Slashdot Mirror


Aussie Army Trains With Fleet of Robots On Segways

kkleiner writes "The armed forces of the world have already begun to hunt down and shoot robots. No, it's not the beginning of the man-machine war; it's a state-of-the-art training simulation that's very cool to watch. Australia-based Marathon Robotics has taken Segways and turned them into human-shaped autonomous robots capable of moving around streets and buildings just like people in a crowd! The Marathon bots can act like insurgents, hostages, or civilians, letting armed soldiers practice before being exposed to the real thing. The Australian Department of Defense already has a training camp using the robots, and the US Marine Corps will be establishing one this year."

109 comments

  1. I for one welcome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...eh...nevermind

  2. cruel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No words. It's just cruel.

    1. Re:cruel by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Cruel? To whom? PETR?

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  3. Life imitating (recent) art... by sznupi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If only they made some of those robots similar to Serge Graystone; or perhaps, more appropriately, to few targetbots we've seen in the pilot.

    --
    One that hath name thou can not otter
    1. Re:Life imitating (recent) art... by frosty_tsm · · Score: 1

      If only they made some of those robots similar to Serge Graystone; or perhaps, more appropriately, to few targetbots we've seen in the pilot.

      Pilot? If I recall, they've shown up in later episodes as well.

    2. Re:Life imitating (recent) art... by grcumb · · Score: 2, Funny

      If only they made some of those robots similar to Serge Graystone; or perhaps, more appropriately, to few targetbots we've seen in the pilot.

      I'm waiting for the robotic kangaroos with Stinger missiles:

      Eager to demonstrate their flying skills for some visiting American pilots, the hotshot Aussies "buzzed" the virtual kangaroos in low flight during a simulation. The kangaroos scattered, as predicted, and the Americans nodded appreciatively . . . and then did a double-take as the kangaroos reappeared from behind a hill and launched a barrage of stinger missiles at the hapless helicopter.

      --
      Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
    3. Re:Life imitating (recent) art... by MakinBacon · · Score: 1

      If only they made some of those robots similar to Serge Graystone; or perhaps, more appropriately, to few targetbots we've seen in the pilot.

      Pilot? If I recall, they've shown up in later episodes as well.

      Just Serge. In the pilot, the Cylon was shooting at similar robots in some sort of testing chamber.

    4. Re:Life imitating (recent) art... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My brother was involved in that project.

      When I asked him about Kangaroos with stinger missiles, he replied with the classic "I could tell you, but I'd have to kill you", with a grin on his face that tells me it was real.

      Years later he told me it was actually that they'd just changed the skins on the soldiers to kangaroos for the demo, and forgot to turn off the weapons function.
      They actually fired beach balls with stinger missile stats, someone had been playing silly buggers at some point in the build.

  4. All I know is... by stakovahflow · · Score: 1

    All I know is that I've got to A) Get a Segway & B) Get my Segway armour-plated & C) Get a life, as thinking Segways are cool is lame...

    --Stak

    --
    Holy happy hippy crap!
  5. Ahh yes... by decipher_saint · · Score: 1

    The second Most Dangerous Game!

    --
    crazy dynamite monkey
  6. Wait... What? by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

    Marathon bots can act like insurgents

    And you don't think this is dangerous? Perhaps the insurgents you are programming are not like the insurgents we encounter.

    1. Re:Wait... What? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think insurgents in real life can climb stairs. I hope that doesn't come as a nasty shock to some Aussie soldier in the future...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:Wait... What? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Funny

      But we'll know who to call when the Daleks show up...

    3. Re:Wait... What? by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      But we'll know who to call when the Daleks show up...

      These are not the Daleks you seek. Nothing to see here. Move along.

      --

      That guy on the Segway looks suicidal.

    4. Re:Wait... What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From an Engadget article on the same story:

      "There's a video of that after the break, along with an RMP 400 doing some sweet jumps off-road, even roaring up stairs."

    5. Re:Wait... What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think insurgents in real life can climb stairs.

      So can Segways.

    6. Re:Wait... What? by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      But we'll know who to call when the Daleks show up...

      That idea may include some unwarranted tactical assumptions.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  7. Resourceful... and comical by bughunter · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Few can command respect by being simultaneously resourceful and comical. Aussies seem to accomplish this feat regularly.

    Hats off, mates! Seriously, as an engineer, I think this is awesome.

    It's somehow Pythonesque, but I can't put my finger on it.

    --
    I can see the fnords!
    1. Re:Resourceful... and comical by mjwx · · Score: 4, Funny

      Few can command respect by being simultaneously resourceful and comical. Aussies seem to accomplish this feat regularly.

      We are also training killer Wombats and Koala drop bears.

      Fear your beer swilling, redneck English, southern hemisphere overloads and our homicidal marsupials.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    2. Re:Resourceful... and comical by anarche · · Score: 1

      We are also training killer Wombats and Koala drop bears.

      dude. on a serious note, lets try and do what we can to protect the drop bears.

      Those suicidal little bastards need all the help we can give 'em to survive.

      --
      Wait! Whats a sig?
    3. Re:Resourceful... and comical by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Americans probably have trouble imagining what a wombat really is so I'll describe it:
      Imagine a bag of pre-mixed concrete with fur. Add claws designed to make it dig like a backhoe and you have a wombat.

    4. Re:Resourceful... and comical by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Americans probably have trouble imagining what a wombat really is so I'll describe it:
      Imagine a bag of pre-mixed concrete with fur. Add claws designed to make it dig like a backhoe and you have a wombat.

      There was a picture of one of the vicious beasts in the article I linked to.

      Next thing you'll be describing the deadly Australian Land Shark, which can follow you 90 Kilometres on shore.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    5. Re:Resourceful... and comical by dbIII · · Score: 2, Informative

      True, but I'd seen dozens of photos of wombats before I saw a real ones and got that impression. Trying to stop a fairly young Wombat from going where it wanted to go was like stopping a minature bulldozer :)

    6. Re:Resourceful... and comical by 2obvious4u · · Score: 1
  8. Oblig. by arcsimm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I, for one, welcome our new Segway-riding military android overlords!

    1. Re:Oblig. by PlasmaEye · · Score: 1

      Beat me to the punch. I wonder if the robots spin counter-clockwise when they get hit with an EMP?

  9. Aussies, Simulators and war by OzPeter · · Score: 1

    This was the first thing I thought of when I saw the story! Shoot Me Kangaroo Down Sport

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  10. Re:Ridiculous by Gravatron · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually, the videos showed them using it as sniper training. In real life, the targets move around, scatter when shots break out, etc. You can't simulate that with paper targets, and shooting at real people during training generates a lot of paperwork.

  11. Politics aside by pwnies · · Score: 3, Informative

    I would pay cash to be able to play this.

    1. Re:Politics aside by Droideka-TheGuy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's called paintball.

    2. Re:Politics aside by ShooterNeo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not NEARLY the same. In this, you're firing live rounds! A recoil, a powerful bang, real bullets go through cover, etc. Could even come up with a sport where it would be a lone man on the course with a real gun versus a team of people controlling the robots. Kinda a Rambo challenge, where if a robot manages to shoot the lone player with a paintball the robot wins.

    3. Re:Politics aside by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Kinda a Rambo challenge, where if a robot manages to shoot the lone player with a paintball the robot wins.

      Wuss, it should be live rounds both ways!

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    4. Re:Politics aside by 2obvious4u · · Score: 1

      Glad someone else brought up paintball, because it would be awesome to arm these things with paintball guns. You could add bots to your paintball matches, that would be awesome!

  12. insane terrorists? by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    These robots do not look like terrorists, they are more like either insane terrorists or a bunch of idiot pervy wankers, however, I say give them guns to shoot back and put bombs on some of them dammit, otherwise what kind of real life simulation is that?

  13. Overly complicated and expensive by riker1384 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why couldn't they have rigged up some cheap 4-wheeled robots to carry targets around? Then there would be no need for the expensive Segway balancing mechanisms.

    1. Re:Overly complicated and expensive by je+ne+sais+quoi · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you watch the video, they mention that the Segways lurch forward a bit when accelerating in a way that is similar to the posture of a human running. Also, I suspect that the stability that 4 wheels gives a platform is far too unrealistic to mimic humans well: If you ever read up on the physics of walking on two legs, you'll find that humans tend to lurch and sway a lot in a somewhat similar way to the segways.

      --
      Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is the war room!
    2. Re:Overly complicated and expensive by riker1384 · · Score: 1

      So add one hinge and motor, and tilt the target back and forth if you want. That's still a lot simpler than the Segway's gyros and all that crap.

    3. Re:Overly complicated and expensive by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      Because then instead of simply buying a segway and stripping it down to the essential parts, you are rigging up a completely new and untested platform, and needing to built it yourself. The segway's "gyros and all that crap" are indeed complicated, but somebody else already did that part for you...

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    4. Re:Overly complicated and expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you can't build a hinge into a 4-wheeled or tracked robot?
      Bottom half stays stationary, top half can lean in any direction. In fact, it sounds better than a segway because it can lean left and right.

    5. Re:Overly complicated and expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are rigging up a completely new and untested platform, and needing to built it yourself.

      Yes, because there aren't any existing platforms in scooters/wheelchairs/atvs/toys?

  14. Not to be obvious by Wrexs0ul · · Score: 1

    But when they want "unprecedented levels of realism" in a training scenario against real people, why not use real people? Outside of the odd practice with live ammo it doesn't like there's even good reason to simply invent a better non-lethal training weapon. It's probably cheaper and suffers none of a robot's shortcomings with terrain... ...like, say, Daleks and their pre-2009 arch nemesis: stairs.

    Unless there's a reason where you wouldn't simply want more soldiers/police/etc. practicing as the other faction?

    -Matt

    --
    --- Need web hosting?
    1. Re:Not to be obvious by icegreentea · · Score: 4, Informative

      The robots are for sniping practice. For long range shooting, nothing comes close to the actual thing. You really don't want to put real people out on the range.

      I mean sure, they COULD just send their snipers off big game hunting, but that might not play so well.

    2. Re:Not to be obvious by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      With this system, they can have one person controlling a whole fleet of robots. And by controlling, I mean he presses start on the computer. That's quite an advantage over having 20 people that you're not even allowed to shoot at.

    3. Re:Not to be obvious by c6gunner · · Score: 1, Troll

      But when they want "unprecedented levels of realism" in a training scenario against real people, why not use real people?

      I like your enthusiasm, but most civvies get upset at the idea of being used as live-fire targets. They won't even let us use the prisoners from Gitmo!

      Outside of the odd practice with live ammo it doesn't like there's even good reason to simply invent a better non-lethal training weapon.

      Ah, I see the confusion. You didn't actually RTFA. No big surprise.

      These robots are intended specifically for live-fire training. For everything else, we certainly DO use real people.

    4. Re:Not to be obvious by Eudial · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Daleks were seen hovering as early as 1985 in Revelation of the Daleks, but I guess that's digressing.

      --
      GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
    5. Re:Not to be obvious by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I recall an incident at an Australian military base recently where some guy shot at a friend assuming that he was firing blanks, and discovered one ohnosecond later that he was firing live rounds. On that occasion blank rounds were banned completely so that the users could assume that any ammo is live ammo. Its safer that way. Even safer to never fire at a human, unless you mean too.

    6. Re:Not to be obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      COULD? They have, and do. Usually to get rid of pests such as goats etc...

    7. Re:Not to be obvious by indiechild · · Score: 1

      This lets you practice with live ammo. While you could use blanks and MILES-type systems and get decent results, nothing really beats firing off a real bullet.

    8. Re:Not to be obvious by TapeCutter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "I mean sure, they COULD just send their snipers off big game hunting, but that might not play so well."

      They have been doing that since WW1. The recent shooting of 6000 terrorist camels hardly raised an eyebrow over here.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  15. Re:Ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There is a world of difference between holding a rifle in your hand in the field vs a computer sim.

  16. Australian Department of What? by GumphMaster · · Score: 1

    It's Australian Department of Defence you insensitive clods.

    --
    Patent litigation: A doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction... in which everyone seems willing to push the button
    1. Re:Australian Department of What? by Phrogman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Give the US its due. Many of its citizens have learned to speak the Queen's English with fairly good results, its just on the spelling front that they apparently have problems. Sadly, up here in Canada a lot of people are adopting the US spellings it seems. I presume this is due to so many spell checkers defaulting to the mangled US spellings for words (if they offer the correct spelling as an option at all).

      --
      "The first time I got drunk, I got married. The second time I bought a chimpanzee, after that I stayed sober" Arian Seid
    2. Re:Australian Department of What? by quenda · · Score: 1

      Fair suck of the saveloy - even we Aussies get confused on that one.
      A lot of email gets lost/delayed because they refuse to register @defense.gov.au and redirect it.

    3. Re:Australian Department of What? by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Can a 3rd party register defense.gov.au? What are the controls and restrictions to registering it?

      --
    4. Re:Australian Department of What? by jibjibjib · · Score: 1

      gov.au. is controlled by the Australian Government Information Management Office; registration is only open to government entities. See http://www.domainname.gov.au/Eligibility_and_Allocation_Policy .

  17. A further benefit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When you have spent a year or so shooting 100+ robots dressed up in various ways and moving in various patterns, it's not that different shooting a couple of insurgents. Almost like robots.

    1. Re:A further benefit by conspirator57 · · Score: 1

      per Shooter, the movie

      q: what's the first thing you feel after you shoot a civilian?
      a: the recoil of your rifle.

      desensitization and social acceptance.

      it's also the reason space operas are more popular than other military sci-fi and naval / aerial battles are more popular than infantry: it's more clinical. things go boom cleanly and you can avoid confronting the facts of death.

      i'm not saying that snipers are inherently evil or that it isn't a necessary function, but i'd rather not encourage the development of sociopathic behavior any more than the actuality of the job does on its ow
      n.

      --
      "If still these truths be held to be
      Self evident."
      -Edna St. Vincent Millay
  18. Re:Ridiculous by Runaway1956 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hmmm. How would YOU train soldiers? There were no segways, no robots back in my day. Or, more accurately, the few robots we had were capable of very limited functions, like loading a missile onto a missile launcher.

    As already mentioned, blowing holes in paper targets is exactly that, a hole in a paper. Papers don't move, except a few rather complicated setups which move the target in one linear direction, or the reverse. Those robots can move in at least two dimensions, at varying speeds, and probably in 3 dimensions if ramps are built for them. Pretty good training, really. And as Gravatron has already pointed out, shooting at people can ruin people's days.

    Let's just hope they aren't paying the price of an Apache helicopter for these robots.

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  19. Amazing by gnarlyhotep · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Someone actually found a viable real-world application for Segway that isn't a publicity gimmick.

    1. Re:Amazing by Planky · · Score: 5, Funny

      and you get to shoot them! What better use is there for Segways :)

    2. Re:Amazing by Phrogman · · Score: 1

      That was my first thought too. Watching the video does make me want to play with a Segway though.

      --
      "The first time I got drunk, I got married. The second time I bought a chimpanzee, after that I stayed sober" Arian Seid
    3. Re:Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And immediately spawned another real-world practical application.

      If these things are remote controlled, you can easily drive one into a bank, and get your ransom and out the door without even so much as speaking, let alone being there on the spot. Put a bomb on that thing, and I'd hand over the cash in a flash.
      Did I just give away the plot to Die Hard 16?

  20. if one misses the 'target' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just wait, it will probably tip over damaging the robot. segway? will it ever end?

  21. Re:Ridiculous by iamhassi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Grown men wasting tax payer $ to play real life video games. It just goes to show you how much money can be wasted on 'defense' spending, and no one bats an eyelid."

    And what is your suggestion to train for realistic scenarios? Dolphins with frickin' laser beams?

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  22. Re:Ridiculous by c++0xFF · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... and shooting at real people during training generates a lot of paperwork.

    Only if you miss.

  23. Insurgent on Segway .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
  24. Simulate people? by porky_pig_jr · · Score: 1

    I thought aussies are fighting with cane toads and camels.

    1. Re:Simulate people? by anarche · · Score: 2, Informative

      nah, we've given up on both those fronts and figured we might stand a chance of an actual victory if we stick in afghanistan

      --
      Wait! Whats a sig?
    2. Re:Simulate people? by Jeremi · · Score: 2, Funny

      I thought aussies are fighting with cane toads and camels.

      Indeed they are. Once trained, an Aussie sniper can reliably strike a target with a high-velocity cane toad from up to 2000 meters away. Camels, on the other hand, are too large to fire from a rifle, and require the use of motorized artillery.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    3. Re:Simulate people? by wordsnyc · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because that's worked so well for everyone since (and including) Alexander the Great. Nobody wins in Afghanistan.

      --
      Sent from the iPad I found in your car.
  25. I don't understand by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 1

    Why don't they just dress up some kangaroos in camouflage and turn'em loose? It'd be a lot cheaper and after the wargames they could have "roo on the barbie".

    --
    "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
    1. Re:I don't understand by deniable · · Score: 2, Funny

      Have you ever tried to dress a live 'roo? The bastards will beat you up, then start with all four sets of claws.

    2. Re:I don't understand by CrashandDie · · Score: 1

      Interesting first-hand account. I'd love to hear your excuse as to why you were dressing up a 'roo.

    3. Re:I don't understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I was lonely and the 'roo was a cutie...

    4. Re:I don't understand by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      they could have "roo on the barbie"

      How to piss off an Aussie

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  26. Re:Ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you watch until the end, it shows exactly that: scatter after shots

  27. Please, Please by arthurpaliden · · Score: 1

    Make one of the robots look like C3PO. And of course and enable it to talk.

  28. Re:Ridiculous by binarylarry · · Score: 1

    I'm glad you're here to save the day, Captain Redundancy!

    --
    Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
  29. This is amazing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The guy in the video was running KDE 3.x! And one can assume that

    (skip to 3:48)

    1. Re:This is amazing! by socceroos · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I just saw that too. Thats pretty cool!

  30. So when mall cops run amok by sizzzzlerz · · Score: 1

    the Aussie army will be prepared!!

  31. Re:Ridiculous by Bugamn · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's ridiculous. Everyone knows that dolphins use sonic amplificators.

  32. Re:Ridiculous by c6gunner · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How utterly ridiculous. Grown men wasting tax payer $ to play real life video games.

    Jealousy is an ugly thing ....

  33. Cool, but subtly lfawed by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

    There's a subtle flaw in the design of this 'simulator' however - no simulated opponents or hostages on the second floors or on the roof.

  34. Re:Ridiculous by Eth1csGrad1ent · · Score: 2, Funny

    Let's just hope they aren't paying the price of an Apache helicopter for these robots.

    Its the Australian Army. The only thing they're going to spend the "price of an Apache helicopter" on is an actual Apache helicopter - and even then, that'd be *one* Apache helicopter, and one only.

  35. One step closer... by GrueMaster · · Score: 1

    To real life Cyberball. I'd pay to see that in an arena.

  36. Re:Ridiculous by deniable · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not to dispute your point, but we're buying Tiger's. Not sure what we'll do with them. They'll probably hang around here and never deploy, just like the Leopards.

  37. Re:Ridiculous by dbIII · · Score: 1

    The funny thing is we came back with an extra helicopter after Vietnam thanks to a couple of crashed and written off US Iroquois and some mechanics with a lot of spare time.

  38. Re:Ridiculous by Cassius+Corodes · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why do you think we are in Iraq and Afghanistan :D

    --
    Control is an illusion, order our comforting lie. From chaos, through chaos, into chaos we fly
  39. Re:Ridiculous by CrashandDie · · Score: 1

    It scares me when someone from a military force says they came back from any war saying they had "a lot of spare time".

  40. Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this what the Duke Nukem Forever team have been working on?

  41. Re:Ridiculous by quenda · · Score: 1

    and shooting at real people during training generates a lot of paperwork.

    Only if you keep a video of the training, and some fool with a conscience leaks it.

  42. Re:Ridiculous by dbIII · · Score: 2, Informative

    Spike Milligan's mostly serious WWII memoirs sum that up fairly well. A lot of waiting about and brief bursts of action appears to be the norm in most conflicts.

  43. Pro Cleanse by heardyes · · Score: 1

    Physically, it is not difficult and I found the PT lessons and field exercises, while very informative, to be easy and even comical at times. Ultimately, the marches you'll do at your unit and on operations will be more difficult. Pro Cleanse

  44. New Kind Of War by Lord_of_the_nerf · · Score: 1

    They're just scoping out their opponents and their traditional mode of transport. The Australian Government is preparing to fight a war against Google on two fronts - the internet filter and a hunting trip to Mountain View.

  45. This is just getting far too far out there. by dogzdik · · Score: 0
    Pretty soon we will be taking robo-combat 101 classes., on how to shoot hardened cyborgs running at 200 miles an hour with their own laser target designators and proximity fused 20mm cannons...

    .

    Hundreds of them....

    --

    .

    Voting up, Voting down - If I really gave a fuck about your approval or not, I'd come and ask you.

  46. Re:Ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not to dispute your point, but we're buying Tiger's. Not sure what we'll do with them. They'll probably hang around here and never deploy, just like the Leopards.

    they should have upgraded to snow leopard...

  47. need for Aussie wikipedia now clear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Aussie's are going to keep coming up with ideas like this it is somewhat clearer why we might need our own tech wikipedia.

  48. When will they shoot back? by jlar · · Score: 1

    I was just wondering when the robots will start shooting back. Will it be 2015, 2020 or 2030? Maybe we should have a slashdot poll on that. And should we call the computers controlling these robots for Skynet or would that infringe on known trademarks?

  49. Re:Ridiculous by Bearhouse · · Score: 2, Funny

    Not to dispute your point, but we're buying Tiger's

    You are buying Tiger's what? Old golf clubs? Whores?

  50. NatalieGlebova by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Very cool to watch actually lifestyle

  51. how much do they eat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and what do you feed them?

    (a tiger!? in india!)

  52. And the amazement continues by freezin+fat+guy · · Score: 1

    It appears they also found a real-world application for Linux on the desktop.