Slashdot Mirror


Cell Phone Data Predicts Movement Patterns

azoblue writes "In a study published in Science, researchers examined customer location data culled from cellular service providers. By looking at how customers moved around, the authors of the study found that it may be possible to predict human movement patterns and location up to 93 percent of the time."

19 of 93 comments (clear)

  1. Traffic lights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hopefully they find a way to program those (!@#) traffic lights a little better with this!

    1. Re:Traffic lights by FlyingBishop · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They aren't programmed to get you where you're going quickly. They're programmed to slow you down so you don't run into someone (and no one runs into you.)

  2. Sleep and Work? by Dayze!Confused · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Seeing how 66.67% of the time I am either sleeping at home or at work it shouldn't be too hard to fill the other 27% with commute/grocery shopping.

    --
    "All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." [Thomas Jefferson]
    1. Re:Sleep and Work? by Cryacin · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'd never trust a statistic I didn't make up myself.

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    2. Re:Sleep and Work? by kerrbear · · Score: 3, Funny

      If they track my wife's phone, they'll notice she spends 93% of the time in her desk drawer. Why the heck do I pay for her phone when she never has it on her!?

    3. Re:Sleep and Work? by caffeinemessiah · · Score: 2, Informative

      Seeing how 66.67% of the time I am either sleeping at home or at work it shouldn't be too hard to fill the other 27% with commute/grocery shopping.

      You're not too far off. I worked at the research wing of a phone company, and I can tell you that "tracking" a person using a cell tower is pretty coarse, even in urban areas. Given that most people go to work on weekdays, I'd say that a lot of your "movement" could be predicted on this level by just predicting your average movement. Add in a weekday/weekend variation, and 93% is hardly surprising.

      This isn't even one of those "well duh, in RETROSPECT everything is obvious" studies -- anyone who has ever worked with CDR (mobile phone) data knows that this is pretty obvious even before running the experiments.

      And for the people who bring up the MIT Reality Mining experiment, keep in mind that they tracked about 100 *individuals*, all of whom were MIT students with pretty regular routines.

      --
      An old-timer with old-timey ideas.
    4. Re:Sleep and Work? by miggyb · · Score: 5, Funny

      Switch her to a pay as you go contract?

      I believe those are called "hookers." Oh wait, you meant the phone.

      --
      This signature serves no purpose other than to help you see which posts were made by me.
  3. Wow! by Beelzebud · · Score: 4, Funny

    Imagine that. If you study someone's daily routine you can "predict" where they will go. Call me shocked.

  4. Really a surprise? by Xgamer4 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is this really a surprise to anyone? I'd wager the day for the vast majority of people goes something like "wake up, work/school, home, sleep", with the removal of work on Saturdays and Sundays and the possible addition of church or something on Sundays. It's not really that hard to predict something that consistent.

  5. This was done last year by Kitkoan · · Score: 5, Informative

    While not to the exactness of this study, this has been done before in May 2009 ( http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/science/jan-june09/celldata_05-15.html ). From the article:

    analyzed six months of anonymous cell phone records from more than 100,000 people in a European country, obtained from a European cell phone provider. Those cell phone records gave an approximation of each person's location at the time of each call, because cell phone calls are routed through the nearest cell tower. He and his colleagues found that people tend not to stray far -- almost three quarters of the people stayed mainly within about a 20-mile circle for the entire six months, and nearly half the people rarely strayed outside a six-mile circle. They also tended to go back and forth regularly between only a few locations, such as home and work.

    And another attempt on the same idea was done by MIT in July 2005 ( http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/07/25/1751234 ). Difference here was that the percentage was 85%. Not the 93% declared now. From the Wired article:

    Eagle's Reality Mining project logged 350,000 hours of data over nine months about the location, proximity, activity and communication of volunteers, and was quickly able to guess whether two people were friends or just co-workers.... Given enough data, Eagle's algorithms were able to predict what people -- especially professors and Media Lab employees -- would do next and be right up to 85 percent of the time.... Eagle used Bluetooth-enabled Nokia 6600 smartphones running custom programs that logged cell-tower information to record the phones' locations. Every five minutes, the phones also scanned the immediate vicinity for other participating phones. Using data gleaned from cell-phone towers and calling information, the system is able to predict, for example, whether someone will go out for the evening based on the volume of calls they made to friends.

    --
    Attention... all grammer nazi"s! Is they're anything; wrong with: my post,
    1. Re:This was done last year by trentblase · · Score: 3, Interesting

      More importantly, people tend to CALL from predictable places. As others have pointed out, most people spend the majority of their time at home and work. But on top of that, these studies only look at where calls are made, not where people actually are. So while I may spend a lot of time out and about on the weekends, I still make the majority of phone calls when I'm at home (not at the movie, shopping, gym, etc..)

    2. Re:This was done last year by Kitkoan · · Score: 4, Informative

      More importantly, people tend to CALL from predictable places. As others have pointed out, most people spend the majority of their time at home and work. But on top of that, these studies only look at where calls are made, not where people actually are. So while I may spend a lot of time out and about on the weekends, I still make the majority of phone calls when I'm at home (not at the movie, shopping, gym, etc..)

      The MIT test didn't work based on calls, it used a program that would run every 5 minutes to locate itself based on cell tower information (a low grade GPS). While the test also used calling information, it wasn't for the purpose of figuring out where someone on average would be. Calling information was used to predict whether someone would going out with friends, ect...

      --
      Attention... all grammer nazi"s! Is they're anything; wrong with: my post,
    3. Re:This was done last year by Bootle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's nice.

      The study picked 50k people who each average 2 or more calls per hour for a six month period and make at least one call for every hour of the week. That's a lot of calls.

      If anything, the main criticism should be that people who make that many calls are not a representative population...

  6. Uh huh... by spiffmastercow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So you're saying that analyzing movement patterns allows you to predict movement patterns. Would you like to guess the color of my red car?

    1. Re:Uh huh... by dgatwood · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, 85% of the time, it will be red. The rest of the time, it's sort of a rust color as we pull it out of the river because you were talking on the cell phone and missed the "bridge out" sign.

      Am I close?

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  7. The science of stalking! by mykos · · Score: 3, Funny

    BRB...this girl I used to date will be at Subway in five minutes. Time to casually bump into her.

  8. upper bound by dario_moreno · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This seems to be the upper bound of predictability by computers ; in other domains of artificial intelligence, such as automatic translation or speech recognition, automated statistical analysis from corpuses seems to perform better than manual encoding of rules, but ends up at maybe 90% efficiency. The rest is too random to be predicted, and it could be the part of poetry, art or intelligence in our lives.

    --
    Google passes Turing test : see my journal
  9. coverup getting desperat. by Cr0vv · · Score: 2, Funny

    More and more we see stories like this, if you can connect the dots. this is a NASA coverup for Planet X, pure and simple. Fireballs almost every day or at least reported on every week, fallin' out of the sky. it'll be happening more and more, then NASA will fall silent. They do not tell the truth of what's out there, if you don't believe this: your programmed. Crow.

  10. Non experimental physics by DrYak · · Score: 3, Funny

    Seeing how 66.67% of the time I am either sleeping at home or at work it shouldn't be too hard to fill the other 27% with commute/grocery shopping.

    I predict you're in a non-mathematical field, perhaps banking.

    I can also predict that he's not an experimental physicist and has no access to instant-teleport technology either. ...and he might also be a little bit slow when he walks between his house, work place, shop and car (or other vehicle he's using when commuting).

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]