Slashdot Mirror


Son Sues Mother Over Facebook Posts

Most kids hate having their parents join in on a discussion on Facebook, but one 16-year-old in Arkansas hates it so much he has filed suit against his mother, charging her with harassment. From the article: "An Arkadelphia mother is charged with harassment for making entries on her son's Facebook page. Denise New's 16-year-old son filed charges against her last month and requested a no-contact order after he claims she posted slanderous entries about him on the social networking site. New says she was just trying to monitor what he was posting." Seems like he could just unfriend her.

8 of 428 comments (clear)

  1. Re:16 years old, no legal rights against parents. by quantumplacet · · Score: 4, Informative

    RTFA, his grandparents have custodial rights, not his mother.

  2. NOOOOO, my delicate preconceived notions! by Millennium · · Score: 5, Informative

    So at first I felt like the kid was overreacting. Parents (or those in loco parentis, which I'll get to in a moment) have a legitimate need-to-know when it comes to what's going on in their kids' lives.

    However, according to the article, this kid's mom doesn't have custody. The grandparents do, and so this doesn't seem to be due to divorce or other "ordinary" situations that would cause a parent to lose custody of their own kids. In other words, something is seriously messed up here, and so while the fact that this is a mother/son thing is good for grabbing ratings, it's not really all that relevant to the matter at hand.

    Moral of the story: RTFA.

  3. Re:16 years old, no legal rights against parents. by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Informative

    I mean, if they whack them...the kid can call child services on them.

    That doesn't mean child services will do anything about it. It's legal here in New York State (hardly a bastion of cultural conservatism) to hit your kids:

    35.10 Justification; use of physical force generally. The use of physical force upon another person which would otherwise constitute an offense is justifiable and not criminal under any of the following circumstances:

    1. A parent, guardian or other person entrusted with the care and supervision of a person under the age of twenty-one or an incompetent person, and a teacher or other person entrusted with the care and supervision of a person under the age of twenty-one for a special purpose, may use physical force, but not deadly physical force, upon such person when and to the extent that he reasonably believes it necessary to maintain discipline or to promote the welfare of such person.

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  4. Stupid woman by Locke2005 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Half of the comments on that article are by Ms. New herself. Obviously she hasn't hired a lawyer yet, because the first thing a lawyer would do is tell her to STFU... she isn't making herself look like any more fit a parent by showing her ass in public in all these postings... and they're probably admissible in court as evidence that she is continuing to harass and slander her son!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  5. Re:Alternatives by Davey+McDave · · Score: 4, Informative

    A case of RTFA in this case, a careless untruthful comment on the summary.

    "In a document from the Clark County prosecutor, he alleges she hacked his account, changed his password and posted things that involve slander about his personal life."

    The posts weren't from her account on his statuses or whatever, it sounds like she actually went onto HIS account and posted slanderous things in his name (or at least, that is what is being accused). Sounds a little more serious now.

    --
    I've got the spirit, lose the feeling.
  6. Re:This crap has gone too far. by Imrik · · Score: 3, Informative

    She allegedly hacked into his account and made posts from it so no, he can't just block her.

  7. Re:No contact. by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Informative

    Stop being so selfish, and let someone called to this line of work have your position.

    I didn't say I was direct care. I'm the IT person at my particular agency. You couldn't pay me enough to work in a direct care role. If I did work in such a role I would have been arrested a long time ago for beating the shit out of some "parent" that abused one of my clients.

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  8. Re:The real question by WCguru42 · · Score: 4, Informative

    The place I see "racism" is in the very idea of the assumption that anyone from the south deserves to be denigrated and disrespected automatically

    First, that assumption would be correct. Second, the word you're looking for is douche-baggery, not racism.

    --
    "Educate the mind but never at the expense of the soul."~Blessed Basil Moreau