Slashdot Mirror


Child Receives Trachea Grown From Own Stem Cells

kkleiner writes "Doctors at the Great Ormond Street Hospital (GOSH) along with colleagues at the University College London, the Royal Free Hospital, and Careggi University Hospital in Florence have successfully transplanted a trachea into a 10 year old boy using his own stem cells. A donor trachea was taken, stripped of its cells into a collagen-like scaffold, and then infused with the boy's stem cells. The trachea was surgically placed into the boy and allowed to develop in place. Because his own cells were used, there was little to no risk of rejection. This was the first time a child had received such a stem cell augmented transplant and the first time that a complete trachea had been used."

9 of 103 comments (clear)

  1. let me just say by martas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    holy crap.

    good job, guys.

  2. Re:In the immortal words of Peter Griffin... by Gordo_1 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Everyone's stance on stem cell research should be queried by the DMV and added to your driver's license, just like organ donation. Then when you need a medical procedure that has benefited from stem cell research, you get the version of the procedure that's in line with your beliefs.

    I know... but I can dream can't I?

  3. Re:In the immortal words of Peter Griffin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Most of the recent advances are done using stem cells from the patient's own body... this was always legal, but too many people got caught up in fighting for embryonic stem. Maybe the restrictions against using embryonic stem cells advanced medical technology by pushing researchers and doctors to use the patient's own stem cells instead.

  4. Re:Cancer? by Kjella · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There's always some people who need surgery NOW and whether they get cancer in 2-5-10-20 years or not it's still a win. I'm all for medical testing and not rushing out unsafe procedures, but the reactions I see are mostly knee-jerk "it's STEM cells, omg you can't" not based on real research. In fact, they don't want the research done in the first place. Of course it's highly experimental medically, so was heart transplants. The first guy survived two weeks, but today we average 15 years. Research can prove or disprove (ok, don't get all philosophical on me) whether it helps medically, but it won't matter because most of the resistance is due to the fanatic anti-abortion crowd which equate embryonic stem cells with unborn babies. And if it's not embryonic, they'll pretend there's no difference because only blind rage will do.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  5. Re:In the immortal words of Peter Griffin... by Trepidity · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We are--- the restrictions on stem-cell funding have always been on embryonic stem cells, not on research involving stem cells derived from post-fetus-stage living humans, as is the case here.

  6. Re:In the immortal words of Peter Griffin... by LordLucless · · Score: 4, Informative

    Um, you are. Or at least, you could be. The restrictions on federal funding are on embryonic stem cell research. Embryonic stem cells are interesting for their pluripotency. Adult stem cells are interesting because they don't trigger rejection. Generally, nobody has any problem with adult-stem research.

    --
    Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
  7. Re:In the immortal words of Peter Griffin... by Princeofcups · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Most of the recent advances are done using stem cells from the patient's own body... this was always legal, but too many people got caught up in fighting for embryonic stem. Maybe the restrictions against using embryonic stem cells advanced medical technology by pushing researchers and doctors to use the patient's own stem cells instead.

    Not at all. This was a natural evolution, especially due to the rejection issues. If anything, we would have had this technology sooner as more scientists would have gotten involved earlier, and we would be much further ahead.

    --
    The only thing worse than a Democrat is a Republican.
  8. Re:In the immortal words of Peter Griffin... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I know... but I can dream can't I?

    Dream? You can't even pay attention. No one has fought against funding for research into cures using adult stem cells. No one has fought against funding for research into cures using your own stem cells. Try to pay attention.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  9. Re:In the immortal words of Peter Griffin... by HungryHobo · · Score: 4, Informative

    correction:
    Nobody who understands the difference has fought against funding for research into cures using adult stem cells.

    There's a massive ignorant crowd of fundies who still consider anything and everything to do with stem cells to be bad.