Slashdot Mirror


Bloomberg Reports That Palm Is Up For Sale

leetrout writes with this excerpt from a story at Bloomberg News "Palm Inc., creator of the Pre smartphone, put itself up for sale and is seeking bids for the company as early as this week, according to three people familiar with the situation."

49 of 240 comments (clear)

  1. First bid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'd buy that for a dollar!

    1. Re:First bid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hahahaha, you're the same guy come back to explain your joke.

    2. Re:First bid by nacturation · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm all of the above people... I just forgot to login.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  2. BeOS! by Fallingcow · · Score: 5, Interesting

    AFAIK, Palm still owns BeOS.

    Hopefully whoever buys them does something with it, or sells it to someone who will.

    1. Re:BeOS! by cameljockey91 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Is that really a feasible or even necessary move? BeOS hasn't been developed in over a decade by the original programmers; what relevance does it have now? Palm failed to utilize the OS, and Be Inc. even changed direction away from BeOS before they were bought.

      --
      "Human kind cannot bear very much reality" ~T.S. Eliot
    2. Re:BeOS! by Fallingcow · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, open-sourcing it would qualify as "something" :)

      I'm sure that'd help the folks working on Haiku.

    3. Re:BeOS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, Palm sold BeOS when they sold Palmsource. Besides, BeOS is dead. Everyone will just have to accept that.

    4. Re:BeOS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah!

      Now we can have a viable competitor to Hurd!

    5. Re:BeOS! by BikeHelmet · · Score: 5, Insightful

      what relevance does it have now?

      The only OS to ever do GUI responsiveness properly?

    6. Re:BeOS! by blind+biker · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I think BeOS stil has a relevance today, as it beats the pants off any current OS in respnsiveness to The User: any command/mouseclick has the highest priority, file copy be damned. I have tested with many current OSes (even OS X fails this test) start copying a huge file, and see if responsiveness is affected at all. With BeOS, it wasn't - not even the slightest. The file would get copied a few secconds later, if I interact a lot with the UI, but so fucking what?

      What a pleasure it was to use BeOS. For whatever reason, programmers just refuse to create such pleasant-to-use operating systems.

      (I won't relay the often mentioned smoothness of displaying videos and playing MP3s. It's not that important. But it sure is impressive when you can play 30 MP3s at the same time, and some even backwards. Is there ever been an OS that dominated all the others so blatantly? The things BeOS was able to do were simply ridiculous.)

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    7. Re:BeOS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My understanding was that while BeOS had many advantages such as the one you cited, the companies like Apple that looked at it decided it was going to be harder to hone the OS down into a practical and consumer-friendly operating system, in terms of refining or seamlessly adding on all the services that needed to be there. And we take an incredible amount of services for granted now, such as being able to render everything from HTML to streaming video in many different apps. But if they were missing, they would be missed, and apparently they were missing and not all that easy to hook up in BeOS, which was conceived back when computers were far more isolated islands than they are now.

      Maybe BeOS did a few things like performance really well, but the demands on an OS for extensibility, scalability, security, hardware compatibility, etc. are much higher today compared to when BeOS was conceived. An OS today must be holistic - good at everything, including a very long list of features that programmers and alpha geeks either don't care about or don't want but are essential to acceptance by consumers and enterprise.

      Feel free to correct me as I know I'm generalizing the hell out of what I've read.

    8. Re:BeOS! by ducky101 · · Score: 2, Informative

      AFAIK, Palm still owns BeOS.

      No, they don't own it anymore. PalmSource, the owner of PalmOS and BeOS was sold to ACCESS Co. in 2005.
      Source http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BeOS#History

    9. Re:BeOS! by ledow · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I do think that current OS's really suffer from the "give me my damn mouse back, let me click that button, don't make me wait for seven thousand services to start up before you let me click the start button that appeared in the first second" syndrome. But that doesn't make an OS, that makes a GUI on top of an OS. The problem is "easily" solved (for a definition of easily) by queueing user events and handling mouse motion / keyboard input in a separate thread (not at all a performance problem with modern machines).

      User reponsiveness is vital, that much I can agree on. I can't wait for the OS that can properly remember and queue user events from the first second so that I can send a list of keystrokes and have it get on with them - I hate when Windows chugs and your button clicks are completely ignored (programmatically, graphically, etc.) and then there's a burst of activity once it's idle again. Ideally, such interaction would be per-application (so non-busy apps would still respond as fast no matter what else was chugging away) - incidentally, window-focus-steals are the worst idea ever invented, whether by the OS or the applications themselves.

      But that's a GUI issue, for the most part. Yes, the OS shouldn't chug that badly in the first place but when it does, the underlying GUI still has millions of cycles in which to respond. It doesn't, because of deep-level order dependencies and other things. The main problem, though, is programs and OS's drawing themselves before they are actually able to respond - I've seen Windows desktop, start bar, etc. appear sometimes MINUTES before the start button can actually be clicked in any useful manner, and that's *completely* pointless and just makes me think that the computer is much slower than it actually is. It's a pain in the arse and all programs should be made to draw to a back-buffer until they are actually ready to respond to user input, and any that don't within 0.5 of a second should be terminated in the style of Windows' "This program has stopped responding".

      The problem is not the OS (though some OS queueing techniques can help desktop interactivity), it's mainly the application side... programs that draw too early, set themselves up piece-meal and serially, draw the user into clicking them before they can respond (what's wrong with greying out any buttons/menus until you *are* ready to respond to them?), don't queue events properly and aren't allocated a high-enough event priority when they are the main-focus app.

      That's not worth an obsolete (sorry, but it is) OS, when it can be fixed by a simple event model and some slightly stricter application requirements. You can't hold an OS responsible if the programs draw themselves, then go through a serial setup and ignore all button presses in between, or when they are busy, etc. Proper multithread use is the main factor. The OS is not.

    10. Re:BeOS! by edittard · · Score: 4, Funny

      set themselves up piece-meal

      Don't spell piecemeal in a piecemeal way.

      --
      At the bottom of the /. main page it says 'Yesterday's News'. Well they got that right.
    11. Re:BeOS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      (I won't relay the often mentioned smoothness of displaying videos and playing MP3s. It's not that important. But it sure is impressive when you can play 30 MP3s at the same time, and some even backwards. Is there ever been an OS that dominated all the others so blatantly? The things BeOS was able to do were simply ridiculous.)

      Ah yes.. the first time I ever tried it I managed to open _all_ my MP3s at once (I wasn't very smart back then) and sat there for several minutes - jaw dropped to the floor as all of them (or most, I couln't really make out individual sounds) played at once, my desktop piled up with windows each playing one file.

      And I could still navigate around without getting stuck somewhere... one of the more amazing moments of my (probably too boring) life..

    12. Re:BeOS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yup, it was missing a lot of the bloat that's forced down our throats with other OSes and that's why it was so fast and elegant.

      But what was really missing was better driver support and applications.

      Off course, it didn't help that the Be Inc never had the balls to try and compete with Microsoft. First they wanted to make computers (BeBox) then they thought they were going to be bought by Apple. After that, they tried the niche market of audio. In Japan they managed to get BeOS pre-installed on a few machines but Microsoft quickly reacted and made sure those manufacturers "reconsidered their decision".

      The only thing that might have saved BeOS at this point would have been to open source it, but apparently they couldn't due to some licensed code.

    13. Re:BeOS! by dangitman · · Score: 3, Funny

      AFAIK, Palm still owns BeOS.

      Pfffft. Big deal. I still own BeOS, it even came with a nice book. You don't see me trying to sell myself for millions of dollars.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
  3. Re:Google should buy them by eparker05 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    To expand on your point; Google lacks a great deal of intellectual property that puts them at legal risk from competitors such as RIM and Apple when it comes to their Android OS. A Google acquisition would spell a quick end to the HTC vs. Apple suit. On the other hand, if RIM, Apple, or Nokia acquires Palm, we can say hello to a torrent of lawsuits directed at every aspect of their respective smartphone manufacturing competitors.

    As an aside, I don't think it would be bad if Microsoft purchased Palm, since Microsoft's smartphone IP is shallow at best. I would be happy to see a real Windows Mobile OS pop up that could cut it with iPhone OS or Android, and I don't think that WM 7 is going to do it.

  4. Sad by jsse · · Score: 5, Interesting

    One of their original flagship 'Pilot 5000' is my first PDA, and people can see the immense potential in it - a lightweight programmable widget. Few months after its first launch a guy called Adams set up a website to share homebrew Pilot's applications and games around the world, the era of Palm had since begun. (Regardless of million hits daily, Adams fold his website after marriage, by his wife's order. He should really regret it by now)

    Palm was actually doing good until one day some pinheads in the management decided that sales is more important than technology advancement. It's amazing to see history repeated itself over and over again in tech world.

    Another good line of products ruined by great management decision. Sad, really sad.

    1. Re:Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Good business can carry crap tech, even the best tech can't correct for even mediocre business.

      Sad, but that's how it rolls

    2. Re:Sad by Phat_Tony · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's always sad to see a once-great company die, but it's especially sad with Palm right now because they came so close to turning things back around at the last minute, which is rarely the case for long-dying companies. The writing had been on the wall for Palm since before the iPhone even came out, and the mere existence of the iPhone looked like the last nail in the coffin for Palm. Then, stunningly, when it seemed like they'd lost their pulse, Palm come out with an entirely new operating system with some really compelling aspects on a brand new competitive hardware platform. If they'd had a little more capital left to keep up a few rounds of hardware and software revisions, maybe they could still make it. Also, the Pre alone might have saved them if they weren't in one of the fastest-evolving, most competitive consumer electronics markets there's ever been, with the iPhone, Android OS, HTC Hero, Motorola Droid, Blackberry Storm2, etc.

      I still use a Sony Clie PEG-N710C running PalmOS for word-processing on the go. No current smartphone can compete with its docking and folding Stowaway keyboard, its reflective color TFT screen that I can see in direct sunlight at the park or on the beach, Documents to Go to seamlessly sync any word processing documents back and forth with my computer, and the ability to mount its Memory Stick as an external drive via a USB cable with any computer so I can copy my files to others on the go. Of course, it would get killed by modern devices on nearly any other task, but for ultra-portable word processing, it still kills anything else I've found.

      --
      Can anyone tell me how to set my sig on Slashdot?
    3. Re:Sad by phantomfive · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Another good line of products ruined by great management decision. Sad, really sad.

      Remember that next time anyone complains that CxOs are overpaid. Good ones really are worth their money (yeah, the bad ones really aren't, but you can say the same about engineers).

      --
      Qxe4
  5. Re:Google should buy them by i+ate+my+neighbour · · Score: 4, Funny

    I would be happy to see a real Windows Mobile OS pop up

    No thanks, I had enough with the pop ups on their desktop OS.

  6. WebOS actually looks great by melted · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'd say it looks better than iPhone OS, and that says something. I hope HTC (or Lenovo, or someone else competent) buys them (and their substantial patent portfolio) and makes an iPad competitor based on WebOS, just to piss off Apple. Steve Jobs will be livid -- any lawsuit will only bring an equal and opposite countersuit, and the software is Apple quality (indeed, much of it was written by ex-Apple engineers and designed by ex-Apple designers), which makes it twice as painful.

    1. Re:WebOS actually looks great by failedlogic · · Score: 2, Informative

      The tentativeness of this 'news' seems important. Goes up on a Sunday before markets open. I'd hate to say it, I wouldn't put it past a competitor to drop a rumor like this as a kick in the nuts.

      The iPad competitor based on WebOS has me chuckling and dreaming of the possibilities. Steve will be so livid to see this happen I'll be LOL'ing.

      Its too bad some cell phones are locked down so much. If price for WebOS wouldn't be so bloody high, would make a really nice project to open source.

    2. Re:WebOS actually looks great by ProppaT · · Score: 4, Informative

      WebOS is by far the best mobile OS on the market. It's still young and still has its problems, but the GUI is as beautiful as it is useful. The "type anything anywhere" concept is beautiful. You want to set an alarm and can't remember that you do that in the clock ap and you don't remember where it is? That's fine...type in alarm from anywhere in the UI and it'll show you the clock icon. It handles multitasking well, looks miles better than anything else on the market, and the best part....there's a backdoor purposely left in for us nerd types to install unapproved apps, overclock the processor, etc. Palm did everything right with WebOS except the marketing.

      My first choice for a purchaser would be HTC. They could take their form factors they were designing for Windows Mobile phones, dump WebOS on it, and have market penetration nearly over night. They're going to have to have new designs/concepts for WM7 soon anyway. Either way, there's going to be a bidding war for Palm because of all the patents they hold. The WORST possible thing that could happen would be Apple buying them for the patents and dissolving the software.

      --
      Wise men say, "Forgiveness is divine, but never pay full price for late pizza."
    3. Re:WebOS actually looks great by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You know what's really depressing about your post? These 'amazing' features that you describe were present on the Newton 15 years ago. Unfortunately, Apple takes NIH to extremes and won't use something invented here but in a different building, so the iPhone lacks them all.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    4. Re:WebOS actually looks great by ProppaT · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, but you're talking about Apple, not Apple. Two distinctly different companies. Apple was a fantastic company that looked to do interesting new things and push concepts and technology. Apple is a company that is so in love with their own vision that they purposely leave out important features if they get in the way of this vision. Palm is/was a great company because they've always had a vision and always pushed the vision, but they've always been realistic about their limitations and mixed a little bit of Apple A with a little bit of Apple B.

      But you're absolutely right, Job's has a major NIH issue and it's honestly a shame.

      --
      Wise men say, "Forgiveness is divine, but never pay full price for late pizza."
    5. Re:WebOS actually looks great by snowwrestler · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, it's a shame he never borrowed ideas from Xerox.

      Or Konqueror, or Unix, or Adobe, or Macromedia, or SoundJam, or Tony Fadell, or Fingerworks. And it's too bad Apple never thought to outsource their manufacturing to leverage the PC components designed and built by other companies like Samsung, Seagate, Western Digital, Nvidia, ATI, Intel, etc.

      Yeah, it's a shame Apple has insisted on inventing everything themselves.

      --
      Build a man a fire, he's warm for one night. Set him on fire, and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  7. Re:No surprise. by spmkk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Not compelling enough? Quick: name two smartphones that have a touchscreen AND a physical keyboard on one surface, with no (other) moving parts. The Pre may not be a godsend, but the Pixi certainly is.

    I have the Pixi Plus with Verizon service. Other than battery life (which is a well-documented issue that has several acceptable solutions), I cannot find a SINGLE thing I don't love about it.

    It's a shame the app store isn't on par with Apple's. As devices go, it's not only one of the most technically capable phones on the market, it's also the ONLY real smartphone that fits in the pocket of a pair of jeans. For someone who doesn't carry a purse, that is a huge factor.

    One of the problems is that in all the side-by-side reviews, the Pre always beats out the Pixi because...wait for it...it can't run as many apps at once. (Note: the iPhone presently can't run more than one, and reviewers worship it.) So people buy the Pre, and then aren't happy with it because the form factor is annoying and the keyboard is unusable (and because they expect their battery to last three days while they watch videos over Wi-Fi). And Palm gets a bad rap, even though they make a device that people would fall in love en masse with if they weren't talked out of giving it half a chance.

    To each his own, but for me Palm offers a product that nothing else today can compete with. I really hope the market gives them a fair shake before letting their technology fade away.

  8. Too bad by frist · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's a shame, the Palm Pre really is a nice phone, I prefer it to the iPhone. WebOS is nicer, and the native SDK is out now. The browsing experience was comparable when I compared iphone to pre. And it has a real keyboard that pops out. They totally blew the ads though, those horrible TV ads w/the weird chick going "oh wait, I just did that" - most likely alienated many potential customers. I know the freaked me out.

  9. Re:Google should buy them by miffo.swe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The problem is there is nothing Google really needs at Palm. The patents would just be used for defense against really crappy patents that should never have been issued in the first place to Apple. As for Android, i personally prefer it over both iPhone, Symbian and WebOS. Palm wouldnt bring anything to the table.

    Nokia on the other hand, they would benefit greatly.

    --
    HTTP/1.1 400
  10. more than 3 is chaos by nohumor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    buy out of palm will be great move if it leads to consolidation of mobile OSes. as of now, we have OS X, android, symbian, winmo, blackberry, webOS, etc... typically most industry have 3 big guys, that is the case for desktop too - win, mac, linux. i think blackberry should buy out palm. blackberry makes solid devices but lack the gee-whiz factor which webOS and ex-apple employees at palm can bring. nokia in turn should buy out blackberry to create a platform which is solid, functional and cool.

    1. Re:more than 3 is chaos by SpeedyDX · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Then HTC should buy out Nokia to combine great touchscreen hardware with a solid/cool/functional platform, and then LG should buy out HTC and put cool blinking lights and win back the teenage girl market. But by then the phone would have lost their business market so they would have to spin off their business-oriented smart phone division (formerly Blackberry). Of course, former Nokia employees would be pissed that LG is creating flip phones and using touchscreens so they all rage quit and form their own phone company that focuses on simple-to-use candy-bar and slider phones. Also because of the flip phone format, touchscreen user-friendliness would be rendered nearly useless, so LG would spin off their touch division (formerly HTC).

      Are we done speculating now?

  11. the one in the /. icon by perryizgr8 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    i have it with me. kept in my old drawer. even though its b/w touchscreen is old, and the cpu is 21Mhz, it was still very good. it had all the customizability my e71 has and had a very painless ui. indeed, it was better than the s60 ui in 5800.
    i have never used the pre because its cdma, there's no decent cdma network here. and of course palm did not launch it outside the us.

    --
    Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
  12. Palm don't want my money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I live in a rich country in Europe. Palm will not take my money to buy a Pre, over a year after its introduction.

    I hope Palm will serve as an example to companies: If you introduce a product whose sales are uncertain, you need to sell it worldwide as soon as possible, otherwise you are just turning down peoples money.

    Palm: Great Engineers, Rubbish Marketeers.

  13. It's dead for a reason. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think BeOS stil has a relevance today, as it beats the pants off any current OS in respnsiveness to The User: any command/mouseclick has the highest priority, file copy be damned. I have tested with many current OSes (even OS X fails this test) start copying a huge file, and see if responsiveness is affected at all. With BeOS, it wasn't - not even the slightest. The file would get copied a few secconds later, if I interact a lot with the UI, but so fucking what?

    That's it? So what?

    How many applications are available for it?

    And how many jobs are out there for it?

    Any proprietary software on it that can't be moved to OSX or something?

    And hardware support? Does it support modern hardware?

    The to all the above is 'no'.

    BeOS is dead for a reason.

    1. Re:It's dead for a reason. by Stormwatch · · Score: 4, Interesting

      BeOS is dead for a reason.

      Yes, and the reason is: Microsoft bullied PC makers so they would not sell computers with any other OS. See here.

      People hate Microsoft for a reason.

  14. Re:No surprise. by tacarat · · Score: 3, Funny

    No feedback to give. I just saw all the *rats and had to say hi.

    --
    "Common sense will be the death of us all"
  15. I thought U2 had a stake by cyberzephyr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I thought the band U2 had a stake in Palm?

    --
    I'm here for the experience, not the Hyperbole.
    1. Re:I thought U2 had a stake by santax · · Score: 4, Informative

      Don't know why you are being mod funny. The investment firm of Bono (elevation -something) actually has put a lot of money in Palm. http://www.benzinga.com/general/193399/bono-named-worst-investor-palm. Seems that elevation is quite relative!

  16. Re:No surprise. by Vectormatic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    now i dont know jack about the palm-pre of web-os, but since when do you NEED an app store on a proper smartphone? The iphone might have triggered android in hopping onto the "app-store" bandwagon, and with all the ipad-hoopla, the media might make you think that without an app-store you cant do anything, but a proper smart-phone should be able to have software installed which isnt given the official X seal of approval.

    My 3 year old nokia doesnt have an app-store (come to think of it, it has the n-gage thing for games), but i still managed to get opera installed... or just about any piece of java code i write.

    I thought the entire point of smart-phones was that they grew closer and closer to a general purpose computer, not being a walled-garden

    --
    People, what a bunch of bastards
  17. Obituary for BeOS by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "I once preached peaceful coexistence with Windows. You may laugh at my expense - I deserve it."
    -- Jean-Louis Gassée, CEO Be, Inc.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  18. Re:HTC by RMH101 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    HTC would own Palm's IP, which appears to be strong enough to ward off Apple - as Apple are suing HTC for features in Android (huh?) currently, this would both strengthen their hand with Apple, and with Google and the Open Handset Alliance, and also give them a choice of going HTC-WebOS, using Android, or Windows Phone 7 (which now you can't skin it removes HTC's Sense UI)

  19. Palm doesn't own it anymore. by bornagainpenguin · · Score: 3, Informative

    AFAIK, Palm still owns BeOS.

    No, that would be ACCESS who own the BeOS code base and who have already blessed the Haiku developers with permission to distribute the BeBook and other assorted documentation. The BeOS code is safe. The Haiku clean room implementation will make it easier to modernize the base for R2 once full BeOS compatibility is reached.

    --bornagainpenguin

    --
    Have a Virgin Mobile USA smartphone? Give VMRoms.com a try!
  20. Re:All of my Palm is up for sale too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's a sweet couch man, I'll give you £35 for it!

  21. Not an application problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You are wrong.

    The problem is that the disk I/O priority in Windows is done in a (presumably) FIFO kind of way, regardless of which application and thread is performing the request. So when Explorer requests 5 x 10 KB files (the icons for the start menu items) from disk, it has to wait 5-10 seconds before Windows finally delivers because 10 other services currently booting are loading DLLs.

    Suggesting that Explorer should instead have already loaded the icons into memory will not work simply because the user STILL has to wait 10 seconds extra before he can click his start menu. Not to mention the problem of how deep you want to load icons in the start menu tree. Even if it loaded them all it would still not help you because when you then selected your application to boot, that process would now need to load 10 megabytes of executable data and that too would be delayed by the other processes doing disk I/O.

    Sadly when faced with this problem Microsoft chose to first ignore it for 10 years. Then they made the hack called Superfetch in Windows Vista. It attempts to solve the problem by actively loading all DLLs into memory and thereby reducing the amount of I/O requests that require actual disk access, hiding the problem somewhat in certain situations. Unfortunately that tactic still doesn't work when you start your file copy or when Windows Search decides to start scanning your disk in the background or if you do a simple file copy.

    I have an USB disk that can stall Windows 7's I/O so badly that if I start copying large movie files to it, any other I/O request can end up being delayed for over 30 seconds! And these other requests were not even intended for the USB drive but my primary Velociraptor SATA disk. Clearly there is something in kernel space that could benefit from some serious improvements. But hey, at least we got ribbons in MS Paint in this release. ;)

    I do agree that resurrecting BeOS for this feature alone is fairly pointless when one could simply just improve the I/O code in the kernels used today. Too bad it requires someone at Microsoft to do it.

  22. Re:No surprise. by d3ac0n · · Score: 2, Informative

    And it isn't. Palm already has a vibrant non-official app ecosystem. Because it is so dead-easy to program for, many iPhone and Android programmers have ported their apps to WebOS, and they are in the unofficial "catalogs" (Such as PreWare) already.

    Very sad to see this happen to Palm. I have a Pre and absolutely love it. Hopefully they will get picked up by HTC or another handset maker and be turned into an OS company. Let's be honest: While WebOS is without a doubt the very best smartphone OS yet made, (Yes, Google Fanboys, it is better than Android in almost every way possible.) it has been crippled by inadequate hardware since launch.

    This is clear when you get a Palm Pre Plus from Verizon and use one of the custom patches that are out there to overclock the processor to a level equal to that of an iPhone or Android handset. WebOS becomes WAY more responsive and is such a dream to use you want to weep for joy.

    So with luck we will see WebOS on HTC or some other great handset within a year.

    --
    Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
  23. Re:No surprise. by Martin+Blank · · Score: 2, Informative

    There is a lack of some types of apps, but it's not as if the entire app store has no merit. Most of the content of all of the app stores is trivial. It's possible that the overwhelming majority is like that. But there are definitely exceptions to that, and some of them are available on WebOS. Here are a few examples:
      - X-Plane (flight simulator series with several forms of it)
      - Need for Speed
      - Epocrates (Medical reference program)
      - TimeTracker (project-coordinated time tracking by GPS location and/or SSID)
      - Graphing Calculator

    There are also several good fitness tracking apps, some apps for geocaching, and some reasonably good sudoku and crossword apps. I couldn't tell you how good the chess apps are, as I'm not very good at the game.

    I haven't seen any stand-alone GPS navigation apps, though it wouldn't be hard to put one together, I think. Google Maps does not (yet) have turn-by-turn, though Sprint's Navigation app is fairly decent and well-integrated (though requires a data connection).

    --
    You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.