Slashdot Mirror


India Attempts To Derail ACTA

Admiral Justin writes "Ars Technica is reporting that India is attempting to gather support from other large countries that have been intentionally left out of the ACTA process to actively protest it. India fears that ACTA will eventually be used against it and other countries that were given no chance to be a part of the process of drafting it. Among the primary concerns are the possibility of medical shipments being seized if they use a port in transit that is controlled by a country with a patent on the pharmaceuticals."

4 of 162 comments (clear)

  1. India in. Now we only need china, and russia. by unity100 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    that will constitute approx half of world population.

    versus, hollywood.

    who do you think will win ?

  2. what i'm wondering is by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Interesting

    how do these assholes actually expect to enforce acta?

    you can pass all the laws you want. but in terms of actually stopping the spread of pirate media, they would have to fundamentally alter the internet in such a way as to also negate any value anyone attaches to the internet. in other words, they would start a revolt. not an armed revolt, just a sort of utter rejection of their vision of complete centralized control

    it would also be extremely expensive, and they would also have to somehow control the internet internationally AND completely. they would, paradoxically, turn those outsider countries that aren't on the usa's bff list, into outposts of internet freedom

    acta, to me, it seems like a completely desperate ploy, or clueless (or both)

    really, in terms of enforceability, acta is a fucking joke

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  3. i understand what you are saying by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Interesting

    they would basically turn the west into the corporate equivalent of the bullshit that goes on with the internet in china or iran: centralized monitoring and control, for the sake of $ (rather than political control)

    in other words, they would force a conflict: the ideals of western liberal democracy, versus the corporate imperative to strangle everything to make a buck

    now you can be a complete cynic and pessimist about this conflict, but personally, talking completely out of realism i think, they're fucking out of their mind: people won't stand for it. some of us will make it their passionate life pursuit to circumvent such controls, and those who are successful at routing around the controls will be folk heroes

    i really don't see this weak ass acta subsuming the ideals of western liberal democracy. i'm sorry, but every goddamn teenager will take it as a personal joy to render acta a joke, and they'll be able to do it: all you need is technical knowhow. it beats all the lawyers, all the laws, all the international agreement

    acta is a form of delusion, its doomed. but let them try, just see them crash and burn

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  4. Quixotic Attempt I'm Afraid by TuballoyThunder · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I'm glad India is taking a stand that supports its national interests and that position coincides with my belief that intellectual property rights have gone to far. The big "however" is that India does not have a great success rate of stopping a treaty. They did not sign the NPT nor the CTBT and the NPT is in force and the CTBT would be if it was not for the Annex II requirement.

    The only thing that will kill the ACTA treaty is if a significant number of countries refuse to sign it or reject it during ratification. Unfortunately, I fear that any US administration would gladly sign the treaty and the US Senate would readily ratify it. If only the treaty would harm the gay unborn whales...