Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Will Your Next Touchscreen Be Touchless?

Posted by CmdrTaco on from the control-the-spread-of-cooties dept.

forgot_my_username writes "The MIT Media Lab is developing a motion screen computer. It looks back at you. It measures light and gestures, and uses those to control the interface. 'Imagine every pixel on your LCD screen emitting light could also be receiving light,' said Ramesh Rakar, an Associate Professor at the Media Lab. They even mention the health benefits of not touching displays."

121 comments

  1. I prefer my mouse. by commodore64_love · · Score: 3, Funny

    I can use my computer without barely moving at all. It's the perfect tool for my lazy self. ;-)

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    1. Re:I prefer my mouse. by wampus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just think, with this no-touch screen, sitting infuriatingly still becomes a requirement for your computer to continue doing what it was doing.

    2. Re:I prefer my mouse. by dingen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The bandwith of 10 fingers is a lot higher than a mouse with just one pointer and a few buttons. You can potentially transmit a lot more instructions in a lot less time using your hands, if only we figured out a proper way to make it work.

      --
      Pretty good is actually pretty bad.
    3. Re:I prefer my mouse. by buruonbrails · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I prefer the keyboard. It's still the most effective input method and the fastest way to manage your computer and smartphone (provided you learned the hotkeys and commands).

    4. Re:I prefer my mouse. by e2d2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wish websites would understand this. I can actually input text that is not my name or address. I don't want to click click click. I want to click, type or better yet tab then type for input. For instance, the idea of navigation is so ingrained than typing the word "pass" to get to the password features has been replaced with "search screen for place to click, now click, now click again, once more, now type".

    5. Re:I prefer my mouse. by sslayer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The bandwith of 10 fingers is a lot higher than a mouse with just one pointer and a few buttons. You can potentially transmit a lot more instructions in a lot less time using your hands, if only we figured out a proper way to make it work.

      Yes, but it already exists: it's called a keyboard.

    6. Re:I prefer my mouse. by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >>>The bandwith of 10 fingers is a lot higher than a mouse

      You mean like a keyboard? Yeah they perfected that technology back in the 70s with TRS-80s (#1 computer at the time), Apple IIs, and Atari 400/800s which replaced previous toggle-switched computers with a 10-finger interface where you could type words directly on a CRT! (or TV). It was a great advancement in personal computers.

      The problem with that 10-finger interface was the high learning curve which made people have to memorize all kinds of esoteric commands and key strokes, or constantly refer to a manual (Alt E == create text box in Word for DOS). The simplicity of the mouse was found to be better.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    7. Re:I prefer my mouse. by slim · · Score: 1

      I prefer the keyboard. It's still the most effective input method and the fastest way to manage your computer and smartphone (provided you learned the hotkeys and commands)

      That entirely depends what you're doing. If you're drawing a picture, the keyboard is usually a terrible interface

      Even when there are exceptional cases -- for example, I've not found a better way to produce sequence diagrams than the text-driven http://www.websequencediagrams.com/ -- you can hypothesise a nicer interface based on touching/clicking and dragging.

    8. Re:I prefer my mouse. by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      You could use TAB to jump from one input box to another.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    9. Re:I prefer my mouse. by dingen · · Score: 1

      You mean like a keyboard?

      No, I mean like 10 mouse pointers.

      --
      Pretty good is actually pretty bad.
    10. Re:I prefer my mouse. by slim · · Score: 1

      Yes, and the hardware needs to be reasonably widespread before the hot-shot UI designers work out how best to use it.

      I thought pinch zoom/rotate was inspired when I first saw it, but I think we've only scratched the surface (heh) of what intuitive interfaces can be achieved with multitouch. Add pressure sensitivity and the palette becomes so much richer.

      I think if you could somehow make the 1cm in front of your screen something you can interact directly with would be great - giving you 'hover' semantics on top of touch and pressure.

    11. Re:I prefer my mouse. by eln · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure, except many websites don't handle tabs in a sane manner. Some end up jumping to different input fields seemingly at random, some move from an input field to the little "What's this?" link next to that input field, some move to some completely unrelated link, or to the submit button even though you're only halfway through the form, or any number of zany things. If websites were designed properly, keyboard shortcuts like tab would work as intended. Too bad so few websites are designed with anyone but an IE 8 user (with Flash player and unlimited bandwidth) clicking a mouse in mind.

    12. Re:I prefer my mouse. by ericspinder · · Score: 1

      I wish websites would understand this.

      Some already do. Almost any ecommerce site, and many 'support/help' sections will redirect based on specific searches. What you want to know is what they are, and for them to more often to support account function queries.

      --
      The grass is only greener, if you don't take care of your own lawn.
    13. Re:I prefer my mouse. by slim · · Score: 1

      No, I mean like 10 mouse pointers.

      Although at present, it's 10 mice with a single button, that only transmit position data when the button is held down.

    14. Re:I prefer my mouse. by bynary · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...giving you 'hover' semantics on top of touch and pressure.

      How much more energy does it take to keep something hovering over a surface as compared to landing said something on the surface? I would imagine that fatigue (of the fingers, hands, forearms, and etc.) would be a much bigger problem should non-touch, gesture based navigation become widespread. Right now it's our wrists, imagine waving your arms in the air for 6 to 8 hours a day.

      --
      http://www.bynarystudio.com
    15. Re:I prefer my mouse. by dingen · · Score: 2, Informative

      Obviously making your screen the touch surface will never work, for exactly the reason you give. But that doesn't mean that the touch technology itself couldn't work for a desktop computer.

      Look at this for example.

      --
      Pretty good is actually pretty bad.
    16. Re:I prefer my mouse. by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > The simplicity of the mouse was found to be better.

      Yeah? Unplug your keyboard and use the computer with just a mouse for a week, then we'll talk.

      Having *both* is better, but if you have to pick one, the keyboard is way more important than the mouse for almost all common computing tasks (image editing being a possible exception).

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    17. Re:I prefer my mouse. by davester666 · · Score: 1

      I would not have both "perfected that technology" and "Atari 400/800" in the same sentence when referring to keyboards unless there was some kind of negation involved. That plastic membrane keyboard was, ummm, bad.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    18. Re:I prefer my mouse. by e2d2 · · Score: 1

      Yes I understand that. What I really meant was the focus on visual cues using icons and links in place of an input text area. I'd love to type in "cinema" to a text box than drag down a drop down menu with 100 different categories. Just one example of where the keyboard is overlooked in favor of the mouse. I'm not a UI expert though so maybe I'm completely off. They try to water everything down to pictures and clicks it seems.

    19. Re:I prefer my mouse. by izomiac · · Score: 1

      Personally, I prefer to use the best task for the job. I launch programs with the run prompt, navigate websites with the mouse, enter data into forms with the keyboard, manage small numbers of files spatially, and manage large numbers of files using commands.

      You could use a hammer for everything, and save yourself the trouble of learning how to use multiple tools efficiently. It's certainly less work in the short term. Plus you provide everyone else with schadenfreude when you try to select a large subset of files with the mouse, or try to type out excessively long filenames with the keyboard.

      For terminal lovers: I'm well aware of, and make much use of tab autocompletion. It doesn't work in all situations, and, even when it does, the mouse is a more efficient approach for certain common tasks.

    20. Re:I prefer my mouse. by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      Good point. So use the Atari 800 instead. I remember reading Atari Age about the new XL machines - I thought they were beautiful: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Atari_800XL_Plain_White.jpg But my parents decided to buy the Commodore Plus/4 instead due to the built-in word processor.

      It died a year later due to power supply problems, and Commodore was kind enough to give all Plus/4 owners a shiny new 128.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    21. Re:I prefer my mouse. by biryokumaru · · Score: 1

      (image editing being a possible exception)

      Psh, real graphic designers do all their image editing from a CLI using ImageMagick.

      --
      When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
    22. Re:I prefer my mouse. by MpVpRb · · Score: 1

      A touchscreen leads to smudging your screen, while picking the wrong menu choice and getting your arm tired.

      Wonder why anybody likes them?

    23. Re:I prefer my mouse. by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

      Sure, except many websites don't handle tabs in a sane manner. Some end up jumping to different input fields seemingly at random, some move from an input field to the little "What's this?" link next to that input field, some move to some completely unrelated link, or to the submit button even though you're only halfway through the form, or any number of zany things. If websites were designed properly, keyboard shortcuts like tab would work as intended. Too bad so few websites are designed with anyone but an IE 8 user (with Flash player and unlimited bandwidth) clicking a mouse in mind.

      Tab order is completely optional in HTML. If you don't specify it, the tab order goes from top to bottom, left to right in the current container. This is why it highlights the "What's this?" link after the textbox... because it's supposed to do that, as per specs.

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    24. Re:I prefer my mouse. by severoon · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm processor-bound in terms of 10 finger bandwidth. I type faster than I think. Sometimes, when I've had too much coffee, I'm bus-bound instead.

      ...and he doesn't type that fast! lolrotflhahawtfbbq1!! hilarious. didn't see that coming at. all.

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    25. Re:I prefer my mouse. by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      (image editing being a possible exception)

      Psh, real graphic designers do all their image editing from a CLI using ImageMagick.

      No, real graphic designers do all their image editing with a hex editor directly on the file.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    26. Re:I prefer my mouse. by BassMan449 · · Score: 1

      No, real graphic designers use butterflies. XKCD

    27. Re:I prefer my mouse. by BassMan449 · · Score: 1

      Tab order may be optional in the spec, but the laws of user experience dictate you specify a sane tab order.

    28. Re:I prefer my mouse. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, an animated demo done by a graphic designer. Surely, graphic designers have more insight into how computers should work than anyone else, they make all those snazzy interfaces for movies!

    29. Re:I prefer my mouse. by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      sitting infuriatingly still becomes a requirement for your computer to continue doing what it was doing.

      Well, it should be possible to ignore extraneous gestures in the same way as you can tell your interface to ignore accidental trackpad input on a laptop.

      This aside, I would welcome a no-touch screen as an alternative to having to clean greasy pizza smears amd other unnecessary paw-prints off my screens, if I were required to use such an interface. Personally, I don't believe touch/non-touch screens offer any useful advantage over a mouse.

    30. Re:I prefer my mouse. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      How much more energy does it take to keep something hovering over a surface as compared to landing said something on the surface?

      More than resting it on the screen, that's for sure. How marvellous that modern technology can take the "gorilla arm" problem and make it worse.

      When I was at college we had some monitors with a primitive not-quite-touch screen that worked by having a grid of IR beams crossing them. Due to the curvature of screens in those days, the beams were more than an inch off the glass near the edges. It was very easy to accidentally trigger actions when pointing at something.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    31. Re:I prefer my mouse. by Mashdar · · Score: 1

      Sounds great for the kids.

    32. Re:I prefer my mouse. by FlyByPC · · Score: 1

      *whoooosh*

      --
      Paleotechnologist and connoisseur of pretty shiny things.
    33. Re:I prefer my mouse. by dudpixel · · Score: 1

      This is definitely an improvement.

      The windows 3-finger salute now only requires 1 finger. You guess which one.

      --
      This seemed like a reasonable sig at the time.
    34. Re:I prefer my mouse. by slim · · Score: 1

      How much more energy does it take to keep something hovering over a surface as compared to landing said something on the surface? I would imagine that fatigue (of the fingers, hands, forearms, and etc.) would be a much bigger problem should non-touch, gesture based navigation become widespread. Right now it's our wrists, imagine waving your arms in the air for 6 to 8 hours a day.

      It's definitely an issue, but not an insurmountable one.

      Firstly, it's clearly not practical to use a touch screen in the eye level position my monitor's currently at. My shoulder would be in agony after 10 minutes. You'd want the screen to be in a similar position to where you'd put a notepad or sketchbook when writing/drawing.

      Secondly, you don't want to be hovering your entire hand for long periods. If you're writing or drawing, you usually rest the wrist or the heel of your hand on the paper. Hence, a good touch interface needs to let you do this, by recognising and ignoring those touches (how to do that: someone else's problem).

    35. Re:I prefer my mouse. by jonadab · · Score: 1

      Does that mean Emacs is now the best software for real graphics designers to get their work done?

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  2. Good for the hearing-impaired by Tony · · Score: 1

    This'll be great for the hearing-impaired. We're all gonna have to learn sign language to interact with our computers.

    --
    Microsoft is to software what Budweiser is to beer.
    1. Re:Good for the hearing-impaired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its called "keyboard"

    2. Re:Good for the hearing-impaired by Suki+I · · Score: 1

      This was a concept that my writer friend had in the books I helped with. It continued through the fan fiction and now he is using it in his new series.

      In the first books, people walked around typing in the air, not paying any attention to others while looking through the transparent displays in their glasses (gogs) and listening to their earbuds.

      I moved the displays to contacts in a story I wrote, then John made the contact displays interactive with the virtual keyboards or with eye movements.

      Did not really think of the hearing-impaired angle, we were all looking at it like the way people talk into their earbuds now and look strange, but even stranger in the future.

      --
      Home of The Suki Series
    3. Re:Good for the hearing-impaired by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      That comment pushes me to the off topic thought that it is a travesty that more schools don't offer sign language as a foreign language. Learning a second spoken language is basically only useful for talking to people who don't speak the same language as you. On a day to day basis, this is only useful for a small percentage of the population. Sign language on the other hand, would (just like a spoken second language) let you talk to other people who only spoke that language, but it would also be useful for people who spoke the same primary language. How many times have you tried to talk to someone that is on the other side of a window, in a place so noisy that you cannot easily hear what the other person is saying, or were in a place where you wanted to say something, but didn't want to make sound? It doesn't happen to me every day, but I run into cases where any speech is difficult more often than I run into cases where the language is the barrier.

      Even if there was not a single deaf person on the planet, sign language would STILL be a more useful second language than French, yet every school I ever went to that offer foreign languages taught French, and not one taught Sign.

    4. Re:Good for the hearing-impaired by maxume · · Score: 1

      Did you beat Vernor Vinge to it? He published such ideas in 2001, in the short story "Fast Times at Fairmont High".

      He won a Hugo for it in 2002.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    5. Re:Good for the hearing-impaired by Suki+I · · Score: 1

      Oh wow, no way we beat that.

      John was pretty thorough about trying to get input from others to make sure his stuff did not read like others too.

      When we find stuff, like the main story here, we try to get it posted to the blog right away to give proper credit to the people who think about these things and make them reality. Especially of they were working on it before Jan. 2009.

      Updating the blog post with your comment now.

      --
      Home of The Suki Series
  3. Calibration by Trip6 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I hope there's a sensitivity calibration - I wouldn't want me shaking my fist at an outrageous story inadvertently reformatting my hard drive.

    --
    I hate being bipolar; it's awesome!
    1. Re:Calibration by netsavior · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "shaking your fist at an outrageous story" should be done UNDER the desk.

    2. Re:Calibration by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Or a scowl sends off a nasty email to an ex-girlfriend. What am I kidding? This is slashdot. That will never happen.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    3. Re:Calibration by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I hope there's a sensitivity calibration - I wouldn't want me shaking my fist at an outrageous story inadvertently reformatting my hard drive.

      I can just see the next greasemonkey script for firefox. If fist is shaken, run getoffmylawn.js...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Calibration by ridley4 · · Score: 1

      It looks like you are trying to masturbate.

      Would you like help?

  4. Apple has a better patent already by drinkypoo · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Apple already has a patent on LCD screens with integrated image sensors. Pretty sure that works based on the reflection of light, too, and it would do more than just detect gestures.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:Apple has a better patent already by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 1

      ...and it would do more than just detect gestures.

      Like lighten your wallet and provide an artificial sense of self-worth?

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    2. Re:Apple has a better patent already by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Like lighten your wallet and provide an artificial sense of self-worth?

      You can get that with a sticker but they don't yet know how to charge you $500 for it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Apple has a better patent already by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Boy, the level of discourse on /. has certainly deteriorated in the past couple of years.

      Apple was clearly investigating just exactly the tech that TFA is talking about. But when the GP mentions that they have a patent application (I don't think it has been granted yet) on that, the best TWO posters can do is to make childish snipes at "The Cult of Apple".

      By the way, YOU develop and sell the iPad for less than $500. I believe that the fact that they have SOLD OUT of the initial shipment of 240,000 units in a little over a WEEK should be enough to tell you that you need to re-evaluate your snotty attitude.

      But of course, it won't.

      NOW who's experiencing "Reality Distortion", eh?

    4. Re:Apple has a better patent already by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I mention Apple's superior display technology, and then you accuse me of only being able to snipe at Macs? You're a myopic fanboy toolbag. Go buy some more shiny electronics, and leave me alone. I hear Britney Spears has sold a lot of CDs, does that mean she's the best, like your beloved iTampon?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  5. First health benefit: by Nov+Voc · · Score: 1

    No more Cheetos-fingers when a friend asks for computer help and you don't insist on using your own mouse/keyboard... *shudders* Though orange cheddar powder is always one of the better "mystery coatings".

  6. Yakov by The_Wilschon · · Score: 1

    In America, you watch television. In Soviet Russia, television watches YOU!

    --
    SIGSEGV caught, terminating

    wait... not that kind of sig.
  7. Why do researchers by Josh04 · · Score: 1

    Hate tactile feedback?

    1. Re:Why do researchers by zappepcs · · Score: 1

      Tactile feedback does not sell new technology. What's more, waving your hands about in front of the screen is absolutely certain to be less confusing to your average computer user than a keyboard and mouse, which are more or less clearly labeled. We already have trouble with locating the 'any' key. There is no telling what kind of issues this technology might bring.

      Tech support: ok, ma'am, slow down, just tell me what happened and we'll get this problem sorted out.
      Customer: Well, I was reading email when my sister phoned. We were talking away when the next thing I know, the screen on my computer was all jumbled up with funny letters, and now I can't find any of my emails. They're all GONE.
      Tech support: Ms Bonneti, do you and your sister talk with your hands?
      Customer: What does that have to do with anything?

      click.....

      --
      Support NYCountryLawyer RIAA vs People
    2. Re:Why do researchers by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Claiming buttons are good does not publish any papers; everyone knows this. If you claim some kind of button substitute is good, you can publish two papers. One making the claim and then another comparing it with buttons in a user study and showing that, actually, buttons are better. If you're really clever, you can then publish a third paper on the methodology for evaluating button substitutes, and a fourth paper on potential problems with future button replacements. Guess which route academics prefer.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  8. Pah... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

    "The MIT media lab. is developing a motion screen computer. It looks back at you."

    They had such babies twenty six years ago...

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
    1. Re:Pah... by Locklin · · Score: 1

      Not only that, they were first conceived 62 years ago!

      --
      "Knowledge is the only instrument of production that is not subject to diminishing returns" -Journal of Political Econom
    2. Re:Pah... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Conceived 62 years ago, babies 26 years ago - that's one hell of a gestation period!

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:Pah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2010 - 62 = 1948. That's when 1984 was written. Think telescreen.

      Yeah, I know. Whoosh.

  9. Ooh... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Forget this "touchless touchscreen" nonsense. Combine this with the various clever stuff being done in lenseless digital imaging, and we will finally achieve the dream... A Telescreen in every house.

    Look for it in the next dubiously compatible revision of HDMI: "Secure audience reporting protocol" an HDMI spec extension allowing your TV to report the number and approximate demographics of viewers to your Blu-ray device or cable STB. Pay-per view programs can now control the number of viewers, V-chip 2 can now detect child-size viewers and automatically halt display of R-rated content(sorry midgets, its for the good of the children)! Neilson will be completely obsolete!

    What could possibly go wrong?

    1. Re:Ooh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Modded as funny (and it is) but this idea is still close enough to the realm of possibility to be a little disturbing.

      1984's vidscreens were like that if memory serves. And you can imagine the uses for the cable companies. And undoubtedly we'll give up another measure of privacy in exchange for a $5/month discount.

    2. Re:Ooh... by KillShill · · Score: 1

      And mirrors will become "Digital Circumvention Tools"...

      --
      Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
    3. Re:Ooh... by VGPowerlord · · Score: 2, Informative

      1984's vidscreens were like that if memory serves.

      *whoosh*

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    4. Re:Ooh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was just thinking about that; "'Imagine every pixel on your LCD screen emitting light could also be receiving light,'" sounds an awful lot like a telescreen.

    5. Re:Ooh... by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Somebody else suggested advertising that watches its watchers. I said kill it with fire.

      I should have the same reaction to this idea, and I do, but I'm not even going to say it. Because this is inevitable. This isn't funny at all. It'll happen, as surely as the RIAA will sue somebody. It will be delayed while Apple behaves as Apple usually does and radically overvalues their own patent, to the point that Taiwanese and Korean manufacturers refuse to license it, but it will still happen. If Samsung pays up and starts manufacturing these, I foresee a MPAA stampede to exploit it.

      Shit, they'll try to use it to plug the analog hole! Detected something that looks like a camera in front of the screen? Refuse to play back. After that it'll take a camouflaged camera with a military-style anti-reflective treated lens on it to take a video of a movie.

      And it's inevitable.

    6. Re:Ooh... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      As for the advertising that watches its watchers, The enemy is already here. There may be others. At least, for the moment, their technology is only economic for emplaced signage, not just any device with a screen(yet).

      As for the second, they are working on it. Current techniques, for movie theaters, all seem to be based on using IR cameras to detect the distinctive reflectivity of camcorder CCDs, along with IR or visible light lasers to flood the sensor(totally safe for the audience's vision, they hasten to assure us). Something based on a directly sensitive screen would presumably need to do more machine vision tricks, since it wouldn't have optimal lighting conditions to work with; but it'd hardly be impossible. And what are a few false positives, anyway? Just consumers.

    7. Re:Ooh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look for it in the next dubiously compatible revision of HDMI: "Secure audience reporting protocol" an HDMI spec extension allowing your TV to report the number and approximate demographics of viewers to your Blu-ray device or cable STB.

      My company has performed computer vision installtions in public spaces, and I can confirm that Intel specifically has been looking into placing "a camera in your living room" for the purposes of gathering audience demographics including how many people (and ideally what age) watch which programs and saw which advertisements.

      We were approached just over a year ago by a representative at a conference. When the issue of privacy was immediately raised by our team the response was to ignore that for the purposes of the conversation as they had reseason to believe a significant portion of the population would not be concerned.

      Posting anonymously for obvious reasons and feel free to take that into consideration.

  10. what ever happended to "vocie recognition"? by peter303 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    That seems like the obvious way to interact verbally with the computer. At least for parts of applications where you are selecting or entering text.
    Touch and gesture has its niches for visual information, where pointing is more succinct than talking or typing about the action.

    APIs for both systems are necessary.

    1. Re:what ever happended to "vocie recognition"? by netsavior · · Score: 2, Informative

      have you ever worked in a cubicle next to a sales person? When they "rightsized" our department they relocated us to in-between a call-center and a sales floor. It was pure hell people yammering on at the telephone alllll day. Now add to that everyone also yelling shit at their computers, and see how much productivity you gain.

      If it won't work for business, it will never catch on.

      Now how about voice control for home? Will it work while I watch a movie? because I never game without a movie or at least loud music playing in the same room...


      If it won't work for games, it will never catch on.

      The holy grail for user interface MUST be silent or close to it, in order to catch on fully. This is why people keep trying stupid alternatives, because the reality is that the "obvious" ones are actually just as bad as the "silly" ones.

    2. Re:what ever happended to "vocie recognition"? by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Voice recognition isn't mature yet. Just look at Youtube videos, it has an error in every line. I prefer to simply write the stuff instead of having to correct it afterwords.

      --
      Dilbert RSS feed
    3. Re:what ever happended to "vocie recognition"? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I tried out the voice activation on my new netbook just this past Saturday, and the first thing I discovered was it won't work when the TV is on. So much for using it at Felber's with all the noisy drunks, except maybe outside in the beer garden.

      --
      Free Martian Whores!
    4. Re:what ever happended to "vocie recognition"? by Zerth · · Score: 1

      What happened to voice recognition?

      It worked really well until an intern ran through the lab shouting "bash, Ar Em dash Ar Ef asterisk, SHUTDOWN NOW!"

      That's when they switched to EEG-based typing.

  11. Health Benefits by Yvan256 · · Score: 5, Funny

    They even mention the health benefits of not touching displays.

    Especially for my co-workers. The last one who touched my display got stabbed in the hand by a spork.

  12. It looks back at you? by Yvan256 · · Score: 4, Funny

    The MIT media lab. is developing a motion screen computer. It looks back at you.

    What are you doing, Dave?

    1. Re:It looks back at you? by freedomischaos · · Score: 1

      Oh nothing really, Big Brother.

  13. Project website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://web.media.mit.edu/~mhirsch/bidi/

  14. Sounds familiar... by Angst+Badger · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How many fingers do you see, Winston?

    --
    Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
    1. Re:Sounds familiar... by 517714 · · Score: 1

      There is one. Does it matter which?

      --
      The US government have made it clear that we have no inalienable rights; any we do not defend vigorously will be taken.
    2. Re:Sounds familiar... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I see six.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  15. Obligitory H2G2 by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 5, Funny

    A loud clatter of gunk music flooded through the Heart of Gold cabin as Zaphod searched the sub-etha radio wavebands for news of himself. The machine was rather difficult to operate. For years radios had been operated by means of pressing buttons and turning dials; then as the technology became more sophisticated the controls were made touch-sensitive — you merely had to brush the panels with your fingers; now all you had to do was wave your hand in the general direction of the components and hope. It saved a lot of muscular expenditure of course, but meant that you had to sit infuriatingly still if you wanted to keep listening to the same programme.

    ....

    Another voice broke in, presumably Halfrunt. He said: "Vell, Zaphod's jist zis guy you know?" but got no further because an electric pencil flew across the cabin and through the radio's on/off sensitive airspace. Zaphod turned and glared at Trillian — she had thrown the pencil.

    --

    Technoli
    1. Re:Obligitory H2G2 by azmodean+1 · · Score: 1

      Came in the thread just to search for "pencil", thank you for slightly improving my opinion of mankind.

      -Only slightly, mind you, you're still just a bunch of Neanderthals who occasionally bang out an intelligible phrase by accident, but at least it's sometimes an amusing phrase.

  16. This could be bad for pron by forgot_my_username · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hypothetically, if I knew someone who may have at one point or another visited a site with risque adult material....
    well, I see potential interface issues
    ...
    right, I am off to register touchlessporntube.com

    1. Re:This could be bad for pron by disi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Right, I remember this one scene in the movie Minority Report where they move pictures along on a big glass-screen. Try to do this kind of stuff on a touchscreen...

  17. this by zobier · · Score: 1

    Seriously, who wants their screen to be a camera, wouldn't a camera be able to do the same - only more cheaply.

    Also, Gorilla Arm.

    --
    Me lost me cookie at the disco.
    1. Re:this by NitroWolf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I wouldn't mind it being a camera, just for the simple fact that then I could video conference and have it look like I'm actually looking at the person, instead of the screen BELOW (or above) the camera.

  18. Need new gestures to be invented by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whole slew of new gestures to be invented and patented!

    Wait a minute, I have one already.. (gestures) Fsck you! (c) [patent pending]

  19. This is the first step toward "eye focus" ads by Culture20 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Get the public used to the idea of computer vision input for everyday tasks, and suddenly adware starts including drivers for the cameras (just in case you forgot to install the drivers yourself).
    "People seem to keep looking at the upper right hand corner of the ad window. Move most of the content there, and the subliminal content to the bottom. Horizontal mirror image for Mac OS X and Ubuntu 10.4"

    1. Re:This is the first step toward "eye focus" ads by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      Oh my god, kill it with fire. Who the hell modded this interesting. Mod it TROLL! Anything to prevent the marketing monkeys seeing it. Mod it into oblivion!

      Fortunately Adblock Plus should still be able to kill the audience-aware ads...

    2. Re:This is the first step toward "eye focus" ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will the advertisements also notice the look of purest hate in my eyes as they try to foist their crap on me for the thousandth time? I hope so.

    3. Re:This is the first step toward "eye focus" ads by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Will the advertisements also notice the look of purest hate in my eyes as they try to foist their crap on me for the thousandth time? I hope so.

      User #9624609 is squinting with more interest every time we repeat the ads. Send him five more.

  20. Really - I just was glancing at those Boobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No need to auto-zoom in....

  21. Quotes by globalsnake · · Score: 1

    Anyone know if the quotes are set up so that the individual sheep read them, or are they the torture of the day.

  22. Nietzche Monitor by NitroWolf · · Score: 1

    So is the first Nietzsche 30" Hi-Color Monitor?

    It would be a great ad campaign... just a black and white screen and the words slowly fade in: "When you stare into the monitor the monitor stares back at you."

    Then a picture of the monitor and in the background the crushed carcasses of all the other monitors competing with it.

  23. Just wait... by thijsh · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've seen a concept of this once where the screen was what they called a 'surface camera' I think. The idea was that you can use it as webcam, input device but also as a scanner... you just put a piece of paper against your screen and you have an instant copy you can edit. And i can imagine they could also extend this with an infrared pen or something like that to create a touchscreen that can also be used as a high-resolution drawing tablet. Just wait until Wacom builds a screen with tech like this and people will go crazy for it.

    1. Re:Just wait... by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      And we'll finally have to let go of a classic tech support phone call. No more mocking the secretary with the piece of paper held to the screen.

      Oh well, we'll always have cupholders.

      Now the idea of extending it to include a light stylus... THAT I like. I don't think that was mentioned in the Apple patent. Make it a diode laser in the stylus and you could get the focus down tight enough to be per-pixel accurate. That sounds very useful.

      Might not be necessary to include a light in the stylus at all. Image analysis could probably detect a stylus tip pretty easily. A touch screen that's not actually touch sensitive. Sounds useful. Less likely to break or drift out of calibration than actual touch screen systems.

      Too bad about the patent.

  24. apple patented this a few years ago? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought apple had a patent like this back in around 2005~2006 where there were sensors for every pixel that acted like a camera. I remember reading it on engadget but nobody knew what that patent was really about.

    1. Re:apple patented this a few years ago? by macs4all · · Score: 1

      I thought apple had a patent like this back in around 2005~2006 where there were sensors for every pixel that acted like a camera.

      They did.

  25. Sanitary... by HockeyPuck · · Score: 1

    Since /. is a IT oriented site, and this story makes a comment like

    "They even mention the health benefits of not touching displays."

    I wouldn't mind a solution that solves the sanitary benefits of getting rid of hand scanners. I'm sorry, but I work in a colo, and there's a hand scanner next to the badge reader (you scan you badge, then your hand and the first door from security to the datacenter opens up). I carry a tube of hand sanitizer because I have no interest in following 500 people with whatever bacteria/viruses they are carrying since entering the facility, returning from lunch or the restroom.

    Someone needs to invent a hand scanner that you don't need to put your hand on any type of surface.

    1. Re:Sanitary... by Dog-Cow · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It would be better to invent people who are not total idiots and assholes regarding proper hygiene. Day to day, there are no diseases you can pick up through touch that your immune system cannot handle with ease. Unless, of course, you are a total idiot that never exercises his immune system.

    2. Re:Sanitary... by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      How do you handle doorknobs? People touch those too.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
  26. Imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Imagine every pixel on your LCD screen emitting light could also be receiving light,"

    Imagine turning off your computer and going outside and seeing the world for a change.

    1. Re:Imagine by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Well, I looked through the window, and where the sky should be I've just seen blue. Therefore I conclude the outside world must have crashed. So I'll wait until they restart it.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  27. Why is this a good idea? by Tangentc · · Score: 1

    I don't think that this will die for security concerns, though it does have tremendous potential to cause them. I think this will die because it's unnecessary, impractical, and redundant. Because this requires gestures much larger than would be required with a mouse or traditional touchscreen; and it doesn't really provide much in the way of increased functionality for the cost of the experimental technology. Lastly, it's because we can already make webcams small enough to fit right above laptop LCD screens which could realistically be used in the same way for a lot less money. Think of it like Sony's Eyetoy, both in how it will be innovative and how it will completely flop.

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.
  28. touchscreens are to be avoided where possible by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    I work in the avionics industry, some of our products use touchscreens. I find touchscreens are much slower/less productive in use compared to a keyboard/mouse setup. Also they get very icky very quickly. Sometimes its even hard to read the screen after a few people have used the system, apparently some people like to rub their hands in dirty sump oil before using touchscreens. Personally I choose just about any other form of input over touchscreen when possible.

  29. Not new by inKubus · · Score: 1

    This isn't anything new. We've been able to do this for years! ;)

    --
    Cool! Amazing Toys.
  30. Will your next article.. by eXFeLoN · · Score: 0

    be completely thoughtless? researchers believe it possible.

    --
    My other sig is a knife wound.
  31. That's it exactly by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    I think I would slit my wrists if I had to work in an office where everyone spent all day talking to their computers rather than typing and/or mousing to communicate with them. There's a reason people don't work that way, and it's not the technology (which is pretty much there now). It's that people don't want that much yammering going on all the time.

  32. Less accurate by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

    I keep saying all the time, I really wish I had a less accurate way to use my touchscreen, and have even less tactile feedback.

    Extending my finger all the way to the screen is such work.

    Please, sign me up!

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
  33. Anonymous Coward. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah sure, everything i want from my devices is even less tactile feedback.
    give me back my keys and get off my lawn

  34. Software solution by gmuslera · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A webcam (or maybe 2 for 3d gesture recognition) is the only hardware device needed, no special hardware that senses with not very fine resolution where are your fingers and usually not with how much intensity are pressing. Think in Microsoft Surface, or better yet, in Sixth Sense technology. Moving the game to mostly software land gives a good potential for features, at least if cpu is enough.

  35. Apple already has this patented. by Brian+Recchia · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PG01&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=%2220060007222%22.PGNR.&OS=DN/20060007222&RS=DN/20060007222 They have a patent for cameras hidden in between pixels.

  36. Great, now we've got a portable abyss... by emag · · Score: 1

    Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the abyss, the abyss gazes also into you. Friedrich Nietzsche

    --
    "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." --H.L. Mencken
  37. puttygen.exe ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... is now creating your secure ssh key. Don't move the mouse to create random noise, just scoot around the office on your office-chair.

  38. Did you see the Vista speech recognition demo? by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

    Dear Aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all.

    Video Link

    --
    GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
  39. I feel a sneeze coming on... by tomzyk · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just think, with this no-touch screen, sitting infuriatingly still becomes a requirement for your computer to continue doing what it was doing.

    Aahhh aaahh AHHH ACHOOO!

    You have just motioned that you want to reformat your D partition. Is this correct?

    "What?! No I didn't!!"

    You nose appears to be pointing towards the YES button and your emphatic gestures indicate the CLICK action. Formatting now.....

    --
    Karma: NaN
  40. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  41. Yo dawg, we herd u liek gorillas. by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    So we made your touchscreen touchless, so you can have a gorilla finger, while having a gorilla arm!

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.