Slashdot Mirror


Two Chinese Schools Reportedly Tied To Online Attacks

squidw* writes "Online attacks on Google and other American corporations have been traced to computers at two educational institutions in China, including one with close ties to the Chinese military, say people involved in the investigation. From the NY Times: '... the attacks, aimed at stealing trade secrets and computer codes and capturing e-mail of Chinese human rights activists, may have begun as early as April, months earlier than previously believed. ... The Chinese schools involved are Shanghai Jiaotong University and the Lanxiang Vocational School, according to several people with knowledge of the investigation who asked for anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the inquiry. Jiaotong has one of China’s top computer science programs. Just a few weeks ago its students won an international computer programming competition organized by IBM — the “Battle of the Brains” — beating out Stanford and other top-flight universities. Lanxiang, in east China’s Shandong Province, is a huge vocational school that was established with military support and trains some computer scientists for the military.'"

31 of 172 comments (clear)

  1. Hum. by bbqsrc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'd like to say I'm shocked by the previous 4 moronic comments, but this is slashdot, so I am not. So they confirm where the attacks came from, where does it go from there? Banning the IP range of those schools from Google services? I somehow doubt they'll find a way to directly pin this on the Chinese government, regardless of if they did it or not.

    --
    Disagree != mod troll.
    1. Re:Hum. by mjwalshe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      so the USA recognises Taiwan and removes most favored status for China, Dont forget China needs its external markets as much if not more than the USA needs China to buy the USA's gilts.

    2. Re:Hum. by m.ducharme · · Score: 3, Informative

      China's already started dumping its T-bills. Strangely, this doesn't seem to be getting a lot of play in the media...I wonder why?

      Times of India

      Reuters

      --
      Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
  2. They are anti-American... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Anyone who has experienced being in a class with any large number of Chinese students (that actually came from and lived in China, just to be clear) will tell you that many of them are deeply programmed to be anti-American. I used to read "USA sucks China rules" on the desks in the library all the time at SUNY Buffalo. I don't blame the students but it's true nonetheless.

  3. Yeah. So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seriously, so what? China is in a cold war with the west. Sadly, the west has not woke up to this. This is just one more of their approaches. And to be honest, it is SMART on their part. The west is working hard to avoid another cold war, but we are in it and losing it. If China was a democracy, then it would be different. However, you will note that all of the nations that are not full democracies are coming together, and they are winning.

  4. Re:Act Of War by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You do realize that by those standards of treating industrial/state espionage as an act of war you should also be including countries like france, germany, israel, russia, south africa and so on? Not to mention the dozens and dozens of countries the US regularly performs hostile intelligence operations on? So you're really hoping for WWIII? Welcome to the real world, kid.

  5. The most awesome vocational school in the world by lobsterturd · · Score: 5, Informative

    Shanghai Jiaotong University? Fair enough. But also see Roland Soong's translations about the vocational school.

  6. Re:Act Of War by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I would like to know what the U.S. contingency plan is for war with China. Look at almost any product in the U.S. today, and it is from China. If we declare war with them, do we suddenly have no more imported goods? This is not a scenario that I like to ponder.

  7. this attack finally convinced me by antifoidulus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    to go ABC with my buying habits, ie Anything But China. I refuse unless absolutely necessary to buy goods manufactured in China. They are obvious hellbent on telling the rest of the world what they are allowed to do(such as meet with the Dalai Lama), not to mention they have the most hypocritical trade policy on the planet. Fuck them, fuck them all.

    It's not easy, but if you are vigilant you can find really good deals on stuff not made in China(which is pretty much all shit quality anyway). I've noticed that clothes made in Vietnam have much better quality than those made in China, ditto for electronics and Japan. I have a camera that is made in Japan and has lasted a long time despite being repeatedly abused. It was certainly worth the extra bit of money I paid over the Chinese made piece of shit I bought before. The last pair of shoes I bought that were made in China fell apart in a couple of months, the US made ones I am wearing now are much durable. The list goes on. Boycott China.

    1. Re:this attack finally convinced me by DeltaQH · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But don't boycott Taiwan (Repuplic of China)

    2. Re:this attack finally convinced me by antifoidulus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Unlike China they actually make some decent quality stuff and are vehemently opposed to the mainland's expansionist policies for obvious reasons.

    3. Re:this attack finally convinced me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      it is when a puppy licks you, you lick it back, then it licks you again.
      vicious

    4. Re:this attack finally convinced me by CalcuttaWala · · Score: 3, Interesting

      i would strongly support the view that Chinese merchandise is really third class stuff. india too is flooded with all kinds of really dirt cheap stuff -- buckets, torches and a million other household goods -- the quality is astonishly bad. really wonder why people cannot make a simple and rational choice.

      --
      Insight into much, Influence over nothing !
  8. Jiaotong university topped the ACM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Four Chinese teams and four Russian teams dominated the top 10 rankings of the 2010 ACM International Collegiate Programming Contest (ACM ICPC). Shanghai Jiaotong University took first place followed by Moscow State University in second place, and National Taiwan University in third place. "

    From http://www.acm.org/press-room/news-releases/2010/icpc-2010

    No wonder why they are so good.

  9. Then boycott Apple, Dell, HP, Seagate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    and other american companies. Buy Nokia, Fujitsu.

  10. The racist 1940s by commodore64_love · · Score: 3, Insightful

    >>>"Beware of the yellow peril! Be a patriotic American ...!"

    +1 funny. (dark humor)

    People who admire FDR always forget this part of his presidency, where he locked-up American citizens and deprived them of their rights to property, trial by jury, free speech, and so on. Why? Simply because these Americans looked like asians. - In many respects FDR was our worst president. I know that's an unpopular view, nevertheless that's what I think.

    I hope IF we have another war with the Asian continent (i.e. China) that we do a better job of obeying the Constitution instead of ignoring it.

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    1. Re:The racist 1940s by littlewink · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Chinese immigrants to the USA are far less patriotic (to the USA) than were Japanese immigrants to the USA during WWII. In fact, somewhere between one-third and one-half of Chinese immigrants are already spying/aiding for the Chinese mainland in some way. Ask any sample of Chinese immigrants to the USA about where their loyalties lie. At the very best they are ambivalent.

      In a war with China the USA would have serious problems with its internal Chinese population. The lessons of the unjust Japanese imprisonment in WWII would not apply. We would be forced to imprison the Chinese. That would not be a racist act but a reasonable and necessary one.

      You have made the mistake of comparing two situations that appear to be similar but that are in fact quite different.

    2. Re:The racist 1940s by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I hope IF we have another war with the Asian continent (i.e. China) that we do a better job of obeying the Constitution instead of ignoring it.

      You mean as well as the constitution is upheld in the war already being waged on the Asian continent, in respect of imprisoning people the US deem "terrorists"? Most likely we're going to see more loopholes used, akin to "if it's not on US soil, it doesn't matter to the Constitution...".

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:The racist 1940s by Mashiki · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're saying this like this was a bad thing. We did the same thing in Canada. As a 1st generation descendant of German/Japanese parents let me just say. Given the opportunity at the time, plenty would have been happy to follow the orders of the fatherland and/or the god-emperor to do whatever it takes to kill you from within.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    4. Re:The racist 1940s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What are you talking about? Everyone knows that whites can't be the victims of racism. Their vast majority of 1.5 billion people (out of 6.7 billion) clearly makes them responsible for all racism and racist behavior.

    5. Re:The racist 1940s by flyneye · · Score: 2, Interesting

      We've had most of our dark days and loss of freedom from Wilson onward.
      Every president has had a way of pissing off a percentage of the population, but from Wilson onward we lost more freedom than we gained.
      Minorities and women not part of the statement, as this is just good sense and necessary to our evolution.

      Over time and circumstances, its been Asians jailed, Negroes jailed, Communists jailed,Hippies jailed, Tax protesters jailed, Marijuana smokers jailed and others who just didn't fit the bill. Race is no barrier to being an enemy of the socialist state.

      One could say Lincoln was the beginning of the shitstorm. The civil war wasn't mainly about slavery as suggested by safe state sponsored school books, it was about money and states rights. Of course Negroes fell under the money/property heading, but it is wrong to highlight this as the main cause merely to obscure the Fed scrambling for power. Lincoln wasn't particularly non racist, but that is another matter.
      Both sides had massive P.O.W. camps for those disagreeable with policy on either side of the Mason/Dixon line.

                If we stay constitutional about our wars, we will just defend our borders, keep our financial interests within, and quit policing the world.
      We have a lot of ways we've developed over time to do away with in order to start over again. In the interest of my grandchildren to come, I'm all for trashing a lot of legislation, foreign policy and business practices and weather the storm in order to achieve repair. Anyone who is not is part of the problem and should seek other borders to live within where their desires can be met. I value freedom over safety or convenience, if that is flamebait to anyone, so be it. We all know the old saying, and what they deserve.
              Personally, if my car has been modified to run faster but wear out sooner, I'd take off the mods and go with factory parts originally engineered to last. Even if it meant the car would be out of service for a while.

                As for our national debt, just hand over those , still alive, who have legislated it so ,to work it off. Not part of our original plan and therefore not valid. Note that states rights don't apply to D.C. and other federal holdings, this means constitutional rights. Don't believe me? Just ask any tax protester dragged into court, denied bail and whisked around the country on federal properties while his lawyers tried to locate him.

                    It's a sick sad government and we are the worse off for it in spite of the lies taught in school. It's easy to blow me off as nuts instead of trying to see my points of view. But ask yourself this, isn't even a broken clock right, twice a day?

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    6. Re:The racist 1940s by theaveng · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "To consider the justices as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions is a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy."

      "Our justices are as honest as other men and not more so. They have with others the same passions for party, for power, and the privilege of their corps. Their maxim is boni judicis est ampliare jurisdictionem [good justice is broad jurisdiction], and their power the more dangerous as they are in office for life and not responsible, as the other functionaries are, to the elective control. The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with the corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots." Thomas Jefferson to William C. Jarvis, 1820. ME 15:277

      In other words - no the opinion of 9 unelected men does NOT supersede the Law. The Constitution rises above the U.S. government, and the justices are part of that government, therefore while their opinion may have been followed in 1944, as of today the Constitutional Law still reigns supreme over the justices. We are a Republic, not an Oligarchy of 9 old men.

      Also Remember: White/colored Segregation was upheld by the Supreme Court in through most of the 1800s and 1900s.
      They were wrong then too.

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    7. Re:The racist 1940s by indiechild · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm ethnic Chinese and was born in Vietnam, but the difference is that I grew up in Western countries, so I never had a chance to be brainwashed and indoctrinated by an oppressive dictatorship. With even teenagers from mainland China, it's already too late, they've been through the schools, they've only known one reality and one truth: China's. They'll come to your country, and they'll help steal military/industrial/trade secrets, they'll help harass and spy on dissidents, human rights activists, Tibetans, Uighurs etc. There are some courageous exceptions (dissidents), but for the most part, this is overwhelmingly true.

      This is basically what has been happening ever since Mao. The communists have destroyed a beautiful country and turned it into something truly ugly.

      So yes, I'm afraid what littlewink says is true. It's almost certain that China will go to war with the USA and Taiwan within the next 5-15 years. It's as inevitable as the next big stockmarket crash and double-dip recession, aka Great Depression.

      My loyalties do not lie with any one country (many would call me a traitor for saying this). I just want to do the right thing -- I'll answer to the truth, not to some arbitrary nationalistic or patriotic agenda. I'm in Australia, which is a close ally to the USA. Once war with China breaks out, I have no doubt that I'll be taunted and spat on in the streets, just like the Nisei were.

  11. That isn't the question at all by Colin+Smith · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The question is, who do you get to buy your debts?

     

    --
    Deleted
  12. Verbal diarrhea by Internalist · · Score: 3, Interesting

    according to several people with knowledge of the investigation who asked for anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the inquiry

    WTF is wrong with people that they can't shut up?? I see stuff like this all the time, and it boggles my mind that people on the inside are willing to discuss stuff that is likely to at least partially jeopardize the investigation under way. Surely it's not a profit-motive...I can't imagine journalists can pay very much for this kind of information...so what is it?

    --
    Research is what I'm doing when I don't know what I'm doing. -- Wernher von Braun
    1. Re:Verbal diarrhea by oldhack · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Psssssh. I'll let you in on this, but you gotta keep my name out of it, OK?

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    2. Re:Verbal diarrhea by tabdelgawad · · Score: 3, Informative

      This is not a leak. It's a standard way of releasing information to the public without having to make an official statement/accusation. And the New York Times doesn't pay for information, period. Don't you (and your moderators) read any newspapers?!

      --
      Imposing Libertarian views on everyone online since 1992.
  13. Re:Act Of War by Culture20 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Simple. You'll buy products from American corporations. Double benefit: on one hand, you rescue American companies out of the economic depression and on the other hand, you make Chinese companies lose.

    Where are the factories? Where are the means of production? Where are the steel mills? The U.S. has a lot of rebuilding to do.

  14. You going to boycott the US government? by Colin+Smith · · Score: 2, Informative

    Cos China owns trillions of US government bonds, which your income taxes pay for.

     

    --
    Deleted
  15. Problem with the US - Lazy trains by eternalelegy · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Lanxiang, in east China’s Shandong Province, is a huge vocational school that was established with military support and trains some computer scientists for the military.'"

    That's the problem with the US nowadays, our trains are always off hauling freight or mucking about with passengers while the Chinese trains are establishing huge vocational schools for CS students.

    Shameful.

  16. Re:Act Of War by Omestes · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Or, sweet Jesus, we can work on actually manufacturing our own crap again. Not that I think we ever would stoop that low. Yes, making our own crap would raise costs, but it also would create jobs which would mean more net money to buy crap. But then again someone would have to settle for mere millions (and the intangible of adding to the long term stability of the US) instead of billions and the joy of being able to play the fiddle while the US collapses into a third world nation.

    --
    A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey