it again, there should be two top tags, <HTML> and <APP> and each one tells the browser to do two very different things.

    --
    Hey KID! Yeah you, get the fuck off my lawn!
  8. Gears for Firefox on Ubuntu 64-bit by Tolaris · · Score: 2, Informative

    Someone has helpfully compiled Gears for Firefox on Ubuntu 64-bit:
    http://blog.celogeek.fr/linux/linux-trucs-et-astuces/google-gears-compilation/

    I've been using it with Wordpress for 8 months now.