Slashdot Mirror


Kid's Single Lady Dream Is Crushed

All you need is $250,000, a considerable amount of counseling and psychiatric assessment, speech therapy, and hair removal.

27 of 45 comments (clear)

  1. Child endangerment by jayme0227 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This guy is driving the vehicle and manning the camera? He should be in jail, not Youtube.

    --
    But then I realized the cable was blue, so I only gave it one star. I hate blue.
    1. Re:Child endangerment by Razalhague · · Score: 1

      The two are not mutually exclusive.

    2. Re:Child endangerment by ben2umbc · · Score: 1

      Well, at the end he does say "I'm a horrible father" so it must be true by his own admission

    3. Re:Child endangerment by RulerOf · · Score: 1

      He should be in ... Youtube.

      Oh. My. God.

      How does one get in Youtube!?!??! I MUST KNOW!

      --
      Boot Windows, Linux, and ESX over the network for free.
    4. Re:Child endangerment by schon · · Score: 2, Funny
    5. Re:Child endangerment by ezbo · · Score: 1

      I just spit coffee all over my keyboard laughing at that.

    6. Re:Child endangerment by EkriirkE · · Score: 1

      You go here or here.

      --
      from 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
      to 45 2F 6E 40 3C DF 10 71 4E 41 DF AA 25 7D 31 3F
    7. Re:Child endangerment by Trogre · · Score: 1

      You... do know that YouTube isn't a place, right?

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    8. Re:Child endangerment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Dammit Ez, I am getting tired of replacing you keyboard. Quit reading funny shit, immediately. Sys Admin

  2. May he be assrapped in the Clink for his crimes. by harrytuttle777 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think this is flame bate (God I hope it is), but I will bite.

    People in U.S. of A used to be able to get away with this wild reckless kind of behavior. I remember traveling in the bed of a pickup, riding a bicycle w/o a safety helmet, and drinking water straight from the garden hose totally oblivious to saliva borne pathogens deposited by the kid before me. Those crazy days are gone forever. Now that we are growing up, and becoming a more civilized society, I realize that my parents subjected me to child endangerment. They should also be arrested. Think of the children.

    In the more civilized world, people should be prevented from making dangerous choices, for themselves, and those around them. Back in the crazy days we did reckless things like send space ships to the moon, or travel on wooden ships that had in no way passed a Coast Guard safety inspection. Now we wory about unauthorized texting, or someone not spending every single ounce of attention to driving on roads that are backed up for miles with traffic jams.

    Well, at least we have a president that realizes the dangers that we face. He will wrap us up in a comfortable safety net of subsidized health care. This way noone will be injured or die. If the crazy individualists still insist on endangering themselves and the families (think of the children) by not buying into the program they should be jailed.

    Actually, now that I think of it jail is the solution to our problems. 1% of the population incarcerated. I think we can do better America. We can do 10%.
    By providing free room and board for those eviceted in the housing crises, America will be fulfilling its social contract to help those in need, and looking after their safety at the same time. I mean you would not let a stray dog just run around will-nilly on the streat. Why should you let a person?

    -America.
    -Land of the free and home of the brave.

  3. driving and recording? by h2k1 · · Score: 1

    He should be driving Pamela Anderson, not kids...

  4. god, where to start? by gandhi_2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    the post-modern friends-not-parents coddling their cry-ass kid, videoing the back seat while driving, misguided hippie attempts to fight gender roles.... the 3 kids look like a diversity poster from a Puget Sound-area charter school.

    1. Re:god, where to start? by RulerOf · · Score: 1

      A single lady's got to earn his money somehow.

      --
      Boot Windows, Linux, and ESX over the network for free.
    2. Re:god, where to start? by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      and what's up with the fucked up aspect ratio of the video? what sort of crazy-ass camera records in PORTRAIT?

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
    3. Re:god, where to start? by EkriirkE · · Score: 1

      Any camera without a 1:1 aspect ratio.

      --
      from 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
      to 45 2F 6E 40 3C DF 10 71 4E 41 DF AA 25 7D 31 3F
    4. Re:god, where to start? by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      You did not read my question? Have you used a camera that records in 1:1? Or one that records in a portrait orientation? Asking because i have not. Not my handycam, not my phone, not my p&s nikon.

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
    5. Re:god, where to start? by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      If the person holding it was doing so sideways it would. They likely just corrected it w/ post-processing. People do it all the time with still cameras. Heck many digital still cameras now have sensors that automatically turn the image when taking a picture like that. Having someone try it on a video camera isn't THAT odd.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    6. Re:god, where to start? by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      my phone and camera both turn images the right way, but NEVER videos. i really haven't seen one that does it. if someone knows such a phone/camera please tell me so i won't buy.
      thsnks in advance.

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
    7. Re:god, where to start? by EkriirkE · · Score: 1

      I read it just fine - and no, I've never used a 1:1 format.
      ...
      Look at how you're holding your camera/phone right now. Now rotate the camera 90degrees in either direction - voila!
      Many times you need to re-rotate it on the computer after transfer as many softwares ignore EXIF rotation (where available).

      --
      from 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
      to 45 2F 6E 40 3C DF 10 71 4E 41 DF AA 25 7D 31 3F
    8. Re:god, where to start? by rnaiguy · · Score: 1

      iPhone

    9. Re:god, where to start? by Splab · · Score: 1

      My old Sony-Ericsson w810i turned it.

      Pretty sure my Nikon D90 does it too, haven't tried though, video isn't that interesting.

    10. Re:god, where to start? by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      i have a w810i here with me, it does not rotate even pictures automatically because it does not have an accelerometer. There is no option to rotate video that i can find. My c510 turns pictures the right way but not videos. Anyway one replier has written that iphone records in portrait. So it must be that.

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
  5. Re:One of each?! by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 3, Funny

    'Gotta catch 'em all'?

    --
    Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
    altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
  6. Re:May he be assrapped in the Clink for his crimes by chrb · · Score: 1

    In the more civilized world, people should be prevented from making dangerous choices, for themselves, and those around them.

    Sometimes they should. I don't want to be on the same roads as a drunk driver. Do you?

  7. Rubbish by Snaller · · Score: 1

    As he writes at TFV (video):
    "And I was looking at the road...not the back of my phone.
    You don't look at your soda when you are holding it do you?"

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  8. Re:May he be assrapped in the Clink for his crimes by harrytuttle777 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I guess, I think people should be held accountable for their actions regardless of the circumstances, and not because of them.

    Meaning that if someone is drinking and driving or texting and driving, or talking to their wife and driving, and they get into an accident and kill someone, the punishment should be the same.

    You and I both may think the person texting and driving is an a$$hole, but in a free society, that person has that right. Now if they get into an accident, it is a different situation. They should be held accountable. Freedom means that individuals must be held responsible for their actions. However it is not up to the state to baby everyone, and tell people how to behave.

    There are millions of distractions on the road every hour. Are you going to make them illegal. In some ways engaging in a heated conversation when you are driving is just as distracting, if not more then texting. Come to thing of it, driving is inherently dangerous. Maybe we should keep people from doing that too. It is just a matter of how far you are willing to go to legislate 'good behaviour'

    -Regards

  9. If american fathers educate children this way.. by BlueTak · · Score: 1

    ...No suprise that the country is going crazy. Wait for the moment when the girl will learn that Santa Klaus doesn't exist : prozac required immediately !