Slashdot Mirror
Fixing Internet Censorship In Schools
jcatcw writes "Schools and libraries are hurting students by setting up heavy-handed Web filtering. The problem goes back for years. A filter blocked the Web site of former House Majority Leader Richard Armey because it detected the word 'dick,' according to a 2001 study from the Brennan Center of Justice. The purpose of schools should be to teach students to live in a democratic society, and that means teaching critical thinking and showing students controversial Web sites, says Craig Cunningham, a professor at National-Louis University. He quoted from a National Research Council study: 'Swimming pools can be dangerous for children. To protect them, one can install locks ... [or] teach them to swim.' Web filtering also leads to inequities in education based on household income. Students from more affluent areas have access to the Internet at home and, often, more enlightened parents who can let them access information blocked in schools and libraries. Poorer students without home access don't have those opportunities."
In order to receive Federal E-Rate discounts, public schools are required to have filtering mechanisms in place that meet the standards set by the Children's Internet Protection Act.
I've administered K12 networks with internet access for over 15 years (both pre-CIPA, and post CIPA)... I personally preferred not having to filter and teaching personal responsibility, especially with high school students. Usually a couple times a semester a student would make a bad choice, and would be made an example of.... which would usually keep the rest of the students on the straight and narrow.
But for now, CIPA is the law of the land, so if you want free choice and thinking on your school's internet connection, contact your senator and congressman, because local admins really have no choice in this matter.
Many schools do ban cell phones, or require that they at least be turned off while the kids are on school premises.
Do a search for "yiff"...
Geoffrey Chaucer:
...That yiff that god that hevene and erthe made ...
Wolde haue a love For beaute and goodness
And womanhede and trouthe and semelynesse
An inaccurate story, as it turns out. It didn't happen that way at all.
As usual, Fox is a source of negative information.
Anyway, isn't it kind of odd to claim that the neglect of a child (which, I repeat, did not actually occur) means the promotion of the "Nanny state"? Aren't nannies supposed to be protecting children, not neglecting them? But I guess that would require some thought about just what a "Nanny state" means, and it's clearly not a phrase meant to provoke thought; it's just a right-wing shibboleth.
Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
You cannot wash away blood with blood
... satisfy the Amish.
I think the present filters satisfy every Amish parent with children in public school already. In that there are probably zero, and if there were any they would likely not use a computer with that being against their religion?
It's an ok place to start look for sources. A better place is a journal/periodical database. Most of the time you can get free access via your school, university, or a public library. Google Scholar is also a good research resource.
Don't take life so seriously. No one makes it out alive.
http://www.ap.org/
http://www.bbc.co.uk/
http://www.theregister.co.uk/
http://online.wsj.com/home-page
http://www.nytimes.com/
http://www.washingtonpost.com/
http://www.cnn.com/
http://www.c-span.org/
http://www.nationalgeographic.com/
http://www.popularmechanics.com/
http://www.scientificamerican.com/
Need I go on?
"I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-