Slashdot Mirror
New Zealand Legislature Mulls File-Sharing Bill
bitserf writes from New Zealand: "Our overlords in government have decided to try and push through some file-sharing legislation. In the bill remains the controversial provisions for three-strikes removal of internet access, though interestingly, nothing prohibiting users from moving to other ISPs. Text of the bill can be found here. Interesting timing, considering ACTA negotiations due to be held in Wellington in April."
Doesn't mean much when your choices are the local cable monopoly or the local telco monopoly. It just makes three strikes into six.
Game! - Where the stick is mightier than the sword!
Note that under this amended amendment a user's ISP access can only be cut off by court order. This is a far better process than was previously proposed.
lizardb0y
http://www.vintage8bit.com/
"They just said to hold it in my mouth, they never said they would pull the trigger!" -n00b
I wonder if there is going to be some sort of unbiased, uncorrupted, unidiotic government organism regulating this. I mean, if the Industry is going to have complete control of this, it'll mean cheaper and more effective way for organisms such as the RIAA to terrorize customers. They won't even need lawyers anymore!
Copyright = copywrong
Maybe someone should tell the politicians that merely visiting ANY website on the internet you will download copywritten material. And that doesn't even begin to deal with "file sharing" sites like Youtube.
When will we get politicians that actually have brains instead of them sitting on them all day long?
Take Nobody's Word For It.
I think it's just inevitable. The Net is going to get more regulation. It only wouldn't if somehow the cables themselves became peer-to-peer, with everyone's computer running self-routing mesh networking code and having cables and or optical or radio connections to all the neighbors.
Build your own energy sources from scratch. http://otherpower.com/
Maybe we'll see a return to lots of small company ISP's, which will start to become the place where the censored gather and organize their net connection and other things..
Build your own energy sources from scratch. http://otherpower.com/
The sad thing is, thats how the *internet was always supposed to be*. The internet "backbone" is made up of peered ASes*. What should happened on Good Earth over in the Good Universe was that the internet slowly grew but remained an internetwork at all levels, not degenerated into star topology ISPs vs. peon end user "customers". The whole concept of an "internet service provider" is the wrong model.
It's not too late! Network to thy neighbour!
* On the plus side, AS numbers are finally 32-bit now (RFC4896). On the minus side, how much hardware supports that yet? But if you're not a transit AS you're damn near nothing on the net.
What does NZ produce to make any of this worth while? It sounds to me like somebody has been offered a few "gifts" to get this policy where it is right now. Could I just make bogus claims that somebody had pirated something of mine and have them banned? What are the consiquences of a neighbour downloading something off your wireless AP? (assuming you only have WEP setup by the ISP when it was installed). In theory you should know after the first strike but what if you just changed your key not realising it is not enough. Or your AP doesnt support WPA, etc. What about business connections where a potentialy large group is sharing a single connection? And who exactly was behind this sudden interest in protecting what really is a majority of overseas owned copywrite? Is it this new IIPA that I've only just herd about?
The NZ Herald article is really confused about the law and it talks about a protest on Monday but I'm from the Creative Freedom Foundation (quoted in the NZ Herald article linked in the story) and as there is no protest planned. The original law that this replaced was a Guilt Upon Accusation-style law where unproven allegations of infringement could see people cut off the internet. We at the Creative Freedom Foundation (20,000 New Zealanders including 10,000 artists) protested against it. This new proposal is nothing like the original. It's a tribunal system where copyright law experts (such as people who helped set up Creative Commons NZ, and technology lawyers who are involved in DNS) will judge infringement. So people are innocent until proven guilty, and there are independent experts involved. The new extensions to New Zealand's Copyright Tribunal can only award fines, it can't kick people off the internet (that facility has been added to the courts, but court cases about copyright are rare in New Zealand). Personally I think the internet is an essential service that's only going to become more important in the coming years. We don't cut off people's power for copyright infringement, and we don't cut off phone lines or road access so the internet shouldn't be tampered with. It is however much better that it's in the courts and not in the tribunal because, in practice, it will be used rarely. The new branch of the Copyright Tribunal can award fines and the maximum they can award in the most extreme cases is $15k (US $10k) which is equal to that of New Zealand's Disputes Tribunal. Remember, this is a large scary figure for the infringement but this is the maximum and it's much less than the existing Copyright Act that New Zealand has. In practice it's still unclear how much the fine for infringement of a movie or a song will be. The new proposal doesn't seem to deal with open wireless access points that are provided as a public service in thousands of places in New Zealand (airports, municipal WiFi, libraries, etc.). It also isn't clear whether hacked computers are liable. I suspect not because there have been defenses where people who didn't authorise any infringement aren't liable (not just the recent Australian iiNet case, but NZ cases too). For the politicians involved doing nothing wasn't politically tenable and, so far, we generally support the new law's approach which is basically this new law is like a specialised court for copyright. Court cases can be flawed and certainly evidence can be maliciously faked, but that's the same of any court case. It does need more work around the areas I've mentioned above though and we'll be lobbying hard for that.
-Docvert converts MSWord to OpenDocument, clean HTML
Well we did most of the graphics for Avatar and all of the graphics for the Lord of the Rings movies. The copyright for those is, as I understand it, partly owned by New Zealanders.
We don't tend to have many successful international music artists though (Crowded House, The Datsuns etc. were a while ago now).
Oh yeah and the Flight of the Conchords doing computer songs.
No, you'd have to prove it in the tribunal or in a court.
It's unclear what happens to open wireless points under the new law. I suspect that people won't be responsible if they didn't authorise the infringement because there have been defenses like that before (not just the recent Australian iiNet case, but NZ cases too).
A good way of thinking about this is to consider the business to be an ISP itself that connects to an ISP. Basically the ISPs pass the buck down the chain until it reaches a customer, so the business would be expected to identify the individual who did it.
This does mean that there may be significant business compliance costs involved in recording who used a public IP address at a particular time. We've asked the government for estimates, and we're working with several groups to get independent estimates for this.
To a large degree it was probably the US and Japan via ACTA.
-Docvert converts MSWord to OpenDocument, clean HTML
& then put them back where they belong. then, clean up that big clump of plastic in the pacific. turn off those combustion engines, etc...
better to not leave a big mess. it may count for something.
as always, never a better time to consult with/trust in your creators. the lights are coming up all over all the time now.
What does NZ produce to make any of this worth while?
The Lord of the Rings trilogy, for one. I could name more, but if you haven't heard of that one, there wouldn't be any point. Whether *you* think that's an NZ production is irrelevant (since I'm anticipating such a complaint) but whether those that are in NZ consider it such is the only question that matters, as they are the ones making and living under this rule.
What are the consiquences of a neighbour downloading something off your wireless AP?
Considering how the only unlimited plans in NZ are so heavily throttled that you can't do anything over it other than browse web pages (and poorly at that), WPA is everywhere. I've pulled over in a nice neighborhood in the US suburbs and gotten multiple WAPs to choose from to pull down a map when I was lost. And that was "normal" there. In NZ, I've tried the same in multiple areas, and I've never seen an open WAP that didn't have a paywall. So, feel free to open your connection up. Your neighbors will latch on it so they don't hit their cap. When you get hit with $500 in overages, you'll reconsider your open WAP policy.
Learn to love Alaska
For the Kiwis, there's also the proposed software patents bill in New Zealand. It's set to be discussed again in, IIRC, March (the page that had the status is 404ing now - I should have mirrored it up). I'll go search for a new source to confirm the status and timeline and will update the wiki.
Please help publicise swpat.org - the software patents wiki
RFC4893...