Mississippi Makes Caller ID Spoofing Illegal
marklyon writes "HB 872, recently signed into law by Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour, makes Caller ID spoofing illegal. The law covers alterations to the caller's name, telephone number, or name and telephone number that is shown to a recipient of a call or otherwise presented to the network. The law applies to PSTN, wireless and VoIP calls. Penalties for each violation can be up to $1,000 and one year in jail. Blocking of caller identification information is still permitted."
There shouldn’t need to be a law for this, though. Telcos should enforce it on their own.
Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
This should be a federal law.
Athiesm is a religion like not collecting stamps is a hobby.
If I spoofed my caller ID, how would they ever know without wiretapping me, or doing something else illegal? How would anyone ever get caught? This law seems unenforceable.
If our elected representatives no longer represent us, do we still live in a Democracy?
How would enforcing a rule such as this enable telcos to make more money? I imagine that some of their larger customers are spoofers. And telcos are corporations. All corporations are inherently sociopathic, lacking in empathy, remorse, guilt, or any sense of right and wrong outside of "more money is right, less money is wrong."
If someone should do something, and they don't, we make a law to force them to.
- None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
Ding ding ding, we have a winner!
More stupid politicians makings laws about things they do not understand.
I bet they did not even know the difference between CLID and ANI.
Everyone should know the difference between the CLID and the ANI. The CLID is in the front and the ANI is in the back.
- None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
I think not, as the law is pretty clear about requiring
...THE INTENT TO DECEIVE, DEFRAUD OR MISLEAD;
and since your Google Voice number is still a number belonging to you, I doubt it would be a crime to use it as your caller id.
Ask Slashdot: Where bad ideas meet poor googling skills.
All corporations are inherently sociopathic, lacking in empathy, remorse, guilt...
A corporation pays my salary, so they can't be all bad.
They only pay you because slavery is illegal. Doing the right thing because you have no choice doesn't count when good karma is being totted up.
You really need to read the law: "however, when a person making an authorized call on behalf of another person inserts the name, telephone number or name and telephone number of the person on whose behalf the call is being made, such information shall not be deemed false information."
"This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
However, here’s my take, and why it still doesn’t need to be illegal IMHO. The companies who spoof are generally doing stuff that should be illegal anyway, right?
No they aren't. For example my company spoofs so that patients who hit *87 or return the call go to a number where their calls will get handled rather than some internal number that might just be an outgoing only line.
That's not spoofing, it's trunking.
IMAGE VERIFICATION IS EVIL!