Slashdot Mirror


US Intelligence Planned To Destroy WikiLeaks

An anonymous reader writes "This document is a classified (SECRET/NOFORN), 32-page US counterintelligence investigation into WikiLeaks (PDF). 'The possibility that current employees or moles within DoD or elsewhere in the US government are providing sensitive or classified information to Wikileaks.org cannot be ruled out.' It concocts a plan to fatally marginalize the organization. Since WikiLeaks uses 'trust as a center of gravity by protecting the anonymity and identity of the insiders, leakers or whistleblowers,' the report recommends 'The identification, exposure, termination of employment, criminal prosecution, legal action against current or former insiders, leakers, or whistleblowers could potentially damage or destroy this center of gravity and deter others considering similar actions from using the Wikileaks.org Web site.' [As two years have passed since the date of the report, with no WikiLeaks' source exposed, it appears that this plan was ineffective.] As an odd justification for the plan, the report claims that 'Several foreign countries including China, Israel, North Korea, Russia, Vietnam, and Zimbabwe have denounced or blocked access to the Wikileaks.org website.' The report provides further justification by enumerating embarrassing stories broken by WikiLeaks — US equipment expenditure in Iraq, probable US violations of the Chemical Warfare Convention Treaty in Iraq, the battle over the Iraqi town of Fallujah and human rights violations at Guantanamo Bay."

15 of 555 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Hmmm... by s0litaire · · Score: 4, Funny

    "If you have nothing to hide..."
    ...Then you're doing it wrong...

    --
    Laters Sol "Have you found the secrets of the universe? Asked Zebade "I'm sure I left them here somewhere"
  2. Re:An easier plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wouldn't an easier plan to destroy the credibility of wikileaks be to overflow it with bogus leaks and fake whistleblowers, flooding them with misinformation?

    Or at the very least, Slashdot it into oblivion?

  3. Re:An easier plan by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wouldn't an easier plan to destroy the credibility of wikileaks be to overflow it with bogus leaks and fake whistleblowers, flooding them with misinformation?

    Yeah, like posting a fake document outlining the governments secret plans to discredit wikileaks.org. That would be the kind of thing that those rubes would eat right up.

    --
    by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
  4. Haven't you heard? by gatkinso · · Score: 3, Funny

    Everything has "changed" under Obama!

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  5. Re:*burp* *fart* *queef* by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 2, Funny

    *burp* *fart* *queef*

    Wow, better get those leaks fixed...

    --
    You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
  6. That was funny! by filesiteguy · · Score: 2, Funny

    I read through some of the PDF file. Nothing new there, just the usual "if someone tells of the uber-sekret stuff we're doing, the bad guys might get us" type of information.

    However, one thing caught my attention on the 4th page: "The Wikileaks.org Web site could be used to post fabricated information,
    misinformation, disinformation, or propaganda and could be used in perception
    management and influence operations to convey a positive or negative message to
    specific target audiences that view or retrieve information from the Web site."

    Um, you mean like, Fox News? http://www.foxnews.com/

  7. Re:An easier plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Message to jayme0227: You, sir, are an asshat. Those of us who are not asshats realized that dgatwood knows that the government has things to hide. Why on earth would you assume that private citizens do not? That was sort of his point.

    Message to the rest of Slashdot: Sorry to ruin the joke by explaining it to death.

    Message to self: Enough with the "Message to $name:" crap. It really wasn't funny the first time and now it's just getting annoying.

  8. Re:Hmmm... by Gerzel · · Score: 2, Funny

    Depends on their position, missionary, doggy, or liberal.

  9. Re:An easier plan by pitchpipe · · Score: 4, Funny

    Message to commodore64: OPEN 15,8,15,"R0:+1Insightful=comment":CLOSE 15

    --
    Look where all this talking got us, baby.
  10. Re:Doesn't apply to classified information by Khyber · · Score: 3, Funny

    "it truly is a matter of life or death in many circumstances. "

    Yes, the government's life or death. The government keeps secrets so we don't string them up by their fucking necks.

    That's about to happen anyways. Civil war is brewing in the USA and it's about to come to a head. Silent meetings, etc. about 50 million people are about to rise up and end this bullshit once and for all.

    Thank god the US Military is only about 1.7 million people and a fair majority of the type of citizens that would fight the government far outnumber those, almost 40:1.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  11. Re:Ah, Yes by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Welcome to the new United Kingdom"

    There, corrected it for you.

  12. Re:Two can play your game by c++0xFF · · Score: 2, Funny

    Example of a reputable source? I'd say WikiLeaks, but the CIA seems to have discredited them....

  13. Re:An easier plan by BlackSnake112 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Stop subjecting my to groinal patdowns when I enter an airport or train terminal.

    It depends on who is doing the pat down.

  14. Re:An easier plan by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 3, Funny

    It depends on who is doing the pat down.

    Have you seen the people who work for TSA?

  15. Re:An easier plan by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Funny


    PRINT "thank you"

    thank you
    READY.

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall