Slashdot Mirror


Wisconsin DA Threatens Arrests Over Sex Ed

WrongSizeGlass writes "USA Today is reporting that the DA of Juneau County, Wisconsin, is warning teachers that they could face arrest over the new sex-ed curriculum. District Attorney Scott Southworth said a new state law that requires students learn to use condoms and other contraceptives 'promotes the sexualization — and sexual assault — of our children.' Southworth also said, 'I'm not looking to charge any teachers. I've got enough work to do.'"

6 of 703 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Why not make it voluntary? by Derekloffin · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you RTA, you will see it IS voluntary. Schools need not do it, and you can have your kid not attend it if they do.

  2. Re:Same guy? by beakerMeep · · Score: 5, Informative

    He also apparently sued the University of Wisconsin claiming their fess violated his first amednment rights because they funded such disagreeable things as "Day care" and "WYSPRIG"

    Sadly it seems he won his $160 back.

    http://www.nacua.org/documents/southworth.html

    What an asshole.

    --
    meep
  3. Sex Ed outside US by Danish_guy · · Score: 5, Informative

    First off, sorry for the long post

    Second off, Seriously WTH??

    I'm a teacher at a danish public school and what the DA is suggesting here is almost criminallly negligent in Denmark.
    The pupils here HAVE to learn how to use contraceptives, it's the law. IMHO anything else is shooting yourself in the foot.
    Not teaching them these things will not prevent the kids from having sex. I've never quite understood the whole American "If we don't talk/think about it then it doesn't exist!" attitude. To be fair though, it's not just the americans. Earlier this week I watched a documentary about British teenagers and their knowledge about sex and it was horrifying. Chicken skin as condoms, rinse out with cola, eat indian food the day after you've had sex. These were somewhat widely spread beliefs among teenagers on how not to get pregnant.(it's 4 in the morning atm and I can't remember what the documentary was called, but I'll find the link to the statistics later after I've slept)

    Anyway, enough of my ramblings.
    I'm glad to hear that Mrs. Helen don't see things the way the DA does. I can not for the life of me see how not teaching about contraceptives would be the better choice. Hindering the spread of STD's and minimising unwanted teen pregnancies would only seem like a good thing, no?
    let's just for arguments sake do a little thought experiment.
    Based on the belief(my belief at least) that teens will have sex no matter what we tell them i see a few different scenarios.

    1: Teens have sex -> Teens don't use protection -> By sheer dumb luck nothing happens.

    2: Teens have sex -> Teens don't use protection -> STD gets transmitted -> Numerous doctors appointments and various medication that in the best case kills the STD and in the worst case the girl will not be able to bear children later in her life.(drastic contrast I know, but entirely possible and it serves the example well)

    3: Teens have sex -> Teens do use protection -> If used incorrectly there's a high probability that we'll end up as in example 2

    4: Teens have sex -> Teens do use protection -> If used correctly the risk of STD's or unwanted pregnancy is reduced to a virtuel minimumm.

    Feel free to correct these if you feel I've messed up, I AM going on my 28th hour awake.

    So even the knowledge of contraceptives can be hurtful if it is not well founded.

    Granted my students look at me like I've lost my mind when I bring bananas and condoms to class, and granted they're quite shy and embarresed at first, usually we'll just end up having a laugh about it though.
    I even know a colleague of mine encouraged her pupils to learn how to put on the comdoms using only their mouths, both the girls AND the boys(Who knows, some of them may be gay and this might come in handy?) This is far from standard curriculum though and not something any school here would reccomend. But as teachers we do have a lot of leeway to use the techniques we see fit.

    oh and as a last little side note here. We DO teach our pupils about alcohol, both in general and from personal experience uusually. They're gonna try it at parties anyway, so might as well prepare them as best we can. I'm not saying we bring alcohol to school, that's highly illegal, but we do talk about it in almost every aspect. The taste, smell, looks, effect(good and bad) etc. as do we when it comes to sex. The teachers have to make up with themselves if they want to include personal experience or not, but talking about how sex feels(both physically and psychologically) and what the goods and bads are about it, tends to have a lot more succes than just dry boring anatomy facts and standard info on STD's. Of course the anatomy, biology and the STD info is required teachings, but just listing facts is a dead sure way of not getting your pupils attention.
                               

  4. Re:Translation for the legislative impared. by Martin+Blank · · Score: 5, Informative

    Teen pregnancy rates dropped from 1990 to 2005 to the lowest level in decades. Drug abuse rates have actually been decreasing on a gentle slope. Divorce rates have declined from 0.47% of the population in 1991 to 0.37% in 2004.

    How's that war on actual facts going?

    --
    You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
  5. Re:Translation for the legislative impared. by e4g4 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Teen Pregnancy
    Drug Use
    Divorce Rates

    For those not inclined to RAnyFA - they all agree with the GP.

    --
    The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources. - Albert Einstein
  6. Re:Translation for the legislative impared. by couchslug · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/tgr/05/1/gr050107.html

    Teen pregnancy has not skyrocketed. The proportion of non-marital births has increased.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."