Slashdot Mirror


How Artificial Intelligence Is Changing Music

mbone writes "Ever wonder how Jimi Hendrix would cover Lady Gaga? Whether you do or not [I'm guessing not], you may be about to find out. Writing for Wired, Eliot Van Buskirk describes North Carolina's Zenph Sound Innovations, which takes existing recordings of musicians (deceased, for now) and models their 'musical personalities' to create new recordings, apparently to critical acclaim (PDF). The company has raised $10.7 million in funding to pursue their business plan, and hopes to branch out into, among other things, software that would let musicians jam with virtual versions of famous musicians. This work unites music with the very similar trend going on in the movies — Tron 2.0, for example, will clone the young Jeff Bridges. If this goes on, will the major labels and studios actually need musicians and actors? In the future, it could be harder to make money playing guitar with all of the competition from dead or retired artists."

8 of 261 comments (clear)

  1. It's a shame, but I'm ok with it by iPhr0stByt3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's too bad if artists can't turn their compositions into money; but at the same time, a true artist doesn't need compensation - he/she does it for the sake of art, no? What do you think?

    1. Re:It's a shame, but I'm ok with it by jason.sweet · · Score: 5, Insightful

      a true artist doesn't need compensation

      Not until his mom kicks him out the basement and he has to pay for his own room and board.

  2. A Novelty At Best by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I'm betting these models have parameters selected by the researchers. For instance, the Rachmaninoff plays Rachmaninoff sample would probably be coded to parametize the delay between notes in order to capture the similar pacings he put in other recordings. The loudness parameterized to implement similar crescendos, sforzandos, decrescendos, etc. How would Rachmaninoff play a rallentando? No matter, just take all recordings of him playing it, statistically analyze the appropriate parameters and apply it to the synthesized notes in the piece. Those synthesized notes have come a long way in the same manner. They used to sound like pure wavelengths produced by an oscillator. Because they were. But analyze the beginning and end of piano notes struck at various force and held for various durations and you can synthesize it by analyzing the statistical aberations in the wavelengths.

    This will take you only so far, however, and for each artist parametized and 'reproduced' will require as much analysis and attention to detail on the researcher's part than had that researcher picked up their own instrument and created new music. The science will, effectively, become an art. Did it matter that Rachmaninoff's were freakishly large (sometimes looking as long as the keys themselves)? Will you be able to build the physics of those hands into your model and simulation?

    In the future, it could be harder to make money playing guitar with all of the competition from dead or retired artists.

    Oh, how humorously short sighted a statement that is. And I don't mean that as a Luddite, I mean that as a fan of the evolution of music. How would early David Bowie's growth to late David Bowie be modeled and reproduced? You'll hear guitar in both those songs. Good luck on that parameterization producing anything but garbage!

    This will be a novelty and one I look forward to enjoying it as such. But nothing more. No more a replacement for music than grand pianos were replaced by early synthesizers. You might be able to convince me at some point it will suffice (like a live piano performance may employ an electric piano) but I dare say the parameters are far too many and far too complicated.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:A Novelty At Best by QRDeNameland · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Jimmy Hendrix was primarily a cover artist, [...]

      OK..first off..it's Jimi Hendrix...

      But "primarily a cover artist"...in what universe?

      Of his best known records:

      - "Are You Experienced?" - 17 tracks (between the US and UK releases), 16 written by Hendrix, 1 cover.

      - "Axis: Bold as Love" - 13 tracks, 12 written by Hendrix, 1 written by bassist Noel Redding, no covers.

      - "Electric Ladyland" - 16 tracks, 13 written by Hendrix, 1 written by bassist Noel Redding, 2 covers.

      - "Band of Gypsys" - 6 tracks, 4 written by Hendrix, 2 written by drummer Buddy Miles, no covers.

      - "The Cry of Love" - 10 tracks, all written by Hendrix.

      Sure...a few of his better known tracks were covers ("Hey Joe", "Wild Thing", "All Along The Watchtower"), but far more were his compositions ("Purple Haze","The WInd Cries Mary", "Foxey Lady", "Fire", "Manic Depression", "Little Wing","Voodoo Child (Slight Return)", "Crosstown Traffic") Hendrix's legacy is just as great for bring an accomplished songwriter as for being a virtuoso guitarist.

      --
      Momentarily, the need for the construction of new light will no longer exist.
  3. Why would Jimi cover Vai? by HornWumpus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    All Vai does is play classical scales really fast.

    Jimi wouldn't bother, his music had soul.

    Vai doesn't do anything that wasn't done much better well before Jimi's time.

    Jimi didn't make versions of Vivaldi ether.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  4. A true artist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Letme amend that then : A true artist doesn't need compensation AFTER HIS DEATH. Nobody actually does.

  5. Re:roll over, beethoven, by wealthychef · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm a musician, but I think this is awesome. Maybe now we can get past our bizarre obsession with entertainers and start focusing on curing cancer, getting nuclear fusion working, etc.

    --
    Currently hooked on AMP
  6. Re:roll over, beethoven, by Jurily · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think the whole celebrity-obsession thing is a direct result of society breaking up at a fundamental level. Just think about it: the way humanity evolved, you had at most 200 people in your village, everyone knew everyone, and you basically spent your life together, for better or worse. There was *always* someone in common you could talk about.

    Now, you're expected to move half a continent when you hit college, then move again when you find a job, rinse and repeat. What do you talk about with random strangers (now over 90% of all your social interactions)?