Slashdot Mirror


Israel Blocks iPad Imports, Citing Wi-Fi Transmission Regulations

unixcrab writes with this excerpt from The Mac Observer: "Apple's iPad is proving to be popular everywhere — except Israel. The country's Communication Ministry is refusing to let people bring the multimedia tablet into the country because it hasn't tested and approved the Wi-Fi technology used in the device, according to Haaretz. Ministry officials commented, 'The iPad device sold exclusively today in the United States operates at broadcast power levels [over its Wi-Fi modem] compatible with American standards. As the Israeli regulations in the area of Wi-Fi are similar to European standards, which are different from American standards, which permit broadcasting at lower power, therefore the broadcast levels of the device prevent approving its use in Israel.' The government seems serious about its iPad import ban. Customs officials have already confiscated ten iPads and told their owners to ship them overseas."

204 comments

  1. Simple solution by afidel · · Score: 1

    Wait till they ship a model to europe that has the wifi part limited to ETSI power and frequency limits.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    1. Re:Simple solution by zero_out · · Score: 4, Informative

      For those who are unaware, you can click on the Prefs button at the bottom of this page, and change your settings to not display signatures in comments. I know that the parent was just trolling, but I think this is a handy piece of information that some people don't know.

    2. Re:Simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm. I guess I was sort of trolling. However, I've been reading and posting here (mostly non-anonoymously) for 13 years, and sometimes the speciousness or pretension of the sig-files takes my breath away and I feel I have to respond. I might take you up on the sig-file idea, so cheers.

    3. Re:Simple solution by sopssa · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yeah but like, what:

      Apple's iPad is proving to be popular everywhere — except Israel.

      It's only released in the US. How can it prove to be popular everywhere already?

    4. Re:Simple solution by ThreeE · · Score: 0

      What was specious or pretentious? Did I miss something?

    5. Re:Simple solution by RulerOf · · Score: 1

      13 years, and sometimes the speciousness or pretension of the sig-files takes my breath away and I feel I have to respond.

      In case you were unaware, I've seen that sig many times on here since... probably as long as I can remember. At the very least, the last 1.5 years or so.

      I find it hard to believe that, as a 13-year /. veteran, you'd only say something now and that you'd not post about it with your regular UID. I'm sure you can spare the karma, since you obviously care about it.

      --
      Boot Windows, Linux, and ESX over the network for free.
    6. Re:Simple solution by AndGodSed · · Score: 2, Funny

      You just keep on trying 'til you run out of cake!

      THE CAKE IS A LIE!!!

    7. Re:Simple solution by bell.colin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Stop questioning the Apple religious movement propaganda, they don't like it.

    8. Re:Simple solution by VennData · · Score: 0

      Guess I should stop working on my iSettler app.

    9. Re:Simple solution by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      Then if that seems to be the the case, how would we know if you are the same AC or another AC. Your writing style seems to be very different from the previous post. My guess from all of this is that the parent AC is a girl wishing she was a boy and you sir/madame might be doing something besides wishing.

      The moral here is to not fish for big fish with a small pole.

    10. Re:Simple solution by bigredradio · · Score: 1

      I've been reading and posting here (mostly non-anonoymously) for 13 years

      Let's see your user id, or I call bullshit! ;-)

    11. Re:Simple solution by clone53421 · · Score: 1
      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    12. Re:Simple solution by RulerOf · · Score: 1

      THE CAKE IS A LIE!!!

      Nonsense. It's so delicious and moist.

      --
      Boot Windows, Linux, and ESX over the network for free.
    13. Re:Simple solution by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Because people are buying them in the US and having them shipped to Israel (and other countries) because they're not officially available in those countries directly, hence the story about them being seized by customs agents?

      Same thing happened with the iPhone.

    14. Re:Simple solution by sopssa · · Score: 0, Troll

      I wouldn't count Apple fans ordering them overseas as "worldwide success"

    15. Re:Simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God people like you are irritating.

  2. In Israel... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...WI-FI transmissions are from right to left.

    You will have to turn your routers and ipads upside down to make them work.

    1. Re:In Israel... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, sure. The Israeli equivalent of the FCC knew that. They just want to keep left-to-right iPads out of the country until they can put up signage advising visitors about proper use. Signs you will see while queueing for Passport Control include:

      • THINKING ABOUT DEFECTING?
      • PROHIBITED ITEMS
      • DECLARING ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, AND HAM
      • PENALTIES OF RIGHT-SIDE-UP WIRELESS USE
  3. Why.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does Israel hate the iPad???

    1. Re:Why.... by daveime · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Perhaps they got tired of hating iPalestinians ?

    2. Re:Why.... by lagi · · Score: 1

      Does Israel hate the iPad???

      I'll tell you why they hate iPads in israel.
      all Israeli major cell providers got each about 300,000 units of iPods to sell over 3 years.
      (they got them not long ago) now they don't sell them here for 50$ and not for 99$ (for about 500$ or crappy deal)
      anyway, point is, this was too late (cause of apple actually, not regulation). why buy an iPod when you can get Android?
      they won't manage to sell them. so they don't need ANOTHER apple crap here.

      second reason is military.
      i assume some untested devices can brake some important military communication.

    3. Re:Why.... by lagi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Perhaps they got tired of hating iPalestinians ?

      i think you are mistaken about who hates who here.
      true, some people here in Israel don't like Palestinians. and with a good reason, almost everyone here got family, friend, relative that got hurt/killed by palestinian terror.
      i do too (more than one actually) and still i don't hate them, just hope we get along in future.
      on the Palestinian side that's a bit different, while we learn in schools about how we should make peace with our Arab friends (even when some don't want to).
      Palestinian learn in school how to hate us / kill us (not all i hope, but generally). and that's a hard fact.
      so maybe you tried to be funny, and it is actually. but i don't like when people say we hate Palestinian cause it's just not true.
      i was a solider in IDF, actually as squad leader and i have seen (on TV) how US or Russian fight in their wars,
      the way and risk our soldiers take just to not hurt Palestinian is huge and unseen in any (active) armed forces around the world,
      and this is something I can be proud of.

    4. Re:Why.... by daveime · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm sorry, but I don't see Israelis being evicted and having their homes and land demolished to make way for Palestinian settlements.

      I don't see Israelis being treated lower than animals with all the border checks, permits, and now military trials just for not having the "right papers" ... which will of course take at least 6 months to "process", and in the mean time husbands / wives are separated from their spouses / siblings and barred entry to their own bloody homeland.

      I don't see Israelis having their essential services cut off at a whim, so they have no electricity, water, sanitation etc.

      You wonder WHY they hate you ? You can preach tolerance and understanding in your schools, you aren't the ones being ethnically cleansed.

    5. Re:Why.... by superyooser · · Score: 1
      I don't see Israelis being evicted and having their homes and land demolished to make way for Palestinian settlements.

      Where were you in the summer of 2005?

      See it here: The Expulsion of the Jews from Gush Katif (Gaza)

      Palestinian police getting ready to take over after the Jews are expelled

      Prime Minister Ariel Sharon ordered the expulsion of thousands of Jewish residents from their homes in Gaza. This was against the will of the people. He denied the country a chance at a referendum on the issue when he saw the polls going against him.

      Here's what happened: IDF troops clad in ominous black uniforms, some mounted on horses (as if to purposefully evoke associations with Medieval inquisitions), literally dragged Jewish families, with wailing women and children, out of their homes. Jewish Gazans were bloodied during the destruction, including Member of Knesset Aryeh Eldad, whose head was gashed when he was trampled by a horse-mounted soldier. Entire communities were demolished. A beautiful synagogue was buried under sand. Graves were dug up and relocated. All so that the Palestinian Authority could set up its terror state in the Gaza Strip, aka now Hamastan.

      During the 1930s, Jew haters in Europe used to tell Jews to "Go back to Palestine (Israel)!" What could they say in 2005? The Jews were in Israel!!

      Here is the web site created by Israelis of the former Jewish communities in Gaza.

      It's no coincidence that the expulsion was originally (accidentally?) scheduled for the 9th of Av, then delayed an extra day when the red-faced authorities realized their mistake. It's also not a coincidence that Ariel Sharon very soon afterward fell into a coma, which he is still in today. It's also not a coincidence that the last name of George W. Bush, who had been pushing the Saudi-devised Two-State Solution and then congratulated Sharon on the expulsion, means "to be ashamed" in Hebrew.

    6. Re:Why.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, dude.

      Please get some therapy.

      You are seriously into schizophrenia territory there.

      (In fact, skip the therapy. You need medication).

    7. Re:Why.... by daveime · · Score: 1

      So in summary, certain Jewish people even perform atrocities against their own people.

      How exactly does that detract from my statements about what the Jews do to the Palestinians ? Just because they also do it to each other doesn't make it "even".

    8. Re:Why.... by cyn1c77 · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but I don't see Israelis being evicted and having their homes and land demolished to make way for Palestinian settlements.

      I don't see Israelis being treated lower than animals with all the border checks, permits, and now military trials just for not having the "right papers" ... which will of course take at least 6 months to "process", and in the mean time husbands / wives are separated from their spouses / siblings and barred entry to their own bloody homeland.

      I don't see Israelis having their essential services cut off at a whim, so they have no electricity, water, sanitation etc.

      You wonder WHY they hate you ? You can preach tolerance and understanding in your schools, you aren't the ones being ethnically cleansed.

      I don't really think that you are sorry, but you have to remember that both sides have dirty hands.

      It's funny you should bring up ethnic cleaning though. The Jews are a little touchy about this subject since people have been trying to exterminate them for about 2000 years.

      But if you want to just stick to Israelis and recent history, you'll remember that their Arab neighbors have been trying to eradicate them in various ways since Israel was established in 1947. This, of course, culminated in the Six-Day War of 1967 when Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Tunisia, Morocco and Algeria all joined together to get their asses handed to them by the Jews.

      The Israelis aren't stupid. They watch the news, they know that every Arab in the region wants to kill them and they're done fucking around. They even went and developed nukes just in case they have to take the rest of the Middle East down with them.

      Is what is happening to the Palestinians fair? Definitely not. But the Palestinians are being hung out to dry by all of their Arab neighbors. The Arab states could easily absorb the population of Palestine (which they created with their wars against Israel), but instead, they've conspired to keep the Palestinians contained and supplied with shitty weapons so they can become martyrs and keep the anti-Jew sentiment alive.

      At least the Jews are open about persecuting the Palestinians, instead of using them as political tools like the Arabs.

      And I'm not Jewish, by the way.

  4. Aw poor Apple by aztektum · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Held to a countries regulations. Oh wait, they had to pass FCC testing here too. Big whoopie fucking do.

    --
    :: aztek ::
    No sig for you!!
    1. Re:Aw poor Apple by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Held to a countries regulations. Oh wait, they had to pass FCC testing here too. Big whoopie fucking do.

      That's not exactly the issue. The iPad uses standard wifi 802.11, just like many other devices. If Apple wants to sell in a given country, they need to submit to approval from their version of the FCC but (and this is what is different) it's really weird to confiscate random wifi devices being carried into the country by individuals. A whole lot of laptops aren't sold directly in Israel and are not confiscated at the border when tourists bring them in.

      Now probably the iPad is just high profile and looks different enough that customs people can tell at a glance what it is and know it is not approved, but it certainly does seem to be being singled out from all the other wifi hardware regularly carried into Israel.

    2. Re:Aw poor Apple by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Wasn't there another story earlier about how only the USA would be getting iPads for the foreseeable future? How much mre non-news could this story be?

      --
      No sig today...
    3. Re:Aw poor Apple by billcopc · · Score: 1

      Or.... maybe the customs officials really wanted one. I mean, really, what can an average citizen do to stop them ?

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    4. Re:Aw poor Apple by marcobat · · Score: 1

      Oh, now i get it, you are saying that this is all just about Israel Communication Ministry being pist off because he didn't receive a complimentary iPad to test?

    5. Re:Aw poor Apple by ygslash · · Score: 1

      Well, the WiFi chipset is exactly the same as in other Apple devices that have been approved, as checked by the IsraelTech.Net blog.

      True, there is the technical legal requirement that they file papers locally and get their rubber stamp, but in these kinds of cases the authorities usually don't go to the extreme of confiscating devices and fining people.

      I wonder what's different in this case? Maybe it's this little item, claimed in a talkback post in the article on IsraelNationalNews.com:

      An Israeli company, Patango, has the exclusive marketing rights for the IPad in Israel. One of the company's lead partners is Nehemia Peres. I bet you'll never guess who's his daddy.

      Why, of course, Shimon Peres, the president of Israel.

      Hmm...

    6. Re:Aw poor Apple by ygslash · · Score: 1

      Oh, that talkback is referring to a post on the Israel Matzav blog.

    7. Re:Aw poor Apple by Manfre · · Score: 1

      Wasn't there another story earlier about how only the USA would be getting iPads for the foreseeable future? How much mre non-news could this story be?

      Yes, but Americans for some silly reason venture out from the glorious USA homeland and visit other countries, one of which has decided to enforce their local regulations in such a way as to prevent this popular item from being brought in to the country.

    8. Re:Aw poor Apple by bigngamer92 · · Score: 1

      Notice the i Pads are being sent back to the domestic country, so unless they have friends in the postal service, it has nothing to do with the customs wants.

    9. Re:Aw poor Apple by dwillden · · Score: 1

      And do the iPad users not have the ability to turn OFF the wifi capabilities?

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
  5. Confiscation seems a bit much by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 0

    Declare nothing. Always answer, "Nope, didn't buy anything overseas"

    And ship things like this home in a box.

  6. A Cheaper Alternative To Shipping Overseas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is too simply BLEND the i-Fill_In_This_Blank_With_Whatever_Apple_Dumps_Into_The_Market.

    Enjoy.

    Yours In Astrakhan,
    Kilgore Trout

  7. So... by geekmansworld · · Score: 1

    Let me get this straight: Israel don't want the iPad in the country because its WiFi transmits at LOWER power than their standards?

    Doesn't... lower power mean LESS interference?

    Can someone with radio skillz please explain how this makes sense?

    1. Re:So... by geekmansworld · · Score: 1

      Okay, got that backwards. So the European standard "permits" broadcasting at lower power, but doesn't require?

    2. Re:So... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      And more importantly, why are there different WiFi standards? Why doesn't everyone just use 802.11?

      --
      Qxe4
    3. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They accidentally a 'only'. Europe does support a few more wifi channels though.

    4. Re:So... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And more importantly, why are there different WiFi standards? Why doesn't everyone just use 802.11?

      The nice thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    5. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The European standard "permits" broadcasting at lower power - meaning that if your device is going to broadcast, the permit given is to do it at a lower power. The standard does not "require" broadcasting at lower power - meaning that your device does not have to broadcast at a lower power, or at all; you're perfectly fine making non-broadcasting devices.

    6. Re:So... by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      Why are there different operating systems? Why doesn't everyone just use Microsoft Windows?

      ...

      Not quite the same thing, but it's sort of related. Having standards compete just like businesses compete hopefully will lead to better standards. Having one standard only that everyone has to adhere to? Hm... SOMEONE is controlling the standard (or some group). Having one standard that everyone adheres to will lead to that one group being rather powerful. And people who work on standards are no more inherently ethical than those that don't.

    7. Re:So... by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And more importantly, why are there different WiFi standards? Why doesn't everyone just use 802.11?

      802.11 a, b, g, or n? Currently the discrepancy may be 802.11a - y2008 variant that allows for 3.7 Ghz transmissions but is only approved by the FCC, not EU governments.

    8. Re:So... by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Surely you don't think that every place is the same, with exactly the same solutions applicable everywhere? (I'd hope so, if you are indeed behind attaining world peace, as your sig suggests)

      For starters, it was probably clear, while drafting the standard, that Europe was bound to have rather high typical density of hotspots. Lower permitted power (and more channels available) probably helps in those circumstances.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    9. Re:So... by klapaucjusz · · Score: 2, Informative

      There's just one series of 802.11 (WiFi) standards.

      However, different countries have different power limits and different sets of allowed channels. For example, in the 802.11b/g band, most of Europe allows channels 1 through 13 at 100mW max, while the USA only allow channels 1 through 11, but with higher power limits (1W, IIRC).

      Because of those regulatory differences, WiFi hardware is sold with slightly different firmware in different countries, and it may be illegal for you to use foreign WiFi hardware.

    10. Re:So... by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      It's probably just worded oddly in TFA.

      Best way to say it is that the maximum "permitted" power is lower in Europe than in the USA.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    11. Re:So... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      There are two interlocking issues here:

      802.11(abgn) is the standard defining how wifi is supposed to work, interoperate, authentication, yadda, yadda.

      However, since wi-fi involves radio transmission, a given wifi-based device is a radio transmitter, and must comply with the RF broadcast restrictions of whatever country it is operating in. Luckily, 2.4GHz is open spectrum in much of the world; but details about allowable power level and such do differ.

      There aren't different wifi standards; but different countries have different limits on transmitter power and frequency.

    12. Re:So... by billcopc · · Score: 1

      It is 802.11, but different countries have different radio restrictions. The protocols and general operation are identical, it's just the frequency bands and power levels that change.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    13. Re:So... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      The nice thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from.

      That's not nice at all, it's confusing.

      What we need is a standard on how to decide which one of the standards should be the standard.

    14. Re:So... by Spatial · · Score: 1

      Don't get ahead of yourself. We need to standardise on a preliminary standard before we start standardising standard standards. Now once that standard has been settled, we can follow standard procedure for standardising standards to decide which standard should be standard.

    15. Re:So... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Don't get ahead of yourself. We need to standardise on a preliminary standard before we start standardising standard standards.

      Who's "we"? We're gonna need a standard for that, first!

    16. Re:So... by baxnick · · Score: 1

      And just how are we going create that if we don't have a standard defining how to define a standard?

    17. Re:So... by dgatwood · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In practice, though, no portable device transmits anywhere near a watt. The only way you get close to 1W ERP is if you're using a base station with a directional aerial. AFAIK, most laptops are capped somewhere around 50 mW, well below the ERP limits of any country, with typical transmit power more on the order of 10-30 mW.

      Either way, it sounds like this isn't so much about the actual power, but rather about the lack of certification.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    18. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They do, but even 802.11 has different regional variations. This is often just a driver setting, though sometimes a hardware difference.

  8. sounds like someone in iCon Group has friends by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Apple doesn't sell their own products directly in Israel, they have a distributor there. Every iPad brought in represents a lost sale for them. Sounds like they're angry about not getting the device quickly enough and losing early sales.

    http://www.apple.com/il/buy/

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
    1. Re:sounds like someone in iCon Group has friends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly - the stated reason is complete horseshit, as the iPad uses an identical WiFi stack to both the iPhone 3GS and IPod Touch. This is entirely down to somebody having political connections.

      But then again, would you expect anything different from a country that is currently deciding whether to become an apartheid regime or just commit ethnic cleansinginvoluntary relocation on a sizable chunk of it's population?

    2. Re:sounds like someone in iCon Group has friends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow...

      iCon is a really really good name for an Apple reseller.

    3. Re:sounds like someone in iCon Group has friends by firewort · · Score: 1

      Shimon Peres' son is the owner of iDigital, the authorized reseller/importer.

      You'd think the son of a former Prime Minister might be able to make a few phone calls, wouldn't you?

      --

    4. Re:sounds like someone in iCon Group has friends by billcopc · · Score: 1

      Edgy, I like it.

      I mostly think the customs officer(s) wanted a free iPad.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    5. Re:sounds like someone in iCon Group has friends by Low+Ranked+Craig · · Score: 0, Troll

      Honestly I have no problem with Israel relocating/segregating the Palestinians. The hatred they have for each other is ingrained from birth an cannot be resolved. Separation, forced if need be, seems like a better solution to me than simply wiping out the Palestinians, or they can continue killing each other on a daily basis.

      Confiscation of someone's iDevice is not comparable on any level to the above.

      --
      I still cannot find the droids I am looking for...
    6. Re:sounds like someone in iCon Group has friends by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      Depends. Was his iPhone confiscated?

    7. Re:sounds like someone in iCon Group has friends by tibman · · Score: 1

      It's not the stack they are talking about, it's the radio's transmission power. It may turn out the ipad radio doesn't exceed their limit, that has yet to be seen.

      About Israel, you should checkout: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_citizens_of_Israel
      Israel isn't fighting Arabs, but islamic militants. Take for example the Druze, they are Arabs who self-identify as Israeli and are accepted by Israel into all areas of government, including the army. Here's a tidbit: "Currently, a Druze MK, Majalli Wahabi of the centrist Kadima, as Deputy Speaker of the Knesset, is next in line to the acting presidency" That's an Arab guy... interesting, eh?

      But it doesn't jive with your statement... not the racial part anyways. You could change it to "currently deciding whether to involuntarily relocate a sizable chunk of non-israeli population living on land annexed during a war?" I'm pretty sure Israel extended citizenship to everyone in the territory but that doesn't mean they have to accept it. If they aren't citizens, what should the host country do? Ignore them? What if they keep blowing up your stuff?

      I have never lived in Israel and get my information from the news and wikipedia. I do have an open mind, please correct me if i'm mistaken.

      --
      http://soylentnews.org/~tibman
    8. Re:sounds like someone in iCon Group has friends by McSnickered · · Score: 1

      TGDaily has an interesting take on it related to Shimon Peres' son who is the Apple distributor:

      http://www.tgdaily.com/mobility-features/49387-why-israel-banned-the-ipad

      Indeed, it is worth noting that Apple's Israeli distributor, iDigital, is run by Chemi Peres, the hyper-entrepreneurial son of Israeli President Shimon Peres.

      Clearly, iDigital wants its lucrative cut of every iPad brought into the country - which it will undoubtedly receive when a modified European version of the iPad is approved for import over the next two or three months.

      But in the meantime, iDigital can't make money off the slow trickle of iPads entering the country via private citizens, tourists and international businessmen.

      And if iDigital can't get its cut, well, then, no iPad for you!

      --
      They call me the working man. I guess that's what I am.
    9. Re:sounds like someone in iCon Group has friends by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      Apple doesn't sell their own products directly in Israel, they have a distributor there. Every iPad brought in represents a lost sale for them. Sounds like they're angry about not getting the device quickly enough and losing early sales.

      And travelers don't take stuff with them?

      Falcon

    10. Re:sounds like someone in iCon Group has friends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are mistaken only in so far as believing that only Islamic Militants in the Middle East rally around the "Kill the Israelli's!" slogan.

      Unfortunately hatred (in this case at least), has been rather ingrained into most Arab's upbringing in most of the world (with some exceptions).

    11. Re:sounds like someone in iCon Group has friends by tibman · · Score: 1

      I believe you. The first time i saw an israeli and US flag chalked on the ground in front of a Mosque, i walked up and asked the citizens coming out about it.. they were evasive and not forth coming. I did get a nice guy to explain to me that walking on the flags is an insult. So i walked on them and said, i am not insulted. He explained to me that the US supports israel and that is why they are together. I then asked him, I am supporting your country, why isn't your flag with mine? He thought this was very funny.

      --
      http://soylentnews.org/~tibman
    12. Re:sounds like someone in iCon Group has friends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How would they be losing sales? Didn't someone originally have to buy the iPad from Apple in another country?

  9. For travelers by WiiVault · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think the concern is more about travelers coming from North America. As somebody who has brought tons of American bought laptops into Israel I find this very strange indeed.

    1. Re:For travelers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the concern is more about travelers coming from North America. As somebody who has brought tons of American bought laptops into Israel I find this very strange indeed.

      Below are theWireless and cellular iPad technical specs as published by Apple. Anything suspicious ? Or are they not disclosing something ?

      Wi-Fi model
      Wi-Fi (802.11a/b/g/n)
      Bluetooth 2.1 + EDR technology
      Wi-Fi + 3G model
      UMTS/HSDPA (850, 1900, 2100 MHz)
      GSM/EDGE (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz)
      Data only2
      Wi-Fi (802.11a/b/g/n)
      Bluetooth 2.1 + EDR technology

  10. Coincidence? by whisper_jeff · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is it coincidence that iPads are being "confiscated" shortly after Apple announced the international launch of the iPad was being delayed? I think not! :)

    1. Re:Coincidence? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      Israeli Customs Agents: Proud new iPad owners!

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    2. Re:Coincidence? by T+Murphy · · Score: 0, Troll
      No, the problem is they read slashdot and saw in the comments to the earlier Apple/iPad story:

      Except Apple is gradually adding multitasking. OS 4 is getting much closer to a final solution.

      There's no way this is just a coincidence.

  11. Nothing to do with Apple by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is users bringing devices from overseas, having them confiscated. The ones Apple sells there would presumably meet whatever standard is required for the country.

    So, I'd say poor users, being foolish enough to actually declare a device too small to really detect by customs. That'll learn 'em.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Nothing to do with Apple by nitio · · Score: 1

      Unless, of course, they HAVE to declare or they face serious tax evasion penalties. Brazil may charge you 50% more of what is beyond the amazing, wait for it, US$500 tax-free you can import.

      --
      http://stoploudness.org/
    2. Re:Nothing to do with Apple by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing that Israeli customs guys are pretty jumpy about undeclared objects, especially ones that look funny on x-ray...

    3. Re:Nothing to do with Apple by delta98 · · Score: 1, Informative

      At least they are letting the owners ship them back out instead of keeping or destroying them.

    4. Re:Nothing to do with Apple by mishehu · · Score: 1

      The gov't has stated that you can have your iPad held pending review by the Ministry of Communications for 50 NIS per day (roughly around $12-13). Otherwise, I think you'll lose custody and ownership of the iPad. I imagine you'll likely get fined if you try to go through the green line instead of the red line and get caught, on top of the prior two choices.

      But... apparently this is newsworthy here because it's about Apple. What do I care even? I have no intention of jumping on the bandwagon. Sounds like a bunch of waaaambulances being dispatched to me...

    5. Re:Nothing to do with Apple by Altus · · Score: 1

      It would surprise me if apple built diffent hardware for different reigons. I know the company I work for builds one piece of hardware that can be certified in all the countries that are relevant. Its not worth it to develop multiple different piece of hardware and deal with all the warehousing and manufacturing issues that would result.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    6. Re:Nothing to do with Apple by gillbates · · Score: 1

      Ok, you don't declare a device you could have snuck past customs.

      Now you have the problem that said device interferes with military radar, and now you have IDF at your door (if you're lucky. You might get Mr. Hellfire instead).

      Me, I'd rather declare and be declined than deal with IDF. Of course, YMMV.

      --
      The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
    7. Re:Nothing to do with Apple by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Destroying them like this?

      http://lilysussman.wordpress.com/2009/11/30/im-sorry-but-we-blew-up-your-laptop-welcome-to-israel/

      What are the odds they charged her for the 3 bullets?

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    8. Re:Nothing to do with Apple by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      too small to really detect by customs

      I’ve never been through Israeli customs but from what I’ve heard I’m not sure I’d bank on that.

      And if you don’t declare it and they do find it, they might just decide to shoot it...

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    9. Re:Nothing to do with Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, yes.

    10. Re:Nothing to do with Apple by clone53421 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What are the odds they charged her for the 3 bullets?

      Not too high, considering they eventually reimbursed her for the computer.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    11. Re:Nothing to do with Apple by catmistake · · Score: 2

      Thanks for posting that link. The story is interesting. But I wish those of Arab descent and Muslims would take a look at what's happening. There are a few bad seeds among their group that are causing the establishment to fear everyone in their group. They should take it upon themselves to ferret out the violent blood thirsty idiots, and serve those motherfuckers up to be judged for their fucked up violence. I believe Tom Clancy wrote in a fictional account the way the Muslims and Arabs could much more easily and quickly get their grievencies addressed: follow the teachings of the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. The first Isreali soldier that kills a passive non-violent Arab protester, the entire world will come to their aid (probably in spirit only, but that is very powerful). If you're just going to blow yourself up anyway, what's the difference if you let yourself *actually* get martered, rather than just redifining what martydom is (hint: a martyr is not a murderer, a martyr doesn't commit suicide... a martyr must truly be innocent of crime, and is themselves murdered because of their principles.) Hey, it's just my opinion, don't cut my head off!

    12. Re:Nothing to do with Apple by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure you could replace Arab/Muslim with any side/race/country, and be correct.

      It's the bad side of the human condition.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    13. Re:Nothing to do with Apple by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      Big deal they will give them back when you leave. I don't think some other countries would do that.

    14. Re:Nothing to do with Apple by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Now you have the problem that said device interferes with military radar, and now you have IDF at your door

      I'll bet you actually think it's important to turn off WiFi devices on planes, too, lest it bring the whole plane down in a fiery ball.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    15. Re:Nothing to do with Apple by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      apparently this is newsworthy here because it's about Apple.

      As the subject line says, this has nothing to do with Apple. If I went to Israel, or any other country, and I had my laptop or anything else confiscated I'd be mighty upset. I may come back and demand my own government ban stuff from that nation and make sure they knew that. It would be even worse if I were on a business trip.

      Falcon

    16. Re:Nothing to do with Apple by ottothecow · · Score: 1
      Wifi signal power is almost certainly a software option. A lot of consumer routers have a function to reduce power (if your house is covered and you don't need it leaking into your neighbors. DD-WRT even lets me increase my power above the standard levels.

      I would imagine apple just flips a few bits and it will pass inspection elsewhere.

      --
      Bottles.
    17. Re:Nothing to do with Apple by falconwolf · · Score: 2, Informative

      The first Isreali soldier that kills a passive non-violent Arab protester, the entire world will come to their aid (probably in spirit only, but that is very powerful).

      Israelis have killed many "passive non-violent Arab protesters". You don't even have to be Arab, just a protester. Rachel Corrie was an American protester who was killed when a Caterpillar bulldozer ran over her. Fact is is Zionists will do almost anything to create a Jewish state for Jews only.

      Falcon

    18. Re:Nothing to do with Apple by clone53421 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      If one of these had actually run over her, there’d have been very little left to identify her by. But don’t let that dissuade you from disseminating false information... keep right on defending people who foolishly walked into demolition zones and deliberately stood in the way of the equipment.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    19. Re:Nothing to do with Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally I like Tom Kratman's take on the whole thing, (re: "A Desert Called Peace", "Carnifex" and "Caliphate" for instance).

      At some point, if the Muslim world does not take care of its own garbage, and allows them to speak for the rest of the community, then the rest of the world will have no choice but to react to the threat they perceive.

    20. Re:Nothing to do with Apple by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

      No the locale setting or the equivlent setting disables the disalaowed freqs and drops the power output.

    21. Re:Nothing to do with Apple by falconwolf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But don't let that dissuade you from disseminating false information...

      I am willing to learn, can you proof she was not run over by a bullbozer" Or are you dissemination false information yourself?

      Falcon

    22. Re:Nothing to do with Apple by clone53421 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The article you cited gives ample evidence.

      An autopsy was conducted on March 24 at the Israel's National Center of Forensic Medicine in Tel Aviv. The final report was not released publicly, but in their report on the matter Human Rights Watch asserts a copy was provided to them by Craig Corrie, with a translation supplied by the U.S. Department of State. In the report they quote Professor Yehuda Hiss, who performed the autopsy, as concluding that "her death was caused by pressure on the chest (mechanical asphyxiation) with fractures of the ribs and vertebrae of the dorsal spinal column and scapulas, and tear wounds in the right lung with hemorrhaging of the pleural cavities."

      Mechanical asphyxiation with fractures and hemorrhaging sounds a lot more like having a wall fall over on you than it does like having a 50-ton bulldozer run over you. If you get run over by a 50-ton dozer, you don’t die of mechanical asphyxiation (being too constricted to breathe). You die of being flattened.

      In any case, standing in the way of a 50-ton bulldozer is stupid.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    23. Re:Nothing to do with Apple by falconwolf · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Mechanical asphyxiation with fractures and hemorrhaging sounds a lot more like having a wall fall over on you than it does like having a 50-ton bulldozer run over you.

      It does not say how those wounds were caused, so it does not deny a bulldozer went over her.

      In any case, standing in the way of a 50-ton bulldozer is stupid.

      No, what is stupid is not being willing to stand up for what you believe. At least she did that.

      Falcon

    24. Re:Nothing to do with Apple by clone53421 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It does not say how those wounds were caused, so it does not deny a bulldozer went over her.

      I can tell you how they were not caused. They were not caused by a 50-ton bulldozer driving over her. That would have resulted in a much different autopsy result.

      No, what is stupid is not being willing to stand up for what you believe. At least she did that.

      No, what is stupid is going into a demolition zone and standing in front of 100,000 lb. bulldozers whose drivers might not even see you.

      What is stupid is taking a tragic accident that was caused entirely by this girl’s stupidity and then claiming not only that the bulldozer ran over her, which it clearly did not, but that the driver did it on purpose.

      Claiming the bulldozer ran over her is merely disingenuous, as the official report was that a wall fell onto her, the bulldozer was there to knock down said wall, and her wounds are typical of what would be expected of someone upon whom a wall had fallen – NOT what you would expect of someone who had been driven over by a bulldozer.

      But claiming that this accident proves that Israelis kill “passive non-violent protesters”, as if they are doing it on purpose, is more than disingenuous. It is outrageous.

      Standing up for what you believe is commendable.

      Becoming a martyr is stupid.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    25. Re:Nothing to do with Apple by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Look, my point is, you have made an extraordinary claim: in effect, “The Jewish military ran a bulldozer over Rachel Corrie on purpose because she stood between them and a Jewish state for Jews only.”

      Extraordinary claims require proof. That claim is only substantiated by hearsay, and the evidence in fact does not overwhelmingly support it. In fact, I believe the evidence is against it. So where is your evidence? Now, even if her wounds could have been caused by a bulldozer running over her (and I do not accept this claim even for a moment), they could also have been caused by a wall falling onto her. So the burden of proof lies upon you, because you are the one making an extraordinary claim.

      Rachel foolishly stood in front of a bulldozer that was bulldozing a structure and was killed when the driver didn’t see her and part of the structure fell onto her and crushed her. If you want to claim otherwise, you must prove otherwise.

      The people who claim to be eyewitnesses of it are (a) friends of Rachel, to some degree and (b) very biased against the Israeli government. Their testimony is highly suspect.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    26. Re:Nothing to do with Apple by alantus · · Score: 1

      Fact is is Zionists will do almost anything to create a Jewish state for Jews only.

      It is true that in the state of Israel the majority follow the jewish faith.

      The jewish population in Israel is 75%, with 0.01% of the total land area, and no resources whatsoever.
      There are 32 countries with more than 75% of muslim population, some of them with more than 99%. Total area of muslim countries is around 30%, take or give. And its not just any land, its fscking oil rich land.

      In these muslim countries jews are not even allowed to own property. People can't even enter these countries with an Israeli passport, not even for tourism.
      Muslims in Israel are allowed to own property, vote and enjoy the same rights that the jews have.

    27. Re:Nothing to do with Apple by makomk · · Score: 1

      The jewish population in Israel is 75%, with 0.01% of the total land area, and no resources whatsoever.

      Wait, what? A good 20-40 percent of the land in Israel can only be leased or rented by Jews, because it's owned by various Zionist organisations that don't want non-Jews to have land. (Much of that was seized from Arab owners under interesting circumstances.)

    28. Re:Nothing to do with Apple by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      Look, my point is, you have made an extraordinary claim: in effect, "The Jewish military ran a bulldozer over Rachel Corrie on purpose because she stood between them and a Jewish state for Jews only."

      Actually I repeated the claim, I didn't make it to begin with. However I should have stated that when I repeated the claim.

      The people who claim to be eyewitnesses of it are (a) friends of Rachel, to some degree and (b) very biased against the Israeli government. Their testimony is highly suspect.

      And those who claimed otherwise, like the military weren't biased nor suspect?

      I also note the claim I did make, that "Zionists will do almost anything to create a Jewish state for Jews only", wasn't commented on.

      Falcon

    29. Re:Nothing to do with Apple by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Actually I repeated the claim, I didn't make it to begin with. However I should have stated that when I repeated the claim.

      Repeating baseless claims is just as bad as making them. And I’m still not sure who you were quoting, because the Wikipedia article is matter-of-fact and doesn’t make the claims you made.

      And those who claimed otherwise, like the military weren't biased nor suspect?

      Indeed they were. But they are innocent unless proven guilty and hearsay isn’t enough to prove them guilty.

      I also note the claim I did make, that "Zionists will do almost anything to create a Jewish state for Jews only", wasn't commented on.

      For a number of reasons. First of all, it’s an unfair categorization: Anyone who’s pro-Israel = Zionist = willing to murder in cold blood “to create a Jewish state for Jews only”. Second of all, it’s not even true with regards to the goal of the Jewish state. There are plenty of non-Jews living in Israel. It’s the Palestinian leaders who want to create a Palestinian state for non-Jews only, which they have stated plainly many times over. And finally, it’s subjective. It’s your opinion, and I really can’t argue with opinions... merely show how they are not based in fact.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  12. So the take away is: don't bring your iPad by zero_out · · Score: 1

    This isn't really "news" so much as a PSA. To everyone who bought an iPad and is going to travel to Israel, don't bring your iPad with you.

    1. Re:So the take away is: don't bring your iPad by billcopc · · Score: 1

      Or hide it where the sun don't shine ?

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    2. Re:So the take away is: don't bring your iPad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or hide it where the sun don't shine ?

      Apple users are used to having things crammed in there.

  13. This should not be news! by stm2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That is pretty common in a lot of countries.
    In Argentina, if you import a device with a plug different from our official plug (in size and shape), the import can be rejected.
    Even if you could buy a cheap adapter in order to make it work (provided that the voltage is compatible), you are banner for importing until you request a device with the right plug.
    So some people end up paying bribes to enter such a devices.

    --
    DNA in your Linux: DNALinux
    1. Re:This should not be news! by digitalchinky · · Score: 1

      Lucky you I say - here in the Philippines there are about 6 common plug types you might randomly end up with no matter what you buy. Voltage at the outlet is 220, but some appliances require 110. As for the wiring, I don't think anyone in this country actually knows what the third prong is for so they never run a wire for it. (grounding conductor connection / earth connection)

      All in all it keeps the private fire brigades in business.

    2. Re:This should not be news! by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      What if you cut off the plug? Surely you can buy a compatible plug later...

    3. Re:This should not be news! by daveime · · Score: 1

      The third prong is for cutting off, di ba ?

    4. Re:This should not be news! by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      Of course it's not news, but putting the word "Israel" in a story title gets page-hits.

  14. Not the soup Nazi by wombatmobile · · Score: 1, Funny

    A spokesperson for the Israeli Communications Ministry said the Israeli Government had fully investigated the import ban, and found that Israel had at all times operated in accordance with international law. Israeli customs officers maintained a high professional and moral level while facing an enemy that aimed to terrorize Israeli civilians by broadcasting wifi at American power levels. Next time we see one of those iPads, the spokesperson said, we'll probably just shoot it.

    1. Re:Not the soup Nazi by e065c8515d206cb0e190 · · Score: 0

      I call Godwin

    2. Re:Not the soup Nazi by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      An iPad might actually be an interesting device to convert into a covert explosive...

      Tiny motherboard(with low current requirements, particularly if you turn off wireless and sound, and turn down volume) and a huge volume of battery.

      Replace the iPad battery with a much smaller one(you don't need 10 hours, 10-15 minutes to pass the "show us that it isn't a bomb by turning it on" test will be fine) and fill the rest of the former battery volume with the explosive of your choice(for extra credit, take advantage of Apple's peripheral support, and tap the appropriate dock-connector pins, then have an iMartyr app to use for detonating).

      Additional tricks(like scoring the inside of the aluminum backplate to make it break up in a more even shrapnel distribution, or replacing the backplate with a steel one in the hopes of getting a directional spray of glass fragments from the front of the device) are left as an exercise for the reader.

    3. Re:Not the soup Nazi by jo42 · · Score: 1

      What about the JooJoo tablet? Doesn't the Antisemitic League find that not kosher at all?

    4. Re:Not the soup Nazi by arielCo · · Score: 1

      Aaand, you can code it a BIG ASS countdown display!

      looks up the Apple Store

      Uhm...

      --
      This post contains no rudeness or derision of any kind. All arguments are friendly. Terms and exclusions may apply.
    5. Re:Not the soup Nazi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, that's so easy its already been done. You wire the trigger into the speaker leads, download ANY countdown app that generates a sound at the end, and viola.

  15. Ipad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not kosher.

  16. 802.11a - 5.5Ghz and up is no go in Israel by RichMan · · Score: 4, Informative

    5Ghz is where a lot of military radar like stuff operates. In particular Israel has specific 802.11a restrictions
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_WLAN_channels

    5.5Gz up is a not supposed to be used in Israel, but is open for use in US, Japan and Europe.

    Here is a good, but not current, discussion of the various issues around wifi.
    http://wifinetnews.com/archives/2007/01/5_ghz_or_bust.html

  17. Nooooooo! No more iPad 'news' items, please. by Bearhouse · · Score: 0, Troll

    That's enough now, Timmy.
    Now go away and do your damn job - find something interesting.
    Try Ars Tech, or something. Anything....
    Hell, maybe even CNN or the BBC

  18. it's not a base station by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    I don't think it does ad hoc networking. If there are no 5.8GHz base stations, then the iPad won't use 5.8GHz Wi-Fi. If there are 5.8GHz base stations, then it isn't really the iPad that's creating the problem, is it?

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
    1. Re:it's not a base station by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      If there are no 5.8GHz base stations, then the iPad won't use 5.8GHz Wi-Fi

      Don't wireless devices look on the given frequencies? Possibly send out signals asking who is around? I didn't think connecting to a network was entirely passive, even in the discovery stage...

    2. Re:it's not a base station by somenickname · · Score: 1

      Most wireless cards that you find in a laptop do absolutely nothing on the 5Ghz channels unless they first hear a beacon on one of those channels. They specifically do this so that they can conform to world regulations on what channels can be used. So the Israeli claim is completely bogus unless Apple went out of their way to hardcode the wifi region directly into the firmware instead of the normal "world roaming" region that most cards have (which is possible, I suppose). Having said that, for some cards it's not a hardware or firmware restriction that prevents the transmission on whatever channel you want but instead a software one. For example, you can use an atheros wireless card that normally has the 5Ghz channels closed as a full on access point by simply hacking the driver to remove the restriction.

    3. Re:it's not a base station by Jeffrey+Baker · · Score: 1

      Well, you're wrong. Current wifi chips which come loaded with "world" firmware will never broadcast on 5GHz channels unless they first see beacons from an AP on that channel. These channels are marked for passive scanning only. When a device sees a beacon on that channel then it assumes that local regulations allow wifi on that channel, and the chip will enable it. The chips used in access points, by contrast, generally are shipped with locale-specific firmware, or at least locale-specific black box operating systems.

      This is why the wifi card out of your laptop can't really be used as a decent access point. You can't get them to ever broadcast beacons on the 5GHz band.

    4. Re:it's not a base station by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most wireless cards that you find in a laptop do absolutely nothing on the 5Ghz channels unless they first hear a beacon on one of those channels. They specifically do this so that they can conform to world regulations on what channels can be used. So the Israeli claim is completely bogus unless Apple went out of their way. . .

      They claim it hasn't been tested. I don't see how you can say that's a bogus claim.

    5. Re:it's not a base station by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      Huh. I didn't know that (obviously).

    6. Re:it's not a base station by mattj452 · · Score: 1

      There is nothing stopping you from creating an ad-hoc network in the 5 GHz band. Also, in the 5GHz band, 802.11h is implemented as well. One of the requirements is to randomly select the channel to be used (when you create the network that is). Third, the IPAD hasn't been WiFi certified yet. Check WiFi Alliances website: http://www.wi-fi.org/search_products.php?search=1&advanced=1&lang=en&filter_company_id=5&filter_category_id=&filter_subcategory=&filter_cid=&date_from=&date_to=&x=47&y=9 Now, not having it certified doesn't mean that it is automatically banned, but it sure doesn't prove that the device is legal in Israel or Europe (where it is not yet being sold).

  19. Something is better than nothing by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Unless, of course, they HAVE to declare or they face serious tax evasion penalties.

    Face how? Remember how I said the device was just about un-detectable by security? It's super flat, if you just leave it under a laptop they wouldn't think much of in on an X-Ray.

    I know Israel security is very tight, but I'm thinking incoming residents don't face much more scrutiny of luggage than in any other country I've been in - where you say you have nothing to declare, possibly get sniffed by a dog, and you are on your way.

    Remember the devices are being confiscated, and the people are being told they have to send them back overseas. So if you DON'T hide them you are out $500 for sure, instead of possibly being out a bit more.

    Of course, I'd just wait until they ship there, but if you're bringing in something under $1k I see to reason to really declare it as it's probably more bother than it's worth, fines or no.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Something is better than nothing by tophermeyer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I know Israel security is very tight, but I'm thinking incoming residents don't face much more scrutiny of luggage than in any other country I've been in - where you say you have nothing to declare, possibly get sniffed by a dog, and you are on your way.

      That is how US customs works, but Israel takes airport security to an entirely different level. You could probably get lucky and get a small device like that through an x-ray, but Israeli security officers make a point to question every person that passes in and out of their facility. These guys are some of the best trained and most experienced in the world in deception detection. My assumption is that the people that are smuggling iPads are not the kind of people that are experienced with masking their deception. Plus, the Israeli's have absolutely no problem with randomly grabbing people out of the crowd and rifling through their luggage.

      Israel is just about the last place in the world I would try to smuggle anything through an airport.

    2. Re:Something is better than nothing by Post-O-Matron · · Score: 1

      I was randomly grabbed out of a line in Heathrow, yet never happened to me in Ben-Gurion.

      Either way security and customs are completely separated, and what you're saying is incorrect. Even if security do ask you to open your luggage, they couldn't care less about what products are there and they don't cooperate with customs in anyway.
      Customs are just a bunch of fat lazy guys sitting at the end of the route eyeballing people, and mostly doing nothing in the green route. All these cases of iPad confiscations happened to folks on the red route (i.e they declared the iPads).

      Also security is tight when you are GETTING ON an airplane. After landing the most that can happen is asking you about your business abroad or in Israel if you look suspicious, but they wouldn't care much about your luggage - if you had a weapon or a bomb in there presumably you would have used it by then...

      (I'm an Israeli living in London in case it wasn't clear)

  20. Non sequitir by RandCraw · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If Israel's WiFi standard is like Europe's, this begs several questions:

    0) Isn't it likely that Apple has already explored this ground? If not prior to the iPad's rollout, then after introducing the same technology in the iPhone when they introduced it over a year ago throughout europe and Israel?

    1) Why haven't european regulators also rejected the iPad? Since they apparently have not, they must have tested the iPad (or grandfathered it as comparable iPhone tech) and accepted it.

    2) Since the europeans tested and accepted the iPad, why haven't the Israelis accepted the european test results since they're supposedly equivalent?

    Sounds like the Israelis are waving a red herring. Either they're protecting an in-country product or license, or they're punishing Apple for something. Either way, this kind of pissy petulence makes them sound like a snotty child.

    "I'll take my ball away and play with myself."

    1. Re:Non sequitir by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    2. Re:Non sequitir by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

      You're making the naive assumption that the European models of iPhone / iPad are identical to the North American versions.

      Hint: They aren't.

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    3. Re:Non sequitir by Animaether · · Score: 1

      If Israel's WiFi standard is like Europe's, this begs several questions:

      No it doesn't.. and not just because you meant to say 'prompts several questions'.

      1) Isn't it likely that Apple has already explored this ground? If not prior to the iPad's rollout, then after introducing the same technology in the iPhone when they introduced it over a year ago throughout europe and Israel?

      Yes. Your point is? Apple haven't launched the iPad in Israel, or Europe for that matter.

      2) Why haven't european regulators also rejected the iPad?

      Your question has a fallacy to begin with. Israeli regulators haven't rejected the iPad per se. They reject any tech that can broadcasts at particular frequencies and/or strengths. See the Wikipedia topic on WiFi channels ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_WLAN_channels ) and pay special attention to the 'n' standard and how -many- channels are blocked in Israel specifically.

      Since they apparently have not, they must have tested the iPad (or grandfathered it as comparable iPhone tech) and accepted it.

      That's a wrong assumption. They needn't test the device simply because it's not actually brought onto the market by any non-grey import entity. By that I also include travelers.

      That said.. though I can't speak for -all- countries, at least in NL they're not -too- strict on what you bring with you/etc. They're far more likely to slap an import fine on you (and possibly still be cheaper off than getting it retail here once available) than that they would say "Channel X isn't allowed in the EU - we are confiscating this device."

      The same applies to the U.S. Although my notebook will happily use 'b' channel 13, it's not going to get confiscated at the U.S. border because of this. Although, under law, if they were to find me actually using it they -could- cite me for it.

      3) Since the europeans tested and accepted the iPad, why haven't the Israelis accepted the european test results since they're supposedly equivalent?

      'The europeans' didn't - even if they did, there's still the differences pointed out in that wiki page. They're not nearly as equivalent as one might think.

      Sounds like the Israelis are waving a red herring. Either they're protecting an in-country product or license, or they're punishing Apple for something. Either way, this kind of pissy petulence makes them sound like a snotty child.

      Or they're just enforcing the laws of their country as they have always done. Once Apple makes an iPad for the European market, I'm sure they'll just tweak the firmware to block the channels that can be used and the power with which it transmits. Problem solved. They're not punishing Apple in any way - just impatient users.. that's a risk you take with grey (or sometimes even black) market import.

    4. Re:Non sequitir by j-beda · · Score: 1

      'The europeans' didn't - even if they did, there's still the differences pointed out in that wiki page. They're not nearly as equivalent as one might think.

      Sounds like the Israelis are waving a red herring. Either they're protecting an in-country product or license, or they're punishing Apple for something. Either way, this kind of pissy petulence makes them sound like a snotty child.

      Or they're just enforcing the laws of their country as they have always done. Once Apple makes an iPad for the European market, I'm sure they'll just tweak the firmware to block the channels that can be used and the power with which it transmits. Problem solved. They're not punishing Apple in any way - just impatient users.. that's a risk you take with grey (or sometimes even black) market import.

      It might not even be a firmware difference - for an Airport base station I think you just select the country you are operating it in during setup and it behaves as it should in terms of channels and broadcast power. It does seem a little over-zealous though - not to good for promoting visitors.

  21. Do they keep laptops too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is non sense... an iPad is nothing more than a computer with WiFi...

    Maybe I`m wrong or i just dont get it....

    1. Re:Do they keep laptops too? by Arimus · · Score: 1

      If the device is not certified to operate to Israelli (I suspect in this instance that equates to the EU) spec then in theory yes it will apply.

      --
      --- Users are like bacteria -> Each one causing a thousand tiny crises until the host finally gives up and dies.
  22. Wifi what? by yoshi_mon · · Score: 1

    What exactly is the issue with the Wifi?

    I could have read this story on any news feed.

    --

    Really, I know what I'm doing...Ohhhh, look at the shiny buttons!
    1. Re:Wifi what? by dlgeek · · Score: 1

      The exact issue is that it doesn't comply with Israel's regulations on transmission power in the 2.4 GHz spectrum.

      To expand a little: every country has similar-but-not-identical standards regarding the use of radio spectrum. This is a very limited resource, and there are all kinds of laws and standards to ensure that I can't use a really powerful wifi radio in my laptop that would prevent any other wifi radio in the surrounding mile from working. The standards in the US allow for higher power usage than those in Israel or Europe.

      These regulations apply not only to manufacturing of devices, but to possession and use of them. Thus, it's illegal for me to modify my laptop to exceed these standards or for someone to use such a laptop. It would also be illegal for me to import such a laptop...or iPad. This is what's happening in Israel.

  23. So how much power does the IPad have? by kj4gxu · · Score: 1

    So the question I have is does anyone know what the WI-FI transmit power is on the IPAD? I didn't see it on Apple's site and don't seem to be finding it anywhere? Are we talking a full 1 watt?

  24. Re:FUCK THE IPAD! by CorporateSuit · · Score: 4, Funny

    Have you considered moving to Israel?

    --
    I am the richest astronaut ever to win the superbowl.
  25. Re:Nooooooo! No more iPad 'news' items, please. by godrik · · Score: 2, Funny

    please mod parent "+10 damn right". I am getting tired of 2 maxipad news a day

  26. In Other Words by MrTripps · · Score: 1

    Mossad doesn't have an easy way to crack into it yet. Shouldn't take long.

    --
    "I'm not a quack, I'm a mad scientist! There's a difference." - Dr. Cockroach
  27. its just by Phizzle · · Score: 2, Funny

    NOT KOSHER!!!

    --
    I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
  28. Freebies by dadioflex · · Score: 1

    Sounds like somebody is angling for some free samples to "test".

  29. ISRAELI CUSTOMS ARE BASTARDS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For all the hype about being so high-tech, Israel in my experience has a god-awful and low-tech customs agency.

    My favorite: The first fella who had his iPad confiscated learned it was being held in a depot...and he was paying for each day it was in customs.

    They are a goofball organization and charge outrageous fees- just try smuggling a Wii or something along those lines into Israel.

    Hopefully this will shame them a bit, but not bloody likely.

  30. Re:Yee-hah! by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    Let the anti-semetism begin!

    I don't know that many people have anything against SeMet, but whatever...

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  31. iPads are dirty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to Orthodox Jewish law, iPads are dirty and must be submerged in a Mikvah to be cleansed.

    1. Re:iPads are dirty by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      It’s a simple mistake, really... they had “mac’s iPad” confused with “maxi pad”, which is a feminine hygiene product used to stop the flow of menstrual blood. And, as all good Orthodox Jews know, anything which has touched menstrual blood is unclean.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    2. Re:iPads are dirty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "mac's iPad" confused with "maxi pad"

      Funny!

  32. HA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All you iPad is belonging to US!

  33. its that they are confiscating them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The issue here is not that the Israeli Government hasn't approved the IPad. It is that the customs officials are actively conviscating the Ipad from tourists and other visitors.

    This is good to know. I wouldn't want to bring my new Ipad and have it confiscated at the Border.

  34. its furbies all over again by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Banned in households of US intelligence agents because they reputedly recorded sounds.

  35. Re:Nooooooo! No more iPad 'news' items, please. by Inda · · Score: 1

    The media overlord BBC is touting Apple products to the point of being obsessive. There's no escape. It's disgusting.

    --
    This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
  36. Inaccurate and out-of-date by HonestButCurious · · Score: 2, Informative

    I don't really understand how this infomercial qualifies as Slashdot material, but still it needs some corrections:
    1. The iPads were not confiscated - they were only prevented from entering Israel. They are still the property of whoever bought them, and he's welcome to take them back to the US and return/sell them on.
    2. This regulation only applies to people trying to *sell* iPads in Israel - one piece for personal use is perfectly OK. I know many people who imported various wireless devices (walkie talkies, wifi routers, even Nexus Ones) to Israel, and as long as it's for personal use nobody challenged them at customs. Most electronics (except for musical instruments) is customs-exempt in Israel anyway.

    The iPad scene in Israel: even though the thing doesn't have Hebrew text entry yet, there's still a very clear interest in it. There are companies who offer to buy it in the US and send it to you. Typical price including shipping is 2500NIS ($660):
    http://www.mustop.co.il/special-deals-israel/ipad

    1. Re:Inaccurate and out-of-date by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Regardless of "common past practice", it would appear the original Haaretz article is referring to cases where Israeli citizens are blocked from importing just one ipad for personal use. Israeli person travels to US, tries to returns home, declares the iPad in order to pay VAT on it, gets it confiscated.

      Given that it is giving specific examples of persons failing to do this with iPads, I have a hard time writing this off as "dated and inaccurate". It appears the root of this is some bureaucratic red tape at the Communications Ministry. (read TFA for better details).

      Of course, this is vastly different than a foreign visitor to Israel trying to bring one along on their trip, and they may or may not be blocking that (most /.'s seem to assume so, but that isn't covered by the facts, so it remains ambiguous.).

  37. You mean, yellow cake? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  38. The Answer by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

    Israel is definitely NOT like Europe.

  39. Re:Nooooooo! No more iPad 'news' items, please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod parent "Redundant".

  40. Re:nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I clicked "Read More" on this article just so that I could scroll to the bottom and see someone marked as troll bash Isreal's "evil" government. I'm leaving satisfied.

  41. But charge you for keeping them by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Big deal they will give them back when you leave.

    a) What if you live there? You don't want to have to leave the country to use a device you bought.

    b) They charge you for every day they have to store it for you.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:But charge you for keeping them by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      a) you can't get one in the first place.

      b) That may be true but a citation would be nice as too how much for how long.

      Go try and take too much chocolate into Switzerland and see what happens. At least it's not total confiscation. That part was left out.

  42. Israel and Apple by olafva · · Score: 1

    Not the 1st problem for Apple products entering Israel:

    http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2009/12/19/video-three-bullets-and-a-macbook/

    --
    What's past is NOT ALWAYS prologue for the future!
    1. Re:Israel and Apple by lagi · · Score: 1

      Not the 1st problem for Apple products entering Israel:

      http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2009/12/19/video-three-bullets-and-a-macbook/

      i know this case.
      something you probably don't know about Israeli IDF is that guys who serve to border patrol are usually, how to say, a bit hot tamped.
      this stupid girl came there and just asked for it (did all kind of stuff to piss them). so some guard just got pissed and shot her laptop.
      a nothing wrong with that, one MacBook less in the world. plus he didn't shoot the HD, so she didn't lost her data even.

  43. I hate Apple too but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would be willing to bet most Wifi radios in non-ipad devices by default or by configuration or firmware modification can be set to transmit at power levels above 100mw or transmit via unapproved frequencies.. Shouldn't all of these devices be prevented from entering the country as well? Whats the difference?

    I understand the when in rome concept but the existance of an ipad does not necessarily mean you will use the device in a way that is not prohibitied by local law. For example ipads and cellular phones can be used on Airplanes as long as all of the RF radios are switched off. The radio in the ipad can be switched off.

    What sucks even more is that one Israeli passport stamp and your essentially banned from going to a great number of other middle eastern countries until you loose your passport and have a new one issued to you. Countries need to be nicer and more understanding of visitors. Especially the US..nothing like coming back from an overseas trip where everyone is quite nice and professional to the sound of a belligerent customs/tsa agent with a badge being an annoying little prick and making fun of visitors who ask questions or don't notice the signs in front of them. A whole lot of PPL just need to grow up.

  44. Israel isn't fighting Arabs, but islamic militants by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    Some in Israel are or were fighting Arabs. And that includes Israel's Founding Fathers. Avraham Katznelson "felt that nothing was 'more moral, from the viewpoint of universal human ethics, than the emptying of the Jewish state of the Arabs and their transfer elsewhere.... This requires ... force.'" In the same article David Ben-Gurion said "We must expel Arabs and take their places ... and if we have to use force ... to guarantee our own right to settle these places -- then we have force at our disposal."

    Oh, and note that that website is not antisemitic or anti-Israel, it is the website of the Jewish group Tikkun run by Rabbi Michael Lerner. "Tikkun" means "to heal, repair, and transform the world."

    Falcon

  45. Re:Nooooooo! No more iPad 'news' items, please. by Bearhouse · · Score: 1

    Well, thanks for the vote of confidence anyway!
    If I'm a Troll, and you're Offtopic, then there's no hope for this place...

  46. iPad fix by Metrathon · · Score: 1

    Whew - for a moment there I thought I wasn't going to get any iPad news today.

  47. This doesn't make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There must be tens of thousands of people coming to Isreal with laptops every day. I doubt that the customs know which ones agree with the Israeli rules. So what is special about the iPad?

  48. Other countries' laws. The US is the exception. by gavron · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Israel isn't the exception. The US is. This is the only country to have certified the use of the apple toy.

    We make a big deal of having people who come to OUR country respect OUR laws. That means a cellphone jammer that's legal in the UK cannot be brought nor used into this country. Laptops get confiscated and searched at the border, and people are interrogated about cash. We can discuss the libertarian aspects in the other 1700 threads... BUT

    Israel is doing no differently than WE do. Their communication ministry (equivalent of our FCC) dictates what is ok and what isn't, and just as the apple toys are not certified for use in Europe they are not certified for use in Israel.

    I'm sorry you don't like that your laptop can be confiscated. I'm sorry you think it would be worse if you're on a business trip. Don't bring drugs to Singapore, icrap to Israel, or laptops with kiddie porn to the US. You'll lose them and your liberty.

    This "article" is worthless because it implies Israel is the exception. In fact it's we who are the exception.

    Time to drop the false sense of outrage and enlightenment and respect other countries rights not to live by our (US) laws.

    E

  49. wonder how that affects sending 'pads via mail by MoFoQ · · Score: 1

    last year, the International Air Transport Association (IATA) changed their rules to classify any lithium-based battery (even the tiny ones found in wrist-watches) as a "Hazardous Material" and under the Universal Postal Convention, it prohibits hazardous materials from being sent internationally by mail (nationally, most Universal Postal Union member countries restrict it to ground-only mail).
    http://www.post.japanpost.jp/int/use/restriction/other_en.html

    The restriction also prohibits electronic devices with batteries in them unless they remove the battery.
    Third-party (FedEx, UPS, DHL, etc.) parcel companies are exempt though mainly because they have their own planes though airlines that also provide air-cargo services may have other restrictions as well as similar restrictions in certain cases.

    I guess they can try to claim it's a "feminine hygiene product"....

  50. Actually the iPad is CE-approved by shambler.com · · Score: 1

    If you look at the back of the iPad you can see the CE logo. You can see a picture here: http://www.holesinthenet.co.il/archives/9761 It's in Hebrew, but just scroll 1/3 way into the post.

  51. True story... No lie by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

    Now you have the problem that said device interferes with military radar, and now you have IDF at your door

    I'll bet you actually think it's important to turn off WiFi devices on planes, too, lest it bring the whole plane down in a fiery ball.

    You laugh, but let me tell you about the last time I flew...

    I was playing Pokemon on the DS, as was a kid a few rows back - so we went to the union room to see about some trades... Anyway, I found someone in the union room and traded my Voltorb for something called "Otto" - I'd never heard of it before. Not thirty seconds later, there's an explosion in the front of the plane... Fortunately nobody was hurt, but it took out some of the plane's instruments, apparently, and forced an emergency landing...

    So, yeah, I really don't think wi-fi on planes is a good idea.

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
  52. Re:Other countries' laws. The US is the exception. by falconwolf · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Thanks for clarifying your willingness not to fight for liberty.

    Falcon

  53. US = Everywhere? by Bysshe · · Score: 0

    "Apple's iPad is proving to be popular everywhere"

    If by everywhere they mean the United States because this thing isn't officially available anywhere else.

    --
    Read what I mean, not what I wrote.
  54. Re:Other countries' laws. The US is the exception. by gavron · · Score: 1

    You don't get to "fight" for anything in another country. They have their laws.

    Now start fighting for liberties in THIS country and stop being an ass.

    E

  55. Re:Israeli theft by Low+Ranked+Craig · · Score: 1

    Did you read what I wrote before responding?

    --
    I still cannot find the droids I am looking for...
  56. Re:FUCK THE IPAD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And live with the next generation of nazis as they fuck up all the palestinians? I think not!

  57. Re:True story... No lie by Vlado · · Score: 1

    And why exactly do you think the explosion was in any way related to your wi-fi?

    Point 1 - I bet that a good percentage of people that use their electronic devices on airplanes do not consciously turn off wi-fi.So far I haven't heard of any plane accidents that were attributed to wi-fi transmissions.
    Point 2 - Lufhtansa for a while actually advertised wireless connectivity on their airplanes for web surfing during long-haul flights. At the time it was a bit expensive and extremely laggy so I only used it once. But they definitely didn't discourage it.

  58. Not different standards, different laws by dingram17 · · Score: 3, Informative
    The actual mechanism of 802.11a/b/g/n is a standard -- nothing wrong with that.

    Things get interesting internationally because the 2.4GHz ISM band is defined differently in each country (but loosely based around the three ITU regions). There is a good reference list on Wikipedia. For example, most of the world can use channels 1-13, but North American users are limited to channels 1-11 at full power (12 & 13 can be used at reduced power -- but that's too complicated for most people so the channels are restricted). Spain used to be limited to channels 10 & 11 and France to 10-13, but this has been changed as the two countries harmonise with the rest of Europe.

    The nice database at Linux Wireless lists frequencies and power levels. Israel is listed as having a 2.4GHz band of 2402.000 - 2482.000 MHz with a max power of 100mW. The US band is 2402.000 - 2472.000 (narrower) with a maximum power of 500mW (much higher). If the iPad is actually running 0.5W at 2.4GHz I can see why the Israeli authorities will be a bit cranky. Australia & the UK have the 100mW limits, but people in NZ with iPads (such as @lisatickledpink) will be fine since the power limit is 1000mW (woo hoo!)

    If Apple had been sensible and limited the power output to 100mW across the board then there would be no trouble with WiFi across borders, and perhaps that is what most laptop manufacturers have done (to avoid the wifi cards being ripped out at Customs)?

  59. Re:True story... No lie by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

    And why exactly do you think the explosion was in any way related to your wi-fi?

    Because somehow the plane's avionics got confused, traded me its autopilot program for a Voltorb, and then the Voltorb self-destructed... Read between the lines, man!

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
  60. Re:True story... No lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And why exactly do you think the explosion was in any way related to your wi-fi?

    Because somehow the plane's avionics got confused, traded me its autopilot program for a Voltorb, and then the Voltorb self-destructed... Read between the lines, man!

    Ohh, if only they hadn't deleted all those Pokemon articles from Wikipedia, he could have checked there to understand your joke.

  61. This settles it then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Independent tests by the Israelis confirm that the iPad's WiFi is not too weak, but to strong.

  62. Re:Other countries' laws. The US is the exception. by gotermite · · Score: 1

    Yup. Reciprocity is the name of the game. You grab our stuff. Then we grab yours. Then there is discussion.

  63. And now some facts from a resident of Israel: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. iPad does comply with European WIFI standards
    2. Israeli Ministry of Communication declares that European and Israeli WIFI standards are identical
    3. iPad uses the same WIFI iPhone, iPod, MacBook and iMac use
    4. iDigital (Peres son's company) is the monopolist importer of Apple products to Israel
    5. Israeli Ministry of Communication has not checked the iPad by itself, but requested the necessary information from iDigital instead
    6. iDigital started to sell iPhone in Israel 3 years after it's sales began in US. The sales isn't too good probably due to the fact that everybody interested in iPhone already bought it "unofficially". Including me.
    7. Apple's products in iDigital are substantially more expensive comparing to US or Europe
    8. "iDigital couldn't be reached for comment about the ministry's decision to ban imports of the iPad" - WSJournal

    Anybody help to add 2 + 2?

  64. Re:Israeli theft by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    Did you read what I wrote before responding?

    Not only did I read what you wrote, I even included the part you wrote, Honestly I have no problem with Israel relocating/segregating the Palestinians, I was replying to in my post.

    As for the rest of your post, there wasn't the hatred you wrote of "The hatred they have for each other is ingrained from birth an cannot be resolved" was not there before or during WWII. It only cam with the founding of Israel. Israeli founders wanted to ethnic cleanse Israel. Don't believe me? Take the words of some of Israel's founders. Try for instance some of those quoted by Tikkun, a Jewish group.

    "Shlomo Lavie, a well-known leader of the Israeli Labor Party, the Mapai, declared that the 'transfer of Arabs out of the country in my eyes is one of the most just, moral, and correct things that can be done.'"

    Or another Mapai leader, Avraham Katznelson, who "felt that nothing was 'more moral, from the viewpoint of universal human ethics, than the emptying of the Jewish state of the Arabs and their transfer elsewhere.... This requires ... force.'"

    Or take the Israeli massacres against Palestinians. Irgun and Lehi, who the British in the British Mandate called terrorists. No less than Ariel Sharon led Israeli troops in the massacre in the West Bank village of Qibya. Hell Lehi even offered to work with the NAZIs. Wiki and Google, that wiki article is the first Google result, provides brief lists of Israeli massacres against Palestinians.

    Now tell me again how separation will end all the problems in the Israeli/Palestinian conflict and that Israeli expansionism and ethnic cleansing aren't part of the problem.

    Falcon

  65. The jewish population in Israel is 75% by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    That's only because Palestinians either fled or were driven out of Israel. If Palestinians had the same Right of Return as Jews then Israel's Jewish population would be overcome.

    There are 32 countries with more than 75% of muslim population, some of them with more than 99%. Total area of muslim countries is around 30%, take or give. And its not just any land, its fscking oil rich land.

    What the fuck dies that have to do with it?

    In these muslim countries jews are not even allowed to own property. People can't even enter these countries with an Israeli passport, not even for tourism.

    Citation required. Of course you may not provide one but unless I am provided evidence of it I will not believe your claims.

    Muslims in Israel are allowed to own property, vote and enjoy the same rights that the jews have.

    Unless of course Israelis want that land. And if not just Muslims but others too have the same rights then why are Muslims being Massacred? For more check out Google's results for Israeli Massacres and A Brief List of Massacres in Palestine. No less than Israel's first Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion said ""We must expel Arabs and take their places ... and if we have to use force ... to guarantee our own right to settle these places -- then we have force at our disposal." The Tikkun article was written by a Jew and Tikkun is edited by Rabbi Michael Lerner so this is not an anti-semetic shot, includes quotes from other Israeli founders as well. Such as Shlomo Lavie who declared that "transfer of Arabs out of the country in my eyes is one of the most just, moral, and correct things that can be done." Another said "All moral enterprises are carried out through compulsion.... The transfer [of Palestinians] is a just, logical, moral, and humane program in all senses" (quoted, along with the three prior quotations, in Nur Masalha's The Politics of Denial of 2003).

    So how is that Jew became the majority in Israel? And do none Jews really have the same rights?

    Falcon

    1. Re:The jewish population in Israel is 75% by alantus · · Score: 1

      So how is that Jew became the majority in Israel? And do none Jews really have the same rights?

      My point is: muslims have more rights in Israel than jews have in muslim countries. I don't think you need a citation for that.

    2. Re:The jewish population in Israel is 75% by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      So how is that Jew became the majority in Israel? And do none Jews really have the same rights?

      My point is: muslims have more rights in Israel than jews have in muslim countries. I don't think you need a citation for that.

      I do need citation that Jews are not allowed to own property, and are not allowed in Arab nations because they have an Israeli passport.

      Falcon

    3. Re:The jewish population in Israel is 75% by alantus · · Score: 1

      While looking for the citation you want, I found some interesting information.

      There are 11 arab countries which won't let you in if you have an israeli stamp in your passport, or even if you have an unused israeli visa in your passport, your nationality doesn't matter.
      They even look for egyptian and jordanian border stamps, knowing that israeli authorities might stamp a separate piece of paper attached to your passport on request.
      This is written in the wikipedia article.

      There are 16 arab countries which don't allow israeli passport holders to enter their country: http://bigpassportandvisa.com/israel-passports/

      There are also some arab airlines that won't allow boarding if they find out you are jewish, it doesn't matter if you are landing on an arab country or not.
      Namely Kuwait Airways, Saudi Arabian Airlines, Emirates Airline, perhaps others.

    4. Re:The jewish population in Israel is 75% by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      There are 16 arab countries which don't allow israeli passport holders to enter their country: http://bigpassportandvisa.com/israel-passports/

      Okay, so you were right. However I noticed on the page linked to above says that Israel doesn't allow Israelis to visit some countries too. See "Enemy States"
      "The Israeli law dictates that Iraq, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Syria and Yemen are considered "enemy states" or 'enemy countries.' If you're an Israeli citizen, you are not allowed to visit any of these countries unless you have a special permit issued by Israel's Ministry of Interior. Hence, if you visit this country, whether with an Israeli or a foreign passport, you may be prosecuted upon your return to Israel. Iran has been recently suggested as an addition to the list."

      Even at the height of the Cold War US citizens were allowed to visit the Soviet Union and China. American Industrialist and Occidental Petroleum stockholder Armand Hammer was a friend to the SU.

      There are also some arab airlines that won't allow boarding if they find out you are jewish, it doesn't matter if you are landing on an arab country or not.
      Namely Kuwait Airways, Saudi Arabian Airlines, Emirates Airline, perhaps others.

      Though it allows Arabs Israel's El Al airline has targeted Arabs. El Al ordered to compensate humiliated Israeli Arab passengers.

      I wonder how many of those Arab airlines are state owned and not private or corporate businesses. Let's see... Kuwait Airways is state owned. Saudi Arabian Airlines started the process of privatization in 2006. And Emirates Airline is "a subsidiary of The Emirates Group, which has over 50,000 employees, and is wholly-owned by the Government of Dubai". I'd think that if these airlines were publicly traded corporations they would allow Israeli passengers.

      Falcon

  66. Israel by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    I also note the claim I did make, that "Zionists will do almost anything to create a Jewish state for Jews only", wasn't commented on.

    For a number of reasons. First of all, it's an unfair categorization: Anyone who's pro-Israel = Zionist = willing to murder in cold blood "to create a Jewish state for Jews only".

    Show me where I said "pro-Israel = Zionist" never mind the " = willing to murder in cold blood" part. If you can't stop spreading lies.

    Since you can't carry on a conversation without making up lies I see no reason to continue.

    Falcon

    1. Re:Israel by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Israelis have killed many "passive non-violent Arab protesters". (willing to murder) You don't even have to be Arab, just a protester. Rachel Corrie was an American protester who was killed when a Caterpillar bulldozer ran over her. (in cold blood) Fact is is Zionists will do almost anything to create a Jewish state for Jews only. (to create a Jewish state for Jews only)

      And I don’t think you’ve actually called me a Zionist in this conversation, but I’ve been called it plenty of times for supporting Israel in the past.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  67. There was no atrocity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Israeli government removed israeli hardliner settlers from land they had settled illegally and were never supposed to be on in accordance
    with international agreements that Israel had previously agreed to.