Rest In Peas — the Death of Speech Recognition
An anonymous reader writes "Speech recognition accuracy flatlined years ago. It works great for small vocabularies on your cell phone, but basically, computers still can't understand language. Prospects for AI are dimmed, and we seem to need AI for computers to make progress in this area. Time to rewrite the story of the future. From the article: 'The language universe is large, Google's trillion words a mere scrawl on its surface. One estimate puts the number of possible sentences at 10^570. Through constant talking and writing, more of the possibilities of language enter into our possession. But plenty of unanticipated combinations remain, which force speech recognizers into risky guesses. Even where data are lush, picking what's most likely can be a mistake because meaning often pools in a key word or two. Recognition systems, by going with the "best" bet, are prone to interpret the meaning-rich terms as more common but similar-sounding words, draining sense from the sentence.'"
That summary was written with speech recognition software?
It only flatlined because nobody tried to write speech recognition software in perl*.
*Disclaimer: Poster is not responsible for attempts resulting in unintended AI development and/or end of the world scenarios brought on by such an irresponsible endeavor.
Motorcycles, Robots, Space Gossip and More!
Even humans mishear speech.
"'Scuse me while I kiss this guy"
That misheard lyric is so common that there's a book about misheard lyrics with that as the title.
--
BMO
This rest ponds was and turd you sings peach recon nation soft where
& It's true.
My own ... is not great. I often miss ... a word or two in a sentence. But they are often ... words, and missing them leaves ... sentence meaningless. If I counted the words I understand ... I'd probably have a 95% success rate. But if I counted the ... I understand correctly, I'd be around ...%. So I get by, but ... tend to annoy people when I ask for ... over one missed word.
I can see how this would be annoying.
<Complete your profile by adding a signature!>
That comma is just out of place and makes the sentence hard to parse.
Years ago I used viavoice on Warp4, and it had a pretty decend recognitation rate ..
Looks like whatever you're using now ain't quite as good.
God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
Comment removed based on user account deletion
Didn't IBM a few years ago announce a big five-year-program to crack speech recognition? Whatever came of that?
How hard is it for a computer to understand the sentence: "Tea, Earl Grey, Hot"? That takes care of 90% of the use case scenarios right there. Next is "Computer, initiate auto-destruct sequence" is the next 8%.
I'd settle for a grammar checker. From the fine summary:
"Even where data are lush"
A good one would have saved this summary from sounding stupid.
snaaaaaaake!
Obligatory UF
"Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
... so its voice recognition works about as well as that of the average American then? ;)
"Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
We might get to the point where we can write text messages by speaking, then the person on the other end could have them read aloud by a computer. That would be so awesome. Maybe some day we'll be able to transfer the actual sound of our voices.
Can see how WHAT would be annoying?
What Dave said: "Open the pod bay doors, HAL."
What HAL heard: "Open the hot babe pornz, HAL."
HAL's speech recognition and morality programming* combined to give the famous reply, "I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that." HAL knew certain things would have been too titillating to an all-ages film audience in 1968.
* Only for the film version. In the book version, it would have caused undue frustration to the reader, unable to see what Bowman was viewing. In that case, it was HAL's etiquette programming.
--TheOrangeSquid Is it any wonder things seem so awry? We swim in a sea of confusion and don't have to think to survive
Its just a speed bump on the way to thought recognition, which will be far more useful.
I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
"she helped my uncle jack off a horse"
Nonsense! For example, a real human could never mishear the phrase "guide dog" as "gay dog" and refuse to let a dog into a restaurant.
Well to be fair, understanding Australians is an order of magnitude more difficult than understanding English speech.
(ducks)
I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
(ducks)
quack?