Why PyCon 2010's Conference Wi-Fi Didn't Melt Down
jafo writes "There's been a lot of teeth gnashing going on recently about broken wireless at conferences. We just wrapped up PyCon 2010, with around 600 (out of 1,000) attendees simultaneously accessing the volunteer-run network, and response has been fairly positive. 2.4GHz (802.11b/g) continues to be problematic, but most users were on 5.2GHz (using 802.11n) and associating at 130mbps, with a 100mbps link to the net (though after the fact we found that 35mbps would have sufficed). My PyCon 2010 wrap-up reveals all the secrets of how we did it, including pretty bandwidth and user graphs."
Editors, please do your job before you accept a story - that's an easy way to make Slashdot much better. In this particular story, it would have been easy - no research required. As I'm sure almost everyone here knows, m != M. Also, what is wrong with "b/s" instead of "bps"? (Also, how do I write non-ASCII characters here?)
Swedish plasma phys. PhD student; MSc EE; knows maths, programming, electronics; finance interest; seeks opportunities
FTFA:
Crimping your own RJ45 should be avoided
Author should have said "testing should NOT be avoided".
I hate it when people say such things. A cable tester costs $15 and you neglected testing. Don't say "crimping your own RJ45 should be avoided". That's blaming someone else for your idiocy.
8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
probably picks up a pay-as-you-go at the airport of whatever nation he happens to visit.
comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
Saves the worry, AND saves the fingers. Mine start cramping at about the 25th end when I'm in a hurry.
I can't believe that they seriously planned to crimp things by hand. I can understand for the occasional single long haul runs, but they made it sound like they were doing many dozens of crimps, and that's just plain silly. The money you save in not paying for molded cables you lose in time and hassle created by bad crimps.
Did you catch the other hilarious minor detail? they only had one crimping tool! That's how to turn fail into epic fail. And they PLANNED it this way... wow.
I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
If he's so great why did you try to replace him?
Actually knowing a bit about jafo and the setup at PyCon, I can tell you exactly what's wrong with your idea: money.
The IEEE/ACM SuperComputing trade show's network (SCinet) does exactly what you say. They also have 10,000 attendees, over 50 people working on the network, a decent budget, and a ton of donated gear and bandwidth.
PyCon (and jafo) don't have $100k to spend on the network. That means that you have to make do with low-cost commodity hardware. The fact that the network can stay up and deliver acceptable quality of service is a testament to jafo's experience.
Building a conference wireless network that works when you buy gear designed for that purpose isn't particularly notable.
Building a conference wireless network that fails miserably with consumer-level gear isn't particularly notable.
Building a conference wireless network that works with consumer-level gear on a shoestring budget *is* notable.