Slashdot Mirror


Ball Lightning Caused By Magnetic Hallucinations

KentuckyFC writes "Transcranial magnetic stimulation involves placing a human in a rapidly changing magnetic field powerful enough to induce eddy currents in the brain. Focus the field in the visual cortex, for example, and the induced eddys cause the subject to 'see' lights that appear as discs and lines. Move the field within the cortex and the subject sees the lights move too. Physicists have calculated that the fields associated with certain kinds of multiple lightning strikes are powerful enough to induce the same kind of visual hallucinations in anybody unlucky enough to be within 200 meters or so. These fields ought to induce hallucinations that would take the form of luminous lines and balls that float in front of the subject's eyes, an effect that would explain observations otherwise classed as ball lightning, say the scientists."

49 of 269 comments (clear)

  1. Doesn't explain... by Em+Emalb · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Doesn't explain people having captured ball lightning on video from in some cases miles away.

    --
    Sent from your iPad.
    1. Re:Doesn't explain... by Terminal+Saint · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Indeed. Heck, my great grandmother used to tell the story of the time ball lightning broke the living room window, did a circle around the room and went back out, leaving scorch marks on the ceiling. But then, it's a story from the great grandmother, so take it for what it's worth.

      --
      It's sad when choosing an installation directory on your own qualifies you as an "advanced user."
    2. Re:Doesn't explain... by je+ne+sais+quoi · · Score: 3, Informative

      I looked on youtube. The second hit seems to be missing for me, my browser is reporting the swf as not found. The third one in Saudi Arabia appears to be the lightning moving along the power lines. I suspect that these guys in TFA could be right, but that the term ball lightning is ambiguous, referring to several different phenomena.

      --
      Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is the war room!
    3. Re:Doesn't explain... by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      There's lots of claimed videos, e.g. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ioN-3UWYrY

      Are there any scientifically verified videos? Elefino.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Doesn't explain... by rubycodez · · Score: 5, Interesting

      there are photos in encyclopedias and on web.

      I've seen ball lightening from distance of half a mile, and it's been created in lab

      http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/01/070122-ball-lightning.html

    5. Re:Doesn't explain... by Em+Emalb · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh wow, I feel so proud, my first ever [citation needed]

      Do I get a Slashdot "Achievement" for that?

      I didn't expect anyone to take my comment seriously. Every video ever seen showing "ball lightning" appears to be either edited heavily or easily explained away as something else.

      Carry on about your day, good sir.

      --
      Sent from your iPad.
    6. Re:Doesn't explain... by deglr6328 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Absurd, you'd might as well also claim the Fox Alien Autopsy video and all the various close encounters of the blurred kind on Youtube aren't explained by the fact that we now understand things like kanashibari. The videos of so called ball lightning out there are far away, shaky, defocused and about as convincing as Chupacabra photos in the Weekly World News.

      Look, I'm sorry to piss on everybody's parade, but its time to relegate ball lightning to its rightful place in history alongside phrenology and N-rays. The invention of the CCD and the associated UNBELIEVABLE proliferation of personal digital imaging devices over the past decade means that virtually everyone has a camera in their pocket at all times now. If the phenomenon of ball lightning existed at all, we should be seeing like one multiply reported HIGHLY CONVINCING video a week uploaded to the internet showing this. In fact, the number of ball lightning sightings and recordings over the past who knows how many years has pretty much stayed constant. If ball lightning exists at all, it's in the heads of observers, either as a result of a terrified mi-d thunderstorm hallucination or a result of some magnetic field induced phosphene as reported in this new paper.

      If ball lightning were an actual physical phenomenon, the number of video observations of it should have skyrocketed over the past 10 years along with the availability of personal digital imaging devices in the same way that once Red Sprites and Blue Jets were first reliably observed with very high speed video in 1994, observational replication around the world was practically IMMEDIATE and widespread.

      --
      - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
    7. Re:Doesn't explain... by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh wow, I feel so proud, my first ever [citation needed]

      Do I get a Slashdot "Achievement" for that?

      You would if you could:
      * Provide the requested citation
      * Post a link to a goatse domain showing a guy with his balls on fire (this is for all intents and purposes considered 'ball lightning')
      * Find a way to blame another /. poster
      * Combine any or all of the above into a super-mega-post

      I didn't expect anyone to take my comment seriously.

      Well, that happens around here so often that they really need a moderation tag for "Whoosh!"

    8. Re:Doesn't explain... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Is there any reason not to consider the option that this artificial phenomenon might have little to do with alleged observations of ball lightning?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    9. Re:Doesn't explain... by deglr6328 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think the third video in that list you are talking about showing "BL" in Saudi Arabia is very important for everyone to see. How many times have we heard of people having BL sightings around power lines or "following power lines"? Frequently! And what does that video show? NOT BL! It's just arcing between two of the power lines that's traveling down the line Jacob's-ladder-like, probably due to wind. Was it initiated by lightning? Maybe, but it is not BL at all. People trust their senses and their assumptions way too much.

      --
      - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
    10. Re:Doesn't explain... by evilviper · · Score: 2, Funny

      my great grandmother used to tell the story of the time ball lightning broke the living room window, did a circle around the room and went back out, leaving scorch marks on the ceiling.

      Your grandmother has a Tyler Durden complex?

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    11. Re:Doesn't explain... by deglr6328 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oooh yeah I'm really religiously "jumping" to conclusions. We've had DECADES to flesh this one out and the evidence is not there. The onus is on the claimant to prove the phenomenon exists, not on me to prove it doesn't. The religious ones are the ones who take flaky anecdotes and blurry photos as real evidence and reject any skepticism about their credulity as "hasty". No.

      --
      - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
    12. Re:Doesn't explain... by ehrichweiss · · Score: 2, Interesting

      1986-ish Radio Electronics magazine had a study where they took pics of ball lightning that originated from arcing around a generator onboard an old engine on a train. I will mention this since I know it's brought up further down in the discussion, the ball lightning only *originated* from the arcing, it however did NOT just follow the power lines like a Jacob's Ladder might but rather had quite the mind of its own, scaring the bejesus out of the researcher when it entered the cabin of the train and began to approach him. I should have this issue archived somewhere so I can verify this at some point soon.

      That said, I do have a VR device that induces the feelings of motion in the brain through electrodes(1 on the forehead and 2 behind each ear on the "mastoid process") that when cranked high will induce visual hallucinations for a second or two...but they wouldn't make me think I was seeing ball lightning.

      --
      0x09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
    13. Re:Doesn't explain... by fractoid · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...let me also point out that LSD doesn't explain real spiders.

      HOLY SHIT THOSE THINGS ARE REAL?

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    14. Re:Doesn't explain... by Myopic · · Score: 2, Funny

      at first he thought it might be a UFO but then realized it was definitely from this earth

      Dude, that's just what they want you to think!

    15. Re:Doesn't explain... by Jesus_666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is what you argue:

      1. Researchers claim that their theory could possibly explain some ball lightning sightings as hallucinations.
      2. There are videos of possible ball lightnings.
      --------
      3. Therefore, the researchers must be wrong.

      Formulated more formally (note that I exaggerated the positions for the sake of readability):

      1. There is at least one ball lightning sighting that has been caused by a lightning-induced hallucination.
      2. There is at least one ball lightning that was captured on video.
      --------
      3. From 1 and 2 follows: Nothing; the two premises contradict each other. // Logical error

      I'm sorry, but "there is" premises (using the existence quantor) can't be refuted by using another such premise. If you can prove that one or even all ball lightning videos are genuine you still can't disprove that ball lightning can be magnetically induced hallucinations.
      If you were to prove that all ball lightnings ever witnessed were captured on video you would have an argument but realistically all you could possibly disprove is the claim that all ball lightning sightings are hallucinations, which the scientists never made.

      In fact, the scientists didn't even claim that even one such sighting was hallucinatory in the way described. They only claimed that magnetically induced hallucinations could explain some of the sightings since they match typical ball lightning descriptions.

      In short: The only erroneous theory is the one you have about what the researchers claimed, which can be refuted by actually reading TFA or even TFS. TFA does go on to generalize a bit but neither the researchers' quotes nor TFS suggest that the researchers ever talked about their theory applying to all ball lightning sightings.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    16. Re:Doesn't explain... by sjames · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not so fast, what do most people do when a severe storm blows in? They put their camera away and run for shelter. Unlike Sprites and Jets, ball lightning is typically small and often seen close to the ground such that you won't capture anything useful from miles away.

      Most of those digital cameras out there are in the possession of people who have no idea how to take a well focused non-blurry and non-shaky picture or video with them in even the best conditions. In addition, they're mostly cheap cellphone cameras with barely adequate lenses that are just about good enough to take a few snapshots while out with friends. The odds that they would get a decent picture of a light source that isn't just a big blur and doesn't look like a reflection from the lens are nearly nil.

      The key to getting good images of sprites was to figure out a few places where they were nearly sure to be seen and to get ready in advance with high end cameras fixed to good solid tripods. A bunch of amateurs with their disposable Kodak cameras and cellphones still won't likely photograph a blue jet.

      There are several easily reproducible phenomena that might be what people are describing or it might be something else (even magnetically induced eddy currents in the visual cortex).

      There is actually little doubt that ball lightning is a real phenomenon. There is a great deal of doubt as to what it is. There are a number of crackpot theories that are almost certainly wrong. There are a few good theories that might be correct. It's hard to gather enough evidence to say which is better since we haven't narrowed down where one should go and under what conditions to reliably see any. It's down to sheer luck.

    17. Re:Doesn't explain... by DeusExMach · · Score: 2, Funny

      When I was growing up on my grandpa's dairy farm, he used to tell us kids not to pee on the electric fence. When HE was pressed for further citation, his response was, indeed, "Ball lightning."

    18. Re:Doesn't explain... by tehcyder · · Score: 2, Funny

      Remember, electricity follows the path of least resistance and copper in power lines provides far less resistance than does air, so perhaps it's just able to "live" longer with power lines around

      Don't anthropomorphize electricity, it makes it mad.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    19. Re:Doesn't explain... by ehrichweiss · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The device is called MotionWare and was released as a prototype about 10 years ago. The inventor had a hard time getting it to the fast track so the 100 prototypes he made are all that exist. It uses electro-vestibular stimulation to generate the sense of motion(though only through one "channel"[the inner ear] of the three, at least, from which we sense motion[inner ear, proprioceptive and visual]).

      Anyway, the hallucinations/visuals seemed to be generated right around my forehead where the front electrode made contact and were always at that spot regardless of where I looked. They were always triggered by cranking the power output up to the maximum setting(I have VERY high skin resistance so this was necessary for me to feel the movement). I attempted to bring this up to the inventor but he didn't seem quite as interested in it as I was. I've since shelved the prototype I bought since I don't really do VR research any more; shame, someone should get some real use out of it as I know it's still functional.

      --
      0x09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
  2. FDA Response by bughunter · · Score: 4, Funny

    Feds will ban Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on the assumption that it can be used recreationally.

    --
    I can see the fnords!
    1. Re:FDA Response by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 4, Funny

      Magnified transcrotal what?

      --
      "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
  3. What the article fails to address by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is how effective Tin foil might be at stopping the hallucinations. They haven't stopped since I started wearing my hat, I'm beginning to doubt they are hallucinations like my doctor tells me.

  4. Oh No! by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now that they know how to create this phenomenon, this fad could catch on and lure our children into magnetic hallucination parties! Won't somebody think of the children!

  5. Same Lights Common in Migraineurs, too by sonnejw0 · · Score: 4, Informative

    For those that suffer from migraines, these lights and balls should be familiar as "aura", or scintilating scotoma. For migraineurs, these lights last longer because they are caused by changing bloodflow to the occipital lobe over a longer period of time. It most assuredly activates the same neurons that this magnetic stimulation of neurons produces. I would not be surprised of reports of concomitant parosmia, or olfactory hallucinations, with the display of ball-lightning caused by magnetic fields.

    1. Re:Same Lights Common in Migraineurs, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      If these are equivalent to migraine auras, I'm very skeptical that they can explain ball lightning. I've periodically experienced migraines and what doctors assure me is an aura preceding it. I don't know about others' subjective experience with auras, but while it's an annoying visual artifact covering some or all of my visual field, at no point did I ever perceive it as some localized 'ball' with anything like a defined position, distance relative to me, etc. as ball lightning is often described. It was always something I perceived as an internal static that makes my vision mostly useless, not some external object.

      Again, there could just be subjective difference, but I've never heard a fellow migraine sufferer describe an aura as some ball of light.

      For those that suffer from migraines, these lights and balls should be familiar as "aura", or scintilating scotoma. For migraineurs, these lights last longer because they are caused by changing bloodflow to the occipital lobe over a longer period of time. It most assuredly activates the same neurons that this magnetic stimulation of neurons produces.

      I would not be surprised of reports of concomitant parosmia, or olfactory hallucinations, with the display of ball-lightning caused by magnetic fields.

    2. Re:Same Lights Common in Migraineurs, too by nasch · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It most assuredly activates the same neurons that this magnetic stimulation of neurons produces.

      Most assuredly, interesting. How do you know this?

    3. Re:Same Lights Common in Migraineurs, too by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 2, Insightful
      That's an interesting theory (and... erm... interestingly phrased) but what do you have to back it up?

      Having had migraines and accompanying "auras", I can safely say that there's no resemblance between the visual distortions from a pending or in-progress migraine and any external visual phenomena (never mind lightning or ball lightning). The other migraine sufferers ("migraineurs"? really?) I've known can confirm this.

      While I am the last to rely on anecdotal evidence, it's an improvement over no evidence.

  6. idea != fact by Itninja · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Typical of Slashdot. From TFA: "That's an interesting idea: that a large class of well-reported phenomenon may be the result of hallucinations induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation."

    From the Summary:
    Ball Lightening Caused by Magnetic Hallucinations

    From 'interesting idea' to stated fact in record time!

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    1. Re:idea != fact by eln · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ball Lightening Caused by Magnetic Hallucinations

      It's clearly a bogus theory. In my experience, ball lightening is usually caused by filling it up with helium.

    2. Re:idea != fact by largesnike · · Score: 2, Funny

      From 'interesting idea' to stated fact in record time!

      almost, Saddam's WMDs are still in front by a fair margin

      --
      "Laugh while you can a-monkey boy!" - Dr Emilio Lizardo
    3. Re:idea != fact by thogard · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I would buy into the "may"... in some cases. I also expect there may be more than one phenomenon that is called ball lightning.

      I used to live in a house that had plastic dome light shade in the room lights. After the light was turned off and they cooled down they would pop. That pop would create a Piezo generated electric field that would cause me to see a bright flash of light that wasn't there. It may have caused others to see ghosts. There have been reports of large amounts of geo-piezo activity in areas where ghosts, angels and aliens are often seen.

  7. Scissors by MrEricSir · · Score: 4, Funny

    Perhaps this explains the appearance of a giant pair of scissors in the sky when performing the iron pyramid experiment.

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    1. Re:Scissors by safetyinnumbers · · Score: 3, Funny

      Perhaps this explains the appearance of a giant pair of scissors in the sky when performing the iron pyramid experiment.

      I'd forgotten about that! Maybe it also explains the giant pliers on Google Street View:

  8. That answers that, for me at least by alop · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've often wondered why I "see" spinning disks (as the article described) when on road trips or on hot days. It's very odd to explain, the best analogy I could come up with was a "Video game style targeting system"... But seeing it explained as a hallucination makes sense.

    --
    --alop
    1. Re:That answers that, for me at least by CorporateSuit · · Score: 2, Funny

      He'll certainly have a lot to answer for if it turns out those spinning disks are really just the uplifting, smiling faces of pure-hearted children!

      --
      I am the richest astronaut ever to win the superbowl.
  9. In Other News by mindbrane · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Transcranial Magnetic Stmulation is used to ameliorate auditory hallucinations in schizophrenics.

    --
    ideopath @ play
  10. Can't be hallucinations by buback · · Score: 2, Funny

    A whole branch of my family was fathered by ball lightning! Happened back in the Great Storm of 1806. Granted, they always were the black sheep at the family reunions, but they were certainly real!

    Now tell me that's a hallucination. I dare you!

  11. Proximity is not causality by Xaedalus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Taken from a comment on the TFA's commentary, and it proves a point. I've always wondered why we tend to take scientific recreations in a lab and automatically apply them to phenomena to the world outside the lab as "absolutely the truth". Are we that desperate for a logical-sounding answer that we'll immediately say "these phenomena were reproduced in this lab using these specific resources and therefore this must automatically happen every time similar phenomena happens under uncontrolled circumstances"

    --
    Here's to hot beer, cold women, and Glaswegian kisses for all.
    1. Re:Proximity is not causality by John+Meacham · · Score: 4, Informative

      We don't at all. The strongest statement the original paper makes is

      "Lightning electromagnetic pulse induced transcranial magnetic stimulation of phosphenes in the visual cortex is concluded to be a plausible interpretation of a large class of reports on luminous perceptions during thunderstorms."

      just plausible. It's the editors that decided to publish it as if it were accepted fact.

      --
      http://notanumber.net/
  12. This is your brain. by osu-neko · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is your brain on lightning. Get the picture?

    --
    "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
  13. Re:Explains a lot for me by Terminal+Saint · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Possibly, but it seems odd that they would all see the same thing in the same position acting in the same way.

    --
    It's sad when choosing an installation directory on your own qualifies you as an "advanced user."
  14. Re:Ministory by IorDMUX · · Score: 4, Informative

    A ball went from the warehouse floor in to the office area (I believe it went through a wall to do this) and stopped above an employee's head, where it dissipated suddenly. I just can't see this entirely being a hallucination if it can be tracked with your eyes.

    Actually, this ability to be "tracked" is common in color/light optical hallucinations that are produced in the "front end" of your brain's visual processing, as opposed to more life-like and realistic (i.e. a deceased relative) visual hallucinations that occur father down the image-processing pipeline.

    You can demonstrate this on your own: Look just to the side of a small, bright light source for a few seconds, then look away, ideally towards a blank wall or other plain surface. (Don't stare into the sun or a laser or anything... I don't want people responding with "OMG now I'm blind!") If you did not focus directly on the light source to begin with, the "echo" of the light should appear slightly off center. As you move your eyes and/or head to try and focus on the echo, it will move away as the spot is fixed with respect to your retina, giving you the illusion of being able to "track" this visual phenomenon across a room or other space.

    --
    >> Standing on head makes smile of frown, but rest of face also upside down.
  15. Re:Cameras by IorDMUX · · Score: 2, Informative
    [Sorry for the double post... I just came up with this after a bit more searching.]

    Apparently it also affects cameras too.

    http://www.google.com/images?q=ball+lightning&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&ie=UTF-8&source=univ&ei=48vpS-vZB8T7lwfijKn_Cg&sa=X&oi=image_result_group&ct=title&resnum=1&ved=0CCoQsAQwAA

    I noticed that the majority of actual images of ball lightning that Google turns up fall into one of three categories: Illustrations, pictures of scientific experiments, or variations on this picture.

    Though I do think that this description of ball lightning sounds as viable as the TMS theory. (Summary: A lightning strike heats fractal silicon "fluff balls" on the Earth's surface which can burn violently and hold themselves aloft like ashes from a fire.) Perhaps we are looking at two entirely different phenomenon: TMS causing the "cool" ball lightning which can mysteriously appear indoors or in airplane cockpits and then disappears without doing damage, and the burning silicon vapor explaining the "hot" ball lightning which has been reported to cause damage and leave scorch marks wherever it goes.

    --
    >> Standing on head makes smile of frown, but rest of face also upside down.
  16. Re:I see what you did there by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just because it has been modded up, I'd like to respond to the troll: on what basis exactly would you exclude funding for this research? Obviousness? Clearly not, because no one had any idea what a modulating magnetic field would do to the inner workings of the brain. Uselessness? Can't see how you arrived at that conclusion, considering that it indicates a way to manipulate how the brain processes inputs, which has a ton of potential application.

    No, the only reason that this is research unworthy of funding is that it doesn't immediately yield a product, which is the lamest, most short-sighted reason for which to deny a grant request.

    --
    Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
  17. Re:Why the fascination with ball lightning? by Bitmanhome · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Ball" lightning is essentially impossible. Electricity cannot behave that way, as far as we know. And yet, many people claim to have seen it. So either it exists, and we'd like to learn how, or it doesn't, in which case we'd like to learn what those people are actually seeing.

    --
    Not that this wasn't entirely predictable.
  18. Re:Cameras by DavidTC · · Score: 2, Informative

    There are a few phenomenon that are known to cause things like ball lighting.

    St. Elmo's Fire, for example, can look like a floating ball. Not usually, but it can, if it forms on an unseen point like a tree branch.

    There's probably other forms of ionization that we simple don't know about. There's plenty of ways to generate things that look likeball lightning is supposed to look, you can do it in your microwave. (Although that method does not seem likely to occur in nature.)

    And I love the idea that Will-o-wisps aren't real. Yes, half the cultures in the world independently invented the idea of lights rising up from marshy water. It's like that old world-wide myth that the stars could fall out of the sky, which, of course, we know is absurd, stars streaking across the sky and plummeting to earth is obviously crazy talk.

    I'm frankly astonished at all the people here who apparently think it's all a hallucination, which is, frankly, just stupid. Plenty of ball lightning has multiple observers and has been tracked for moderate distances.

    As has been pointed out, visual hallucinations are pretty easy to recognize as such, considering they either follow the field of view, if generated in the optic nerve, or the eyes, if some sort of vision after-effect.

    People who see fake lights and don't recognize them as such after about ten seconds as such are, quite likely, schizophrenic or have some other mental illness. Hallucination and optical illusions do not work that way in normal people.

    It's only when it's the brain itself generates stuff that it appears even slightly consistent with reality. No one can walk around tracking an optical glitch and think it's an actual floating ball in space.

    --
    If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  19. Wrong conclusion by Evil+Pete · · Score: 2, Informative

    It would be helpful if people actually read reports of ball lightning sightings before they jump to conclusions.

    Is this a possible explanation of some ball lightning sightings? Well it could be.

    Does it explain them all? Definitely not. Ball lightning has been observed many times to do lots of damage. It has also been observed in areas where there has been no lightning or storm activity at all. Including sunny days. Read up on it then make up your own mind. This is not a simple phenomenon. No one explanation seems to explain it all and perhaps there are multiple physical mechanisms to create the reported glowing balls of light with wildly different properties. I read a monograph some years back which detailed about 2 dozen different scientific theories and many good witness accounts showing the mismatch to each of these theories. Well there have been even more theories since, each of them compelling and reasonable ... and contradictory. The real problem of course is that the data is from witnesses, it is not repeatable so the theories cannot be tested against each other.

    --
    Bitter and proud of it.
  20. Re:Cameras by darkstar949 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Burning mod points by saying this, but digging around on Google turned up a site that has an form lightning that I don't recognize that was captured by film - http://www.ernmphotography.com/Pages/Ball_Lightning/BL_Gallery1.html