Slashdot Mirror


HotelChatter's Annual Hotel Wi-Fi Report 2010

Ant writes with this excerpt from an annual review of wireless access for hotel guests: "This year marks HotelChatter's sixth annual hotel Wi-Fi report. Over the years we've documented the progression of hotel Wi-Fi, from blatant disregard, to price-gouging for Wi-Fi access, and reliable Wi-Fi for loyalty program members, through guests taking matters into their own hands with wireless laptop/notebook cards and 3G access. A year ago, we thought guest demand for free, reliable, hotel Wi-Fi might just go away, thanks to 3G, but today, a growing number of hotel guests not only demand the hotel they book have proper wireless access, but most will consider not staying at a hotel that can't meet their basic access needs. That's right, Wi-Fi is a make or break amenity for many hotel guests that can sway booking decisions — and that isn't going away."

31 of 157 comments (clear)

  1. Price gouging by iamhassi · · Score: 2, Informative

    Went to Disney this year. Not only did Buena Vista Suites charge $10 a day for wifi, the speeds were only 1 megabit down (~150 kBps) while my 3G iPhone offered a bit over 2 megabit.

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    1. Re:Price gouging by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Went to Disney this year. Not only did Buena Vista Suites charge $10 a day for wifi, the speeds were only 1 megabit down (~150 kBps)

      The revelation that Disney gouges everyone who sets foot on their property is hardly new.

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    2. Re:Price gouging by houstonbofh · · Score: 2, Informative

      La Quinta is always free. Holiday Inn and Holiday Inn Express, are almost always free. Choice Hotels (Comfort Inn/Suites, Quality Inn/Suites, Econo Lodge) are almost always free.

      Pick your brand carefully.

  2. Hilton sucks. by PatHMV · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I stayed at a Hilton recently, and they wanted something like $16 PER DAY for WiFi access in the room. I could almost stay at Motel 6 for that, WITH free WiFi there. It's because they're aimed at business travelers, who don't care what the bill to their company is. I won't stay at a Hilton again, if I have a choice.

    1. Re:Hilton sucks. by dubbreak · · Score: 2, Funny

      But the pillows are so nice!

      --
      "If you are going through hell, keep going." - Winston Churchill
    2. Re:Hilton sucks. by Bill+Dimm · · Score: 2, Informative

      Even worse than that, you pay $15/day for WiFi at the Hilton in NYC and then it doesn't work worth a damn. I was exhibiting at a trade show there and I tried to email a 300kB white paper to a few people I met, and it timed out many times before I got it to go through due to the poor network. I had problems both evenings, but not in the morning, so they probably just can't handle the peak traffic. I emailed them a complaint about it when I got home, and I didn't get any response whatsoever. Not even a "we're sorry."

    3. Re:Hilton sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I emailed them a complaint about it when I got home, and I didn't get any response whatsoever. Not even a "we're sorry."

      They tried to send you a response, but it timed out when they hit send.

  3. Close the barn door, Martha! by notjustchalk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I find it ironic and more than a little insulting when certain hotels (ones that typically charge high room rates) try to gouge an insane amount of money for wifi from travellers when free wifi is all but the nearest coffee shop away. Why do these places, many of which cultivate an air of "our service separates us from the other rabble", treat their customers with such contempt when it comes to wifi? One would think they would do anything to keep what business they have and actively work to get more customers (especially when just about every small mom and pop B&B has free wifi!).

    ps. Hyatt Regency Vancouver, I'm looking at you! (benefit of the doubt: that was a couple of years ago)

    1. Re:Close the barn door, Martha! by nblender · · Score: 5, Informative

      The expensive hotels are going to get the corporate traveller whose expenses are paid by the employer and who, more than likely, is expecting to work in the room so the WIFI charge is simply another line item on the expense report... They're going to get that business regardless whether they have free wifi or not...

      The cheaper hotels are getting the cost conscious tourist, salesperson or tradesperson customer. They need to work hard to attract that customer from the other discount hotels and so charging for Wifi would be suicidal...

      At least that's my theory...

    2. Re:Close the barn door, Martha! by dubbreak · · Score: 2, Informative

      ps. Hyatt Regency Vancouver, I'm looking at you! (benefit of the doubt: that was a couple of years ago)

      I think last time I stayed there they were trying to charge $30/night for access. I was more disturbed by the low quality mattresses and pillows in a "premium" room. They were definitely not comparable to the nearby Hilton (which also charges too much for wireless..). Of course you are paying for the convenience of being directly at the airport. If you have a super early flight it's hard to beat being able to get up, get dressed then only have to take an elevator to get to the flight check in counter. No one else offers that convenience, so they are obviously taking advantage of it.

      --
      "If you are going through hell, keep going." - Winston Churchill
  4. Most Expensive Hotels Price Gouge on the Wi-Fi by Game_Ender · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The most expensive hotels, are the ones most likely to have for-pay wifi. At rates of like $10-$15 an order of magnitude more expensive then a wireless or landline connection for your house. Does anyone know a good pre-pade type 3G data provider?

  5. Re:roaming by cgenman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Domestic roaming is included in most 3G plans.

    International roaming, of course, is a complete racket.

  6. The Chart by ojintoad · · Score: 4, Informative

    This pretty graphic is a nice summation of the article and can be used as a cheat sheet.

    I have no documentation of this, but there's always been speculation in my company that the classier hotels don't give internet for free because either a) their clients will pay or b) the business that is paying for the room will pay. This is evidence of the observations but not the causation.

  7. Expensive hotel := bad WIFI, cheap motel := good by wowbagger · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The funny thing I've noticed is, the cheap motels (Motel 6, Super 8, Econolodge) pretty much all offer decent WiFi for no additional charge - even the little mom-and-pop motels are offering free WiFi.

    On the other hand, the big boys - the Sheraton's, the Hiltons, etc. - that I've stayed in all either a) have no WiFi at all, just wired Ethernet into a DSL-like system running on POTS cat-3 wiring (and often only for pay) or b) have WiFi but charge you for it.

    It seems to me the places where you are staying on Other People's Money (places that cater to business travelers who expense the trip) are gouging on WiFi, the places where you are staying on your own dime all recognize WiFi as a competitive point.

    I know that when I am traveling on my own money - you don't have free WiFi, I don't stay with you if I have a choice, and I almost ALWAYS have a choice.

  8. free internet connectivity is a hotel filter by nblender · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't much care about wifi. I bring an airport express with me... But I refuse to pay for internet connectivity in any hotel. period. I once stayed at the BirgerJarl in Stockholm and was checking my IP address and lo-behold, I was handed an IPv6 address! Next time I went through the lobby, I mentioned how impressed I was to a lady at the counter and she replied that if I liked, she could give me an IPv4 address instead and to just let her know ...

    1. Re:free internet connectivity is a hotel filter by ironjaw33 · · Score: 2

      I don't much care about wifi. I bring an airport express with me... But I refuse to pay for internet connectivity in any hotel. period. I once stayed at the BirgerJarl in Stockholm and was checking my IP address and lo-behold, I was handed an IPv6 address! Next time I went through the lobby, I mentioned how impressed I was to a lady at the counter and she replied that if I liked, she could give me an IPv4 address instead and to just let her know ...

      It's a small world: I stayed at the same hotel a week and a half ago (and was stuck there due to the volcanic ash cloud). When I checked in, I asked about charges for wifi and the concierge stifled a laugh.

    2. Re:free internet connectivity is a hotel filter by nacturation · · Score: 5, Funny

      I once stayed at the BirgerJarl in Stockholm and was checking my IP address and lo-behold, I was handed an IPv6 address! Next time I went through the lobby, I mentioned how impressed I was to a lady at the counter and she replied that if I liked, she could give me an IPv4 address instead and to just let her know ...

      "And that, kids, is how I met your mom."

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  9. Marriott charges for Internet by dustman81 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I recently stayed in a Marriott that charged $12.95 a day (noon-to-noon) for Internet and long distance calling. I took my Pre, fired up Mobile Hotspot and went 'FU' to the hotel. In these days of free ubiquitous Internet, it is offensive that any place charges for Internet access, whether it be wired or wireless.

  10. Hotels are For Suckers by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hotels, in general, are for suckers in my opinion. If you're planning a trip, go to www.couchsurfing.org, make yourself a profile, meet some cool people while you travel, stay in the area for relatively cheap and/or free, and chances are, your host will be able to provide internet that you don't have to pay for. Of course, for business trips and the like, that kind of thing may not work out. However, I've often found that corporate overlords dictate hotel choices when flying for business anyways so its not like you get to make the choice based on internet or any other thing that you value.

    Also, hostels are awesome. We should open some more of those in the States.

    1. Re:Hotels are For Suckers by sirflyalot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I am a business traveler that stays in hotels 315+ nights a year. No, I don't want to be some homeless person that sleeps on someones couch. I do try to stay in "Boutique" hotels or bed and breakfasts whenever I can, though. I am not reimbursed for wifi charges, so charging me for wifi is a total deal breaker and has been for many years.

    2. Re:Hotels are For Suckers by CrashandDie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of course, for business trips and the like, that kind of thing may not work out. However, I've often found that corporate overlords dictate hotel choices when flying for business anyways so its not like you get to make the choice based on internet or any other thing that you value.

      Depends what your job is. Hotels are part of job perks, and you shouldn't understimate the value of a good hotel/expense allowance when considering a new job.

      Reviewing and negotiating the travel policy before you sign up for the job can mean the difference between sleeping in a Best Western and wanking to MTV, and having the St. Regis bar fix you a quick sandwich if you get there at 1AM because of delayed flight or late night with the customer.

      For the past two years, I've been traveling abroad an average of 2-3 weeks per month. It may sound stupid, but one of the few ways to keep your sanity is by being allowed to stay in hotels that have the same standards everywhere. There's nothing more disgusting and utterly demotivating than having to sleep in a bed where you wonder if the sheets have been changed.

      In other words, if you have to travel a lot, and the company won't pay for proper accomodation, it's time to take your ass (literally) elsewhere.

      The same rule applies to personal travel; if you have to lower your standards in order to get away, maybe you shouldn't be getting away, you should just get creative. I've done a bit of couch-surfing, especially when I was a student, and it just doesn't work as a couple. You're often in the middle of the living room of a 60 sq ft flat, and you wake up everytime the host goes for a piss, or because he's a street cleaner and goes to work at 3AM. Granted, I never did it when I was single, and the website wasn't as popular and overflowing with offers as it is now, but heck, I'm not a student anymore. I can pay for a decent hotel and not eat Ramen Noodles for the rest of the month.

    3. Re:Hotels are For Suckers by demonlapin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Your opinions change when you have money. Seriously.

      Lots of things that sound stupid when you're young and poor turn into no-brainer decisions when you move into six figures.

    4. Re:Hotels are For Suckers by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I will never have enough +1; Informative mod points to properly mod your comment up. $100K+ vs $30K definitely changes how you view expenses.

    5. Re:Hotels are For Suckers by The+Grand+Falloon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Have a couple of rugrats. You'll end up staying in a hotel just so that you can let your two year old walk around without his great-grandmother having a heart attack about what little porcelain piece of shit he's going to break.

    6. Re:Hotels are For Suckers by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hotel inspector?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  11. Re:roaming by geekoid · · Score: 2

    huh. Apparently I'm getting screwed.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  12. Motel 6 by Itninja · · Score: 3, Interesting

    We did a West Coast road trip this year and stayed in hotels ranging from 5-star Best Westerns to 2-star Motel 6's (um, Motels 6?). Consistently the Motel 6's had much better Wifi (e.g. faster, more secure, and better signal). Where most of the higher end hotels must have had a single WAP for the entire building. Not to mention most of their WPA passcodes were , whereas the Motel 6's gave me a one-use card with a unique passcode on it.

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
  13. in 2010 WIFI is just like any other service by Teun · · Score: 2, Funny
    Or maybe I should say WIFI *should be* like any other service.

    I travel quite a bit and especially in the United Kingdom the hotels are trying to gouge you for internet access but I must say bitterly complaining to the manager and asking if he similarly charges separately for power, water and sanitation often results in a lower priced plan.

    UK hotels that typically try to charge 15 pounds/day but can be brought down to charge 15 pounds per stay.

    Only one bastard thanked me for the idea to put a counter on the toilet flush. :)

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
  14. Re:Expensive hotel := bad WIFI, cheap motel := goo by XiaoMing · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What makes me wonder then is why such a disparity between hotels rooms and business/first class vs economy flights.

    In hotels, it seems like the basic conveniences, as long as they charge you fractionally little enough for it, you won't mind paying in addition to whatever the room cost already was (~10% a day?). However on flights, the more you spend on your ticket, the more they will go out of their way to plant their lips on your butt as far as letting you board first, get cozy, have a free drink, check a bag for free, etc.

    I guess the difference is that you're not getting two disparately priced rooms within one building in the case of hotels?
    But it's still pretty damn ironic that those you pay more to, try to screw you over more in the hotel industry. Somewhere along the way apparently it seems image and prestige way overtook actual customer satisfaction and service.

  15. Re:roaming by Cimexus · · Score: 2, Informative

    You're right. And to go one step further, the concept of 'domestic roaming' doesn't exist in most countries anyway. A LOT of business travel is still domestic, especially in large countries like the US, Australia etc. Therefore I don't think the "hotel guests don't want to use 3G cause it's expensive" argument holds that much water.

    I think the idea of 'domestic roaming' (for data or voice) is mostly a US thing where you have quite a few smallish/local operators. Every other country I've been to, phone providers normally cover the whole country. (Similarly the idea of 'long distance home phone service' as a service you purchase in addition to/separately from a local call service is also, AFAIK, an American thing ... elsewhere a phone company just connects you and that phone can call any number on the planet, although you may obviously still be charged differently depending on the distance of the call.).

    International data roaming OTOH is as you say a racket. And a danger to unwary travellers, especially if your device likes to do a lot of random 'background' tasks that just use a few bytes here and there, but the roaming provider has something like "100 kB minimum session charge". That can rack up to thousands of bucks very easily. Turn off your 3G data completely when travelling people!

  16. try choice hotels/comfort inns by n4djs · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was staying at the Renaissance in Las Vegas, booked for a week for a HP training class. Checked out after the first night when I realized that Wi-fi was $10/night. Where did I go? The Choice Hotel 2 blocks down the street.. room was quite nice.
    How much did that cost the Renaissance? about $500 for the week....
    I haven't stayed at a Mariott in years for the same reason.
    Wi-fi is a basic assumption in my hotel choices today. I won't even spend the company's money on this.