Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Mice Made in Chinese Youth Sweatshops?

An anonymous reader writes "The National Labor Committee offers an in-depth look into working conditions in Chinese sweatshops producing hardware (mice, etc.) for Microsoft, complete with pictures. Apparently, so called 'work study students,' 16 and 17 years of age, work 15-hour shifts, six and seven days a week, for around 65 cents per hour. Microsoft said it is taking the claims seriously and has 'commenced an investigation.'"

24 of 481 comments (clear)

  1. More companies too by sopssa · · Score: 5, Informative

    MS is probably the most catchy one, but the factory produces and packages hardware for a lot more USA companies too:

    KYE factory in China, which manufactures computer mice and webcams for Microsoft, Hewlett Packard, Samsung, Best Buy, Foxconn, Acer, Logitech, ASUS and other US companies.

    Earlier also Apple products were done by child labor at many factories.

    These companies should move their factories to US or EU. But it's cheaper there and this is one of the reasons why. As long as it's cheaper, they don't care about ethics.

    1. Re:More companies too by TheKidWho · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Of course that stuff is made in China; corporations care nothing about human rights, only profits

      The opposite is also true, our consumerist society cares most about cost which is what drives these companies to move to places like China.

    2. Re:More companies too by FlyingBishop · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Ethical is paying a fair wage to your employees, and budgeting so that your suppliers can do the same.

    3. Re:More companies too by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Given that the factory in question is in blatant violation of existing Chinese labor laws, the suggestion that it be smacked down is hardly couchbound western cultural imperialism...

    4. Re:More companies too by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If our politicians were more beholden to voters and workers and less beholden to multinational corporations, we'd have tarriffs protecting American workers from competing with sweatshops.

      1930 called. They want their protectionist economic theory back.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    5. Re:More companies too by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The opposite is also true, our consumerist society cares most about cost which is what drives these companies to move to places like China.

      No, son. Our corporations care more about profits which is what drives these companies to move to places like China.

      Surprisingly, you can find companies succeeding at all sorts of industries that we have been told have "moved out of the US" such as textiles, clothing, shoes, even electronics. For the transnationals that are owned by people who have nothing to do with the business itself, succeeding and making a profit is not enough. Employing people is not enough. Getting rich is not enough. Your not "winning" unless your constantly growing, and then growing faster. The drive to show quarterly increases in profit have driven this "dive to the bottom" that is resulting in kids in China working 12-hour shifts to make your WalMart trash.

      Honestly, every Walmart could close tomorrow and people's lives would go on as before. Stores would open and sell stuff. People would make stuff. Life would go on. But predatory capitalism, where Capital precedes Labor instead of the other way around, is going to make things a lot worse for a lot of people. The best part, is they can sell it as "making life better".

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    6. Re:More companies too by commandermonkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You are may be correct in stating that they choose to work in those conditions. And although the conditions may be abhorrent to a citizen of a developed western country it may be the norm in China.

      That doesn't mean I am comfortable with supporting those practices.

      When people go off about 'what the market will bear' they seem to only factor in the financial cost of producing an individual widget and not the cost of Goodwill, Public Perception etc. that also factors in.

      Look at the apartheid boycott's. Damage to companies based on their labor practices was very real and help bring about social change within a country. Even though the practice was the norm in the region.

    7. Re:More companies too by khallow · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Given that the factory in question is in blatant violation of existing Chinese labor laws

      Is it? I'm sure the well-bribed, local officials would say otherwise. And their word is really how it is determined whether law is broken or not. That's how it goes in a nation of men not of laws.

    8. Re:More companies too by petermgreen · · Score: 5, Insightful

      note that these people are in the age range where in most of the western world you have some but not all of the rights and responsibilities of an adult.

      According to http://www.dol.gov/compliance/guide/childlbr.htm "Minors age 16 and 17 may perform any job not declared hazardous by the Secretary, and are not subject to restrictions on hours ". So these people are old enough that if they were US citizens they could work in the US. In the UK things are similar but slightly more complex (mainly that things are defined in terms of school years rather than actual age).

      I'm not saying there aren't problems here but it's not exactly "child labour" in the conventional sense of the term.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    9. Re:More companies too by t33jster · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Ok, wages are a piece of the puzzle here, but for a moment, take wage out of the equation, and consider the working conditions from TFA.

      "We are like prisoners," one worker told the NLC. "It seems like we live only to work. We do not work to live. We do not live a life, only work."

      I can relate to that from time to time, but when it's gotten really bad, I've been able to spruce up my resume & find a new (often better-paying) job with the skills that I've learned while 'imprisoned.' That's not the case here:

      The workers - mostly women aged 18 to 25 - work from 7:45 a.m. to 10:55 p.m. They eat horrid meals from the factory cafeterias. They have no bathroom breaks during their shifts, and must clean the toilets as discipline, according to the NLC. They sleep in factory dormitories, 14 workers to a room. They must buy their own mattresses and bedding, or else sleep on 28-inch-wide plywood boards. They "shower" with a sponge and a bucket. And many of the workers, because they're young women, are regularly sexually harassed, the NLC alleges.

      Add in a rich industrialist who adopts one of the spunky factory workers, sprinkle in a few production numbers, and we have Annie. Seriously though, I've worked as many hours for a week or two on end, but hey, I'm salaried, and sometimes I have to suck it up.
      If they were paid whatever a reasonable wage is, then the rest of this crap wouldn't be going on. If it was a reasonable wage, then they could save up, send themselves to college & make a better life for themselves, and the factory would eventually run itself out of labor. Sweatshops don't retain employees with morale-boosting team activities or high wages. Instead employee loyalty is had by paying them just enough to maintain their state of poverty.

      --
      Take off every 'sig' for great justice.
    10. Re:More companies too by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A 15 hour day is evidence of a non-fair wage.

      We are essentially using them as slaves or batteries.

      They have no time to live as humans.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  2. Fact of life... by MrCrassic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While it sucks that working conditions like these exist, how else can we buy mice for $20?

    1. Re:Fact of life... by Peganthyrus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Robots?

      --
      egypt urnash minimal art.
  3. 66 cent compared to what? by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In my opinion saying they "only" make 66 cent an hour means nothing without a reference. How much can you buy with 66 cent in China?

    1. Re:66 cent compared to what? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Nonsense. Purchasing power varies massively across the world. Even in international chains like Starbucks charge a lot more for the same thing in different countries. When you're talking about locally produced food and goods it's a much bigger difference. The cost of food is closely related to the amount the people farming are paid, which is a lot lower in most of Africa or China than it is in the EU or USA, for example. And that's ignoring the fact that the Chinese government intentionally keeps the Yuan devalued against the US Dollar to promote exports, meaning that the purchasing power of the Yuan in China is higher than the exchange rate would lead you to believe.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:66 cent compared to what? by TheKidWho · · Score: 4, Informative

      In China you can eat a good meal for $0.50
      In America you can barely afford a Candy Bar for $0.50

    3. Re:66 cent compared to what? by billius · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm not an economist, but according to Wolfram Alpha the GDP per capita for China is 3290 USD. Figuring 15 hours a day * $.065 per hour* 6 days a week * 52 weeks in a year = $3042 a year, so about 92% of the GDP per capita. Like any big country, I'm sure the cost of living varies quite a bit from region to region (for example a Big Mac in China costs about $1.83, meaning it takes about 3 hours to have enough to buy one) and working 15 hours a day definitely sucks, but at least on the surface the pay doesn't seem that bad. Anyone with more knowledge of economics have an opinion on the matter?

  4. Solution by Alarindris · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Take away their pay and call them 'interns'.

  5. Re:Well natch MS is looking into it by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It would be really helpful to put this in perspective. In some parts of India, $1 will pay for cheap accommodation and food for a day. In other parts, it will just about get you a cup of tea. This works out to just under $10/day, which seems a pitiful amount compared to prices where I live, but how does it compare to prices there? Are they able to save enough to go to university after a couple of years, are they barely able to afford food, or is it somewhere in the middle?

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  6. Sweatshop? Only by your standard by jsse · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm not here to pro-Microsoft, but....

    65 cents x 15 hours x 24 days (people work 6 days a week there) = US$234 ~= RMB1,614.00

    The wage is much more than the average of the workers there. The starting salary of a factory worker is no more than US$100/mth, an experienced worker (>2 yrs exp) might not be able to ask for more than US$200/mth.

    Also, from what I've seen in the article, the working environment is MUCH better than any other factories I've ever seen in China.

    Still, I agree that the working hours are too long, but I'm sure the workers there are more than willing to work more than you'd ask for, given high-paid.

  7. Re:Relevance? by MBGMorden · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And in the meantime enjoy a shittier quality of life while making no appreciable difference in the situation.

    There are a few inconvenient truths in the world:

    1. Nothing you do yourself is going to affect the world large scale. You can convince others of your ideals and act as a group, but in that case your words' affect on others, not your own actions, made any change.

    2. People typically act in their own self interest, and they benefit for it.

    3. A large group of individuals acting in their own interests will often not enact a course of actions which are in the best interests in the group as a whole. Prime example here can be seen with a large crowd in a theater. If someone yells fire (and there actually is one), then it's in my own best interest the book it. The faster I get out of that situation the better. When every individual acts in this manner though, people can be trampled to death. The overall death toll will be higher, but the odds on survival rest on those who run, not those who calmly exit. Indeed those who walk out (the best for the group if everyone did it) are the most likely to be trampled. You can TRY to take the high road and walk, but the reality is once the crowd is running you're not stopping them, and you're only hurting yourself by not running along with them.

    --
    "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  8. Re:Child labour by western standards, perhaps by Tapewolf · · Score: 4, Informative

    Reading the article, the main thrust of it doesn't seem to be the fact that they're using 16-year-olds, though there is a part about 14-15 year-olds as well. The problem is mostly the way the factory is being run.

    The workers – mostly women aged 18 to 25 – work from 7:45 a.m. to 10:55 p.m. They eat horrid meals from the factory cafeterias. They have no bathroom breaks during their shifts, and must clean the toilets as discipline, according to the NLC.

    They sleep in factory dormitories, 14 workers to a room. They must buy their own mattresses and bedding, or else sleep on 28-inch-wide plywood boards. They "shower" with a sponge and a bucket. And many of the workers, because they're young women, are regularly sexually harassed, the NLC alleges.

  9. not always by zogger · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That wasn't true two generations ago, and I remember it clearly, as do a lot of other folks on this board who are early boomers or older. The USA made just about everything people here bought, and they bought everything that was made, and the currency shifted around internally a lot more than it does now, acting as an economic force multiplier inside our own 50 state/nation "free trade common market", and not near as much went to imports from outside of those 50 states. And we had a robust middle class that actually owned things, instead of being in debt for everything beyond the ability to pay, and you only needed one normal blue collar level income to support a family, etc. We had ten year house notes, 12 month car loans, and medical insurance was way cheap.

    Now what has changed is Cxx salaries went from around 10-40 times what a line worker made, to now..who knows, thousands? What does Balmer or any of these other transnational CEOs-and all their legions of sub bosses- make compared to the wage of these Chinese factory line workers? I'm not going to bother to look it up, but I bet it is more than 40 times, a LOT more. We also didn't have near as much wall street mass wealth skimming going on, and the propaganda shilling to engage in global wage arbitrage or "globalism" hadn't started yet (much).

    As to people here not wanting to do the work, any time a factory announces hiring they have thousands of applications for hundreds of jobs generally speaking. As to ag work and construction etc "no one wants to do it so they have to import workers", another fairy tale. And I know I have read here *many* times that in white collar IT work they game the system to get insourced cheaper labor as well, come up with background credentials needed that are physically impossible for anyone to have achieved, then use that as "proof" they need more H1Bs and so on. Musta read hundreds of those anecdotals here over the years now.

    These fatcats goal is to break the back of the middle class, to steal their wealth, full stop, so they can have their global two class society, especially in the US where the middle class got so big and strong. They are feudalists at heart. Between outsourcing and insourcing, they are succeeding. If their schemes worked for the nation as a whole, like those liars claim, then we wouldn't have an economic "crisis" like is going on. That proves their lies completely.

      Last year, because of their corruption and takeover of government, they granted over a million green cards (that's just the legal insourcing, who knows how many million more off the books insourced people showed up to keep driving wages down), right in the middle of a mass unemployment situation with a lowballed 10% unemployment rate, and if you add in real part time workers and people finally off unemployment insurance, it is 17%, which is in the middle of "great depression" era numbers.

    Outsourcing and insourcing, the double whammy plan to marginalize and destroy the middle class here so they can have their globalist master/serf society, with one percent owning everything eventually. That's what is going on.

  10. Re:Work hours by VendettaMF · · Score: 4, Informative

    Bad examples still.
    Milk is not a commonly used foodstuff here, and bread as you're thinking of it is purchased only by foreigners living here.

    I can buy all I can eat in a restaurant for six yuan, and can eat for a week for 30.

    --
    kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.