Slashdot Mirror


Obama's Twitter Account "Hacked"

Oxford_Comma_Lover writes "A 24-year-old living with his mother in France was arrested for 'hacking' into Obama's twitter accounts. (Warning: WSJ does obnoxious paywall things. Your miles may vary.) Apparently he guesses the answer to a question related to password recovery in order to break into the accounts of famous people; he has no computer science training or financial motive. He posted screenshots to a few boards and twitter found out within a few hours, either from a tip or from noticing when someone from France logs onto twitter as the President of the United States. (He did not actually tweet as POTUS, but just wanted to show he could break into the account.)"

7 of 308 comments (clear)

  1. He shouldn't be arrested by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Apparently he guesses the answer to a question related to password recovery in order to break into the accounts of famous people

    If thats all it takes then the system is broken, not the people abusing it.

    1. Re:He shouldn't be arrested by DragonWriter · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If thats all it takes then the system is broken, not the people abusing it.

      Its pretty trivial to break into most homes, cars, etc., but when people actually do it, we consider their actions to be the problem.

      I don't see why the fact that it is a computer system means that there is suddenly nothing wrong with the actions of the person deliberately breaking in.

      Sure, its fairly trivial for an online service to institute better security than "guess an fairly easy question and get access", so there are grounds for saying that the system has a problem. Its another thing, though, to go further and say that it is the system and not the intruder that is the problem.

    2. Re:He shouldn't be arrested by girlintraining · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Having a security question that is easily guessable is like leaving your car door unlocked. I wouldn't be surprised if it got stolen. Simple as that.

      You know, bathroom locks in most homes and apartments can be opened with a straightened paper clip. There's a reason for this: You can't accidentally open the door, but if there's an emergency (say someone has a fall, or locks themselves in to overdose on pills) the door can be easily opened.

      Pointing out the flaws of the security system don't relieve the person overriding it of their ethical responsibilities to their fellow human beings. Most security exists merely to satisfy the restraint that breaking it isn't accidental, because strong security can impede a variety of legitimate activities. As one example, my cousin lives with roommates who steal her pills, so she had a lock placed on her bedroom door. However, she needed me to get into the room while she was away to get some paperwork. So I fashioned a simple lock pick and gained entry (with the owner's permission). The average person would be unable to do this, but as a security expert, I can. However, I did not do so without permission, because that would be a violation of privacy, however trivial it was for me to actually open the door (about 5 seconds).

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
  2. The password by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I heard was "Let them eat cake"

  3. Good. by geekoid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Having a password clearly dictates the intent of the person is not to allow other people to use it.

    If a door is locked, then people know they shouldn't enter and kicking in the door would be a crime... or at least very rude.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  4. log of 'hacked' password recovery session: by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Funny

    q: "what city were you born in?"
    a:"honolulu"
    incorrect
    a:"oahu"
    incorrect
    a:"kandahar"
    correct

    q: "what is your political affiliation?"
    a:"democrat"
    incorrect
    a:"centrist"
    incorrect
    a:"fascist"
    correct

    q:"what is your favorite catchphrase?"
    a:"yes we can"
    incorrect
    a:"change we can believe in"
    incorrect
    a:"from each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs"
    correct

    (i love obama and i'm 100% for common sense healthcare reform... i need to make this qualification because some tea party morons out there might actually take my joke seriously)

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  5. Re:He should've at least posted something. by amliebsch · · Score: 5, Funny

    No, no, no, he should have tweeted:

    "My fellow Americans, I am pleased to tell you today that I have signed legislation that will outlaw France forever. We begin bombing in 5 minutes."

    --
    If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.