Slashdot Mirror


The Pirate Party of Canada Is Official

wasme writes "The Pirate Party of Canada has become the first Pirate Party outside of Europe to become an official political party. Elections Canada confirmed with the party that the PPCA has gained 'eligible for registration' status, and can run in elections starting June 14. From the PPCA's official announcement: 'We are pleased to announce that as of April 12, 2010, the Pirate Party of Canada is officially eligible for Party Status. After 10 months of dedication and hard work, we have reached eligible status, which only leaves a 60-day "purgatory" period. After that, we will field candidates in subsequent federal elections, and begin the real work of a political party.'"

14 of 430 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Congratulations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If everyone who has ever used the Internet to obtain an unrestricted digital copy of music or a movie is going to be labeled "pirate", then I don't have any reason to avoid the term. The term has already lost all meaning.

    I was born in the U.S., I purchased DVDs while living there. Now to watch what I've purchased, I'm a "pirate".

  2. Re:Needs a better name by MRe_nl · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you're going to limit the naming of your party to "things Americans don't shoot at", you're seriously limiting yourself, slippery. "Democrats" and "Republicans" is right out the window for instance ; ).

    --
    "Kill 'em all and let Root sort 'em out"
  3. Re:Serving two masters by jdigriz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Please, Bad Analogy Guy, explain to us how differences in physical geography cause different needs for digital freedom.

  4. Re:Congratulations by MrNaz · · Score: 5, Funny

    Your rather eloquent expression of the invalid conflation between egregious breaches of social morality and insignificantly trivial breaches of consumer behavior is misplaced.I think what you mean to say is "ARRRR!"

    --
    I hate printers.
  5. Re:Needs a better name by nawitus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why does it matter when a) they've been elected to the European Parliament and b) even the copyright lobby belives it's a "cool" name? It would be a near political suicide to try to change the name. There was a short lived "information society party" in Finland but that didn't go anywhere.

  6. Re:Serving two masters by PhunkySchtuff · · Score: 5, Insightful

    corporations don't make laws or form government you silly twit.

    You must be new round here.

    It's called the "golden rule" - he who has the gold, makes the rules. From where I'm sitting, corporations have most of the gold, and there sure are a lot of laws being made in their favour at the moment.

    Plus, corporations may not form government, but they sure do field people who form government - Halliburton anyone?

  7. Oh great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Another Canadian political party siphoning off left-leaning voters. Already that vote is split between Liberal, NDP, Green, and (some would argue) the Bloc. This vote split is why the conservatives can continue to hold political power with 38% of the popular vote.

    In political systems with fully proportional representation (example: Israel) these sorts of political parties make sense: the hurdle to get representation in the legislature is surmountable and you may even be brought into a coalition government. However, in first-past-the-post systems (Canada, US, UK) these vanity parties are only self-defeating. Whichever side of the political spectrum is best able to AVOID this fragmentation is almost guaranteed power. To use a Canadian example, look at the solid Liberal control in the 90s, made easy by a 3-way fragmentation on the right (the old PC party, Reform, and Alliance). Once those parties re-coalesced into the current Conservative party they were able to take over from the perpetually fragmented left.

    If you have a particular issue that you want to advance in a first-past-the-post democracy, the correct move is to identify which of the major parties is most receptive to your goal, and organize within that party. Form an organization, raise money, make noise. If you're a visible constituency within a major party (and can be counted on to bring in votes, donations, and volunteers) then they will have reason to differentiate themselves by embracing your issue.

    If instead your constituency says "ha! We're going to take our votes and make our own damn party" then BOTH major parties will simply say "ok, no need to listen to care what those guys want -- they're not going to vote for us anyway". You're only making copyright reform HARDER to achieve.

  8. Re:Serving two masters by Troed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The goals of the party are essentially dictated centrally from Sweden

    I'm curious as to why you think your fantasies are of interest to the rest of us? :)

  9. Re:Needs a better name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    US Navy Seals shot and killed 3 pirates last year.

    Pfft! Hadn't you heard? Canadians are notorious for killing seals.

  10. Re:Serving two masters by SlothDead · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Spreading BS like "The goals of the party are essentially dictated centrally from Sweden and then implemented throughout the world wherever the PP has any power to do so." is very irresponsible, please stop that.

    The various Pirate Parties are independent, there is no hierachy.

  11. Re:Pirate parties should rename themselves by MoellerPlesset2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I agree. However, forming single-issue political parties is generally a "bad thing". Pushing as hard as you can on a single issue and ignoring the rest of the world is ok when you are a non-governmental pressure group but not when your goal is to be in the government.

    Who says their goal is to be in government?
    Besides, the fact is, the PP in Sweden has succeeded rather well in both gaining lots of attention for the issues, and largely forced the hand of the established parties to start listening to people on copyright/IP issues. Across the board. The result is that Sweden is now one of the EU's biggest champions when it comes to advocating common-sense on these issues. (for instance, they've already made it quite clear they won't sign ACTA the way it looks at the moment).

    take a look at crazy coalitions in some European countries where parties with 0.5% of the vote are actually represented in the government

    Hyperbole. Which European country has parliamentary representation for a party with 0.5% of the vote? Usually the cutoff to get a seat in parliament is 3-4%.

    ..and able to influence things way beyond their mandate since their limited platform allows them to trade support on all kinds of issues in exchange for their favorite issue.

    So? If all people care about is one issue, to the extent that they're prepared to vote for a single-issue party, then why shouldn't that count for something? It's up to the other parties to decide if they want to compromise in exchange for support or not. If anyone should be criticized it's them.

  12. Re:Congratulations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "When piracy basically didn't exist" means "When they didn't talk about it on the telly" right?

  13. Re:From that infernal nonsense Pinafore . . . by dkleinsc · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Well, I wanted to pick something written by and about Canadians. Plus you have the rhythm and rhyme scheme all wrong. This is a better version:

    "In short, in matters digital, downloadable and musical,
    I am the very model of a modern copy criminal."

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  14. Re:From that infernal nonsense Pinafore . . . by Trails · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They call it theft for reasons that are quite clearly subliminal
    In order to support a business model that's primordial
    Infringement is a civil matter, extortion is criminal
    But they push legislation that will kill our highway digital
    And so we need a party that will argue antithetical
    In order to preserve our freedoms we hold indispensable
    So I say welcome to the party that is dubbed piratical
    You'll get my vote election time lest Bob Rae joins your ensemble!