Slashdot Mirror


Airship Inflated To Create Monster "Stratellite"

yoderman94 writes "A huge inflatable vehicle as long as a 23-floor skyscraper is tall has become the world's largest airship in its bid to serve as a stratospheric satellite, or 'stratellite,' according to its developers."

34 of 204 comments (clear)

  1. Let's get this out of the way by dkleinsc · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is the pilot named Cid?

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    1. Re:Let's get this out of the way by Qzukk · · Score: 5, Funny

      Is this an American pop culture reference

      Given that Cid is the recurring character name for the airship pilot/mechanic/engineer in the Final Fantasy games developed in Japan, the answer is "it depends on what you consider American".

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  2. Why dumb down the article? by Keebler71 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Once again...thank you "press" for giving us useless measurements... is it's max speed measured in units of cheetah velocity, its volume measured in swimming pools and its weight measured in automobiles?

    --
    "It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance." - Thomas Sowell
    1. Re:Why dumb down the article? by Carnildo · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's also merely the largest modern airship. The Graf Zeppelin was three times longer, and most of the interwar airships were similarly large.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
  3. Huh? by shadow349 · · Score: 5, Informative

    From TFS:

    stratospheric satellite, or 'stratellite,' according to its developers.

    From TFA:

    The airship is designed to carry payloads of up to 2,000 pounds (907 kg) at altitudes of 20,000 feet (6,096 m).

    From Wiki:

    The stratosphere is situated between about 10 km (6 miles) and 50 km (31 miles) altitude above the surface at moderate latitudes, while at the poles it starts at about 8 km (5 miles) altitude.

    Anyone else see the issue?

    1. Re:Huh? by drumcat · · Score: 3, Funny

      Clearly he didn't measure in football fields.

    2. Re:Huh? by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's also clearly not a satellite, as it won't actually be in orbit.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
  4. Let the naming ceremony beging by abbynormal+brain · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Great Big Suppository in the Sky

    --
    L'esperienza de questa dolce vita (The experience of this sweet life) - Dante Alighieri, The Divine Comedy
  5. Re:Units by diskofish · · Score: 2, Funny

    .78

  6. To Create Monster 'Stratellite' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Tokyo is so screwed!

  7. Re:Units by Culture20 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    as long as a 23-floor skyscraper is tall

    How many football field lenghts would that be?

    ((10 feet plus 5 foot drop ceiling space plus foot of actual floor plus an extra foot for good measure) times 23 divided by three) divided by 100 equals ~1.303333333 football fields

  8. Re:Airship by Jeng · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Here I was thinking it wasn't a real airship yet because it sounds like they have only filled the balloon, but not attached anything to the balloon yet.

    At this point its just a balloon. It still needs its skin, engines, a compartment for pilot and or crew.

    They have the air part down, now they just need the ship part.

    --
    Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
  9. Didn't we have these 50 years ago? by petes_PoV · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I remember the "Echo" satellites from the early 60's. their orbital times were even published in the newspapers and you could see them move through the night sky. I know you can see the ISS when it's around, but aren't these sorts of baloons rather old-hat now?

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
  10. Re:Units by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 4, Informative

    (235 feet) / (100 yards) = 0.783

    Not even one.

    This may be the largest current airship, but the airships of the past absolutely dwarfed this. The Hindenburg was 245m (803 ft 10 in), or 2.67 football fields.

    --
    "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
  11. Worlds largets vs TFA by OzPeter · · Score: 3, Insightful
    From the summary

    .. become the worlds largest airship..

    from TFA

    But even the modern record-holder for size dwindles in comparison to airships back in their heyday, such as the 804-foot (245 m) Hindenberg.

    There must be some strange use of the word "largest" that I don't understand

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  12. This will not PROTECT the environment by saurongt · · Score: 3, Insightful
    FTFA:

    "Our airships are radically different designs that move beyond the performance limitations of traditional blimps or zeppelins by combining advanced technology with simple construction and the ability to fuel with algae, protecting our environment"

    Fueling with algae protects the environment as much as buying a Prius. Alternative fuels do not protect the environment, they only reduce the damage slightly.

  13. Re:Units by hedwards · · Score: 4, Funny

    Would that be American or European football fields?

  14. Monster by Propaganda13 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Am I the only one that started reading the title thinking they had made a giant airship that looked like Mothra only to be disappointed by the time I finished reading the title?

  15. Re:Units by Culture20 · · Score: 2, Funny

    American football or Metric football?

    As these were British units of measurement, it was clearly describing the field size for the game not played in Great Britain.

  16. Helium or Hydrogen? by bmo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What I want to know is if we're going to waste expensive helium on this or inflate it with hydrogen?

    Weather balloons, hobbyist stratospheric balloons, etc, are usually filled with helium. But the only rationale for using helium is that it doesn't burn. It's more expensive than hydrogen. It's less efficient than hydrogen, and we only have so much helium left. We're not sending up people. There is no reason to use helium, really.

    It's time to get rid of the Hindenburg meme.

    --
    BMO

    1. Re:Helium or Hydrogen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      the Hindenburg was a thermite fire, not a hydrogen fire

    2. Re:Helium or Hydrogen? by mangu · · Score: 3, Interesting

      the Hindenburg was a thermite fire, not a hydrogen fire

      You have been watching too much MacGyver. Anybody who has ever worked with thermite knows how difficult it is to ignite.

      Even the Mythbusters have debunked that old bullshit about the Hindenburg paint. This story was funny once, it stopped being funny about the millionth time it was repeated on the internet.

    3. Re:Helium or Hydrogen? by flink · · Score: 2, Informative

      Elemental hydrogen is very easily gotten many different ways at various level of expense as it is one of the most abundant elements on the planet. Refining it from oil reserves isn't the only way. Electricity + H2O -> H2 + O is pretty well known.

      Elemental helium by contrast is relatively rare on Earth and is only got from natural gas deposits. The He in these deposits builds up over millennia as a consequence of beta decay of other radioactive elements. Additionally many refineries aren't equipped to process He, so a lot of it that is mined just gets lost.

    4. Re:Helium or Hydrogen? by N0Man74 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The earth only has so much matter left!

  17. Airvertising in the near future? by blankoboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If these huge airships become common place you can bet that it will not be long until we have 'airvertising' similar to what we saw in Bladerunner? I imagine a huge airship with a Geisha commercial plastered on one side.

  18. Re:Units by cdrudge · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No. Unless you have a smart ass that wants to get technical on you.

  19. Good news and Bad news by DesScorp · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "and we only have so much helium left"

    That's the bad news. The good news is actually two-sided. For one...

    For helium-3's true believers - the ones who think the isotope's fusion power will take us to the edge of our solar system and beyond - talk of the coming shortage is overblown: There's a huge, untapped supply right in our own backyard.

    "The moon is the El Dorado of helium-3," says Savage, and he's right: Every star, including our sun, emits helium constantly. Implanted in the lunar soil by the solar wind, the all-important gas can be found on the moon by the bucketful."

    So all of the helium we could need is on the moon, and if we can reach them, the gas giant planets. So the second part of the good news is that this gives us a real, economically viable reason to go back to the moon and stay this time... to actually build a base and commence helium mining and collection. And there's other resources on the moon waiting for us as well.

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    1. Re:Good news and Bad news by Tekfactory · · Score: 4, Informative

      Helium-3 is not Helium like you put in Balloons, its the Isotope of Helium you put in Fusion Reactors and Medical Imaging technology.

      It is worth $46,500 per troy ounce.

      Hydrogen would be much less expensive for this application, and like others have stated if you don't paint the sides of the airship with rocket fuel, a rigid airship with segmented air bladders is pretty safe.

      Maybe we can even reopen the Blimp port on the top of the Empire State Building.

  20. Balloon? by wombatmobile · · Score: 2, Funny

    it sounds like they have only filled the balloon, but not attached anything to the balloon yet.

    Still time to rent it out as a condom.

    1. Re:Balloon? by bar-agent · · Score: 2, Funny

      Still time to rent it out as a condom.

      Finally, one that fits me!

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
  21. Re:Units by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 2, Funny

    Would that be American or European football fields?

    I don't know that. Aaaaggghhh!!!

  22. Re:not largest by any stretch of the imagination by nacturation · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's additionally about the same length as a 747. While saying "the length of a 23 story skyscraper" sounds impressive, it's quite a common thing to have in the sky.

    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  23. Re:Units by need4mospd · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's exactly as long as a 235ft long piece of cheese.

  24. Re:Units by Vintermann · · Score: 3, Informative

    This may be the largest current airship

    .

    Nope. The Zeppelin NT is 75 meters, 2-3 meters longer than this one. It also has twice the payload.

    --
    xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.