Slashdot Mirror


Food Bloggers Giving Restaurant Owners Heartburn

crimeandpunishment writes "Call it the invasion of the pasta paparazzi. Food bloggers are so excited about sharing their experiences, especially at trendy, popular restaurants, that they're too busy taking pictures and video to enjoy the food when it's at its best. Many signature dishes come out at the perfect temperature ... take a few minutes to capture what it looks like, and your palate won't be nearly as pleased. Some restaurants have taken the step of banning cameras, or at least have established a 'no flash' rule. Others just want to make sure enthusiastic reviewers are still enthused after eating their food."

22 of 311 comments (clear)

  1. Re:And once again by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Actually how it looks is just as important as taste and smell. When you eat a meal, the first part of your body that perceives the meal is your eyes. Most people will not eat food that looks unappetizing. Next is your nose (which strongly correlates with your taste buds). Many more people will not eat food that smells unappetizing. Only then does taste play a role. Almost no one will eat food that tastes unappetizing.

    Want citations? Look 'em up yourself.

    --
    "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
  2. Boy oh boy! by DigitAl56K · · Score: 4, Funny

    This story looks magnificent, I love the arrangement of the words and the punctuation! Hang on while I read it... ... meh...

  3. Disturbing the other guests by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Perhaps the real problem is that all the flash lights disturb the other guests in the restaurant.

  4. Re:Perfect temperature by T+Murphy · · Score: 4, Interesting
    RTFA:

    Take the diner who recently ordered a signature dish, Hot Potato-Cold Potato, in which a marble-sized sphere of piping hot Yukon Gold is dropped into a bowl of 40-degree potato soup at the pull of a pin. Eating it at the proper temperature is key to the experience.

    Desserts with something fresh out of the oven and ice cream on top are similar- wait even 5 minutes and the melting ice cream hurts the taste and texture noticeably. Now, if they were talking about typical dishes without built-in temperature differences, I might agree with you.

  5. Minutes? by shoemakc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...a few minutes? What is this, the 1840's?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_photography

    --
    --an unbreakable toy is useful for breaking other toys--
    1. Re:Minutes? by game+kid · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dude. High dynamic range entrées take time.

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
  6. Re:Perfect temperature by discord5 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Many signature dishes come out at the perfect temperature

    No they don't. Get over yourselves.

    You sir, obviously haven't experienced the finer art of cooking. Last week I made a lasagna that needed to be served at the perfect temperature in order to be optimally satisfying. It needed to be so hot that it would scorch the taste buds right off of your tongue, or else you would be unable to stand the taste.

    DE-LI-CIOUS! Hmmm. Nothing beats homemade cooking.

  7. Re:And once again by FoolishOwl · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No, the point of food is to maintain health and strength. Whether you enjoy eating it is secondary to that.

  8. Re:Perfect temperature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I always though geeks were into cooking? First impressions matter. The first bite cements a flavor memory, that sticks with you as your food cools. Miss the window of opportunity and a great dish just becomes good or even meh. This is also why good food is generally served in small portions. Its like your first sip of coffee in the morning, if you waited tell it was cold or left it in the pot to burn you might just spit it out. But if you had a few drinks before waiting tell its past its prime you might just finish off that last gulp or two without any problem. Same thing.

  9. Re:And once again by skine · · Score: 4, Informative

    Most people will not eat food that looks unappetizing.

    Obviously you're not from Rochester, NY. Our best known local dish not only looks ugly, but it has an ugly name as well. Then again, Nick Tahou's makes some delicious Garbage Plates.

  10. Re:And once again by T+Murphy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There's food the basic resource, and food the product of the art of cooking. If you are going out to a restaurant, you are paying for the latter kind of food. In developed countries, your definition rarely applies, as shown by many people choosing food for taste and ignoring the health part.

  11. New /. section? by jdawg · · Score: 4, Funny

    Anxiously awaiting food.slashdot.org.

    And the incessant whining from RMS about restaurants that don't publish their recipes.

    1. Re:New /. section? by Adambomb · · Score: 5, Funny

      I have altered the soup. Pray I don't alter it any further.

      --
      Ice Cream has no bones.
  12. Re:And once again by Trailwalker · · Score: 4, Interesting

    While on one of my long distance hikes, I would occasionally pass a country store and purchase a 24 oz can of a never before heard of brand of beef stew. I would pour this into my pot, add a cup of minute rice and some beef bouillon and top with a cup of water. Heated, this made a quart and a half of murky grayish brown gruel. It was a real treat and the pot was licked clean.

    At home, I can not even look at a plate of this concoction, much less eat it.

    Nothing like the ambiance of the mountains, day after day of dehydrated crud for food to make anything different a tasty feast fit for the gods.

  13. Re:Perfect temperature by techno-vampire · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Writer has never worked in a restaurant kitchen.

    Obviously. First, a good restaurant chef will time things so that they get done as close to each other as possible. Second, some of the dishes will come off of the stove or out of the oven a bit hotter than the perfect temperature and need a minute or two to cool down; generally, those are plated first, so that by the time everything else is done, they're Just Right.

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
  14. You are all missing the point. by Organic+Brain+Damage · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Food bloggers are simply braggarts. "Look at me and the wonderful food I'm enjoying! Aren't I just precious?" This is the sub-text of almost every food blog. It's even more obnoxious than disturbing the fellow diners.

  15. Re:And once again by bmo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You are obviously someone who has never had a good meal in his life.

    Where is this epicurean desert that you live in that I can avoid it?

    Given the choice between some good labor intensive peasant food (I'm Polish) and "utilitarian food," I'm going to be loading the plate up with some pierogis thanks.

    Saying that eating should only be for nutrition is like saying sex should only be for reproduction. I reject your outlook. It is without enjoyment. It is spartan for the sole reason of utility. It is a dour, rainy day in late November.

    --
    BMO

  16. Re:And once again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Going to McDonalds for a salad is like going to a prostitute for a hug.

  17. Re:And once again by zippthorne · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I dunno. Healthy foods can taste *really* good, and look good too, with their vibrant colors. Unhealthy food only really tastes comfortable, and of course there's the slight bump from the fats and sugars that were once scanty in our pre-civilization diet.

    It's also more expensive, though, which I think is the real problem. An overdone ground-beef patty, mayonnaise, some wilty lettuce and a slice of partially hydrogenated vegetable oils with some fat-soaked potato slices and tomato & corn syrup preserves on the side is not only cheap to produce, but the ingredients store well for long periods unrefrigerated.

    I'm not convinced "taxing it" is the answer either, as then this comfortable, unhealthy mix will be unavailable to the poor, but they won't magically be able to afford healthy food as a result...

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  18. Re:And once again by Wildclaw · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Nothing like the ambiance of the mountains, day after day of dehydrated crud for food to make anything different a tasty feast fit for the gods.

    The taste of food is intrinsically linked to how much your body needs it. And it even goes down in more detail as to what kind of food your body needs. It is fascinating really. Especially how quickly the taste adepts once you get the needed mineral/vitamin into your system.

  19. Re:And once again by jhjjhj · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Rich people worry about how dinner is presented

    Middle class worry if it's tasty.

    Poor people worry if there is enough.

  20. Re:Perfect temperature by snowgirl · · Score: 4, Informative

    Serious Foods: RE: Resting a Steak

    Presented to you is actual photographic evidence for the reason for "resting a steak".

    Now, to point, if you rest a steak and the person gets it cold, then they fucked up. Using the argument of "resting a steak" is not a proper reason for a cold steak.

    Rather the myth should be that resting a steak means letting it go cold. This later one would be the mark of a bad chef.

    --
    WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS