Slashdot Mirror


New Heat-Reduced Magnetic Solder Could Revolutionize Chip Design

A new heat-reduced soldering technique using magnets may lead to some revolutionary changes in the way chips are manufactured. Details are scant since the inventor seems to be playing it close to the vest for now in hopes of attracting chipmaker interest. "The result is a tin-silver alloy that contains a dispersion of iron particles tens of micrometers in diameter. When a magnetic field is applied to the solders, two things happen. First, the iron particles heat up, locally melting the solder. This localized heating, which works on the same principle as inductive stoves, remains completely contained, keeping the surrounding area cool. And second, the iron particles line up with the direction of the magnetic field, squeezing and pushing the liquid in that direction. This alignment is retained when the solder solidifies, and the well-ordered particles provide mechanical reinforcement that's greater than that afforded by a regular dispersion of particles."

27 of 103 comments (clear)

  1. What about the RF characteristics? by jcr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How much iron are we talking about? Is this tantamount to having ferrite beads on all connections now?

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:What about the RF characteristics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      How much iron are we talking about? Is this tantalum to having ferrite beads on all connections now?

      -jcr

      re-engineered that for you.

    2. Re:What about the RF characteristics? by drerwk · · Score: 2, Informative

      No. First, iron and ferrite are not always the same thing, so it might just be iron in the solder. Second, the geometry matters, and the spheres are not beads.

    3. Re:What about the RF characteristics? by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't think the particles are spheres. The article says tens of microns in diameter, but also says the particles align to the magnetic field and never mentions spheres. I would guess the particles are cylindrical. Also pure iron has a permeability comparable to some ferrites.

    4. Re:What about the RF characteristics? by macraig · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's not a diversion, you're cementing the point and expressing solidarity.

  2. the real question by jollyreaper · · Score: 2, Funny

    Will Microsoft install a magnetic field generator in the next Xbox to ensure the solder fails there, too?

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  3. Accidental reflow? by pavon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    From the article:

    A new type of solder can be melted and shaped in three dimensions under the force of a weak magnetic field

    How weak are we talking about here? I wouldn't want my chips to become desoldered just because they were exposed to an electromagnetic field. The article didn't mention any thing about that.

    1. Re:Accidental reflow? by moteyalpha · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What about -intentional- reflow. It would be useless for Mil Spec certainly and I would guess that war walking could take on a new level of meaning. It would be interesting if they used multipurpose dies that could be connected and recycled to a new configuration. Oh yes, liquid metal terminator brains. Mmm brains.

    2. Re:Accidental reflow? by X0563511 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hmm. How would the solder bond to connections though? From what I'm getting from this, the solder (and just the solder) would heat up. Basically you'd get a blob of molten solder refusing to bond to anything because of surface tension?

      (100% guaranteed cold solder joints, basically)

      You could pre-tin the connections, but then wouldn't the solder just remelt (while the metal plating remains cold) and "ball" off?

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  4. iron, huh? by metamechanical · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The result is a tin-silver alloy that contains a dispersion of iron particles tens of micrometers in diameter.

    Not saying it can't work, as the above is light on precise chemistry, but in an alloy like this, you're bound to have atoms floating around... say, to the surface of the deposition... where it will oxidize. And something like OSP (which yes, wouldn't bond to SnAg) only lasts so long in storage... Don't we already have ENOUGH problems with solder joint oxidation? I look forward to seeing how this issue is addressed.

    --
    If I had a nickel for every time I had a nickel, I'd be richcursive!
    1. Re:iron, huh? by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 4, Funny

      (which yes, wouldn't bond to SnAg)

      With a chemical formula like that, how can it not bond?

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
  5. magnetic field? by Lord+Ender · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When a magnetic field is applied to the solders [they heat up]

    Not to be pedantic, but this is the Internet... They are applying magnetic flux to their solder, not just a magnetic field. A field doesn't impart any energy.

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    1. Re:magnetic field? by HalifaxRage · · Score: 2, Funny

      Will the PCB include a capacitor for this flux?

      --
      bomb the us up set someone
    2. Re:magnetic field? by metamechanical · · Score: 2, Informative

      When a magnetic field is applied to the solders [they heat up]

      Not to be pedantic, but this is the Internet... They are applying magnetic flux to their solder, not just a magnetic field. A field doesn't impart any energy.

      Perhaps true, but keep in mind that in the context of Solder, "Flux" has an entirely different meaning.

      --
      If I had a nickel for every time I had a nickel, I'd be richcursive!
    3. Re:magnetic field? by zippthorne · · Score: 2, Informative

      Neither does magnetic flux. Magnetic flux is a local property of the static field and not the same thing as EM flux. It was a good pun, though.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    4. Re:magnetic field? by TeknoHog · · Score: 2, Informative

      Magnetic flux is simply the area integral of magnetic field strength. You can't have one without the other. (For the pedantic, the integrand here is actually magnetic flux density, which is proportional to magnetic field strength.)

      However, for inductive heating you need a time-varying magnetic flux, which in this case is probably achieved by varying the field strength. The field can still be aligned on an axis, so the method works anyway.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    5. Re:magnetic field? by wizardforce · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can't apply a magnetic field to a material where a field didn't previously act without having the field intensity fluctuate (flux).

      --
      Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
  6. Re:Wait.... by metamechanical · · Score: 2, Informative

    This would work great for individual components, and you could leave final assembly in the realm of other soldering techniques.

    The only problem with that is that when you want to use two separate bonding techniques on a board, the cost and complexity skyrockets. This is why (or at least, one reason) this is traditionally avoided (the exception for that is reflow and wave soldering, which touch different component types... DIP vs. surface mount... even then though, the chemistries involved are frequently similar).

    Even if you could manufacture that on the cheap, how are you going to support it? Throw away whole boards instead of rework/repair them? Some boards might be cheap enough to just throw away... but if they're that cheap, you're probably not using a fancy pants soldering technique anyhow.

    --
    If I had a nickel for every time I had a nickel, I'd be richcursive!
  7. JB Weld by macraig · · Score: 4, Interesting

    JB Weld contains so much iron particulate in suspension that it responds to a magnetic field. If it weren't for the fact that the particles are so much larger and get drawn out of suspension and toward the magnet, it might be possible to speed-cure the stuff with this same trick.

    1. Re:JB Weld by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      If only there was some way to alternate the magnetic field...

      But that's crazy Star Trek talk

  8. Re:Wait.... by Carnildo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So it depends on their definition of relatively... Is that a household kitchen magnet (which would do little damage to most magnetic sensitive components once removed from the chip)? Or is it a 0.5T magnet (that's relatively weak compared to most MRI magnets and would likely saturate most magnetic sensitive components to the point of failure)?

    Once the solder melts, it should be possible to shape it using a refrigerator magnet -- molten solder simply doesn't have much viscosity or structural strength. You don't need to worry, though: melting it is done by inductive heating, which requires a strong time-varying magnetic field.

    --
    "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
  9. Seems to be based on core loss by grimsnaggle · · Score: 2, Informative

    Solder is already conductive, so the eddy current losses won't be localized in the iron particles. Further, copper traces are even more conductive.

    This must be based on the hysteresis losses in the iron B-H curves. That means he's probably got a very high frequency magnetic field generator that he's using to heat up the iron. Seems like a simple principle.

    That said, I still don't want iron filings in my solder!

  10. Isn't that how we make cold joints by MarcAuslander · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In soldering 101 I learned that if you put hot solder on cold metal, the solder doesn't really wet the joint, and you will get early or immediate failure of conductivity. You can even accidentally create a diode. So why will this work?

    1. Re:Isn't that how we make cold joints by mikael · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's for use with assembly line surface mount technology

      The boards are then conveyed into the reflow soldering oven. They first enter a pre-heat zone, where the temperature of the board and all the components is gradually, uniformly raised. The boards then enter a zone where the temperature is high enough to melt the solder particles in the solder paste, bonding the component leads to the pads on the circuit board. The surface tension of the molten solder helps keep the components in place, and if the solder pad geometries are correctly designed, surface tension automatically aligns the components on their pads. There are a number of techniques for reflowing solder. One is to use infrared lamps; this is called infrared reflow. Another is to use a hot gas convection. Another technology which is becoming popular again is special fluorocarbon liquids with high boiling points which use a method called vapor phase reflow. Due to environmental concerns, this method was falling out of favor until lead-free legislation was introduced which requires tighter controls on soldering. Currently, at the end of 2008, convection soldering is the most popular reflow technology using either standard air or nitrogen gas.

      The researchers are proposing to replace these methods with a high-frequency oscillating magnetic field that would heat the solder to melting point

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  11. No useful details in the article. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 3, Informative

    "When a magnetic field is applied to the solders, two things happen. First, the iron particles heat up, locally melting the solder. This localized heating, which works on the same principle as inductive stoves, remains completely contained, keeping the surrounding area cool."

    Quote from ScuttleMonkey, the Slashdot editor: "Details are scant..."

    Neither the Slashdot editor or the writer of the linked article understand the physics. Magnetic fields cause something to heat only if the field is rapidly changing. Then the magnetic field causes everything conductive to heat, including iron particles.

  12. "Magnetic sensitive components"? by DeadCatX2 · · Score: 4, Informative

    When you bring a magnet near a PC, the damage is done to magnetic recording media, not the chips. Silicon is not generally sensitive to magnetic fields. This guy has managed to put a video game controllers, keyboards, and mice inside an MRI bore. If those integrated circuits can work in a 3T magnetic field, I'm pretty sure it can survive this new magnetic assembly technique.

    --
    :(){ :|:& };:
    1. Re:"Magnetic sensitive components"? by DeadCatX2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're tellin' me! Two of the PCBs I designed use FPGAs, one of them a BGA package. It's quite the trade-off when choosing an oven profile that gets hot enough for long enough to melt the solder but not destroy the FPGA (stupid lead-free solder!). Lower temperatures would make our life a lot easier...

      --
      :(){ :|:& };: