Governement should not subsidise anything. Ensuring proper regulation and competition is enough.
Am I the only one appalled by such counterproductive use of tax dollars?
Don't get me wrong, I like fibre and hate the usual suspects (TWC, Comcast,...). But seriously? $8,500 per home and that's if the home actually subscribes to the service?
2- Let's imagine (crazy idea, I know) that their goal is the application of local law... they certainly know that this will create unwanted attention in the short run, but maybe that's a sacrifice they're willing to make to have wikimedia comply with local law?
To all the whiny complainers above: they're free to decide what they want to sell or not.
As a customer, you can always choose to buy somewhere else if unhappy.
In favor of Cisco IP: latency, coverage (barely any cell reception in my office), sound quality (especially in speakerphone mode), office directory, sturdiness, cost, cost, and cost
Given that they sell goods that would fit best in the "affordable luxury" category?
are likely to vote for Trump in November... what does that tell you
sore loser
"just as church and state are"... have you seen a dollar bill recently (as, post 1956)?
No thank you. Also: bring back the old style keyboard, and trackpoint only option. Then maybe I'll consider Lenovo again. x61s forever.
If it's not the closest, are we going to rename it?
Agreed. At home I use lightweight WMs such as XFCE or Openbox. Not a fan of the bloat...
I'm sure they would like to, but they can't. Have you heard of something called financial regulations?
So has (roughly) the rest of the stockmarket (from march 2009 til now)
Microsoft Considered Renaming Internet Explorer To Netscape Its Reputation
That's /one/ alternative.
http://tech.slashdot.org/story/13/08/07/1930208/aosp-maintainer-quits
I was going to buy it... now I won't
Governement should not subsidise anything. Ensuring proper regulation and competition is enough.
...). But seriously? $8,500 per home and that's if the home actually subscribes to the service?
Am I the only one appalled by such counterproductive use of tax dollars?
Don't get me wrong, I like fibre and hate the usual suspects (TWC, Comcast,
1- Maybe they would spell Streisand correctly?
2- Let's imagine (crazy idea, I know) that their goal is the application of local law... they certainly know that this will create unwanted attention in the short run, but maybe that's a sacrifice they're willing to make to have wikimedia comply with local law?
I was totally going to post that.
To all the whiny complainers above: they're free to decide what they want to sell or not. As a customer, you can always choose to buy somewhere else if unhappy.
Seriously, what's the point of that Obama quote?
I mean... like... you know, like... no!
Luckily this is something that happens only with news stories.
In favor of Cisco IP: latency, coverage (barely any cell reception in my office), sound quality (especially in speakerphone mode), office directory, sturdiness, cost, cost, and cost
How do you handle logins and passwords to various sites?
You realize you can configure it to do just that, right?
Whether your focus is on performance, reliability or both, you have other areas that require much more attention than the FS.
Windows XP support will stop in 2014. It seems strange that Win 7 updates to DirectX would stop in 2012.
and we won't have to put up with this anymore.