Slashdot Mirror
US Military Surrenders To Social Media, Changes Access Restrictions
Thanks to a new policy by the Department of Defense, members of the US Military will now have limited access to social media sites. "According to the memorandum, members of military departments and all authorized users of the Non-classified Internet Protocol Router Network (NIPRNET) can now use the publicly accessible capabilities of various social networking and user-generated content sites, instant messaging, forums, and e-mail. This includes YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, MySpace, and others. Access to porn, gambling, or hate crime sites will remain restricted, however, and commanders can cut down on social media use if they feel the need to 'preserve operations security.'"
This is a security nightmare. We might as well just give out the root passwords now.
In a cave in Helmand. Hunting for the BL. Hope they don't have internet or they'll know we're coming.
WTF? The internet was MADE for porn, hate-crimes and gambling.
In fact, forget the blackjack.
I am a little offended it did make the list, it was around way before youtube and facebook.
Half of writing history is hiding the truth.
You do not talk about Fight Club on the Internet!
I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
I work at a government site. Sometimes, when I'm researching a JavaScript problem, or CSS problem, or browser bug, or some other problem, I get blocked by the fact that someone's tech blog is on a "social network or personal site". Fortunately, the same blocking software lets me proceed by certifying that the access is work-related. The military should have that same freedom for unclassified work.
That is a little over dramatic.
Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
RT @FirstSarge: Anybody see where that last round came from?
via TweetDeck
RT @Grunt88: Second hut on the left.
via TweetDeck
RT @sexxysela: Hai gaize! Du U want 2 partay wit me???LOL!!11!!
via TweetDeck
RT @FirstSarge: Clear the line, ma'am, please? We're taking fire here.
via TweetDeck
If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
Oooooo, I'm hoping for some great Facebook pages from Seals and Marines killing dirtbag pirates and Taliban assholes.
I want to see pictures and video dammit!
Or ultimately, that shot that Seal took to knock off those pirates when the sea captain was taken hostage last year. To see that shot, on the seas - rolling and whatnot from hundreds of yards away would just be awesome! And to see Somali pirate brains splatter into the water would just be perfect!
Next, I would hope for a rogue Marine/Seal/Special forces team to go and grab Taliban assholes and just go off on an extermination spree - a la Waffen SS.
Yeah, I know, in my dreams.
I never understood the need to block things like porn for the military. You get a bunch of guys together for months on end in a highly stressful condition. Porn would be one excellent way for them to release some steam, but no, they're not allowed to do that. So what are they supposed to do ? Go out, shoot some guys and rape their GFs ?!? I mean is this all it's really about, some kind of control via stress and basic sexual drives like in most wars of the past ? If it was just for me I'd airdrop a billion netbooks full of porn with free satellite access over the middle east.
Non-Linux Penguins ?
I remember when I was serving in Iraq (Nov '05 to Nov '06) Facebook was just getting big. MySpace was all the rage. People would upload some pictures and videos. In our unit, we didn't really have a policy although our Operations NCO kept a handle on our accounts (he didn't have access to them, but would just check them from time to time to make sure we weren't posting anything that violated opsec). Also, if we maintained a blog we gave him the URL. I didn't think it was a big deal and I understood the rationale. You don't want to post anything online that can:
a) Be taken out of context by the media or others (or if you want to be cynical, anything that can put the military in a bad light).
b) Anything that violates opsec and puts the success of the mission or personnel at risk
Not all of us had access to the NIPR net. Most of us just went to the Internet Cafe (really, a small trailer with a satellite internet connection), the MWR (Morale Welfare and Recreation center), or pooled money to get internet access (2nd platoon pooled in money and set up a satellite dish and a modem, and then strung wires between the trailers). I'm not sure how effective this policy will be in these situations.
At the end of a drill weekend I'd usually be hanging out at the readiness NCO's office before I left and sometimes I'd forget I was using a military computer and try to log on to facebook only to see that it was blocked. Sometimes they blocked Gmail (but that seemed intermittent - I was able to get to it usually). Regarding the comment someone made earlier that the military should have a policy for requesting a site be unblocked, I believe it does. A buddy of mine works for the NGB's IT department (I forget the actual name) and he handles cases. It's very hard to get a site approved though unless you can demonstrate a legitimate use. It's not like writing code where you can find an example on some random dude's blog. The military has their own sites for resources, and anything you need to find can be looked up in a TM (Technical Manual) or an AR (Army Regulation), or DA PAM (Department of the Army Pamphlet), most of which are in digitized form.
Vivin Suresh Paliath
http://vivin.net
I like
Jokes about French military ineptitude may not be the end of trolls. They may be the beginning of the end of flamebait. They may even, in certain crcumstances, be the end of the beginning of offtopic.
But they sure as hell are not the end of the beginning of redundant.
Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
As an active duty military systems administrator posting from a ship at sea, I welcome this change.
Being underway for months at a time with a 164kbps satellite connection split amongst fifty computers for over a hundred crew is rough enough on morale. Being able to see pictures of their wives and kids makes all the difference in the world.
Foolish people doing foolish things are always going to be the problem, not the engineering officer whose hooked on Farmville after the workday ends.
So long as it doesn't disrupt their effectiveness at work, I very much support this change.
Thanks, I'll be here...forever.
That online access to manuals may save trees, but a computer makes a lousy pillow compared to a FM 12-6.
Orwell: "In a Time of Universal Deceit, telling the Truth is a Revolutionary Act"
When I was deployed to Iraq in '03 to early '05, I had to give up my IT job and go be a grunt for 18 months, and because I didn't have a MOS to prove my skills do some domineering douche E-6 admin, I got to convoy and do escort security. Being the convoy guy, you had access to the motor pool, so I'd get in a humvee once in awhile and do some war-driving on base with what little techie equipment I brought with me just for my own amusement. What amazed me what not only my findings themselves, but news that our officers in our unit would make the commo guys hook 802.11b/g routers up to NIPRnet (unsecured, mind you) so they could have free-range internet in their tents while the rest of us sucked it up in line for hours to get 5 minutes to write an e-mail and have some troll look over my shoulder to make sure I wasn't typing and "sensitive position information" in my e-mail (as if the Iraqi's don't know where all our bases is anyway! Isn't that why I got motor attacked twice a week?).
The point I'm trying to make is OPSEC in the military is a illusion and a joke and operate under the phrase "Do as I say, not as I do". The highest official is going to thrust down on the enlisted and preach being operationally secure, but it's the same guy who wanted NIRPnet broadcasted over an unsecure wifi router for 'convenience'.
that these rules serve to protect very sensitive information. It's not like protecting my personal photo album or someone sending annoying emails from my Facebook account to my address book ...
Social engineers can and will take advantage of the "human factor" within military networks if left to their own devices (i.e., social media retards). Listen, I was in the Marine Corps and although I loved my brothers in arms, not all of them were the brightest bulbs on the string.
Limited access with layers of approval is probably an appropriate model. However, when and where they feel it is necessary, the military should feel free to completely block without all the grief and criticism.
L'esperienza de questa dolce vita (The experience of this sweet life) - Dante Alighieri, The Divine Comedy
I work in a mission critical (yeah, not really so much, it's weather) field on an Army post. The network is already pretty much unusable during the 7am, noon, and 3pm rushes without youtube.
Luckily being associated with spoiled chil.. pilots we have a non-government cable drop in the office.
Great. I can hop on Facebook and chatter away with the world, but I still can't load Gmail to email my wife.
Fucking brilliant.
Did the military surrender to social media? Or did the social media sites surrender to the US military?
Who needs security or PPL doing their jobs when you can tend to your farms and advance the cause of your favorite crime families on Facebook?
Its all fun and games until a notebook or pc is turned into a remote listening device and records a classified conversation.
Likewise, there are at least one legitimate reason for allowing access to pr0n.
I sense a disturbance in the Force. As if thousands of military sung:
The Internet is for Porn!
How long will it be before the first tweet is posted with GPS co-ordinates that give away an important location or mission?
Forget the "rob my house" Twitter app, now the 'bad guys' can set up a "where are they attacking from" Twitter app!