Slashdot Mirror


Homer Simpson Named Greatest TV Character

A survey by Entertainment Weekly has named Homer Simpson the greatest character created for television or film in the past 20 years. Everyone's favorite beer-swilling, donut-eating dad beat out Harry Potter and Buffy the Vampire Slayer for the top spot. From the article: "'People can relate to Homer because we're all secretly propelled by desires we can't admit to,' Groening was quoted as telling Entertainment Weekly. 'Homer is launching himself head-first into every single impulsive thought that occurs to him. His love of whatever ... is a joy to witness.'"

25 of 142 comments (clear)

  1. Apropos by MonsterTrimble · · Score: 2, Funny

    That Harry Potter & Buffy yelled 'Doh!'

    --
    I call it 'The Aristocrats'
  2. I saw wierd stuff in that place last night by oldhack · · Score: 5, Funny

    Weird, strange, sick, twisted, eerie, godless, evil stuff.

    And I want in.

    --
    Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    1. Re:I saw wierd stuff in that place last night by narratorDan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      /b/ accepts everyone...

      --
      "If you're not confused by quantum mechanics, you really don't understand it." - Niels Bohr
  3. Greatest? by HeckRuler · · Score: 5, Funny

    If by "great" you mean "iconic", sure. And in TV land the two are probably synonymous. But back in my day, you had to conquer Asia-Minor to be considered "great".

    1. Re:Greatest? by geekoid · · Score: 2, Funny

      So going into space isn't great? travelling through dimensions? I mean, he's no inanimate carbon rod, but who is?

      Besides, even Homer isn't stupid enough to get into a land war in Asia.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Greatest? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 2, Funny

      Especially if you did it without a flag.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    3. Re:Greatest? by Kozz · · Score: 4, Funny

      If by "great" you mean "iconic", sure. And in TV land the two are probably synonymous. But back in my day, you had to conquer Asia-Minor to be considered "great".

      Your day was 2300-some-odd years ago?

      Dude, you're old!

      Indeed. Get out of his hanging gardens!

      --
      I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
  4. Re:Harry Potter was a TV character? by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Greatest character created for television or film"

    Geez, it's bad enough that people can't RTFA, but that was in the summary for heavens sake.....

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  5. Re:Harry Potter was a TV character? by Kral_Blbec · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Harry Potter was created for books and adapted for film. Still doesn't qualify.

  6. DISQUALIFY HOMER NOW! by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He was created MORE than 20 years ago! Homer is almost 25.

    Tracey Ullman aired them on Fox in 1987.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Simpsons_shorts

    --
    "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
    1. Re:DISQUALIFY HOMER NOW! by Rary · · Score: 3, Interesting

      He was created MORE than 20 years ago! Homer is almost 25.

      The age of the character was not a selection criteria. The list includes any fictional character who had a lasting impact in pop-culture within the last 20 years, regardless of when they were created.

      The Reuters article added the phrase "created for television and film" on their own.

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

  7. Re:Yup. by Pojut · · Score: 3, Informative

    Purely from a variety and skill point of view, I would have to nominate Arnold Rimmer from Red Dwarf. The number of different characters and personality mutations that character (and subsequently the actor) had to go through was ENORMOUS. Each and every one of them were expertly done, they were all done by the same actor, and unlike The Mighty Boosh where one actor plays multiple characters, they were all still technically Rimmer.

  8. Re:Except he was created in 1989. by eln · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually he was created in 1987 for the Tracey Ullman Show, which makes this choice just that much more ridiculous.

  9. Nope. by XiaoMing · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A fat, balding, selfish, stupid, bad-skinned, horrible-father-figure is voted as being "great". Welcome to America.

    You have to realize, the reason he's great is _because_ he embodies those "fat, balding, selfish... etc. (I'm going to add irreverent to this)" qualities on so many levels.
    Not only is he as lazy and ignorant as we all at least on SOME occasions have wanted to be, but he's also the embodiment of irony and self-deprecating humor in that respect too.
    There's a reason why other countries that hate America still love the Simpsons and love Homer. And no it's not because they're stupid enough to think that character actually represents America (maybe Hank Hill from King of the Hill, though =P). Sure America might take many (too many? most?) of those qualities too far, especially in how stubbornly we present ourselves politically to the rest of the world. But The Simpsons, in its decades long run, is our attempt to not just revel in that attitude, but also constantly remind everyone in the world, including and _especially_ ourselves that we are nowhere near as perfect as we claim to be.

    If anything, the Simpsons has been a great lesson in finding the good with the bad, a little bit of the bad in the good, and a lot of funny in everything.

    1. Re:Nope. by Masterofpsi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh, Homer does much more than be a bumbling idiot. He does what no one from Family Guy or South Park can really do: he manages to capture the essence of a character who is, at heart, really, truly good, who has a big heart, who tries his best to be honest and helping. He's not smart and he can even be a jerk at times, but in the end, we're rooting for him because he still means well, and when he gets hurt, it hurts us.

  10. Re:Except he was created in 1989. by oddTodd123 · · Score: 2, Informative

    That's the least of their problems. Number 2 (Harry Potter) was created for a book. Number 5 (Joker) was created for comics in the 1960s. Numbers 8 (Hannibal Lecter) and 9 (Carrie Bradshaw) were originally created for books as well. So this is really the list of the top characters appearing in television or film in the last 20 years.

  11. This reply smells like feet. by magusxxx · · Score: 4, Funny

    I would have said Al Bundy. *shrug* Peg: Miss me? Al: With every bullet so far.

    --
    Care killed the cat, but satisfaction brought it back.
  12. Re:Except he was created in 1989. by Rary · · Score: 5, Informative

    That's the least of their problems. Number 2 (Harry Potter) was created for a book. Number 5 (Joker) was created for comics in the 1960s. Numbers 8 (Hannibal Lecter) and 9 (Carrie Bradshaw) were originally created for books as well. So this is really the list of the top characters appearing in television or film in the last 20 years.

    Actually, everyone is quoting TFA and TFS, but if you actually go to the source, it doesn't actually use the words "created" or "TV". It's simply "The 100 Greatest Characters of the Last 20 Years". They specifically refer to the "100 greatest characters in pop-culture" and state "(w)hether the fictional women, men, ogres, muppets, babies, and cartoon rockers who made our list were initially created before 1990 didn’t matter so long as they made a lasting impact in the culture after 1990."

    --

    "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

  13. Everyman by Yungoe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The reason Homer is so appealing to us is because he is Everyman, at his worst. Whenever he does something I either have done it, thought about doing it or know someone who did it.

    1. Re:Everyman by Abcd1234 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Simultaneously, at least during the golden years of the series, Homer, while not very bright, was portrayed as being a loving father who wanted to do the right by his family, even if he didn't always know how to. "And Maggie Makes Three" is the absolute perfect example of this (and is one of my favorite episodes of the series as a consequence), but there are a many others.

      As such, we can related to him on multiple levels, as he exemplifies both the best and the worst of people.

  14. Re:I vote by Jeng · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sorry but walking around naked raving about aliens is no way to go though life.

    --
    Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
  15. Re:Yup. by Kreigaffe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yeah and your counterexamples were Red Dwarf and Mighty Boosh.
    You probably don't understand my point. Everyone else does.
    Nobody watches Red Dwarf. It's not bad, but it's not exactly good. Mighty Boosh is just bad.
    But hey that's your call. Go keep talking down widely-popular bits of culture and talk up your inconsequential and little-cared-for interests, eventually it'll make you look more worldly and sophisticated than others. Maybe. Probably not, most people have actually seen both of those shows and are well aware they're nowhere near the quality in both production and entertainment value as The Simpsons.

    --
    ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
  16. Re:Yup. by jgrahn · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yeah and your counterexamples were Red Dwarf and Mighty Boosh. You probably don't understand my point. Everyone else does. Nobody watches Red Dwarf. It's not bad, but it's not exactly good. Mighty Boosh is just bad.

    You're wrong. I watch Red Dwarf. And I find The Mighty Boosh mind-blowing. QED, smeghead.

    Go keep talking down widely-popular bits of culture and talk up your inconsequential and little-cared-for interests, eventually it'll make you look more worldly and sophisticated than others. Maybe. Probably not, most people have actually seen both of those shows and are well aware they're nowhere near the quality in both production and entertainment value as The Simpsons.

    Oooh, I get it! You're just spoofing the Comic Book Store Guy, right?

  17. Re:Yup. by DrKnark · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am probably not a master of social convention, but Kramer makes me LMAO every time. I dont think this "understanding" has to be a requirement to like Seinfeld. And tbh I never met anyone in software who didnt like seinfeld.

  18. Re:Yup. by Toonol · · Score: 2, Funny

    Rimmer IS NOT an "Everyman", he's an effeminate elitist boob with delusions of grandeur.

    British, in other words.