Slashdot Mirror


Gamer Wins $1M For Pitching Virtual "Perfect Game"

A few months ago, 2K Sports announced a unique contest to promote a new game they were working on, Major League Baseball 2K10. They said whichever gamer was the first to pitch a perfect game and provide proof would win $1 million, with the contest running for two months. Reader yukk tips news that the two months have now passed, and 2K Sports has announced a winner. It turns out the prize was won on the very first day, by a player who had put less than an hour and a half of effort into it.

31 of 142 comments (clear)

  1. A 1.5 Hour baseball game by pantherace · · Score: 5, Funny

    Fastest baseball game ever, that wasn't called due to weather.

  2. baseball? by mirix · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The most boring possible video game genre.

    Playing baseball - boring.
    Watching baseball - very boring.
    Playing a video game of baseball - even more boring.
    Watching someone play a video game of baseball - kill me now.

    --
    Sent from my PDP-11
    1. Re:baseball? by Rogerborg · · Score: 5, Funny

      Posting about reading about watching someone play a video game of baseball - I will invent a time machine and kill your father before you were conceived. It's the only way to be sure.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    2. Re:baseball? by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 5, Funny

      One word.

      Cricket.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    3. Re:baseball? by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 2, Funny

      The most boring possible video game genre.

      Playing baseball - boring.
      Watching baseball - very boring.
      Playing a video game of baseball - even more boring.
      Watching someone play a video game of baseball - kill me now.

      It depends about the video of someone playing a baseball computer game. Does it have that mullet forever hair, 80's throwback Billy Mitchell in it?

      --
      There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
    4. Re:baseball? by ddxexex · · Score: 4, Funny

      Umm, wouldn't killing mirix's _mother_ be the only way to be sure?

    5. Re:baseball? by Imrik · · Score: 5, Funny

      Better do both to be on the safe side.

    6. Re:baseball? by anarche · · Score: 2, Funny

      One word.

        Cricket.

      Baseball.

      Proof that Americans never had an attention span.

      --
      Wait! Whats a sig?
    7. Re:baseball? by Thanshin · · Score: 4, Funny

      And then discover he's adopted.

      See? See what the Terminator had to go throug?

    8. Re:baseball? by boot1973 · · Score: 3, Funny
      You have missed the point of both cricket and baseball.. They are both excuses to sit outside and drink.. only with cricket you can legitimately do that for 5 days in a row!

      Americans have a lot to learn about sitting about and drinking.

      With cricket you also get the excuse to visit exotic countries and then sit about and drink for 5 days in a row. Clearly cricket is by far a superior game.

    9. Re:baseball? by JWSmythe · · Score: 2, Interesting

          Wish? I thought it *was* another country. :)

          A friend of mine who's a big NASCAR fan begged me to go with him to Talladega. He brought his RV. I flew to Atlanta for work, and then drive out to meet him. I could have sworn I saw a sign that said "Welcome to Deliverance, Alabama" at some point before I got there (it was late, I was tired). I took that sign to mean it is the nation of Alabama. I swear everything changed when I hit the border. I did find it odd that there was no border checkpoint, but that can happen.

          When I got there, I was greeted by several thousand rednecks, cold beer, and cars driving in circles. I recognized there was only one thing I could do. Drink myself into a stupor until it was time to leave. :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  3. Perfect game in less than 90 minutes? by Nialin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    One of two things comes to mind:

    1) This game is far too easy for a $1million reward.
    2) Read # 1

  4. $1 million for 1hour and a half of occupation by Gri3v3r · · Score: 2, Funny

    the definition of 1337.

    1. Re:$1 million for 1hour and a half of occupation by SeaFox · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It could have been an hour and a half playing Major League Baseball 2K10 after having spent years with earlier-year versions of the game.

    2. Re:$1 million for 1hour and a half of occupation by _xeno_ · · Score: 2, Informative

      It could have been an hour and a half playing Major League Baseball 2K10 after having spent years with earlier-year versions of the game.

      According to Kotaku, this version of the game has different pitching controls from the previous versions.

      Although according to the same article, he spent two weeks prior to the game's release playing the demo and practicing for the contest.

      So, yeah - not like he only spent an hour and a half on this. He practiced.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
  5. Re:Perfect game in less than 90 minutes? by NewfieNerdGirl · · Score: 3, Insightful

    But apparently they researched how long to keep the contest open AFTER getting their first winner in less than 24 hours. It would be interesting to know how many copies of the game they sold on Day 1 and how many they sold from Day 2 to when they actually announced they had a winner.

  6. Re:Perfect game in less than 90 minutes? by dominious · · Score: 4, Insightful
    FTFA:

    "The funny thing is I haven't even come close since then," McGilberry said. "There must have been something special about that day."

  7. Re:Perfect game in less than 90 minutes? by SpeedyDX · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Having actually played the game, getting a perfect game is not easy.

    You have to get 27 straight outs. You get an out one of two ways: 1) you strike out the batter, or 2) the batter hits the ball and your defence gets the batter out. Complicating things further, it gets progressively harder to pitch accurately when your pitcher gets tired (after you hit about 80 pitches, you have less than half a second to complete the pitching gesture. After 100 pitches, good luck getting a good pitch off even if you pull off the gesture under a quarter of a second).

    So you have to weigh whether you want to focus on strike outs and risk getting your pitch count too high to handle, or you focus on trying to get the batter to hit into the defence and keep your pitch count low. If you try to pitch to hit, you risk having a ball just dribble by your infield or having a blooper drop in between your infield and outfield, ruining your game. Adding to the frustration is a buggy infield AI that sometimes allows soft liners through, or the first baseman running for a ball that should've been the second baseman's thus leaving first base empty.

    In any event, minus the buggy infield AI, the perfect game challenge highlighted something very important for MLB 2K10. When you're pitching, it is a pretty immersive experience. You really feel the pressure when you're delivering the pitch, and you have that split second of helplessness and frustration when the batter makes solid contact with the ball.

    Pitching is definitely the highlight of the game, and the reward did a pretty good job to draw attention to that. Although we can't speak to the financial success of the campaign without any sales stats, it was at least a success in the sense that it was effective in showcasing the strongest aspect of the game.

  8. Re:Perfect game in less than 90 minutes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You could probably actually sue them since (IANAL) they didn't make full disclosure about the details of their contest. If the knew someone had already won and didn't announce it just to drive more sales that smacks of fraud.
    I can't cite a specific statue, but I'm sure you could find one that would fit.
    Just a thought, you could probably get a partial refund of the game at the very least.

  9. It's not a contest at all. It's marketing. by Asmor · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There was no $1 million prize. Not from the publisher's perspective, at least.

    They paid $1 million for marketing. Who they payed the $1 million to was irrelevant. The only difference here is that the money went to some schlub consumer instead of a marketing firm.

    Seems fairly disingenuous, but I don't even think I'd go so far as to call it unethical.

    1. Re:It's not a contest at all. It's marketing. by Yvanhoe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, I'm jealous too :-)

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
  10. $1 million for a perfect game? by OnlyJedi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sounds a bit low to me. If he were a real major league pitcher, he would get paid nearly $1 million just for showing up to a game, even if he lost.

    1. Re:$1 million for a perfect game? by killjoy966 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not likely. In 2008, average salary for a starting pitcher was $4,429,366. There are 162 games during an MLB season (not including playoffs) meaning a pitcher only makes $27,341.77 per game. Even if you assume he only gets "paid" for the games he plays (there are typically five starting pitchers on a team) then he only gets $138,417.68 per appearance.

      Even the highest paid starting pitcher currently in the league only makes $23,000,000 per annum making his per appearance fee $718,750. Of course there's also performance bonuses and endorsement deals and what have you, but I don't have numbers for those.

      --

      Sigs are for suckers.

  11. Re:Perfect game in less than 90 minutes? by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 2, Funny

    There was.

    You were trying to win a million dollars.

    --
    Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  12. Misleading by Ollabelle · · Score: 3, Interesting
    And for long did they know the prize was already won and everyone else had zero chance to win? That's the part that bothers me.

    I remember a similar situation with Virginia's scratch-off lottery tickets: a fixed number of tickets are printed with winning numbers, and once those prizes are all claimed, the Lottery Agency is supposed to pull the remaining tickets since they're all losers. But of course, they don't.

    --
    Ibid.
    1. Re:Misleading by __aayejd672 · · Score: 2, Informative

      FTFA:

      2K Sports kept the contest open for two months and couldn't believe what they saw when they reviewed the time code on McGilberry's perfect game. Was it really possible that a gamer threw a perfect game in the first 24 hours the game had come out?

      Looks to me like they kept entries then reviewed them once the 2 months were up.

  13. Re:Proof that liars work in marketing. by boxwood · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ummmm they probably are happy because first they got some attention when they first announced the contest, a lot of people went out and bought the game so the could participate in the contest, and now they get a lot of articles written about the contest and the happy winner of the game. People reading those articles will think more positively about 2K Sports, and the baseball game. They aren't looking at it like they're giving away a million dollars, they're looking at it like they're paying a million dollars for a lot of good publicity.

    They could have spent that money on ads that most people would ignore. But instead the spent a million dollars on a contest which gets articles written about it on websites like slashdot and have people discussing it.

    What he's saying is that the good publicity they got was worth more to them than $1 millon.

  14. Re:Did anyone else submit a no hitter? by getSalled · · Score: 2, Funny
    ... or fielder errors or dropped third strikes with the runner reaching first or catcher interference.

    No one gets to first base. Surprised more Slashdotters didn't submit entries...

    (ducks and cover)

  15. Re:Perfect game in less than 90 minutes? by The+Flymaster · · Score: 2, Informative

    There have been 16 perfect games in MLB since 1900. That is about 1 every 7 seasons, not every season.

  16. Re:The game was rigged too by getSalled · · Score: 2, Insightful
    There have been 6 perfect games in the past 20 years in MLB. In those 20 years, there have been approximately 48,000 games -- so a 1/8000 chance of it happening since 1990.

    If you consider the entire history (or even the 130 years since the first one), there have only been 18. I have no numbers on the total number of games played in that time span, but I would venture to say the chances are much worse than 1/8000.

    You could probably assume that the 2K10 players themselves were doing whatever they could to increase their chances as well (like a Yankees v Nationals matchup). If 2K Sports really wanted surge in sales, they should've offered $10M for a perfect game against the Yankees.

  17. Re:Did anyone else submit a no hitter? by The+Dancing+Panda · · Score: 2, Informative

    Has to be better than a no hitter. A perfect game means no walks, no errors, no hits.