Slashdot Mirror


Scientology Tries To Block German Documentary

eldavojohn writes "The Guardian is reporting on the strained relationship that Scientology is having with the German government and the airing of a pesky documentary on Southwest Broadcasting. Until Nothing Remains, a $2.3 million documentary, is slotted to air on German television at the end of this month. It recounts the true story of Heiner von Rönn and his family's suffering when he tried to leave the Church of Scientology. A Scientology spokesperson called the film false and intolerant and also said they are investigating legal means to stop the film from being aired. More details on the film can be gleaned here."

24 of 565 comments (clear)

  1. A point to note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Germany doesn't know yet what Scientology is, a business, a religion or a cult. This may make up the courts' mind.

    From Wikipedia/Church of Scientology:

    In Germany, official views of Scientology are particularly skeptical. In Germany it is seen as a totalitarian anti-democratic organization and is under observation by national security organizations due, among other reasons, to suspicion of violating the human rights of its members granted by the German Constitution, including Hubbard's pessimistic views on democracy vis-à-vis psychiatry and other such features. In December 2007, Germany's interior ministers said that they considered the goals of Church of Scientology to be in conflict with the principles of the nation's constitution and would seek to ban the organization. The plans were quickly criticised as ill-advised. The plans to ban Scientology were finally dropped in November 2008, after preliminary investigations failed to unearth evidence of illegal or unconstitutional activity.

    The legal status of the Church of Scientology in Germany is still awaiting resolution; some courts have ruled that it is a business, others have affirmed its religious nature. The German government has affirmed that it does not consider the Church of Scientology to be a religious community.

    If any fellow Anonymous in Germany feel like telling the German government why they should not consider Scientology a religion, then please be my guest. Be clear, make yourself heard. "Ich bin Anonymous!"

    1. Re:A point to note by bloobloo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In Germany it is seen as a totalitarian anti-democratic organization

      If only somebody in Germany had the guts to say the same thing about Catholicism, or for that matter Islam.

      They did, 500 years ago, and it led to the Reformation.

    2. Re:A point to note by clarkkent09 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What ever happened to "live and let live"?

      No atheist is stopping religious people from living. Check the history of all major religions and you will find out that religious people quite often did stop atheists from living, and in quite imaginative ways too. I am just giving my opinion, feel free to give yours and stop playing the "hurt feelings" card you big baby.

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    3. Re:A point to note by clarkkent09 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Correction, millions were killed in his attempt to build a Communist society. Religion was an incidental thing in Communist ideology that barely gets a mention in the Communist Manifesto, except as one of the many things to get rid of as the new society is built. Orthodox Church in Russia was diminished by Stalin and many priests killed as part of a struggle for power between rival totalitarian ideologies. In other words, Stalin may have been an atheist but that doesn't mean he killed in the name of atheism. Big difference.

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    4. Re:A point to note by Hurricane78 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Germany doesn't know yet what Scientology is, a business, a religion or a cult.

      Same thing!! A cult is a business that makes money and gains power from people with a small schizophrenic delusion that partially detaches their inner model from reality. And a church is just a cult that’s officially accepted by the powers that be (e.g. Government). Which happens, as soon as they catch themselves enough politicians.

      Organizations like these are by definition immoral, since they exploit people who need help. And control their lives with nasty social engineering. There is no good about it...

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    5. Re:A point to note by KiloByte · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Communism and its variant Juche are 100% religions in everything but name. They have their rituals, clergy, scripture. They fight infidels and are highly proselytic. You have portraits of the Prophets everywhere. There are holy sites, and sometimes pilgrimages (like to Lenin's corpse). And I really can't notice a modicum of difference between 1st May processions we used to have in Poland and catholic Corpus Christi ones we have now.

      It's quite strange that Juche tends to be quite often named a religion, yet the Soviet and Chinese versions are not.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    6. Re:A point to note by ThaReetLad · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well you start by confiscating children of believers, in the name of preventing "brainwashing", move on to imprisoning believers for "anti-revolutionary activities", and then start killing millions. You might also set up state approved alternatives that gradually remove spiritual elements. You also mandate "atheism lessons" for all school children.

      It's what the USSR, PRC, and DPRK did.

      --
      You can't win Darth. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    7. Re:A point to note by dylan_- · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You could well be right. My point wasn't to suggest that somehow atheism was bound to result in mass murder, it was to say that a simplistic reading of history that condemns religion for the past, can also condemn...well, just about any group, including atheists.

      There seems to be little consideration that the religious abuses of the past were more political than anything else. Though they do emphasize why mixing religion and politics is such a terrible idea: politics corrupts religion ;-)

      --
      Igor Presnyakov stole my hat
    8. Re:A point to note by loutr · · Score: 5, Insightful

      My great-grand father was a pastor, my grand-mother and mother are protestants, but after going to sunday school and such I've become an atheist when I was a teen (for the reason you cite), and no one pressured me into reconsidering it. IMO the problem is the bigotry of the families you speak of, not that particular religion. BTW, there's "going through hell with your parents" and then there's "being harassed constantly and having your private life thoroughly investigated for dirty secrets to try and get you fired, jailed or institutionalized".

      Speaking of my great-grand father, he was the kindest, most selfless man I've ever known (hid jews during WW2, helped develop a small pacific island, ...). He most certainly never pressured his parishioners into giving him or his church money.

      Anyway, my point was that despite all the crooked priests and bigot followers, mainstream religions are much less greedy and evil than cults like scientology. For example, you can get the bible for free or at a very moderate cost, and without giving out any personal information. Same with the Qur'an. Try acquiring scientology "courses" for free or anonymously...

    9. Re:A point to note by gerrygerbil · · Score: 5, Informative

      To describe Catholicism as a "totalitarian anti-democratic organisation" and thereby making a direct comparison to Scientology is simply doing your own intelligence and critical thinking skills a disservice.

      Crap. I was brought up in the theocracy that was the Republic of Ireland, and "totalitarian" and "anti-democratic" are accurate adjectives. It's totalitarian because the Church sought to regulat every part of your life, including your thoughts ('thought crime' is a very familiar term to survivors of Catholicism like myself). It's anti-democratic because religion is, by its very nature, anti-democratic - scripture's scripture, and you have to follow it. The Catholic Church is run by an old man in an Italian city-state with a hierarchy of other old men who give orders and are completely unaccountable to their victims (sorry, 'parishioners'). Catholicism is far, far worse than Scientology, at least in Ireland were it's State-backed and obligatory, and its ordinances reach even unto non-believers (hence all the women who travel to the UK for abortions because the misogynist pricks that run the Church have banned it). At least you've a choice whether or not to be a Scientologist, and if you so choose then more bloody fool you.

      If you're a Catholic, no-one's going to try and make your life a living hell if you want to stop coming to church.

      That's complete bollox, that is. If you were a Catholic in Eire and you didn't come to Mass, the local priest would be calling at your door wanting to know why you weren't there, and he could and would give you serious grief if you didn't turn up next Sunday. You don't know what the fuck you're talking about. Pleasingly, the Church in Ireland is having done to it what it's done to all those kids over the decades: being fucked up the arse. The days when you'd have to bow and scrape to your local priest because he had an almost literal power of life and death over you are now over - now he's just a weirdo in a black dress who can't have sex like normal folk (and as a result is seriously fucked-up in the head).

  2. Re:Rights? by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Informative

    Let's take a look at the Grundgesetz...

    Grundgesetz, Artikel 5:

    (1) Everybody has the right to express and distribute his opinion in word, writing or picture, and also to inform himself from any public source. The freedom of press and the freedom of reporting through broadcasting and movies is assured. No censorship takes place.

    (2) These rights are limited only by the general laws for protection of the youth and protection of the personal honor.

    (3) Art and science, research and teaching are free. The freedom of teaching does not release from the faith to the constitution.

    (IANAL, but it beats Babelfish)

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  3. Re:Rights? by rvw · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Regardless, Scientology is prohibited in Germany; So I doubt they will have much of a case for the german courts.

    This is like the Streisand effect - it will only generate publicity. So thank you Scientology for making me aware of this documentary.

  4. Re:Rights? by ahaubold · · Score: 5, Insightful

    An organization as dangerous as Scientology must not be given a chance to prevent education. The are banned for a reason. I hope the courts will just laugh at them and send their lawyers home. And now i'd really like to see that movie.

    --
    Nope, I think you mistook me for someone else.
  5. Re:Rights? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Scientology is not prohibited in Germany. However, it failed to gain the status of a church and is considered a cult. Also it is being watched closely because it is considered "hostile to the constitution", IIRC.

  6. Re:Rights? by dziman · · Score: 5, Informative
    From the official translation: https://www.btg-bestellservice.de/pdf/80201000.pdf

    Article 5 [Freedom of expression, arts and sciences] (1) Every person shall have the right freely to express and disseminate his opinions in speech, writing and pictures, and to inform himself without hindrance from generally accessible sources. Freedom of the press and freedom of reporting by means of broadcasts and films shall be guaranteed. There shall be no censorship. (2) These rights shall find their limits in the provisions of general laws, in provisions for the protection of young persons, and in the right to personal honour. (3) Arts and sciences, research and teaching shall be free. The freedom of teaching shall not release any person from allegiance to the constitution.

  7. Re:Where can I find a copy? by icebraining · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You can't for now, but maybe XenuTV will be able to help when a digital copy is released.

  8. Re:Rights? by SerpentMage · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The problem here is that many public networks shy away from these documentaries BECAUSE of the clout of Scientology. However, ARD is supported by public euros and as such answers to nobody even the government. Many whine about having to pay a TV tax, but I gladly pay my monthly TV tax as it produces documentaries that ask hard hitting questions. Public networks would definitely not support it...

    I am a supporter of free markets and capitalism, but at times we need the government.

    --

    "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
    "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
  9. Re:Rights? by value_added · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is like the Streisand effect ...

    We're talking about Germany. I'd suggest "Hasselhoff Effect" instead.

  10. Re:Thank you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The Profit: http://torrents.thepiratebay.org/4092650/The_Profit_-_The_movie_Scientology_doesnt_want_you_to_see..4092650.TPB.torrent

  11. Re:Two words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Thats eleven words.

  12. Re:Rights? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Scientology is not banned. They have just been denied the legal status of a church, and they're closely watched for their antidemocratic behavior.

  13. Re:I've never met an evil Scientologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Scientology == Catholicism == Christianity"

    Every time there is any Internet forum discussion critical of Scientology this same meme pops up. It's not true. Elevating Scientology to the same status as established religions with thousands of years of history is an attempt BY SCIENTOLOGY to legitimize itself. Just look at how a discussion about Scientology and a "docudrama" about it spawned this sub-thread plus discussions of Atheism vs. Theism, Christianity's historical abuses of believers and non-believers, political power struggles of one dogma vs another, the current state of Islam, etc.

    Any other org is fair game so long as negative attention is diverted from Scientology.

    Keep your eye on the ball, folks.

  14. Re:Religious nuts destroyed live-and-let-live by mcgrew · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wish people would stop thinking of the "Christian right" as Christians, as they don't follow the teachings of Christ at all and in fact preach the opposite of what Christ taught.

    Christ was a rebel who was executed for heresy. Were he alive today rather than 2000 years ago, the "Christian Right" would crucify him again.

  15. Re:They are not that dangerous. by ilsaloving · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is only because Scientology was invented relatively recently. The level of critical thinking on new things is significantly better now than it was in the past (although it may not seem like it...). We also have much better record keeping practises, so it's easy to identify where Scientology came from, how it started, etc. That's why Scientology is having such a rough time of it. It's a heck of a lot harder to start a religion now than it was centuries ago. As a result, it has to be more aggressive as well, although that's (finally) starting to backfire on them.

    If It had been started a couple thousand years ago like all the other major religions when ignorance was the norm, then we would all be praying about Xenu.

    You'll notice that all major religions were created a long time ago, when superstition was rampant and science as we know it didn't exist. It's very difficult to eliminate something that's been so firmly entwined in cultural memory. Combine that with the human tendency to resist change, especially regarding beliefs taught to you since childhood (when, incidentally, you are genetically programmed to suck up any and all knowledge fed to you, hook line and sinker), you can see how something so nonsensical can somehow manage to keep going for so long.