Slashdot Mirror


BIOS Will Be Dead In Three Years

Stoobalou writes with news that MSI is planning a big shift towards UEFI (universal extensible firmware interface) at the end of 2010, possibly spelling the beginning of the end of the BIOS as we know it. "It's the one major part of the computer that's still reminiscent of the PC's primordial, text-based beginnings, but the familiarly clunky BIOS could soon be on its deathbed, according to MSI. The motherboard maker says it's now making a big shift towards point-and-click UEFI systems, and it's all going to kick off at the end of this year. Speaking to Thinq, a spokesperson for the company in Taiwan who wished to remain anonymous said, 'MSI will start to phase in UEFI starting from the end of this year, and we expect it will be widely adopted after three years.'"

9 of 532 comments (clear)

  1. I read the article... by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Very uninformative. It sounds like UEFI is a BIOS (basic input-output system), only it's mouse/graphics based rather than text based. What am I missing here?

    1. Re:I read the article... by nine-times · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think they're just wrong to put the stress on EFI being "a point and click interface". I was under the impression (correct me if I'm wrong) that the deal with EFI is that it was a design of firmware for the system that ditches a lot of old legacy stuff. Incidentally, by upgrading the design, it will allow manufacturers to create a GUI to configure this stuff. But the GUI isn't really the point.

    2. Re:I read the article... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      TFA is largely worthless; but EFI is actually a pretty big deal. In essence, it keeps the really hair and complex bits of the BIOS(y hello thar, ACPI, I am talking to you) and adds a giant heap of further complexity. Haven't you always wanted a BIOS that needs its own FAT32(or HFS+ in Apple's freaky nonconformant implementation) partition in order to store its own device drivers?

    3. Re:I read the article... by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If phrases like, "CMOS Settings," and, "IDE Controller," aren't descriptive enough for you, or they seem complicated and semi-unintelligible then you have no business dicking around with the low-level settings of your motherboard.

  2. Re:about time by Microlith · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They'll do the same with EFI.

  3. Re:about time by Angst+Badger · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Macs went to EFI over four years ago. Hard to believe it took the windows machines this long to take the leap?

    The average user doesn't know and wouldn't give a shit if they did. Ergo, this kind of change in the PC market is driven by the interests of the vendors, as the consumer essentially has none. That said, it's worth noting that some consumer PCs have used EFI since 2003 and Itanium workstations were using EFI back in 2000, and x64 versions of Windows added support for EFI in 2008.

    BIOS is the bane of the PC service tech. That's where manufacturers lock up the hardware and prevent you from being able to fix it or work on it.

    It's worth noting that one advantage of EFI to vendors is precisely that it better enables them to lock down a system than BIOS does. While it doesn't have to be used that way, you can safely bet that many vendors will use it that way to the detriment of the consumer. It's also not without (in my opinion, valid) criticism for adding additional complexity to the system without actually resolving the problems of BIOS.

    The main advantage appears lie in offering a GUI for end users to manipulate system settings that they lack the knowledge or inclination to tinker with. To be fair, it does add some convenience features and better support for large drives, but I haven't seen anything about EFI to get terribly excited about.

    --
    Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
  4. Re:BIOS vs. EFI by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yo Dawg. I heard you liked using a basic input output system to boot your computer.
    So we put a basic IO system to boot your basic IO system for your system.

    BIOS is dead. Long Live BIOS?

    I've moved all my machines to GPT. I understand the need to keep around some legacy stuff, but BIOS and the MS-DOS partition table really need to step aside for some new technology. They lasted us ~30 years, but the hoops you have to jump through to boot some newer stuff is getting annoying.

  5. Exactly by Benfea · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Making the BIOS settings accessible to more stupid people will not make computer maintenance easier. Anyone too dumb to figure out how to use BIOS as it exists now has no business being there in the first place.

  6. Re:A GUI for the motherboard? by NJRoadfan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The only thing I really want from a BIOS setup screen is some detailed online help for some of the options. Who here hasn't had a BIOS that had some obscure acronym titled option thats either missing in the manual or has a vague engrish description along the lines of "Turns Foo On/Off".