Slashdot Mirror


Nose Scanners — the New Face of Biometrics?

An anonymous reader writes "Forget fingerprints and ID cards, this photo story shows how the latest thing in biometrics is nose scanning! Bath university researchers have claimed that the nose will soon be able to be used as a way of identifying a person. Apparently the 'PhotoFace system captures a 3D image of a person's face by taking several photos lit from different angles to throw shadows on the face and then building a model of facial features. The software determined that there are six main nose shapes: Roman, Greek, Nubian, Hawk, Snub and Turn-up.' Some cool pictures make this worth a click — but what happens if a person breaks their nose?!"

115 comments

  1. Before you know it by Pojut · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Biometrics are going to use your DNA for verification, which is the only fool-proof system. I mean, come on, how would you fake someone else's DNA? ::cough::GATTACA::cough::

    1. Re:Before you know it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Twins.

      Exactly the same DNA, different person.

    2. Re:Before you know it by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 1

      Twins.

      Exactly the same DNA, different person.

      The goatee.

    3. Re:Before you know it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Solution: In any set of humans born with the same DNA, kill all but one of them.

    4. Re:Before you know it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of twins will beg to differ with you. I guess you mean identical twins and not fraternal twins?

    5. Re:Before you know it by Nabbler · · Score: 2, Informative

      They don't actually map the entire DNA of every person, even the british cops, they use some main markers, and those do actually sometimes double up, plus you can fake or spoil DNA very easily by using someone else's hair or spit or some such.

      But I fear the worse too for the future.

    6. Re:Before you know it by Inconexo · · Score: 1

      I think the answer comes with the question.

    7. Re:Before you know it by Nabbler · · Score: 1

      Oh and also they use things like the face and nose because then CCTV can scan and recognize on-the-run without asking permission or stopping people and from a distance. One of the first to use CCTV (security cams) facial recognition in europe was McDonald BTW, to alert them of unwanted troublemakers that tried to return.

    8. Re:Before you know it by DJRumpy · · Score: 1

      Well with this system, you don't need to go that far. Just break your nose, and you're a whole 'new you'.

      I'm sorry, but this idea is about as useful as a box of hair...

    9. Re:Before you know it by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm sorry, but this idea is about as useful as a box of hair...

      Hair Scanners -- the New Toupée of Biometrics?

  2. I am worried... by ctrl-alt-canc · · Score: 1

    will they scan also the inside of the nose ?!? It would be very awful to analyze...

    1. Re:I am worried... by idontgno · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, it's snot as bad as that.

      Sorry, it had to be said.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    2. Re:I am worried... by ChipMonk · · Score: 1

      But you two both blew it, and now this thread is totally boogered up.

      Nice going, guys.

    3. Re:I am worried... by ulski · · Score: 1

      I heard that on Omicron Persei 8 they will be "scannning" your lower human horn

    4. Re:I am worried... by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1

      The Inside? Really?

      Damn, I won't get one of those at home. If I snort too much, I can't get back in! Talk about an effective anti-drug campaign.

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    5. Re:I am worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is not to be, erm, sniffed at

  3. Biometrics waste of time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seriously. Wow. What a waste of energy and resources. It's called a nose mold, costs like ten cents. Security theater at it's finest.

    1. Re:Biometrics waste of time. by ChipMonk · · Score: 1

      It might work for some, but it could never work for others. Can you see Jimmy Durante with a prosthetic turn-up nose?

    2. Re:Biometrics waste of time. by skine · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would assume that part would be taken care of in thermal imaging.

    3. Re:Biometrics waste of time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you can't heat up a nose mold? And you think thermal imaging introduces MORE reliability to a system with massive variables in it?

    4. Re:Biometrics waste of time. by Kiaser+Zohsay · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Tried to find a link, but its apparently just too obscure, so I'll go from memory. Carl Reiner was presented some sort of lifetime achievement award by Mel Brooks, who played it as if Reiner had been a total fake all those years, and this was the last straw. The camera cut to shots of protesters with signs reading "Reiner isn't funny", and then Mel accuses Reiner of forcing him to wear a fake Jewish nose. Brooks then proceeds to remove his fake rubber nose, revealing a decidedly less ethnic one underneath, pointing at it and shouting "I have a gentile nose!".

      Of course the gentile nose was a fake one on top of his actual nose. But if Mel Brooks can rock not one but two fake noses long enough to present an award, then airport security should be a piece of matzo.

      --
      I am not your blowing wind, I am the lightning.
    5. Re:Biometrics waste of time. by mooingyak · · Score: 1

      From http://www.myjewishlearning.com/culture/2/Film/American_and_European/Hollywood_and_Judaism/Mel_Brooks.shtml

      found a bunch of links using the terms 'carl reiner mel brooks false nose'

      Flash forward to the April 1991 American Comedy Awards, a show honoring Carl Reiner with its Lifetime Achievement Award. Steve Martin introduces Brooks as Reiner's "illegitimate son" and asks for a few words about his longtime friend and collaborator. Addressing the star-studded audience as "Ladies and Jews," Brooks's voice grows steadily more strident as he indignantly castigates Reiner first for not being funny and second for forcing him to assume a false identity: For 25 years he pretended that he was a Jew when he was really a gentile from Waco, Texas. (The real Waco Kid?) Finally, Brooks rips off his "false" nose, begins yelling in a Texas drawl, and vows never to utter "any more of that Jew talk."

      A few moments later, a convulsed Reiner thanks Brooks for channeling into humor his deep-seated anger over having to pay homage to someone less talented. Brooks builds all his films on his indignation, attacking serious topics such as bigotry, intolerance, and greed through comedy

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    6. Re:Biometrics waste of time. by Kiaser+Zohsay · · Score: 1

      That is obscure, even more than I thought. Wikipedia has a very incomplete list of ceremonies and winners. And if Wikipedia doesn't have it, you know it's obscure.

      --
      I am not your blowing wind, I am the lightning.
    7. Re:Biometrics waste of time. by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Steve Martin was born in Waco, Texas.

  4. Worst possible choice by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is really a bad idea. The nose is actually one of the few parts of the body that grows (and changes) your entire life. Never mind swelling from colds, etc.

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    1. Re:Worst possible choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention is the most often changed through plastic surgery.

    2. Re:Worst possible choice by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 1

      The nose is actually one of the few parts of the body that grows (and changes) your entire life.

      Your identification card is updated on a fairly regular basis already.

    3. Re:Worst possible choice by SerpentMage · · Score: 3, Funny

      Two words....

      Michael Jackson

      nuff said...

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    4. Re:Worst possible choice by Angst+Badger · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is really a bad idea.

      Welcome to the always exciting and perpetually almost ready for prime-time world of biometrics.

      --
      Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
    5. Re:Worst possible choice by 1s44c · · Score: 2, Funny

      Two words....

      Michael Jackson

      nuff said...

      Actually his nose is quite stable now. It's likely to remain in its current state long after the rest of his body has decayed to nothing.

      Maybe in some future time someone or something will dig up his remains and wonder what all the extra parts were for.

    6. Re:Worst possible choice by tepples · · Score: 2, Funny

      At least people will be able to tell how honest you've been since your last ID card. If the shape of your nose has changed too much, you've been telling lies.

    7. Re:Worst possible choice by ISoldat53 · · Score: 1

      The other part that keeps growing is the ear and they have been taking ear prints for a long time now. Usually they are taken from suspects after forensics has found an impression on something like a door or window.

    8. Re:Worst possible choice by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Funny

      Can you imagine some archelogist digging him up in a few millenia and wondering what kind of shaman he must be? I mean, religious mutilation, various artificial parts inserted in the body...

      Must've been a really weird cult of human sacrifice and deification of silicon parts. Some successor of Däniken would certainly claim it's clearly a sign that silicon based aliens were worshipped here by us trying to convert one of us into one of them...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    9. Re:Worst possible choice by Nick+Number · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually his nose is quite stable now. It's likely to remain in its current state long after the rest of his body has decayed to nothing.

      Maybe in some future time someone or something will dig up his remains and wonder what all the extra parts were for.

      Or, in a zany twist, they might mistake the surviving fragments of a Woody Allen movie as a documentary and elect Mr. Jackson's remains as The Leader.

      --
      Promote proofreading. Don't mod up sloppy posts.
    10. Re:Worst possible choice by Hognoxious · · Score: 0, Troll

      Or, in a zany twist, they might mistake the surviving fragments of a Woody Allen movie as a documentary and elect Mr. Jackson's remains as The Leader.

      Stranger things have happened. Remember when that Jewish anti-Roman revolutionary dude faked his own execution - boy did that get out of hand!

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    11. Re:Worst possible choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worst possible choice [...] The nose is actually one of the few parts of the body that grows (and changes) your entire life. Never mind swelling

      You forgot one body part of us and our fellow /.ers (rumors has it we are all males, OK?) which would actually be an even worse choice: It also grows (and changes) your entire life, never mind swelling ...

  5. This is perfect... by Rivalz · · Score: 1

    Imagine Hollywood movie studios requiring this. Or California's gov.

  6. Roman, Greek, Nubian, Hawk, Snub and Turn-up by srussia · · Score: 3, Funny

    Add a CowboyNeal option and you've got the next Slashdot poll.

    --
    Set your phasers on "funky"!
  7. Article? What article? by ekgringo · · Score: 4, Informative

    For the first time ever, scientists at the Slashdot institute have actually managed to produce an article summary that is longer than the article linked, as well as providing new information not available in the article itself! How is this possible?

    1. Re:Article? What article? by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is actually a good sign. Linking to single stories is fine, but aggregating stories and providing a complete picture in the summary is better than simply picking the juiciest quotes and pretending like it's any sort of value add.

    2. Re:Article? What article? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the first time ever

      You must be new here.

    3. Re:Article? What article? by ekgringo · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but I actually read the article, or rather in this example, the caption.

    4. Re:Article? What article? by earthman · · Score: 1

      It's possible because you only read the first of four pages of the article. The four different photos each have a different text beneath them.

    5. Re:Article? What article? by nacturation · · Score: 1

      Shame on me for having to double-check... I should have known it's definitely not a kdawson post.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  8. Next exciting biometrics tech: a-hole scanners by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    Another stupid idea. Next is the ear scanner, the hair scanner, the tooth scanner (all of the above is out in the public, for someone to make a replica of any part of your body that is out in the open, is just a matter of time). Then they'll move to more private areas I guess and then the internal organs, which will of-course go through a phase of vaginal and anal scanners.

    This is dumb. Of-course Michael Jackson could use this better than others, he changed his nose shape more often than other people change their hair color and his nose was not out in the public.

    1. Re:Next exciting biometrics tech: a-hole scanners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dental records are already used as a very reliable form of identification (generally of corpses, not really practical for every-day identification of living people).

    2. Re:Next exciting biometrics tech: a-hole scanners by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      and you know what bad guys do if they don't want a corpse identified that way? Pull the teeth out and throw away separately. You want that done on a living for password retrieval?

  9. DNA (Douglas N Adams, that is) would have loved it by turthalion · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This would finally have enabled Douglas Adams to use the awesome power of his nose for the forces of good.

    He had a famously large hooter.

    See this link for Douglas's own views on his nose.

    --
    Michael Coyne
    http://turthalion.blogspot.com
  10. The second most common cosmetic surgery? by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

    Rhinoplasty makes this pointless.

    Well done folks... Well done.

    --
    Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    1. Re:The second most common cosmetic surgery? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Rhinoplasty makes this pointless.

      Rhinoplasty makes this ideal, especially for those who may need to have their identity changed for their own safety, unlike fingerprints or gods forbid a retinal pattern.

      It will however lead to more stringent federal regulation of the practice because you can never be allowed to hide your identity from the government.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  11. What about my nose? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm Tycho Brahe, you insensitive clod!

    1. Re:What about my nose? by mangu · · Score: 1

      I'm Tycho Brahe, you insensitive clod!

      Then you are a terrorist trying to circumvent an important security measure.

      You will tell us everything you know, even if we have to waterboard you until your bladder blows up.

    2. Re:What about my nose? by camperdave · · Score: 1
      The 411 for those who are curious...

      While studying at University of Rostock in Germany, on 29 December 1566 Tycho lost part of his nose in a duel with fellow Danish nobleman Manderup Parsbjerg. Tycho had earlier quarrelled with Parsbjerg at a wedding dance at professor Lucas Bacmeister's house on the 10th, and again on the 27th. The duel two days later (in the dark) resulted in Tycho losing the bridge of his nose. From this event Tycho became interested in medicine and alchemy. For the rest of his life, he was said to have worn a realistic replacement made of silver and gold, using a paste to keep it attached. Some people, such as Fredric Ihren and Cecil Adams have suggested that the false nose also had copper. Ihren wrote that when Tycho's tomb was opened in 24 June 1901 green marks were found on his skull, suggesting copper. Cecil Adams also mentions a green colouring and that medical experts examined the remains. Some historians have speculated that he wore a number of different prosthetics for different occasions, noting that a copper nose would have been more comfortable and less heavy than a precious metal one.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    3. Re:What about my nose? by Nick+Number · · Score: 1

      I'm Tycho Brahe, you insensitive clod!

      Sorry sir, but we can't allow you on this flight. Our system identifies you as the evil Lee Marvin from Cat Ballou.

      --
      Promote proofreading. Don't mod up sloppy posts.
  12. Heuristic scanning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's see... Nose completely free of boogers, but horrifically scarred by fingernails? Log in as root, must be the administrator.

  13. High School just got worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Life just keeps piling on for the poor suffering adolescent geek. Now when he develops a giant zit on his nose, he doesn't just have to worry about the derision of his peers, but his nose-scanning locker won't open.

  14. Nose job? by brian0918 · · Score: 1

    Will people now have to get clearance from the NSA/FBI/DOD in order to get a nose job?

  15. One positive aspect... (was:Re:Before you know..) by beh · · Score: 4, Funny

    On the positive side, if anyone beats you up and breaks your nose, they can now be sued for aiding and abetting terrorism by making the 'nose database' useless...

  16. I think they should analyze stool samples... by Joce640k · · Score: 2, Funny

    It would be just as secure and applying for an ID card would be a real hoot.

    --
    No sig today...
  17. Like this? by nathan+s · · Score: 2, Interesting

    http://arstechnica.com/science/news/2009/08/dna-samples-used-by-crime-labs-faked-in-research-lab.ars

    Granted, they say it carries markers of having been lab-tampered, but that detecting the markers requires currently-unusual sophistication. Interesting, though.

  18. Bath, famous for Rugby Football, to ID on NOSES? by evilandi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Lemme get this straight. Bath, a town internationally known for its Rugby Football team, is proposing we use noses for biometric ID?

    Rugby being the game for which the phrase "full contact sport" is not so much an understatement as a warning of imminent loss of life? Like American Football only without the pads and helmets? The game where a broken nose is probably the most common injury?

    The Bath Rugby team probably have only one intact nose between all 15 players.

    --
    Andrew Oakley - www.aoakley.com
  19. Better than the alternative. by RealErmine · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'd rather see the words: "Please insert nose to verify identity." than "Processing colonic map." on the ATM of the future.

    --
    Dewey, you fool! Your decimal system has played right into my hands!
    1. Re:Better than the alternative. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I presume "processing colonic map" the first of two part authentication, with a dental record verification as the second step. It is an ATM, after all.

  20. Odd by Alarindris · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why don't they just scan the whole face?

    As if the nose were more unique than the rest of the face plus the nose.

    1. Re:Odd by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      The nose is fairly invariant under changes of glasses, hair, make up and so on. At least this was the reasoning in another article I read on the topic.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  21. You Know What They Say... by Greyfox · · Score: 2, Funny

    A nose by any other name would still smell

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  22. What about the genitals? by drunken_boxer777 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Come on, TSA!

    You've already got the millimeter body scanners rolling out across the US and rest of the world. Kick it up a notch! Go straight for the biometric genital scanning!

    Pfft, privacy. You don't need privacy. You need safety. Now drop your drawers!

    1. Re:What about the genitals? by jimbolauski · · Score: 1

      Millimeter waves might not be small enough for some

      --
      Knowledge = Power
      P= W/t
      t=Money
      Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
    2. Re:What about the genitals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh great, I can see the new spam now. "GET UR MANHOOD BIOMETRICLY SCANNED 100% RELIABILTY 10 INCHES OF SLONG SCAN POTENTIAL: V1A6RA

    3. Re:What about the genitals? by somersault · · Score: 1

      Please insert your penis into GILIAN's* mouth and wait while she extracts a DNA sample.

      *Government Investigatory Laboratory In Android Nymphomaniac

      --
      which is totally what she said
    4. Re:What about the genitals? by MadUndergrad · · Score: 1

      You can use the android, I'll take the gynoid.

  23. Re:We need to scan everything by GargamelSpaceman · · Score: 1

    Fingerprints can be faked, it is well known with scotch tape and talc powder, noses change over time, and are only useful to weight other factors. Thats why we also scan your tongue, your eyes, and of course your butt. ( Just drop your pants and sit on the butt scanner - no, it's not a photocopier. )
    - With apologies to Monsters vs Aliens

    --
    ...
  24. Please, Oh, Please... by hyades1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't let the security-crazed among us start thinking about what other stickout-y parts of the human anatomy they could photograph from six angles, digitize and put on our passports. All to keep the children and kittens safe, of course.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  25. When will biometrics go the way of jetpacks? by SlappyBastard · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seriously. No one cares for biometrics. Aside from making for very sick dismemberment jokes in spy movies, biometrics haven't done much to go mainstream.

    --
    I scream. You scream. I assume that means we're both acquainted with the problem. We proceed.
    1. Re:When will biometrics go the way of jetpacks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Passports for Cattle and Horses use noseprints for identification purposes

  26. Worse... by bylo · · Score: 1

    ...cut off your nose to spite your face.

  27. Re:Bath, famous for Rugby Football, to ID on NOSES by Rogerborg · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Bath Rugby team probably have only one intact nose between all 15 players.

    And they stole it from an opposing prop forward.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  28. Re:Bath, famous for Rugby Football, to ID on NOSES by jimbolauski · · Score: 1

    In case they want to do ears, rugby players used to have them ripped off before they started taping them to their heads them, now cauliflower ear is a more common injury.

    --
    Knowledge = Power
    P= W/t
    t=Money
    Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
  29. Plastic Surgery by KiwiCanuck · · Score: 1

    Seriously?! Don't they know that a nose job is the second most popular plastic surgery?

  30. Mistaken Identity by ari_j · · Score: 1

    Oh great. Now I'm going to have to deal with Cyrano de Bergerac being on the no-fly list.

  31. Michael Jackson would've had problems by wisebabo · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I mean look at how his nose "morphed" over the years! I think some of the shapes it went through weren't even human, not according to this software.

  32. For some reason... by commodore73 · · Score: 0

    This made me think of the great Woody Allen movie "Sleeper", but I couldn't think of a joke quickly (would the technology still recognize the leader after the steamroller incident?). I didn't read every comment, but I didn't notice any about plastic surgery (many about broken noses though). I wouldn't have summarized this story on slashdot, or my summary would have included the word "ridiculous" at least once.

  33. Rul by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm scared. The next step of biometrical scanner will be the colon deepness. May god have marcy of our souls.

  34. Nose Scanners? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I smell a rat!

  35. Re:One positive aspect... (was:Re:Before you know. by somersault · · Score: 1

    Don't forget anyone who feeds you too many donuts..

    --
    which is totally what she said
  36. Re:One positive aspect... (was:Re:Before you know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    but what happens if a person breaks their nose?!

    It would be a denial of service attack.

    Running afoul of felony battery laws while also breaking DMCA protections!

  37. Life mirrors art I guess... by EriktheGreen · · Score: 2, Funny

    There was an old cartoon from back in the 80s when the first really painful desktop security measures were put in place... back when people still ran unpatched OSs and downloading updates (via dial-up modem) wasn't common.

    I think it was "The Fifth Wave" series. Wish I could find it to post a link.

    Basically, it was a manager turning to an employee looking stubborn at his computer terminal and saying "Now c'mon, Bob, you know nose scanning is our best defense against unauthorized computer use!" The nose scanners were cups on thick cords hanging from the ceiling like airline oxygen masks.

    Biometrics is a cute marketing trick, but it's no substitute for good security process. That's why I like signing in to my laptop using the "fingerprint" of a small area on the underside of my scrotum. Any legitimate reason to doff one's pants at work is good. "I'm just logging in." or "Whoops, there goes my screensaver. Zzzzzzzip...."

    Erik

  38. Not to inturrupt your rant, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's a Nubian?

    1. Re:Not to inturrupt your rant, but... by treeves · · Score: 1

      A goat. Why do you ask?

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
  39. RTFA before posting the summary by argent · · Score: 2, Informative

    Did the submitter read the story?

    While able to process images more quickly than conventional biometric identification techniques such as whole face recognition, the system's recognition rates were comparatively low and researchers recommend it as an addition to existing biometrics rather than a replacement.

  40. Re:DNA (Douglas N Adams, that is) would have loved by Ozymandias_KoK · · Score: 1

    You know that a hooter is actually something else, right?

  41. Location Location Location by spaceman375 · · Score: 1

    We have many ways of identifying people; biometrics is only one category. Every means of identifying a person is hackable in some way. I would feel much safer if authentication were based on multiple sources. In particular, GPS tracking, bluetooth presence, facial recognition, each time you enter a password, all should be used to build a continuous track of your location, with confidence ratings as you move between various protocols. Credit card purchases, boarding an airplane, logging in at work; all should verify that your location data says that you are where they think you are, with a continuous trail leading to that location, before granting access.

    --
    On the one hand you take life too seriously, and on the other, you do not take playful existence seriously enough. Seth
  42. Where's Matt Damon? by chill · · Score: 1

    The nose plays.

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
  43. Re:DNA (Douglas N Adams, that is) would have loved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fat failure.

  44. Brain Scan by Rolgar · · Score: 1

    Maybe we should patent the brain scan for ID since that will be the next idea?

  45. Rule 34 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then they'll move to more private areas I guess and then the internal organs, which will of-course go through a phase of vaginal and anal scanners.

    Somewhere in Japan, some mangaka is now making hentai based on this.

    *VAGINAL SCAN UNSUCCESSFUL - DOUBLE-CHECK REQUIRED - PLEASE POSITION YOURSELF FOR ADDITIONAL AUTHENTICATION MS. HAJIMOTO*

    "Uh...um...alright...OOOOH GOD..."

  46. I can move my nose... by mi · · Score: 1

    Seriously — the very tip — kinda like a rabbit does. (It is a real "chick-magnet", BTW.)

    When posing for an ID-picture, I always move it a little bit so that it looks a different on the picture from what is is in normal (relaxed) position. I don't think, the described method would identify me from those pictures...

    You can train yourself to do it, BTW — an hour or two in front of the mirror and you'll "get it".

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  47. Re:One positive aspect... (was:Re:Before you know. by Syberz · · Score: 1

    How useless is this, at any given point there has to be about 50-100 people in Beverly Hills that have the same nose.

    --
    ~Syberz
  48. It doesn't matter by sjames · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It doesn't really matter what the biometric is of, the whole idea has been shown to fail. It turns out that a key feature necessary for authentication is that a credential can be revoked and a new one issued whenever it has been compromised. That is just not practical for biometrics. If it can be measured, someone can capture that measurement and create a fake.

    As shown on Mythbusters, the more expensive the fingerprint reader was, the easier it was to fake it out, but all of them failed one way or another.

    If we start lining up and shooting marketing departments, we might one day be able to produce a biometric system that would only fall for very difficult surgical duplications (and so raise the bar quite high), but such systems would likely cost several orders of magnitude more than other equally secure methods that we already have available. Meanwhile, in those few cases where the access is important enough to resort to the surgical approach and someone does so, we're right back to the inability to issue a new ID.

  49. The Terrorists can beat this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    by trimming their nose hair.

  50. Broken nose? by KitFox · · Score: 1

    Broken nose... Lose fingers to a saw... go blind...

    It simply stands as a standard that there is no standard that is 100% effective or unbreakable or loss-proof. Things can only be "More Secure" or "Less Secure". Generally the more secure they are, the easier it is to lose them as well.

    The only major difference between passwords and biometrics is that one is knowledge-based and one is physical. Neither are fully secure. There is the difference between how easy it is to potentially steal or duplicate somebody's biometric signature versus how easy it is to steal or duplicate a password of similar relative "strength" in any given situation. Compare the process of stealing an 8-digit numeric key code versus duplicating somebody's fingerprint in a way that the scanner will recognize for example.

    But with the low recognition rate, and the recommendation to use this as an additional layer of security, itreally is just that, an addition layer. Just like IP access lists. The duplicated fingerprint will do you no good as the nose knows!

    So yeah, looks like they reach in but failed to pick a true winner (sorry). But as an extra layer of entropy, the speed makes it potentially more useful than face recognition, and due to the multiple angles and shadows, it doesn't suffer from "Photo in front of the camera" problems.

    --

    @Whee

  51. Unfortunately this Technology by tdp252 · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't work for the likes of Cher and Heidi Montag. Their plastic surgeries change their identity every few weeks !

  52. Re:DNA (Douglas N Adams, that is) would have loved by OolimPhon · · Score: 1

    Not in the UK.

  53. what happens if a person breaks their nose by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

    > but what happens if a person breaks their nose?!"

    You just need to phone DHS and reactivate your face.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  54. Re:One positive aspect... (was:Re:Before you know. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    What do they do on the days where it's somebody else's turn?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  55. What about... by vikingpower · · Score: 1

    ...scanning a person's ass cleavage for identity purposes ? Recent research has shown that ass cleavage is in shape, length and depth absolutely unique to any person. With the added advantage the ass cleavage has over the nose: it cannot break.

    --
    Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
  56. One word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    burka

  57. Jennifer Grey... by zawarski · · Score: 1

    ...enough said.

  58. Re:Bath, famous for Rugby Football, to ID on NOSES by jpstanle · · Score: 1

    My thoughts exactly. As an American who has only recently started playing the sport of rugby football, even my limited experience has painfully demonstrated how reconfigurable the human nose is.

    As a sidenote, being kicked in the face while laying at the bottom of a ruck sure does make you feel alive =)

  59. Re:Bath, famous for Rugby Football, to ID on NOSES by qsliver · · Score: 1

    goon 1 "My prop forward has no nose!"
    goon 2 "Your prop forward has no nose?"
    goon 1 "My prop forward has no nose!"
    goon 2 "How does he smell?"
    ...

    Fill in the rest your self.

    --
    The above comments are the ravings of a lunatic and should be ignored completely.
  60. I Boke By Doze. I Boke It Two Tibes. It Beds Fuddy by DynaSoar · · Score: 1

    > but what happens if a person breaks their nose?"

    Segmented curvilinear correction. A broken nose only changes shape in the broken spot, almost always the bridge. The majority is intact. The database results will have those hits that match, say, 5 of the 6 measures. Those will then be subjected to 'morphing' within the constraints of the average (more likely within the standard deviation) of how bridges that most often fit with that nose type are bent and in what way. The Segment that doesn't fit will have the bent or Curved piece 'unbent' or made to fit a Linear model by a Correction algorithm. The result will be a correlation measure for that sixth piece to go along with the five segments already matched. It's not a certain measure, but it'll give a smaller number of likely possibles to start with, and if there's no positives, lesser correlations to look at.

    What makes this article bogus (I won't call Bullshit because it looks like they really believe this will work) is variants on Groucho nose glasses. A simple fake nose will fool it. It doesn't even have to be a complete fake nose; flesh colored putty packed on to certain areas will make it a different nose.

    > Some cool pictures make this worth a click

    Cool my ass. I've worked with police sketch artists. They have a book with all the examples in their software of all the parts of the face used as variables. Noses sans face are some of the ugliest pieces of human anatomy.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  61. Same old EPIC FAILURE. by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    Doesn’t matter if it’s any body part, or a card or anything “that you have”. As long as there is no accompanying “that you know”, it’s insecure. Period.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  62. Would that work in Hollywood? by kimgkimg · · Score: 1

    Rhinoplasty capital of the world?

  63. Re:One positive aspect... (was:Re:Before you know. by kmoser · · Score: 1

    That would be a denasal of service.