Slashdot Mirror


Microbial Life Found In Trinidadian Hydrocarbon Lake

KentuckyFC writes "Pitch Lake is a poisonous, foul-smelling hell hole on the Caribbean island of Trinidad. It is filled with hot asphalt and bubbling with noxious hydrocarbon gases and carbon dioxide. Various scientists have suggested that it is the closest thing on Earth to the kind of hydrocarbon lakes they can see on Saturn's moon Titan. Now a group of researchers has discovered that the lake is teeming with microbial life which is thriving in the oxygen-free environment with very little water, eating hydrocarbons and respiring with metals. Gene sequence analysis indicates that these bugs are single-celled organisms such as archea and bacteria. The researchers say the discovery has exciting implications for the possibility of life on Titan. There is a growing sense that Titan has all the ingredients for life: thermodynamic disequilibrium, abundant carbon-containing molecules, and a fluid environment. There is also evidence that liquid water may not be as important for life as everybody has assumed, since some microorganisms can make their own water by chewing on various hydrocarbons. That may make Titan an even better place to look for life than previously thought."

31 of 141 comments (clear)

  1. holy crap by martas · · Score: 4, Funny

    they found life even there?? what's next, finding living organisms on C-SPAN?

    1. Re:holy crap by NekSnappa · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, but nobody is willing to swim there.

      --
      I want to shoot the messenger!
  2. Has populations between 10^6 to 10^7 cells/gram by assemblerex · · Score: 5, Interesting

    More like a poisonous, foul smelling sea of organisms with some asphalt sprinkled on top.
    This has a life density comparable to seawater.

    1. Re:Has populations between 10^6 to 10^7 cells/gram by martas · · Score: 2, Interesting

      though based on the description it seems these things are pretty tiny... even for single-celled organisms. i wonder how their average cell mass compares to some of the more usual critters we know and love.

    2. Re:Has populations between 10^6 to 10^7 cells/gram by Thanshin · · Score: 4, Funny

      i wonder how their average cell mass compares to some of the more usual critters we know and love.

      Well, they're most probably smaller than panda bears.

    3. Re:Has populations between 10^6 to 10^7 cells/gram by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Depends on where you sample your seawater. But the cells here are much smaller. And Titan is unlikely in my mind given the 200K+ thermal difference. Life is clever, but the laws of physics catch up to you. Besides, we're talking long chain vs short chain hydrocarbons.

    4. Re:Has populations between 10^6 to 10^7 cells/gram by redJag · · Score: 2, Informative

      The unattainable is unknown at ZomboCom!

  3. Family resemblance? by haus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    To the best of my knowledge all life on earth (at least all life that has been investigated at the DNA/RNA level) seems to have considerable similarities, which implies a relationship, perhaps a common origin point.

    I wonder. Will this life, which on the surface seems to be fairly different from most of what we know/understand as life will also have such similarities with life as we know it?

    If it does, it seems to show a remarkable level of flexibility, beyond what many may have imagined. If not, that may even be more exciting as it may provide support for the idea that the creation of life may not be an exceedingly rare event.

    1. Re:Family resemblance? by jandersen · · Score: 5, Insightful

      To the best of my knowledge all life on earth (at least all life that has been investigated at the DNA/RNA level) seems to have considerable similarities, which implies a relationship, perhaps a common origin point.

      Which is of course what the theory of evolution tries to explain, with considerable success.

      While it is certainly remarkable how flexible life on Earth is, we also have to keep in mind that it has evolved from a common, water-based origin, and the fact that archaea can adapt to living in tar with access to very little water does not mean that life could have started in such an environment.

      The thing about water is that it is an altogether remarkable substance; it has a number of properties that are not found together in many other substances - I am certainly not aware of any - and there are reasons to believe that life (at least chemical life as we know it: with DNA/RNA, proteins etc) needs this constellation of properties to arise. We simply don't know if life can arise in other environments; our understanding of what life is at the deepest level is still very patchy.

    2. Re:Family resemblance? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I’m sorry? Life did start out oxygen- and water-free. Where do you think all that stuff comes from? It’s processed poop. Nothing else.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    3. Re:Family resemblance? by juhaz · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm sorry? Life did start out oxygen- and water-free.

      Here? Oxygen-free, yes. Water-free hell no. Elsewhere? Well, we'll talk about that when we find some.

      Where do you think all that stuff comes from? It's processed poop. Nothing else.

      Uhh, stars? Oxygen is a fusion end result, the third most abundant element in existence. I probably don't need to go into hydrogen, and the conditions for combining the two aren't exactly rare either. Water is one of the most common molecules in the universe, it's everywhere, and certainly predates any life by far. And unlike oxygen which is so reactive it tends to end up as a part of something else, water sticks around once you have it.

  4. water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "since some microorganisms can make their own water by chewing on various hydrocarbons"

    It's a chicken-and-egg issue. Why should something evolve that can create something that it needs to exist in the first place? It doesn't seem to be very likely that something organism evolves out an environment without water, that later needs water. But, it may evolve from a wet environment to a state where it later no longer depends on pre-supplied water.

  5. This explains a lot actually.. by frinkacheese · · Score: 2, Funny

    My mother-in-law is from Trinidad, this explains everything. I always thought there was something a little odd about the way she spent so much time filling up the petrol in the car. I thought that odd sulphurous smell was the cream she used for a skin condition.

    And all along, she was just a hydrocarbon sucking pitch lake alien!

  6. Re:Theological implications by Pikoro · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wait wait wait. Just wait a second. Are you saying that Hell is in Trinidad and Tobago? I know of worse places that that.

    --
    "Freedom in the USA is not the ability to do what you want. It is the ability to stop others from doing what THEY want"
  7. Re:necessity of water by osu-neko · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... why do you have to base it from whats abundantly around you in your tiny micro speckle of the universe and project it on everything?

    You don't. However, if you're going to theorize life without this chemical that plays a crucial role in so many chemical processes that are used by life as we know it, and expect to be taken seriously, you need to find replacements that are likely to exist instead of water in there alien environments and will be able to serve in its stead, or you need to come up with replacement life processes.

    Presumably, you've done neither... which would make your speculation on life without water about as scientific as speculating life based on fairy-dust.

    Get back to us when you've worked out this possible alien biochemistry, then we can start seeing how viable it would be given the alien environments we might fight the building blocks for it, and how well it operates compared to the processes we know.

    --
    "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
  8. What's the temperature Kenneth? by tjstork · · Score: 3, Informative

    The whole problem about comparing this place to Titan is that Titan is extremely cold. Titan's got the materials (except for Nitrogen maybe?), for sure, but, it doesn't have the heat. Life is more of an energy problem than a materials problem. You need energy to roil things, to drive all those chemical reactions and to keep stirring the pot so evolution can take place. I would be more than willing to bet that you would find single cell life on Venus more than on Titan just because Venus has plenty of heat.

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:What's the temperature Kenneth? by m0n0RAIL · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I assume then that the interior of the sun would be a good place to look for life, because of all the heat?

      You don't need a high temperature to drive the chemistry of life - you need a temperature gradient so that work can be done by transferring heat energy from one location to another. Titan has this due to internal heating from tidal forces, as has Europa. Life may operate at a slower pace in a cold environment, but the right catalysts could improve this.

    2. Re:What's the temperature Kenneth? by Peter+Trepan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Is it silly? If variable self-replicating patterns can be generated by plasma, you'd have the prerequisites for evolution even in the center of the sun.

      --

      Step into a huge movement. Don't Tread In Me.

  9. Re:necessity of water by timmarhy · · Score: 2, Insightful
    the reason for us assuming the need for water has nothing to do with projecting our requirements on the rest of the universe.

    it has everything to do with water's unquie properties. it's non corrosive, non reactive, is liquid at reasonible temperatues and is able to transport other elements without contamination.

    life isn't going to exist at 1000c or -200c, and the mechanics of life ie. a fluid transport mechanism, won't work with solids.

    if you can offer a viable alternative i'm all ears

    --
    If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
  10. The lake *is* alive and it's not happy. by w0mprat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is a quote from a tourist some time before the article:

    "Unlike a sterile and lifeless parking lot, you soon get a sense here that this lake is somehow alive. Roy said that a forty foot by forty foot hole completely fills itself in within 3 days."

    "The lake is constantly pulling things into itself, almost like a slow motion black hole. It's supposed to have "feelers" stretching outward for several miles, additional veins of pitch which stretch out from the main lake."

    "this photo of him peeling back the hardened skin of the lake."

    "The lake seemed to me more than anything to be like a large creature with no face, only arms and guts in which it slowly swallowed everything around it."

    "If it swallows some things, then it also spits others out"

    "Here is some leaf litter from part of the forest floor which the lake swallowed, chewed around for a few years and then spat out as indigestible. These leaves were in perfect condition, but as dry as it's possible to imagine."

    So it seems to be a living entity, demonstrably fussy, finding it a hard time getting a decent meal and likely depressed.

    http://www.richard-seaman.com/Travel/TrinidadAndTobago/Trinidad/PitchLake/

    --
    After logging in slashdot still does not take you back to the page you were on. It's been that way for 20 years.
    1. Re:The lake *is* alive and it's not happy. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 3, Funny

      So it seems to be a living entity, demonstrably fussy, finding it a hard time getting a decent meal and likely depressed.

      Hmmm... In that case, I wonder what its /. UID is?

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    2. Re:The lake *is* alive and it's not happy. by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sounds uncomfortably close to the living ocean on Lem's Solaris. Did he report strange visions of his dead wife or something like that?

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
  11. Meteor hiking by DrYak · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It still should be possible for life to emerge in a more "emergence-compatible" place like Earth (or some even suggest some comets, under specific circumstances), and then be carried to other planets by meteorites impacts, etc.

    Imagine a meteorite hitting Earth and ejecting a small amount of tar-growing Titan-compatible bacteria : with an enormous amount of luck, a few surviving spores could end up landing mostly intact on a Titan-like planet.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  12. Re:necessity of water by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    it has everything to do with water's unquie properties.

    ... as currently assumed by man. Why can't there exist something with simular properties?

    There IS a projection though, regularly they find life in a place they did not anticipate. Sulfarlake caves without any sunlight or water? Yep, there's an abundance of life there too.

    All the reasoning from on our little sphere and feable concepts mostly very limited to personal understanding and ability to absorb and conceptualize.

    The thing which strikes me the most though it the common beginning, the "spark" to light it all up... For all I know or have been told or have read or have been taught, space around us is non-organic. Just a brude collection of basic elements in such a disposition they don't really interact all too much and it's sortof a boring thing, unless you have these massive forces working on eachother.

    They've explored planets in our solarsystem, yet it's crudely sterile. Yet, on earth, there's this explosion of life which recurses to both ends (very tiny up to organized configurations building a greater organism) and with each interaction, we shed off some of this life (sweat, skin, hair, we drag around organic matter on our clothes, shoes, leave greasy spots with everything we touch [eg fingerprints], virusses, bacteria, spit, food, ... ).

    Yet, when we shoot ourselves up in the sky a bit, sterile to such an extend we could infect it with our organic amusementparks we lug around discharging more organic life, jumping, falling and flying off of us just by literally being there, standing around.

    To me, humanity or life isn't just a freak occurence, but maybe we're so poorly equipped and are standing like a mole who crawls up in the upper world and figure "wow, this fast empty vacuum isn't giving me any vibrations I can interprete, this must be the emptyness of space where all life stops to exist.", while if he would have eyes to see and brain to conceptualize, he'll think "fuck, this is awesome! WHAT IS ALL THIS STUFF!"

    --
    I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
  13. oxygen by sznupi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Our (very) distant ancestors evolved and thrived in an enviroment without significant amounts of oxygen; heck, it was most likely a poison to them. But then a group dumping it in large amounts showed up, and the rest is history...

    Now, it even seems it's quite possible that, what was once a dangerous byproduct, enabled explosion of life later on.

    --
    One that hath name thou can not otter
  14. The Pitch lake is not noxious and foul smelling by Gel214th · · Score: 4, Informative

    It is actually a tourist attraction.

    Countries such as Germany mandate that their roads, the famous Autobahn, must constitute a certain percentage of pitch from Trinidad. The Asphalt from the pitch lake is internationally acclaimed for its high percentage of asphalt resins and world renowned for its quality.It is also the world's largest and most consistent deposit of natural asphalt.

    It is used in New York's Kennedy and La Guardia airports,to line the George Washington Bridge,and as previously stated in the German Autobahn system to name a few.

    In the face of all this the cavalier and in some sense derogatory terminology used by the poster is both unfortunate and inaccurate. One suspects the author has never actually visited the Pitch Lake in Trinidad. It doesn't smell, it is not filled with noxious fumes. The area is quite pleasant and forested.

    The pitch lake represents a little understood and fascinating eco-system, and it's great that it is finally being researched. It is incredible when one imagines how much of our past can be found in its depths,claimed from the earth tens of thousands of years ago, resting somewhere within it.

    --
    -Gel214th
  15. Re:Theological implications by Silfax · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wait wait wait. Just wait a second. Are you saying that Hell is in Trinidad and Tobago? I know of worse places that that.

    You must work at the same place I do? Is that you Bob?

  16. Caribbean island of Trinidad and Tobago by steveb3210 · · Score: 4, Informative

    "Caribbean island of Trinidad and Tobago" There are two islands. Trinidad. and Tobago. And the country is Trinidad and Tobago. But its not just one island.

  17. Re:Oryx by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They don't drink but they do ingest water as a constituent of the solid foods they eat. Dessication works as a form of preservation or mummification precisely because practically nothing in nature will eat anything devoid of water.

    Going back to the point, water-based life can only evolve in the presence of water. Water-based life faced with an scarcity of water may evolve the ability to synthesise its own water. It could then slowly adapt to survive in a complete absence of water. (Compare with trees, which produce oxygen from carbon-dioxide, but would die in an environment that was initially oxygen.)

    If a lifeform evolved to exist on hydrocarbons alone, in the absence of water, then it would have developed an efficient way to do so at a primitive level. It is extremely unlike that a two-step process of creating water would be more efficient. In the long-term, yes, as it would allow Earth-like evolution, but the immediate-term disadvantage would lead to any such strains extinguishing themselves and not getting the chance to go beyond the single cell.

    Unlike hot-vent extremophiles, it's hard to argue that these bacteria could be the source of life as they live in hydrocarbons, which are the result of a not-yet-fully-understood process involving dead organic matter.

    HAL.

    --
    Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  18. Re:Theological implications by Pikoro · · Score: 2, Funny

    Larry? You read slashdot?!?

    --
    "Freedom in the USA is not the ability to do what you want. It is the ability to stop others from doing what THEY want"
  19. Re:necessity of water by schon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't know what's more amazing - that you can post something that is so wrong, or the fact that someone modded you up.

    the reason for us assuming the need for water has nothing to do with projecting our requirements on the rest of the universe.

    This is hilarious - you say that projection has nothing to do with it, then you proceed to try to prove this point by projecting human requirements.

    it's non corrosive, non reactive

    BZZT. Water is very corrosive and reactive. It is known as "the universal solvent" for a reason.

    is liquid at reasonible temperatues

    How does one define "reasonible"[sp]? Oh yeah - by projecting our own requirements.

    life isn't going to exist at 1000c or -200c

    More projecting.

    the mechanics of life ie. a fluid transport mechanism, won't work with solids.

    Aside from the fact that this is just still more projecting, why exactly is water the only substance that fits this bill? Why could another compound not fill the same purpose?