Slashdot Mirror


Correcting Poor Typing Technique?

An anonymous reader writes "When beginning to use keyboards I did not pay much attention to touch typing technique. Instead, I eventually achieved decent rates by simply doing what felt natural to me. These days my qwerty typing speed is in the range of 90-110 WPM, probably more toward the lower end. While this isn't too shabby, I feel some awkwardness in my technique (such as not using my little and ring fingers when I really should). Has anyone been in a similar situation, wanted to fix it, and actually done so? What do you reckon is the best way to fix half-broken typing? Touch training sessions? Should I switch to Dvorak and pretty much learn typing from scratch, but properly this time?"

8 of 425 comments (clear)

  1. Dvorak by sys.stdout.write · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Should I switch to Dvorak

    No. Even if you gain speed on your keyboard, the ability not to suck on other people's laptops is totally worth the 20 WPM decrement or whatever.

  2. On the other hand... by Junta · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As someone who uses dvorak, it's a great deterrent to people who frequently need to borrow other keyboards for a moment...

    Not to mention the amusement of watching them type something, look confused, repeat a few times before they say something.

    In terms of speed, I don't know about that, but dvorak does leave me a bit more comfy as I leave the home row less.

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  3. 90-110 WPM is fast by xerent_sweden · · Score: 5, Informative

    90-110 words per minute is typing really fast. The standard length of a word is five letters and if you measured with that word length you really have nothing to worry about. I couldn't imagine anyone writing faster than that.

  4. Ditch typing and go voice by noidentity · · Score: 5, Funny

    Go voice, you won't regret it. Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all.

  5. If it works, it's correct by phantomfive · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Some years ago, I read a study by a woman who looked at the technique of several great pianists (eh, one keyboard's the same as another). She found there were some few things that they all played the exact same way. Her conclusion was that for these few things, they played the same way because there was only one way for the human hand to possibly do it. For the other things, their technique varied drastically. There was no uniformity at all in styles. Her conclusion was that if it works, it is correct.

    Thus in your case I suggest that if you feel your fingering method for typing is slowing you down, then try to figure out what exactly is slowing you down and see if you can speed it up. That will be easier than trying to use some arbitrary rules that may or may not make a difference.

    This is especially true when we are talking about arbitrary rules taught to beginners, where the teachers are often not experts, and the rules are often formulated to make it easier for beginners to learn, not to make you as fast as possible. Going back to the piano example, beginners are often taught to play with their wrists held high, fingers curved, playing on the finger tips. This is decent advice, but sometimes it's faster and more precise to play with your fingers straight and flat (Horowitz did this on fast black-note passages sometimes).

    Actually I can give a ton of examples where the 'rules' weren't necessarily the best, and the people became the greatest in their field by breaking those rules (appropriately), but I'll leave it at, "if it works for you, use it."

    --
    Qxe4
  6. If you're doing almost two words a second... by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    ... does technique really matter? I've had three kinds of experiences as far as typing.

    School
    Teacher: Here's a typing test.
    Me: OK. (Types.)
    Teacher: Your technique is absolutely horrible, you'll never be able to progress like that. If you're going to take typing you'll have to start in the beginner class and relearn from scratch.
    Me: No, thanks.

    Clerical job interview
    Interviewer: Here's a typing test.
    Me: OK. (Types.)
    Interviewer: 90 WPM, only one error. You pass.

    Technical job interview
    Interviewer: You've been using computers since the Commodore 64 days and remember DOS. Yeah, we're not going to bother with a typing test. I'm sure you're fine.

    My uncle was a journalist who typed with two fingers his entire career. His editor didn't care if he typed them by slamming his face on the keys, as long as the reports were on time and well-written.

    So, unless you need to do something for ergonomic reasons or just a mad fit of self-improvement, probably not worth it. Your ring finger will get over the neglect.:)

  7. Re:Why? by mrclisdue · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm a touch typist, and I can type 150wpm.

    Bear in mind that *everyone* greatly embellishes their wpm.

    No citation needed, just leave the room and ask a few people...then test them if you really feel it would be necessary.

    cheers,

  8. Re:Why? by Trahloc · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well he forgot to mention he also took woodshop. Didn't do as well there and left his pinkies on the table.

    --
    The Goal: A long simple life filled with many complex toys.