Slashdot Mirror


Filming For The Hobbit Begins In July

krou writes "Sir Ian McKellen has revealed that filming for The Hobbit and its sequel is scheduled to begin in July, and will take approximately a year to complete. Casting is now 'taking place in LA, London and New York,' and [director Guillermo] Del Toro is already 'living in Wellington, close to the Jacksons and the studio in Miramar.' Apparently the script is still being worked on, and 'the first draft is crammed with old and new friends, again on a quest in Middle-earth.' The planned sequel to The Hobbit is to be an original story not written by Tolkien, covering the 60 years between The Hobbit, and The Lord of the Rings."

23 of 298 comments (clear)

  1. The audition by Animats · · Score: 4, Funny

    I have visions of furries lined up for the audition.

    1. Re:The audition by mweather · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Beorn will probably get cut like Tom Bombadil did.

    2. Re:The audition by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Funny

      Probably. He'll then appear in a spin-off: The Beorn Identity.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
  2. Sequel by Jaysyn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "The planned sequel to The Hobbit is to be an *original story not written by Tolkien*, covering the 60 years between The Hobbit, and the Lord of the Rings."

    Thanks but no thanks.

    --
    There is a war going on for your mind.
    1. Re:Sequel by Hal_Porter · · Score: 5, Funny

      I heard George Lucas is writing it. Young Gollum will be a comedy character to lighten the mood. His appearance has been changed a bit to appeal to the 5-10 age range that have the most pester power over merchandise sales, e.g. big floppy bunny ears. To save time it will all be CGI scenery. Human actors will be dosed with Thorazine to make them more docile and easier to pose.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    2. Re:Sequel by Zalbik · · Score: 4, Funny

      "The planned sequel to The Hobbit is to be an *original story not written by Tolkien*, covering the 60 years between The Hobbit, and the Lord of the Rings."

      The summary is wrong, from TFA:

      "According to studio New Line, the first film will be an adaptation of The Hobbit, the novel Tolkien published before his Lord of the Rings cycle.
      The second will be an original story focusing on the 60 years between the book and the beginning of the Rings trilogy. "

      So we're getting a hobbit movie AND a new story.

      So you're saying, we're getting "The Hobbit" movie, and a planned sequel to "The Hobbit" which is to be an *original story not written by Tolkien*, covering the 60 years between The Hobbit, and the Lord of the Rings."?

      Thanks for clearing that up.

  3. To quote the great Randall Graves by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oh jeez, MORE walking?!?!?

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  4. Summary is wrong ... by krou · · Score: 5, Informative

    I commented on the post in the Firehose after I submitted it, but the summary should've said "... is scheduled to begin in July ..." instead of June.

    --
    'If Christ had tweeted the sermon on the mount, it might have lasted until nightfall.' - John Perry Barlow
    1. Re:Summary is wrong ... by maxwells+daemon · · Score: 4, Funny

      dammit. should have gotten the refundable plane tickets.

  5. Oh yippy skippy by bziman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Oh joy, another visually stunning film with a disjointed script, mixing Tolkien's brilliant timeless dialog with flat modern drivel penned by Fran Walsh. And the sequel... that's just going to be visually stunning with drivel for plot and dialog.

    It wouldn't be so bad if they didn't screw up the plot and dialog so badly. Ugh.

    1. Re:Oh yippy skippy by MozeeToby · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Three words, Guillermo del Toro

    2. Re:Oh yippy skippy by Eil · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Tolkien's dialogue can't, and never could, survive a direct adaptation to the big screen. Even if it could be managed, people would still complain that the actors didn't act in the manner that they themselves had envisioned while reading the books. Perhaps more importantly, books have the luxury of taking up entire chapters to describe background, settings, and conversations; movies do not. Tolkien purists will never be satisfied with *any* adaptation of his work. Luckily for them, the source material will always be available for their enjoyment.

  6. Hobbit 2: Electric Boogaloo by xleeko · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... like Jar Jar Binksarrim of the water people. And Elrond will have an affair with Galadriel. That's right, as soon as we fully Americanize this story, we will have a real winner here, folks.

    Sorry, that was only the first draft. Now, Bilbo is a time-traveling immortal who joins with a hip new Gandalf to save Middle-Earth's ozone layer.

    Then, they break dance!

    1. Re:Hobbit 2: Electric Boogaloo by dkleinsc · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, we all know that the real title will be The Hobbit 2: The Search for more Money.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  7. Sequel? No, give us Silmarillion by PHPNerd · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The planned sequel to The Hobbit is to be an original story not written by Tolkien, covering the 60 years between The Hobbit, and the Lord of the Rings."

    A sequel NOT written by Tolkien? Ew. How about instead another prequel taken from The Silmarillion? That would be full of awesome, almost guaranteed to win several internets.

  8. better lotr sotry ideas: by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Interesting

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Silmarillion

    duh

    it will be hard to nail tolkien's tone in a made up "middle movie". even if it isn't "studio committee of frat boys"ed to death, lotr fundamentalist fanboys will eviscerate it. they can deal with no tom bombadil, since its a story line that's so out of touch with the rest of lotr that it can safely be surgically removed, but whatever they do with the rumored necromancer plotline for this "middle movie" they better be damn respectful to the world of lotr:

    http://www.storyscape.net/hobbit_necromancer.html

    as an aside, i always thought a good jumping off point for lotr fanfiction/ hollywood exploitation would be an examination of the blue wizards:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Wizards

    so little is sketched by tolkien of them and the world to the east of mordor they went too, that it could make for some great lotr-type stories without stepping on any middle earth toes or the fanboys who guard the mythology's continuity

    it could have an east asian or russian mythology theme, keeping in touch with all those maps that overlay mordor with either germany, transylvania, or the middle east

    and maybe we would get more oliphants! ;-P

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  9. Re:ugh, sequel by hey! · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, I read *The Hobbit* to my son when he was in 2nd grade. After I read the last word on the last page, the instant I set the book down he said, "Can we read *The Hobbit 2* next?"

    Poor kid. That's just how I feel.

    *The Hobbit* is greatly underestimated by even Tolkien fans, who pooh-pooh it because it's not LotR. The tone of the story is a bit condescending at first, something that Tolkien himself expressed dissatisfaction with in later years, but as in LotR there's a lot going on under the surface of *The Hobbit*. It's a story well worth serious study. Achieving that in story so readable and enjoyable on a superficial level is a tremendous achievement.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  10. Re:I'll go ahead and be first by VShael · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think it absolutely vital for fantasy, and all fiction everywhere, to move beyond reverence for certain works.

    Somehow humanity managed to move beyond Shakespeare, creating new-ish works which we prefer to his, and I believe we can move beyond Tolkien

    Yeah, there's a difference between making a modern adaptation of Shakespeare, or even a whole other thing INSPIRED by Shakespeare, and writing "Hamlet 2: The Revenge of the Prince!"

  11. Re:ugh, sequel by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I love the book, but I don't think it's a good idea for someone else to try making a sequel.

    --
    "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
  12. Re:same actors for immortals? by Rogerborg · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yup, she bought the level 80 expansion and left her guildies behind.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  13. How about a Tim Burton-style franchise reboot? by kimvette · · Score: 4, Funny

    Can we get Tim Burton to direct, and make it a franchise reboot?

    I can see it now: the hobbits living in an advanced society not unlike 21st century Europe undergo a genetic mutation as the result of exposure to radioactive volcanic ash. One of the hobbits becomes Lord Sauron, who proceeds to rise up and conquer the lands, forming an oppressive kingdom where he removes and monopolizes all modern technology. Society within that first generation regresses to a 10th-century-style existence. Meanwhile, Lieutenant Starbuck, an astronaut who crashed on some faraway planet, helped the hobbits form a rag tag resistance group comprised of wookies, psychlo, and griffins, stumble across a cache of F-35 Lightning fighters, and although they have never seen so much as a flashlight or even matches, over the course of two weeks, become expert fighter pilots. Did I mention these F-35 Lightnings were not what they appeared, but are actually transformers, and in the bunker-style hangar they came across, there was a large semi. Well, the transformers were remaining covert to try to learn what all these strange creatures were up to since the creatures showed a barely perceptible spark of conscious thought. Optimus Prime took pity and he and his brothers revealed their true nature to the rag tag team. They agree to help the hobbits, psychlo, wookies, and griffins wage war to overthrow Sauron. The battle was quick and decisive.

    Now for the Tim Burton twist ending: Glinda, the good witch told Lieutenant Starbuck "sorry man, but you have to go home now. I'll service you first." She gives him a BJ and tells him all he needs to do is to play the hokey pokey then he will be swiftly transported home. He does the hokey pokey, except he put is left foot in when he should have put in his right foot, so he landed in a parallel universe where the Earth is now ruled by giant tarantulas.

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  14. Re:ugh, sequel by bhsurfer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think the siege of Gondolin out of the Silmarillion would make a hell of a movie, as would the part where Morgoth & Ungoliant destroy the trees. Man, I need a life. I also agree that, given the right writing, the sequel they're planning could be decent.

    --
    Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others.
    Groucho Marx
  15. Re:ugh, sequel by HeckRuler · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'll third that, it'll save me the agony of reading The Silmarillion