iPad UK Pricing Confirmed; Apple UK Tax Applied
The iPad will be available in the UK and eight other countries from 28 May 2010; both models will be available for pre-order on 10 May. Reader marcopolo007uk adds a note from iPad-Review.co.uk with pricing: "WiFi Models: 16GB / 32GB / 64GB — £429 / £499 / £599. 3G versions: 16GB / 32GB / 64GB — £529 / £599 / £699. These are a little higher than some had guessed... The Apple Tax stings the UK consumer again." At the current exchange rate, these prices are right around 150% of those offered in the US.
What's the problem again?
VAT
And how is this Apple's problem?
At least in the UK you're getting a better return for your tax pounds. You spend a smaller percentage of your GDP on military and you get nationalized healthcare.
Steve Jobs is writing a new story. "The Emperors New Computing Device"
Apple is glad to see such free advertising! This is consumerism crap, not slashdot-worthy "stuff that matters" content...
And free houses for all the Chavs. I'll take my nano-tech, space laser, military-industrial complex.
It's not 150%, it's 126%. And the UK price includes 17.5% VAT which Apple would have to send straight to Gordon Brown's tax collectors if he hadn't just been thrown out (I think he is refusing to leave, but thank heavens he will), whereas the US price doesn't include US sales tax.
From our perspective, the good news is that my mother pulled through, both her and my uncle are on medicines for the rest of her life (free, of course) and my mother has just finished the chemotherapy, so she's feeling a little fragile atm, but she made it; anything else is irrelevant.
Simon.
Physicists get Hadrons!
Wait, no, I retract my previous reply to you! It's not a fair point!
I got myself a little confused, but you're comparing apples to oranges (no pun intended!).
My initial comparison was untaxed price to untaxed price, and the mark up is between 3% and 8% there. You're then talking about adding US sales tax and comparing that taxed price to the untaxed UK price.
1) There's plenty of people who would struggle to get $5k together
2) He also paid insurance premiums, and the premiums may go up and the exclusions may become more significant because of his history now
3) In the UK, he'd have paid £0 at point of need, not $2.5k or 5k
4) How do you know for sure that Duke provides better treatment? What do you mean: better outcomes? better experience? safer? all three? Where's the evidence for your assertion?
From the wiki on life expectancy:
Average lifespan at birth in the UK: 79.4 years
Average lifespan at birth in the US: 78.2 years
So, minor win for the UK's far inferior system there. Now, from the wiki on infant mortality rates:
Infant deaths per 1000 live births / under 5's deaths per 1000 live births in the UK: 4.8 / 6.0
Infant deaths per 1000 live births / under 5's deaths per 1000 live births in the US: 6.3 / 7.8
Another one called for the Kingdom, there. Again, not a huge difference, but pretty significant if you're a parent of 1.8 out of 1000 children. So, the question seems to boil down to a choice between expensive good care or cheap effective care.
Be smart, help people!