Slashdot Mirror


Venezuela Bans Hostile Videogames and Toys

An anonymous reader writes "In an effort to 'help improve child education and prevent misconduct,' the Venezuelan government began enforcing a law on March 3rd banning war videogames and toys, imposing a fine and 2.5 years in prison on the production, distribution, sale, hiring and use of video games and toys inciting violent behavior. Alberto Federico Ravell, former director of opposing news network Globovision, has already come on twitter denouncing the authorities for seizing imported Gameboy, Wii and PlayStation 3 consoles, due to considering them violent."

4 of 335 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Story at 11 by h4rr4r · · Score: 0, Troll

    Citations?
    Try to avoid any crackpot sites like foxnews.

  2. Re:hugo... by jav1231 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Barrack O'Chavez? :p

  3. War play is a racket... by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 0, Troll

    It's been said by Major General Smedly Butler that War is a Racket:
    http://www.lexrex.com/enlightened/articles/warisaracket.htm

    Well, another racket is the unhealthy alliance between toymakers and media makers, a racket that started with deregulation of children's media under the "family values" Reagan Administration. That racket has destroyed big chunks of healthy childhood for many young boys:
    "The War Play Dilemma: What Every Parent And Teacher Needs to Know"
    http://www.amazon.com/War-Play-Dilemma-Childhood-Education/dp/080774638X

    One of the authors of that book suggests a similar unhealthy alliance has make a lot of money harming young girls as a racket, too:
    "So Sexy So Soon: The New Sexualized Childhood and What Parents Can Do to Protect Their Kids"
    http://www.amazon.com/So-Sexy-Soon-Sexualized-Childhood/dp/0345505077

    Also, an indirectly related book from the time just before the first September 11th (in Chile in 1973):
    "How to Read Donald Duck: Imperialist Ideology in the Disney Comic"
    http://www.amazon.com/How-Read-Donald-Duck-Imperialist/dp/0884770230

    With that said, I don't think banning is the answer. Money poured into alternatives and discussion is probably a better solution. Alfie Kohn's work is a good start for such discussion (beyond the above books):
    "No Contest: The Case Against Competition"
    http://www.share-international.org/archives/cooperation/co_nocontest.htm
    http://www.amazon.com/No-Contest-Case-Against-Competition/dp/0395631254
    "Contending that competition in all areas -- school, family, sports and business -- is destructive, and that success so achieved is at the expense of another's failure, Kohn, a correspondent for USA Today, advocates a restructuring of our institutions to replace competition with cooperation. He persuasively demonstrates how the ingrained American myth that competition is the only normal and desirable way of life -- from Little Leagues to the presidency -- is counterproductive, personally and for the national economy, and how psychologically it poisons relationships, fosters anxiety and takes the fun out of work and play. He charges that competition is a learned phenomenon and denies that it builds character and self-esteem. Kohn's measures to encourage cooperation in lieu of competition include promoting noncompetitive games, eliminating scholastic grades and substitution of mutual security for national security."

    Another related book to understand how it all went so wrong:
    "Supernormal Stimuli: How Primal Urges Overran Their Evolutionary Purpose"
    http://www.amazon.com/Supernormal-Stimuli-Overran-Evolutionary-Purpose/dp/039306848X

    Also, curing vitamin D deficiency that people get from staying indoors too much playing games or even just reading is probably more important:
    http://www.vitamindcouncil.org/treatment.shtml

    Also, kids need to learn the irony that in a world full of fancy computers and advanced manufacturing (like depicted in many such violent games), fighting over land or oil is just ironically stupid, instead of using that technology to make the world work for everyone. The unrecognized irony is more deadly than those games.

    --
    A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
    1. Re:War play is a racket... by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 0, Troll

      To turn that around, advanced technology, sir, is walking a line dangerously close to communism! :-)

      That's because we are seeing the value of most human labor slowly plummeting to zero (one reason why no one can afford health insurance anymore except the doctors and medical equipment manufacturer owners. :-) See:
      http://marshallbrain.com/robotic-freedom.htm
      http://www.marshallbrain.com/manna1.htm

      So, as Marshall Brain suggests, the end point of capitalism is the starvation of all people who do not have a lot of capital (because, when their labor is worthless, they will not be able to pay for food, clothes, rent, medical costs, etc.). Everything from milking cows to doing genetic research is being automated:
      "VMS robotic milking"
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aPqWpOxQmIs
      "Robot Scientist Makes Discovery"
      http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2009/04/02/robot-scientist.html

      Robots are making the leap from less coordinated than humans to more coordinated than humans:
      "High-Speed Robot Hand Demonstrates Dexterity and Skillful Manipulation"
      http://www.hizook.com/blog/2009/08/03/high-speed-robot-hand-demonstrates-dexterity-and-skillful-manipulation

      More links to robot videos here:
      http://listcultures.org/pipermail/p2presearch_listcultures.org/2009-November/005926.html

      The thing is, "ownership" is ultimately a political construction:
      "The Mythology of Wealth"
      http://www.conceptualguerilla.com/?q=node/402

      Propped up by millionaire wannabees and slightly privileged guards:
      "The Wrath of the Millionaire Wannabe's"
      http://www.conceptualguerilla.com/?q=node/47
      "The Coming Revolt of the Guards"
      http://www.historyisaweapon.com/defcon1/zinncomrev24.html

      Are you a billionaire? Otherwise, by capitalist standards, if your work can eventually be automated, your life will then be worthless in their eyes, and you should then logically starve once everything you can do of value to billionaires has been automated. And don't say you'll just get another job, because as Marshall Brain suggests, that one will be automated too once we pass some critical thresholds in AI and robotics. That's like saying you will hide under a tree to stay dry in a rainstorm and when that tree gets wet through you will go find another.

      The only question is, do we put in place social reforms now, or do we wait until even more people are starving? Well, there's an obvious answer to that in a capitalist society, and as American financier Jay Gould said after hiring strikebreakers, it is "I can hire one-half of the working class to kill the other half."
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wage_slavery

      So, ideally, we need to find alternatives to a society build around a conception of work:
      http://www.whywork.org/rethinking/whywork/abolition.html

      The real reason why violent (and other) games are evil in a way is just that they are a distraction from dealing with that very serious issue of rethinking our society on some better ba

      --
      A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.