Slashdot Mirror


First Non-Latin TLDs Go Online Today

eldavojohn writes "ICANN today switched on the country code top level domains for Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates, which are the first non-Latin TLDs available and are also fully readable right to left. Slashdot does not support them but you can find the TLDs in the BBC article. ICANN said it had 21 more requests for TLDs in 11 different languages. A quick note — if you do not have the language packs installed, you may experience unpredictable browser behavior in the URL bar. Right now countries like China and Thailand have implemented workarounds to achieve the same effect."

66 of 302 comments (clear)

  1. Really? by Tekfactory · · Score: 3, Funny

    China and Thailand have implemented workarounds to achieve unpredictable browser behavior in the URL bar?

    1. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, like www.bankofamerica.com.secure.cn

    2. Re:Really? by AnonymousClown · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, like www.bankofamerica.com.secure.cn

      I have a better one: www.bankofamerica.com.secure.ru.

      It has an algorithm that predicts what expenses you will have in the near future and withdraws your money and puts it in a safe account that's unknown to you so that you don't spend it. They did that to me - took all my money out - and then all I have to do is send them an email and they'll pay my bills - all for a $19.95 monthly service fee on my CC. I can't loose!

      This is my first month on this program, so I'll let you guys know how it works.

      --
      RIP America

      July 4, 1776 - September 11, 2001

    3. Re:Really? by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, they are a little behind. They just implemented AOL keywords.

    4. Re:Really? by CastrTroy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I got a better one. www.bankofamerica.com. See, I used Unicode character 212e instead of the e. Looks the same to most people, and would probably fool quite a bit of people. I wonder how they hope to stop situations like this. (I actaully used an e, because slashdot wouldn't let me put in the HTML entity, but this is good enough to demonstrate the problem)

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    5. Re:Really? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Funny

      I actaully used an e, because slashdot wouldn't let me put in the HTML entity, but this is good enough to demonstrate the problem

      So, if you only could have done it, you might have done it.

      Now I'm really scared.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    6. Re:Really? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I can't wait to register mohammed.com in arabic and redirect it to goatse!

      You realize that now every Anonymous Coward is a target, right?

      Thanks a lot.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    7. Re:Really? by phantomcircuit · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just for anybody who is interested and lazy... javascript:alert(unescape("http://www.bankofam%u212ercia.com"))

      It doesn't look exactly like 'e', but it's certainly close enough to fool some people.

    8. Re:Really? by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do that to ebay.com paypal.com, etc.... It opens up a world of unholy hell for all the scammers on this planet to make it even harder to determine if a site is real or fake....

      Thanks ICANN!

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    9. Re:Really? by vux984 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ironically, "http://www.bankofamercia.com" is probably close enough to fool some people too, and doesn't require any fancy javascript. ;)

    10. Re:Really? by boxwood · · Score: 5, Funny

      I have an even better one: www.bankofamerica.com

      It has an algorithm that increases my taxes and deposits the money into their executive bonus pool.

    11. Re:Really? by OnlyJedi · · Score: 2, Informative

      The solution is pretty already for the most part in place, and occurs at the browser level. Most of the browser vendors have known about this for years (since 2005 I believe) and implement a combination of whitelists, phishing filters, and Punycode to avert the problem .

      Other possibilities they could add is highlighting the background of any URL not in the user's native character set, or that uses characters of different sets, write those suspect characters in bold, or pop up a security dialog. The problems with these approaches it that they are much more prone to user error than a default-enabled filter. How many real-users (as in, outside the slashdot crowd) would known what the changed background or bold letters mean? How many just ignore any popup dialog that appears and hit OK to get on with it? At least something like Punycode it's a lot easier to see something wrong with the URL, and the phishing screens are much more likely to be noticed than a simple pop-up.

    12. Re:Really? by negRo_slim · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Phishing aside I would say the biggest concern here is the fact we are effectively walling off parts of the internet for respective regions.

      --
      On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
  2. Good news everybody! by sunderland56 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Slashdot does not support them

    It is now possible to get a domain that cannot be slashdotted!

    1. Re:Good news everybody! by leuk_he · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes you can slashdot them, but you cannot show a correct text-. Yet...

  3. Thats all good by Johnny+Fusion · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But they will still need Latin characters to type "http://"

    --
    There are two kinds of fool. One says, This is old, and therefore good. And one says, This is new, and therefore better.
    1. Re:Thats all good by AnonymousClown · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wouldn't the Latin URL start off with "HTTPUS" for the URLUS?

      --
      RIP America

      July 4, 1776 - September 11, 2001

    2. Re:Thats all good by medcalf · · Score: 2, Funny

      That depends on if you interpret "hypertext" as motion towards, in which case the answer is no, or not, in which case the answer is yes.

      --
      -- Two men say they're Jesus. One of them must be wrong. - Dire Straits
    3. Re:Thats all good by HiVizDiver · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Don't you mean HTTPVS/URLVS?

    4. Re:Thats all good by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Funny

      SPQR://

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    5. Re:Thats all good by abigsmurf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      These Protocols are crazy!

    6. Re:Thats all good by GaryOlson · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wouldn't the Latin URL start off with "HTTPUS" for the URLUS?

      Only works if your DNS server is properly configured to return the proper IP addressus
      CCXVI.XXXIV.CLXXXI.XLV

      --
      Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
    7. Re:Thats all good by HiVizDiver · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's called a "Newton", you insensitive clod!

  4. Non-latin TLDs? by kvezach · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, hooray for a more fragmented Internet. While every keyboard can type A-Za-z, that's not true of Chinese or Arabic, so sites using those TLDs will be effectively off-limits to those that aren't "native". Sure, the sites can also register an ordinary domain name, but then why not just use that domain name to begin with?

    1. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      While every keyboard can type A-Za-z, that's not true of Chinese or Arabic, so sites using those TLDs will be effectively off-limits to those that aren't "native".

      For now, I hope so. Imagine a RTL domain name, coupled with a phishing email telling recipients to visit moc.tfosorcim.[NEWGTLD] that renders as [NEWGTLD].microsoft.com. Won't that be fun?

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    2. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by QuantumRiff · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Everyone with a Western Keyboard can type A-Z and a-z. Not so with other countries keyboards. (btw, you can still type the unicode characters in windows, its just much more difficult). But really, if they have a Chinese language URL, and a site that is entirely written in Chinese, are they worried about not having you as a potential customer, when you can't figure out how to connect using their language?

      There are more people online in China than live in the US. This is going to be awesome for their local online economies, as people will be able to use their native languages.

      --

      What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    3. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by sznupi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When was the last time you had to type in a relativelly unknown URL? (not things like google, gmail, your bank, etc.)

      For that matter, when was the last time you had to type an URL of a site in a language which is off-limits to you anyway?...

      This might help greatly in popularization of the internet in large part of so called "developing countries", especially since the biggest changes can be expected when the common folks get hang of it; they are much more likely to be fluent only in their native language and script. Or - imagine the uptake of the internet in the latin world if all URLs were in, say, the Georgian alphabet.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    4. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by C0vardeAn0nim0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      this a boon for russian scamers.

      some letters in russian cyrillic look like latin characters but have different uses. example, the cyrillic character that looks like a "C", is actually aquivalent to "S", their "H" is actually our "N". so a TLD ".som" in cyrillic would be seen on the screen (and understood by westerners) as ".com".

      so here's my suggestion to firefox developers: put some easy to see visual clue on the address bar to tell exactly in which language or character set the URL is written in.

      --
      What ? Me, worry ?
    5. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by wvmarle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This way lots of non-English speakers, or even users of non-Latin alphabets, can use the Internet much better than they could before. Only half of the world uses Latin. So the other half is more or less excluded because domain names have those limitations, so just to be able to use the Internet they first have to learn a foreign script (a phonetic script - Chinese for example is not phonetic, so that in itself is a huge challenge for a Chinese to learn).

      But you probably never set foot outside of your own country, let alone into a place where people actually use such a non-Latin script. If you did so you may start to understand why this is a Very Good Thing.

      And the Internet is not going to be more "fragmented". When is the last time you visited say a Swedish or French or Hungarian web site? It is not that they use a different script or so. However I have the feeling that you still can not read what is written there - so that is "fragmented" already for you. And as long as you do not learn how read Arabic or Japanese or Chinese you will not likely want to visit any of those web sites that use Arabic, Japanese or Chinese native characters for name.

    6. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by HisMother · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, I tried this: for the bankofamErcia example, I see http://www.xn--bankofamrcia-lra14ee268a.com/ which is very cool!

      --
      Cantankerous old coot since 1957.
    7. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by raju1kabir · · Score: 2, Informative

      So the other half is more or less excluded because domain names have those limitations, so just to be able to use the Internet they first have to learn a foreign script (a phonetic script - Chinese for example is not phonetic, so that in itself is a huge challenge for a Chinese to learn).

      Actually, the way that most Chinese people type on the computer is using a Latin keyboard to type pinyin phonetics. So they've already learned it whether or not they are using the internet. This is not going to change with the new TLD. The only difference is how it looks on the screen after they type it (and the fact that they don't have to click the icon to switch between Chinese and English input mode).

      When is the last time you visited say a Swedish or French or Hungarian web site? It is not that they use a different script or so. However I have the feeling that you still can not read what is written there - so that is "fragmented" already for you.

      An English speaker would have to be retarded to not be able to make basic sense of a Swedish or French web site. Hungarian, okay, that's harder.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    8. Re:Non-latin TLDs? by negRo_slim · · Score: 2, Funny

      I agree we need a new system in place to handle finance, I suggest using human based locomotion to place your rotund gluteus maximus in the safe confines of a real establishment with real people, providing a top tier method of verifying where your money is going that nearly any lay person could use! And not only that; it would go a long way to help support your local economy while helping to expend your probably excess storage of chemical energy.

      --
      On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
  5. Seriously? by elewton · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Is it chauvinistic that I find this insane?

    I wouldn't mind if they used an escape character sequence and then mapped other alphabets to strings of Latin characters, but actually breaking backwards compatibility...

    1. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      they didn't break backwards compatability,
      here's the brilliant standard http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punycode
      it's just awesome.

    2. Re:Seriously? by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think unicode is a bag of shit. If ISO 8859-1 was good enough for Homer, Jesus, & Shakespeare it's good enough for everyone.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    3. Re:Seriously? by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh C'mon! Jesus used the Aramaic alphabet.

      Shakespeare wrote in a "diffyrente waye", with an alphabet that included letters like the "thorne" - a "th" that is frequently mistaken for a "y" - hence our ridiculous "Ye Olde".

      As for Homer Simpson? I don't believe he can write very much at all.

      --
      "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
    4. Re:Seriously? by bradleyjg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Jesus spoke Aramaic (AFAWK didn't write at all) and his followers recorded his life in Koine Greek. Neither of which can be represented in ISO 8859-1.

    5. Re:Seriously? by tlhIngan · · Score: 4, Informative

      Is it chauvinistic that I find this insane?
      I wouldn't mind if they used an escape character sequence and then mapped other alphabets to strings of Latin characters, but actually breaking backwards compatibility...

      Except there *IS* an escape sequence. And the actual representation is in standard latin alphabets.

      The reason is that browsers can detect the escape sequence and interpret the rest of the URL as a unicode string.

      The escape is "xn--" - domains using it have xn--domain, TLDs as xn--TLD. Use both and they both have to be escaped - xn--blah.xn--blahtld.

      The trick for the Rest of Us is to be able to set that as "off" by default to keep these xn-- sequences from looking like normal latin characters. The good news is the encoding is such that Paypal and the like don't get rendered as xn--paypal.com and such, but xn--junk_that_renders_as_paypal.com.

      Internationalized domain names have been around a few years. This is just an internationalized TLD using the same DNS-friendly encoding scheme.

  6. Why not post example by grahamm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why did the BBC article not include a link to a valid non-latin URL so we could see how our browsers cope? Even if the page is not understandable, it would be nice to know that the pages load.

    1. Re:Why not post example by tot · · Score: 5, Informative

      The ICANN blog has a working link.

    2. Re:Why not post example by chill · · Score: 4, Informative
      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
  7. Fragmenting and such... by Unka+Willbur · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ridiculous tribalism, that's all it is. Fragmentation of the Internet to appease some regressive, regional e-peenery is the stupidest idea to date. I speak 8 languages and love some, like Russian immensely, but the internet is a nation with its own language, and that language is Standard English. I call shenanigans on anything else being shoehorned into its basic infrastructure!

    --
    "Remember when I said I would never lie? Well, that was the first time."
    1. Re:Fragmenting and such... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      English? WTF? LOL!

    2. Re:Fragmenting and such... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      When the 7 Billion people around the globe will be speaking Standard English, then you may have a point. Until then I think it is everybody's right to use his/her native/preferred language on the Internet, including in TLDs. I speak 5 languages and Arabic is my native language and I think that today is a great day for the Internet.

    3. Re:Fragmenting and such... by melikamp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      but the internet is a nation with its own language

      Yeah, but it's not English, it's TCP/IP. And DNS is not even an integral part of the Internet, but rather a layer on top, used mostly for the WWW part. Many peer-to-peer applications would work just fine even if DNS was never created.

    4. Re:Fragmenting and such... by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Ridiculous tribalism, that's all it is.

      Well, then as the submitter, I regret tagging it with "culture."

      I speak 8 languages and love some, like Russian immensely, but the internet is a nation with its own language, and that language is Standard English. I call shenanigans on anything else being shoehorned into its basic infrastructure!

      Huh, as a developer I had always assumed that we wrote software to help people. Not that people changed their behaviors and customs to be able to use our software. I guess I was wrong. I find it disturbing that a polyglot like yourself can so easily dismiss an engineering challenge as "ridiculous" and "shenanigans" because all it takes to get around it is for everyone in the world to learn my language of takes.

      I find it humorous that we sit here and rail for interoperability and satisfying the consumer and no DRM and open standards ... only to turn around and call something that opens up the internet to the rest of the world "ridiculous."

      If this is the consensus among geeks, what a shame it is to be a geek.

      Where do you stand on the effort that went into the Linux language packs? Were those ridiculous tribalism as well when someone took the time to make them?

      --
      My work here is dung.
    5. Re:Fragmenting and such... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is a UI problem, and it's pretty easy to fix. Simply display punycode URLs in a different colour, such as red. Some browsers do this already. Punycode isn't new; it's been supported for second-level domains for a long time. The only new thing here is that some ccTLDs are now using Punycode for the top-level part as well as the subdomains.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    6. Re:Fragmenting and such... by melikamp · · Score: 2, Informative

      Email, Web, NNTP: not P2P.

      VOIP: the ones connected to the phone lines are not P2P.

      So let's take torrents as an example. All you need is one Web site (so one IP address) that publishes tracker IPs. Then your clever torrent client can get participants' IPs from the tracker.

      I am not saying that DNS is not being used: I am not stupid. My claim is that the Internet would remain a very vibrant place even if DNS crashed and burned tomorrow, after some necessary adjustments.

    7. Re:Fragmenting and such... by jmv · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ridiculous tribalism, that's all it is. Fragmentation of the Internet to appease some regressive, regional e-peenery is the stupidest idea to date.

      Maybe if DNS addresses were based on Chinese, Hindi or Arabic then you'd have a different opinion.

  8. Re:Social media IDN fail by cpghost · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have an email address ending in .name, and 4 character TLDs can even be difficult sometimes.

    I have and use .info and .name domains too, but have not seen any problems with them (yet). Maybe some programs don't check RFC-822 (or whatever it is called nowadays) addresses as they should, but this is not new.

    --
    cpghost at Cordula's Web.
  9. This is just like .xxx by drumcat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Guess what -- this will all get blocked. More fragmentation = less free internet. Here comes Sharia law that says all internet usage must be in Farsi, and all websites with latin endings will be blocked. Weak.

    1. Re:This is just like .xxx by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Guess what -- this will all get blocked. More fragmentation = less free internet. Here comes Sharia law that says all internet usage must be in Farsi, and all websites with latin endings will be blocked. Weak.

      No, the sharia will be that all internet usage must be in Arabic since that is the only language the Koran can be in (if it isn't in Arabic, it isn't the Koran according to Muslims).

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    2. Re:This is just like .xxx by Ipeunipig · · Score: 2, Informative

      There is not a Sharia law about rocking the casbah, though I've heard they don't like it.

  10. A great victory by MoellerPlesset2 · · Score: 5, Funny

    For the inhabitants of Mönsterås, Sweden.
    The town name means 'patterned ridge', but to date they've have had to put up with the domain "Monsteras" - which means "monster-carcass".
    (å, ä, ö/ø in the Scandinavian languages are considered to be their own unique characters, not accented 'a's and 'o's.)

    1. Re:A great victory by Fenris+Ulf · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's a hostname (which is already supported via IDN, such as http://xn--malmpeeps-37a.se/ ), this story is talking about TLDs.

      There's no technical reason Mönsterås can't have mönsterås.se

    2. Re:A great victory by sootman · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sweet! Now I can finally get my site, "anosfeliz.es" off blacklists! ;-)

      (For the non-Spanish speakers out there: "feliz" means happy (and adjectives come after nouns, like Rio Grande [big river] or El Camino Real [the royal road]), "años" means "years" and "anos" means "anus." So instead of "happy years" it would be... something else entirely.)

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  11. you're not thinking the issue through by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Insightful

    currently people are not getting on the internet because its all in english: it serves as a barrier and they see no reason to even try

    but when the internet supports their native language, they get on the internet, get a taste of it, like it, want to use more it, and inevitably this drives them to the english web, since there's more of whatever they're looking for over there

    in other words, the long term effect of supporting other languages on the web is paradoxically further and faster consolidation to english

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:you're not thinking the issue through by wvmarle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not necessarily.

      Since sometime back in the '90s the web site www.ilse.nl was founded: a search engine that would index Dutch language sites only. Very useful for those that speak Dutch. Luckily for us Dutch we don't need a different character set, we can get along with the limits of Latin just fine. When it came to searching for Dutch language sites it was the number one choice. And so there are a few more, www.startpagina.nl is another very popular one.

      Wikipedia comes in lots of languages - but I have never heard anyone here shout "fragmentation! Less freedom!" about that. Even though most of those other languages are inaccessible to them. But then English is inaccessible for a large part of the world, and the vast majority of people still prefers to use their native language. And that preference continues online. Even though they may be proficient in English.

      I can actually imagine that the English language in the long term becomes a minority language. After all there are more native Chinese speakers than native English speakers in this world. There are probably even more non-English speakers than that there are English speakers, and in this case not even talking about native English speakers.

  12. Good first step! by fortapocalypse · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now to axe the latin protocol prefix, colon, slashes and dots. Also, what about those with disabilities- it is visual after all. We need "thought domains"- but wait, what about those with impaired mental capacities? Domains by intuitition would work. But what about parallel universes! Argh.

    1. Re:Good first step! by Fenris+Ulf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Since when does a user have to type the http:/// in a browser bar?

  13. ever hear of facebook? twitter? by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Interesting

    i'm not at all implying that other people care about USA-centric crap, but i'm saying they most definitely are interested in tech that often starts in the usa

    there's also the network effect

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_effect

    more people using a given website simply makes it more compelling, because how many people are in a given social website often defines how useful that site actually is. this renders languages other than english at an automatic, and continuing, disadvantage

    even internet tech that started outside the usa, if it gained an international following, say the chan message boards from japan (4chan), icq in israel, or chatroulette in russia, they all migrated to the english web as an inevitable aspect of becoming an international success, and even though they of course have multilanguage abilities and continue to be used in multilanguage ways, their english manifestations are their largest elements

    then there is the bizarre phenomenon of paleolithic tech that gets born in the usa, and mostly forgotten there, but continues to live on in other areas

    google's orkut started in the usa, but faded, but is huge in brazil, and also india. google relocated orkut from california to belo horizonte

    remember friendster? its still alive and well in malaysia, philippines, indonesia. a malaysian company in fact recently purchased friendster

    all i'm saying is we're talking about technology, not culture, and no one believes that being usa-centric is the point or even an aspect of being rooted in the english language

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  14. Safari and Firefox work by ral · · Score: 2, Informative

    The site in the ICANN blog worked for me in both Safari and Firefox, in the Windows XP and OSX versions of both. Both Safari and Firefox showed Arabic in the text on the tab, but only Safari showed Arabic in the address bar.

  15. Where to go to register a domain? by longhairedgnome · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Where can I go to register a site in squibbly? ÷ :]

    --
    GENERATION O98346: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig and remove a random number from the generation. T
  16. How it works by jroysdon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As I maintain my own DNS servers and such, I was curious how this worked. Here's what I learned with 15 minutes of research:

    My first stop was to see the root.zone and I looked for these new TLDs, curious to see how they would show up in a Latin-based zone file. Ah, I spotted these odd XN-- zones and then knew what to dig into more.

    Take for instance (I pasted a Unicode domain, but Slashcode won't show it) which is handled by ns[1-3].dotmasr.eg.:

    $ dig ns (Unicode domain)

    ; > DiG 9.6.2-P1-RedHat-9.6.2-3.P1.fc12 > ns (Unicode domain) ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;.(Unicode domain) IN NS ;; ANSWER SECTION:
    . 3600(Unicode domain) IN NS ns1.dotmasr.eg.
    . 3600 (Unicode domain)IN NS ns2.dotmasr.eg.
    . 3600(Unicode domain) IN NS ns3.dotmasr.eg.

    If you look in the root.zone file, you will see that the ASCII/Latin version of this zone is really XN--WGBH1C.:
    XN--WGBH1C. NS NS1.DOTMASR.EG.
    XN--WGBH1C. NS NS2.DOTMASR.EG.
    XN--WGBH1C. NS NS3.DOTMASR.EG.

    TLD Reserved Domains has a list of the current mappings. ToASCII and ToUnicode are the methods to convert back and forth which links to RFC 3490 which has the nitty gritty details.

    (meh, Slashcode doesn't support Unicode encoding, but I can see the Unicode domain name I am pasting in before I hit Preview in Firefox)

    Also, the whole switching from right to left in Latin characters to left to right in some Unicode is odd when trying to edit!

  17. you do see the irony by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Interesting

    of posting what you just wrote in english, on a usa-started and hosted website

    as a dutchman though, you are very much within the western world, which is even more english dominated than the wider world, and your perfect english is an example of that

    but as i a sit here in midtown manhattan staring out at brooklyn (from breukelen in utrecht), read about the yankees baseball team (from jon quesa: "johnny cheese", how the dutch derisively referred to the english dairy farmers), and contemplate all the kills in the area (creeks), and all the roosevelts in our presidencies, i know that linguistic and cultural influence is a very relative thing indeed

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  18. Been done for a longtime by DrYak · · Score: 3, Informative

    This has been dome for a long time (spelling paypal with similarily looking cyrillic characters. i.e.: "raura" but in cyrillic. or "eVau" for "eBay").
    Most browsers circumvent it by either displaying the escaped characters (a.k.a. Punny Code) or by using a different colour to tag non-lating characters (don't know which browser uses this technique).

    The current difference now, is that the top-level domain, too could be done in non-latin caracters.

    i.e.: up until now, the hacks only spellt "PayPal" with seemilarily-looking cyrillics. starting from today a new TLD could be created which looks like "com" but is instead cyrillcs ( "som" in this instance )

    Browsers will simply react by showing the escaped form or flag the letters with a different colour.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]