Slashdot Mirror


IE9 Throws Down the Hardware Acceleration Gauntlet

An anonymous reader writes "Over on Microsoft's IE blog they have an interesting comparison of browsers with regard to hardware accelerated page rendering. They write, 'One of our objectives with Internet Explorer 9 is taking full advantage of modern PC hardware to make the browser faster. We're excited about hardware acceleration because it fundamentally improves the performance of websites. The websites that you use every day become faster and more responsive, and developers can create new classes of web applications through standards based markup that were previously not possible. In this post, we take a closer look at how hardware acceleration improves the performance of the Flying Images sample on the IE9 test drive site. When you run Flying Images across different browsers you'll see that Internet Explorer 9 can handle hundreds of images at full speed while other browsers, including Internet Explorer 8, quickly come to a crawl.' Absent from the comparison is a nightly build of Firefox with Mozilla's forthcoming Direct2D acceleration enabled."

15 of 601 comments (clear)

  1. Re:What'll you bet... by houstonbofh · · Score: 4, Funny

    But why? So I can support more flash adds on a page? Please, no...

  2. Re:I don't want flying images in my browser by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 4, Funny

    What about those of us who don't want to see flying-rotating-3d-semitransparent-glowing-shaded adverts flying across our web pages.

    Just use Lynx.

  3. Re:Who understands "throws down Gauntlet"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why do people keep using idioms which don't mean anything in the modern language any more?

    On naive reading it would sound like IE9 is giving up.

    Right, they're quitting because that stupid Elf keeps shooting all the food.

  4. Re:The slowest part of my browser... by ShadyG · · Score: 3, Funny

    You could upgrade your connection. That's hardware acceleration right there.

  5. Re:Why bother ... by gzipped_tar · · Score: 3, Funny

    You forgot a functional x86 emulator written in javascript so you can run Linux in Firefox in Linux in Firefox in Linux...

    --
    Colorless green Cthulhu waits dreaming furiously.
  6. Re:What'll you bet... by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 3, Funny

    Chrome is bitchin' fast. I know people complain about it being Google's evil eye of Sauron watching everything you do, but I don't care. It's bitchin' fast.

    --
    I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
  7. They should fix their rendering code first by unity100 · · Score: 3, Funny

    for their shitty ie8 treats tag as a block level element. which means, you cant format or distribute long, populated forms properly with the use of divs, tables or any other form of structured output tag. adding "display : inline;" to a separate style declaration into the form tag doesnt fix it either. so, if you have any nested structure coexisting with the form, the tag acts like a or a

    in regard to that structure in ie8. no other browser has this issue, not even ie6 has this issue.

    this is a current hell, that i am in precisely at this second in time, and i have to fix their incompetence for my client.

    so my advice to them is ; fix your browser before doing any 'acceleration'.

  8. Re:Who understands "throws down Gauntlet"? by eddy+the+lip · · Score: 5, Funny

    I goodthink his assertion. Goodspeak clear. Unreal wordpics doubleunclear. Unreal wordpics make badthought. Unmodern peoplegroups had unhealth from doubleplusungoodthinking wordpics.

    --

    This is the voice of World Control. I bring you Peace.

  9. Re:I don't want flying images in my browser by AndrewNeo · · Score: 3, Funny

    He also forgot to tell us to get off his lawn. Or was that implied?

  10. Re:I don't want flying images in my browser by sweatyboatman · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is the entire human history of ignoring the loud and obnoxious rabble and jamming what needs to be done down the throats of the scared, huddled masses

    fixed that for you. only half meant as a joke.

    --
    It breaks my pluginses, my precious!
  11. Re:I don't want flying images in my browser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    What about those of us who don't want to see flying-rotating-3d-semitransparent-glowing-shaded adverts flying across our web pages.

    Just use Lynx.

    $ telnet www.example.com 80

  12. Re:Who understands "throws down Gauntlet"? by archangel9 · · Score: 2, Funny

    This discussion of idioms is just badong.

  13. Re:Firefox 3.6 on linux works like a dream with de by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Got their first what?

  14. Re:I feel sad. by Thud457 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Verily I hear you, English! You won't believe what a arduous chore it is to travel into town since they've removed the hitching posts and watering troughs. Bessie might wander off, along with my carriage, in search of water were I step into the general mercantile to buy a bolt of gingham for the Mrs.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  15. Re:why flamebait by lowlymarine · · Score: 2, Funny

    Starfleet's new proprietary warp 3 drives far outshine the open-source models. The teracochrane output isn't even comparable! You're barely going to get warp 2, 2.1 at best out of those F/OSS things.