Slashdot Mirror


Energizer USB Battery Charger Software Infects PCs

swandives writes "Researchers at US-CERT have warned that software accompanying the Energizer DUO USB battery charger contains a Trojan that gives hackers total access to a Windows PC. The product was sold in the US, Latin America, Europe and Asia starting in 2007. Upon installation, the software creates the file 'Arucer.dll,' a Trojan that listens for commands on TCP port 7777. Upon receiving instructions, the Trojan can download and execute files, transmit files stolen from the PC, or tweak the Windows registry. Uninstalling the software disables the automatic execution of the Trojan. Users can also remove Arucer.dll from Windows' system32 directory and reboot the machine to disable the backdoor component."

37 of 260 comments (clear)

  1. Near Anagram for Duracell by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Funny

    Interesting that Arucer.dll is (aside from an extra 'r') an anagram for Energizer's competitor Duracell. Perhaps the authors of the software thought Duracell was spelled 'Durracell'? And perhaps they decided to pick an anagram of the competitor to make it look as though Duracell is behind this?

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Near Anagram for Duracell by Jazz-Masta · · Score: 4, Informative

      There have been reports of Arucer.dll utilizing 100% CPU as far back as mid 2007. It was originally included by Energizer and used to check that the device was indeed connected to the machine.

      They aren't sure how long dll has been infected, but all signs point to the entire time (back to May 2007). Considering how many forum posts have issues with the dll going back 2.5 years, you'd think someone would have figured it out long ago.

    2. Re:Near Anagram for Duracell by CaptnMArk · · Score: 4, Funny

      Duracell(r)

    3. Re:Near Anagram for Duracell by toastar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      you think the Term 'hacker' and the term 'criminal' are mutually exclusive?
        I know we spent a decade trying to show the world they are different,
      but even a technically skilled criminal can be a hacker.... he just has to wear a black hat while he does his deed.

    4. Re:Near Anagram for Duracell by causality · · Score: 3, Informative

      Since when has determining your processor utilization been considered basic competency? Get off you high horse.

      I think it's intellectually dishonest to mention processor utilization as though that were the only possible way. I notice this frequently, that people are often rather eager to excuse and defend incompetent users out of some misguided sympathy for them. Real compassion for them would mean teaching, explaining, and providing good references for their edification. It would not mean excusing their failures or sugarcoating their incompetence. Any literate adult can achieve competency with a computer, and most problems that make the network a worse place for everyone directly involve users who lack knowledge, so why the "get off your high horse" spite towards those who expect better?

      If anything, I think the "high horse" is the belief that users will always be ignorant, will always be victims of these security issues, and can never overcome them. It is not the belief that they can and should overcome them. That's especially evident to me when you have to (intentionally or otherwise) zero in on one particularly unlikely means of detection because you think ignoring other possibilities helps your case. This is known as confirmation bias, incidentally. In response, I'll give you a plausible scenario for which CPU utilization need not be measured.

      I'll give another scenario under which this could have been detected. Here, when I say "firewall", I refer to Komodo, ZoneAlarm, and other software firewalls that are commonly available for Windows and/or free of charge, and are installed on millions of machines.

      Running a firewall that could have alerted the user to suspicious/unprompted network activity is basic competency, right up there with running a virus scanner and an anti-spyware scanner. For Windows, these tools can be regarded as "maintainence", and anyone who operates a machine without correctly maintaining it (personally or by seeking help) cannot be rightly called competent. Now, basic competency may or may not correctly interpret that network activity, but that doesn't matter. It doesn't take computer expertise to say "hey, this firewall keeps asking me about things I don't understand and did not set up myself, so maybe I should get this computer looked at by a techie." At that point you're no longer talking about average users and whether they can achieve competency.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    5. Re:Near Anagram for Duracell by gparent · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Except you don't have to keep pumping money into CPU time. You just plug it in and it raises the power bill, which is normal because it's a computer.

    6. Re:Near Anagram for Duracell by Runaway1956 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Since about the time Windows came out with their Task Manager. Basic competency. Very basic. No one suggests that finding the executable, and disassembling it to find out what makes it tick is part of basic competency, but opening task manager to see which of your 97 active processes is using all of your computer time is indeed "basic".

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    7. Re:Near Anagram for Duracell by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 5, Funny

      The should all be charged with assaulting battery!

      -rimshot-

    8. Re:Near Anagram for Duracell by Bakkster · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A driver should be aware of their fuel economy, but it's more likely the job of a specialist to determine why the fuel economy has changed. Knowing if the difference is due to the air filter/oil filter/radiator/spark plug/exhaust/fuel filter, or any of the other parts which could cause this problem is generally left to someone knowledgeable. The end-user should only be expected to notice the issue and request help, which it seems many did by requesting assistance on the company forums.

      --
      Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
    9. Re:Near Anagram for Duracell by Khyber · · Score: 3, Funny

      What, you don't own a kill-a-watt so you can determine that? So much for being a geek!

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    10. Re:Near Anagram for Duracell by multisync · · Score: 5, Insightful

      you think the Term 'hacker' and the term 'criminal' are mutually exclusive?

      No, but neither are the terms "accountant" and "embezzler," or "journalist" and "liar," or "priest" and "pedophile."

      The problem with using the term "hacker" is as soon as you throw that term in to the conversation, it takes the spotlight off of the party that is actually responsible.

      So Sony puts a root kit on your machine that could allow "hackers" to get control of it, it's those damn "hackers" who are the problem, not Sony. Perhaps not the best example to give, since Sony was heavily criticized for their actions (at least on Slashdot); but how many times have we seen stories about public servants losing laptops full of unencrypted information reported as "hackers could be accessing your private information."

      The problem isn't some mythical "black hat" pounding furiously away at the keyboard as graphic images swirl around his head, it's that companies and government agencies are not taking due care with people private information, and frequently take liberties with their customers' property that would be considered criminal if it was your physical property they were abusing. Invoking the phrase "hacker" let's the real parties who are responsible off the hook.

      In this case, I would be interested in knowing why Energizer has no idea how this trojan got in to their charger in the first place, and whether it was truly the work of a nefarious black hat, or a misguided attempt by the company to keep tabs on how customers are using their product.

      Who knows, but as long as the focus is on "hackers" exploiting this trojan, rather than how it got bundled with the charger in the first place, it's unlikely we'll get the real story, or that the people who were really responsible will face any consequences.

      --
      I don't care why you're posting AC
    11. Re:Near Anagram for Duracell by Runaway1956 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Somewhere, above, in this conversation, someone already stated something to the effect "incompetent != stupid". People who can't find task manager may or may not be stupid, but they are definitely IN-FUCKING-COMPETENT!

      Further, it has already been stated that you do the incompetent no service, and no justice, by making excuses for them. You'll do them a greater service by pointing out that they are incompetent, then help them to become competent.

      Here, you are just running at the mouth, looking for a fight, when you don't even appear to understand what the fight is about.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  2. Software?! by dch24 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why does a USB-powered charger need software at all?

    It's called a DUO because it can plug into the wall or into a computer. So it works without a computer. To get the computer to jack up the USB power output from the default 100mA, the device could identify itself as a hub -- no software required.

    I get it that the software can monitor charging, report stuff, advertise... But how does Energizer feel now, with egg on their faces?

    1. Re:Software?! by Shakrai · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why does a USB-powered charger need software at all?

      The question is why does it need software that listens for commands from the mothership?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    2. Re:Software?! by DIplomatic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But how is Energizer supposed to let you know of amazing offers on things to buy without installing software???

    3. Re:Software?! by Captain+Spam · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I get it that the software can monitor charging, report stuff, advertise...

      I always wondered, with the sheer amount of portable devices which charge over USB nowdays, why not put some manner of standardized charge reporting into the specs of the next version of USB, so that we don't need to bother with nonsense like installing a new program or drivers for each device just to monitor its charging on the computer (or whatever charger), if we do want monitoring and such? That way, we could just tack a charge indicator onto whatever the OS or windowing system uses to track connected USB devices, instead of X amount of additional programs displaying it in any variety of mismatched ways.

      I mean, I'll grant that many devices just report their own charge on their own respective screens, so for things like phones or whatnot, it might not be that useful. Plus, my suggested scheme would quickly get shot down by companies like Energizer in this case when they realize revenue stream conduits^W^W^W customers wouldn't have a reason to install "special" drivers and programs loaded with ads...

      Oh, yeah. That IS why it wouldn't get adopted. Hrm.

      --
      Demanding constant attention will only lead to attention.
    4. Re:Software?! by magus_melchior · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Another commenter notes that the language code of the trojan is Chinese.

      I think that American businesses should strongly reconsider the merits of having their goods produced in a highly authoritarian state who is known to employ hackers.

      --
      "We are Microsoft. You shall be assimilated. Competition is futile."
    5. Re:Software?! by mat128 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Wrong. A device can only receive up to 100mA without asking for it (like a keyboard, mouse, etc.) The USB spec calls for a 500mA maximum. Many usb devices need more and use 2 ports (like external 2.5" hdds).

    6. Re:Software?! by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 3, Informative

      > I always wondered, with the sheer amount of portable devices which charge
      > over USB nowdays, why not put some manner of standardized charge reporting
      > into the specs of the next version of USB

      You'd be surprised how lax are the implementations to "standards". I've worked with both USB memory sticks for .mp3s and Bluetooth phones, and the code to handle them is a morass of special cases per manufacturer. Not including the version number differences. That's within the same interface version.

      Implement "just the spec" and be damned with any mfr. who doesn't work correctly, and suddenly you've lopped off 55% or more of the devices out there. Your client OEM won't be too happy.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  3. Interesting detail in the DLL: by carlhaagen · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Its language code is Chinese.

  4. This Trojan by retardpicnic · · Score: 5, Funny

    just keeps going....and going...and going....

    --
    sig loading.......
  5. Sometimes by xav_jones · · Score: 4, Funny

    No version for linux is a good thing.

  6. Re:A clean uninstaller? wow! by kurt555gs · · Score: 3, Funny

    I tried $sudo apt-get install arucer in Kubuntu, but the Trojan is not yet in the repository. Perhaps is should use $sudo dpkg and install it from the USB key it's self.

    I wonder if Wine will run this?

    --
    * Carthago Delenda Est *
  7. Told you so by Animats · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Some time back, when USB chargers started to appear at airports, I warned that this might happen. A public charging port is such an attractive attack vector.

    Of course, the real problem is Windows's "autorun". It was a truly awful idea to have Windows run any executable that appears on any removable device or medium. That went in (in Windows 95, I think) when CDs were only manufactured by major vendors, before home CD writers or USB storage devices. So it probably seemed "safe" at the time.

    Worse was making it very difficult to turn autorun off.

    1. Re:Told you so by Myopic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No no, it didn't seem safe at the time. Everyone who didn't have their head inside their kiester knew it was a gaping security hole.

      Golly, I wish some of those people worked at Microsoft.

  8. Purchasers should have known something was wrong by jlowery · · Score: 5, Funny

    if only because of the giant wooden Energizer Bunny on the packaging.

    --
    If you post it, they will read.
  9. USB? Software? On a BATTERY CHARGER? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 4, Funny

    What the... WHYY?

    My battery charger takes four batteries and goes into the power socket. That’s it.
    I don’t see why in the world a charged would need more than this.

    It’s like having a supercomputer to control a toaster. It makes no sense at all.
    In my eyes, those who bought that thing, deserve what they got.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  10. Re:A clean uninstaller? wow! by kseise · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ubuntu does not equal Linux. Come on man! You probably have to wait for it to be packaged upstream. Besides, a DLL is a LIBRARY file. You should be looking for lib-arucer or something similar like waffles, or whatever the developer felt like naming it. If that doesn't work, try x-arucer, or switch to Gentoo. I am sure they can get it.

    PS- Wine might run it, but you will probably need a patch. Try Cedega or Play-On-Linux, or qemu or dosbox.

  11. Outsourcing / QA / Negligence by grahamsaa · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Energizer obviously isn't the first company to be hit with this sort of embarrassment, and it's surprising to me how resistant some of these companies are to learning and adopting good QA and security practices.

    If corporations feel that they must outsource production of devices like these, they damn well better be prepared to do thorough in-house testing before they release malware to the public. I'll give them the benefit of the doubt that they were probably unaware of this trojan, but that makes them no less negligent.

    --
    Facts have a liberal bias.
    1. Re:Outsourcing / QA / Negligence by vlm · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You're assuming they didn't outsource engineering, QA, security, and testing.

      You have the olden days idea, that China only manufactures.

      I would not be surprised to learn Energizer-USA in 2010 is no more than an overpriced CEO and some marketing folks.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  12. Re:Purchasers should have known something was wron by dkleinsc · · Score: 4, Funny

    Not true. If it had been a giant wooden bunny, they'd have known that Lancelot, Galahad, and Bedevere had forgotten to get inside in the first place.

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  13. Just wait until... by mhajicek · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just wait until you plug it into your Toyota.

    1. Re:Just wait until... by ascari · · Score: 5, Funny

      Toyota: Just keeps going, and going, and going?

  14. An AutoStart Fix for Windows XP and W2K by NicknamesAreStupid · · Score: 4, Informative

    This little trick will disable all autoplay features, eg. CDs, USB-memories etc. Open the registry editor, regedt32.exe, and configure the following registry value:
    Hive: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE
    Key: SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\policies\Explorer
    Value Name: NoDriveTypeAutoRun
    Type: REG_DWORD
    Value: hex: 0x03fffffff

    1. Re:An AutoStart Fix for Windows XP and W2K by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's things like this that just go to show why windows will never be ready for the desktop.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
  15. Interesting... by clone53421 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It gives hex dumps of some of the commands. (Since some of them would obviously require arguments, they clearly can’t be full packets, but they’re signatures of each particular packet.)

    All of them follow this pattern:
    C2 E5 E5 E5 9E
    8 bytes that are different for each command
    C8
    4 bytes that vary
    C8 D1
    3 bytes that vary
    C8
    4 bytes that vary
    C8
    12 bytes that vary
    98 E5

    Graphing the sequences showed very obvious trends: Lots of values clustered in approximately the 155-170 range, and lots in the 200-220 range. Also, the 3-byte field that is different for every command has a different clustering pattern.

    XORing the patterns with 0-255 yielded the following at 229:
    '\0\0\0{98D958FC-D0A2-4f1c-B841-232AB357E7C8}\0
    '\0\0\0{F6C43E1A-1551-4000-A483-C361969AEC41}\0
    '\0\0\0{783EACBF-EF8B-498e-A059-F0B5BD12641E}\0
    '\0\0\0{EA7A2EB7-1E49-4d5f-B4D8-D6645B7440E3}\0
    '\0\0\0{E2AC5089-3820-43fe-8A4D-A7028FAD8C28}\0
    '\0\0\0{384EBE2C-F9EA-4f6b-94EF-C9D2DA58FD13}\0
    '\0\0\0{4F4F0D88-E715-4b1f-B311-61E530C2C8FC}\0

    Now, colour me surprised, but those look a damn awful lot like CLSIDs...

    VERY INTERESTING.

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  16. Detect it with Nmap by iago-vL · · Score: 3, Informative

    I spent the morning reverse engineering the Trojan and wrote an Nmap script to detect if a remote system is infected. Hope it helps out: http://www.skullsecurity.org/blog/?p=563.

    Ron