Slashdot Mirror


Military Develops "Green" Cleaners For Terrorist Attack Sites

An anonymous reader writes "Chemists with the US military have developed a set of ultra-strength cleaners to be used in the aftermath of a terrorist attack. The formulas are reportedly tough enough to get rid of nerve gas, mustard gas, radioactive isotopes, and anthrax. But they are also non-toxic, based on ingredients found in foods, cosmetics, and other consumer products."

6 of 97 comments (clear)

  1. Its good stuff by Chrisq · · Score: 4, Funny

    They tested it on CowboyNeal's underpants.

  2. Re:Let me guess..... by fractoid · · Score: 4, Funny

    It wouldn't even need to be that much. You know what's really good at cleaning up toxic chemicals? Lungs. I bet you could use cow lungs from abattoirs. Mmmm, lung juice cocktail, even increases stamina!

    --
    Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
  3. Re:Oil Spills by inamorty · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why on earth would you want to remove rainbows from the sea?!
    BP spent so much effort putting them there.

  4. Re:Am I alone in translating "green" by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Informative

    Whenever I hear a product called "Green-" I always translate that to mean "inferior".

    That's because you're either stupid or a troll. This is not a false dichotomy: there's no third way. For example, orange oil kills ants faster than poison, while mint oil kills yellowjackets faster than poison. Both smell nice and have zero nasty side effects even if you get them on your skin (they can cause irritation if not washed away, but that's about it.)

    Isn't a massive terrorist attack causing widespread destruction likely to cause FAR more pollution than anything we'd have to do to clean up AFTER IT?

    Your argument can be summed up as thus: If I have already been shot with a large-caliber weapon, who cares if I must be shot with a small-caliber weapon during surgery? Thus it is just as stupid as everything else you said.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  5. Why is this Idle? by ShadowRangerRIT · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I know some editors class too many things that should be Idle as something else, but this seems to be the opposite; a legitimate article that is being filed as Idle. How exactly is this not considered news? It's a new application for existing chemicals that helps deal with terrorism without restricting rights, which is a hell of lot better than most of the anti-terrorism procedures we've been putting into place.

    --
    $_ = "wftedskaebjgdpjgidbsmnjgcdwatb"; tr/a-z/oh, turtleneck Phrase Jar!/; print
  6. Re:Let me guess..... by Jaysyn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "No First Use" = We have enough conventional weaponry to send anyone back to the stone age if we no longer care about the international repercussions.

    AKA "I can beat you with one arm tied behind my back."

    --
    There is a war going on for your mind.